logo
Habeck: Climate protection can fail from incompetence, unwillingness

Habeck: Climate protection can fail from incompetence, unwillingness

Euronews20-03-2025

Germany's parliament on Tuesday passed a historic bill unlocking a record level of state borrowing for defence and infrastructure through amending the country's constitutionally enshrined fiscal rules.
The Greens were originally reluctant to offer their support of the bill until they received guarantees last week that €100 billion of the special fund would be directed to supporting climate economic transformation measures.
After the vote, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stressed the close connection between climate protection, energy policy, and security at the Berlin Energy Transition Dialogue (BETD).
"This is a strong and powerful signal, also to our friends in Europe and the world. Germany stands ready to face the epochal challenges posed by the security and climate crises with full force," she said.
"This €100 billion for climate action is a direct investment in our future and thus also in our prosperity and security. To be clear: climate policy is security policy."
Outgoing Vice Chancellor and Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Protection, Robert Habeck, warned that it was now up to politicians to implement the special fund.
"Climate protection in Germany will no longer fail due to money. It can only fail due to inability or unwillingness," he said.
Although climate change was still a prominent topic at last year's Munich Security Conference, current geopolitical conflicts have pushed the issue off the political agenda. In snap federal elections in Germany in February, climate change was only a marginal topic.
At the BETD, Habeck told Euronews it was important to put the climate crisis back on the political agenda.
"The lessons are all there. The Berlin Energy Transition Dialogue has expanded on this once again. Security, prices, climate neutrality – everything speaks in favour of bringing this issue forward now and building on the success," he said.
"We need politicians who continually explain (this issue) to the people, to the public. And we also need these people in the media, who continually ask the right questions."
In their criticism of the first draft of the financial package, the Greens initially accused the SPD and CDU of wanting to use the package to finance their election promises.
The Greens complained that the package lacked sufficient commitments to climate protection and only after talks with the SPD and the CDU/CSU was an agreement reached on allocating specific climate funds.
When asked how the rise of right-wing and anti-democratic forces in Germany and Europe can be countered, Habeck explained that adopting the attitude of right-wing populism in a watered-down form is the wrong strategy.
Where this had already happened, populism and right-wing radicalism had always won - especially to the detriment of the conservative parties, which would be 'eaten up.'
'That's why the opposite is true,' emphasised Habeck. 'You have to focus on your own values and clearly explain what democracy, freedom of opinion and a diverse society offer in terms of added value and wealth. But it is not enough to simply proclaim these values. Democracy must also be successful and solve the pressing problems.'
Habeck referred to the recent reform of the debt brake by the German parliament and the increase in security and defence spending, which were already overdue.
'The traffic light coalition would certainly not have collapsed if the CDU/CSU had behaved as statesmanlike as my party did,' he added.
'But the traffic light government is perhaps not the decisive factor,' Habeck continued.
'The important thing is that we have simply lost years. People have become unemployed, companies have gone bankrupt. We have done too little, too late for Ukraine because the CDU/CSU did not take the step that we took yesterday as the upcoming opposition party. They will have to live with this guilt - for decades to come.'
Europe's defence industry is highly fragmented, with the market dominated by major players from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden, and more than 2,500 SMEs – often leading to overlap and duplication.
'We are producing very many expensive products, but in small numbers," MEP Riho Terras (Estonia/EPP) told Euronews in an interview. "What we need is for the market to provide the necessary quantities of ammunition, missiles, and various defence equipment."
'Countries must consolidate and buy together, giving small- and medium-sized enterprises the opportunity to operate equally on the market,' said Terras, who is vice-chair of the European Parliament's committee on security and defence.
The EU has quadrupled production since the start of Russia's military aggression in Ukraine, but no single member state has the capacity to scale up the European defence industry and compete with global players such as the US and China.
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen envisions establishing a true single market for defence products and services by the end of her mandate, enhancing Europe's production capacity, fostering joint production, and reducing dependencies on third countries.
However, some argue this vision will not be easy to achieve by 2029.
"Defence is essentially a single monopoly customer, which is the state, and if not monopoly, then rarely more than a couple of companies, so there isn't really the scope for a competitive market where you have many customers using their consumer choices and many providers competing for those customers,' Paul Taylor, senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre, told Euronews.
Taylor also argued that national security concerns can also be invoked by member states to avoid competitive tendering in joint public procurement.
In recent months, the EU has repeatedly called on its members to increase defence spending and address critical capability gaps in areas such as ammunition production, drones, air missile defence systems, and AI.
According to Mario Draghi's landmark report on competitiveness, the most cost-effective way to rebuild European defence is through demand aggregation and joint procurement.
To date, the EU is heavily dependent on US arms imports, which accounted for 64% of the total in 2020-2024, up from 52% in 2015-2019 - so fostering more collaborative procurement would help cut Europe's dependencies towards global competitors, also including China.
'We need to encourage countries to buy equipment together in larger quantities, which would help consolidate the market, Terras said, adding that tenders should also be opened to companies from other like-minded countries such as the UK, Norway or Turkey.
Collaborative procurement will also be key to unlocking pan-European flagship projects like a planned air defence shield and strengthening NATO's eastern border with Russia and Belarus - which will be particularly relevant to ensure Europe's ability to defend itself from potential future aggression.
In a white paper on the future of European defence, the European Commission warned on Wednesday (19 March) "Europe cannot take the US security guarantee for granted and must substantially step up its contribution to preserve NATO's strength" with Washington increasingly focusing on the Indo-Pacific region.
'Will member states, who are clearly spooked by the international geopolitical situation, really put the money there in a sustained effort? I think that's the fundamental question,' Taylor asked.
'We need European defence, and it takes a decade of effort, a decade of spending to get there,' he argued.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU hits back against 'Buy China' policy in medical devices market
EU hits back against 'Buy China' policy in medical devices market

Euronews

time13 hours ago

  • Euronews

EU hits back against 'Buy China' policy in medical devices market

EU member states' representatives voted this week for retaliatory measures against Chinese restrictions on European medical device manufacturers, diplomatic and EU sources confirmed to Euronews. This followed an investigation by the European Commission found "clear evidence" that China unfairly blocked EU-made medical devices from its procurement market. It represents the first countermeasure implemented using an International Procurement Instrument (IPI), which came into force in August 2022, designed to ensure fair access for EU firms to procurement opportunities outside the bloc. Ambassadors adopted the proposal midweek, but the details are expected to be published in the EU's Official Journal in the coming days. 'We had truly hoped that the International Procurement Instrument process would lead to more meaningful dialogue and progress with China, but unfortunately, that hasn't happened yet,' said Oliver Bisazza, CEO of MedTech Europe, the EU's association of medical device manufacturers. Bisazza wants to see the full details before reacting, but he pointed out that medical device companies remain committed to constructive engagement between the EU and China. 'This sector is vital for saving and improving people's lives and maintaining essential healthcare infrastructure, offering crucial services. This is something both parties should consider,' he added. EU companies have long struggled to gain access to China's public procurement market, despite China being one of Europe's largest trading partners for medical devices - accounting for 11% of export destinations in 2022. The Commission's investigation focused on China's government procurement law, which enforces the so-called "Buy China" policy, requiring public entities to prioritise domestic products and services, with limited exceptions. The probe found that EU manufacturers face a range of obstacles, including opaque approval systems, discriminatory certification procedures, vague national interest clauses used to exclude foreign bidders, and pricing pressures that are often unfeasible for European firms. One stark example: in Guangdong Province, the number of 'approved' imported medical devices dropped from 132 in 2019 to just 46 in 2021, highlighting the tightening of market access for EU firms. The China Chamber of Commerce to the EU responded with concern, tweeting that the IPI measures send 'a troubling signal' for bilateral trade ties. In a follow-up statement, the Chamber argued that the targeted use of the IPI risks becoming a de facto trade barrier and urged the EU to reconsider the necessity and long-term impact of such actions. The measures come at a sensitive moment in EU-China relations, which are currently undergoing a tentative diplomatic reset. After years of friction, the two sides have stepped up engagement to manage long-standing disputes. Much of this renewed dialogue is a response to shifting global dynamics, including the Trump-era trade war and broader US-China tensions, which have prompted Brussels to pursue a more balanced approach. A key milestone in this reset is the upcoming EU-China Summit, now confirmed to take place in Beijing in the second half of July 2025. Despite the escalating procurement dispute, a Commission spokesperson downplayed concerns that the IPI measures would damage broader trade relations. 'We've been making very clear to any global partners with whom we believe there is a problem as regards to the level playing field for procurement: should those problems not be removed, we would be forced to take action,' said the spokesperson. On Wednesday, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič met with Chinese Minister Wang Wentao on the sidelines of the OECD Ministerial Council – their third meeting overall and second in person. According to the Commission, the talks covered a wide range of critical bilateral issues as both sides work to ensure progress ahead of the July summit.

EU countries green lights charges for cabin baggage
EU countries green lights charges for cabin baggage

Euronews

time15 hours ago

  • Euronews

EU countries green lights charges for cabin baggage

Proposals to allow charging air passengers for carry-on cabin baggage were green-lit by EU transport ministers on Thursday as part of wider reforms of EU air passenger rights, despite resistance from Germany, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain. As Euronews reported, the proposal would create a new free hand luggage item, one that can be slipped under the seat, leaving other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges. The agreed proposals would mean airlines must reroute passengers at the earliest opportunity, including through other carriers or transport modes when appropriate. If rerouting isn't offered within three hours, passengers may book their own travel and claim up to 400% of the original ticket cost in reimbursement. Delays of over four hours on short and intra-EU flights (under 3,500 km) will trigger €300 in compensation. Long-haul flights (over 3,500 km) will warrant €500 after six hours of delay. Airlines would no longer be permitted to invoke "extraordinary circumstances" unless they prove all reasonable measures were taken to avoid disruption. Airlines would also be explicitly required to provide food, drinks, and accommodation during delays. If they fail to do so, passengers may arrange these themselves and claim costs back. To bolster enforcement, the rules impose stricter information requirements. Airlines must clearly inform passengers of their rights at booking and during complaints handling. New timelines are foreseen: passengers would have up to six months to submit a claim, and airlines must respond within 14 days. 'The position finally adopted today answers to an urgent call by air passengers and airlines for up-to-date, clearer and more straightforward rules. The revised rules will bring over 30 new rights to the air passengers, applicable from the moment when they buy a ticket, until they arrive at their destination, and in some cases even beyond. It is a historical milestone as an agreement couldn't have been reached in the last 12 years,' Dariusz Klimczak, Minister of Infrastructure of Poland, whose country holds the presidency of the Council, told reporters. European consumer organisation BEUC criticised the position adopted by member states, saying it 'substantially decreases several key rights'. 'Although the deal improved some rights on paper, giving consumers improved access to information in case of disruption, care and assistance, it represents a substantial rollback of other key rights. Take compensation for instance. The new eligibility thresholds will deprive the majority of passengers from their compensation rights as most delays are between two and four hours,' Agustín Reyna, BEUC's director general, said after the vote. 'Consumer groups have already pointed out that airlines should stop charging passengers for their hand luggage by lodging a complaint with the consumer protection authorities and the European Commission last May. Such practices are contrary to EU rules and EU top court case law which states that hand luggage is an essential aspect of passengers' carriage. On the contrary, the text adopted by the Council legitimises charging for reasonably sized hand luggage,' the director added. The next legislative steps Now it is the turn of the European Parliament to adopt its position on the file. If it does so, the text will enter interinstitutional negotiations with member states, the Parliament and the Commission to find a common position on the new rules. BEUC lamented the fact that the revision is being conducted through an expedited procedure that gives shorter deadlines in the Parliament, which will only need to approve the proposal by an absolute majority. Global police organisation Interpol says that 20 people have been arrested as part of a major international operation against the production and distribution of child sexual abuse material. The arrests were made between March and May in an operation that spanned 12 countries. It was led by the Spanish National Police in collaboration with Interpol and Europol. "The operation was initiated by Spain in late 2024, when specialised officers carried out online patrols and identified instant messaging groups dedicated to the circulation of child sexual exploitation images," Interpol said in a statement. Through Interpol and Europol, Spanish officers alerted authorities in countries where the alleged perpetrators were residing. Spanish authorities arrested seven suspects, including a healthcare worker and a teacher. "The healthcare worker allegedly paid minors from Eastern Europe for explicit images, while the teacher is accused of possessing and sharing child sexual abuse material via various online platforms," Interpol said. In Spain, the searches carried out by police resulted in the seizure of desktop computers, laptops, mobile phones, tablets and digital storage devices. Authorities in seven Latin American countries detained 10 suspects, including a teacher in Panama. The remaining arrests were made in the US and other parts of Europe. "Bulgaria, Italy and Portugal participated at the European level," an Interpol spokesperson told Euronews. So far, 68 additional suspects have been identified and further investigations are underway globally, according to Interpol. "Information gathered during the operation has been shared with law enforcement authorities in 28 countries in the Americas, Europe, Asia and Oceania," Interpol added. The arrests were preceded by talks between Interpol and Spanish investigators in Chile at the Latin America Victim Identification Task Force meeting. The operation was presented there to specialised officers from across Latin America. Authorities exchanged information on cases, provided concrete leads and launched coordinated actions.

EU lawmakers take aim at Eurovision over ‘rigged' televote
EU lawmakers take aim at Eurovision over ‘rigged' televote

Euronews

timea day ago

  • Euronews

EU lawmakers take aim at Eurovision over ‘rigged' televote

Just over two weeks after the conclusion of the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest, controversy over the integrity of televoting continues to mount. A group of 12 MEPs from socialist, leftist, green, and liberal groups has written to the top brass of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organises the contest, expressing 'renewed apprehension regarding increasing concerns of irregularities tied to the 2025 contest' in a letter seen by Euronews. Their appeal follows a wave of concern from national broadcasters, including the Netherlands' AVROTROS/NPO, Norway's NRK, Spain's RTVE, Slovenia's RTVSLO, Iceland's RÚV, Belgium's Flemish VRT, and Finland's Yle. The broadcasters cited suspicions of televoting manipulation and questioned the role of state-backed promotion, particularly involving this year's runner-up in the contest, Israel's entry, which reportedly benefited from campaigns pursued by the Israeli Government Advertising Agency (Lapam). Irish broadcaster RTÉ has formally requested access to the voting data, while VRT publicly questioned whether it will continue participating in the contest if full transparency is not ensured. 'While the Eurovision Song Contest is meant to unite Europe through music and culture, recent developments have cast a shadow over its credibility and neutrality,' Slovenian MEP Matjaž Nemec, who initiated the letter, told Euronews. Nemec criticised the involvement of national governments in promoting their acts, calling it a breach of the EBU's principles of fairness, impartiality, and independence. The letter cites data from VRT revealing significant and unexplained discrepancies between viewer numbers and televoting participation during the 2023–2025 contests. 'These trends are not easily explained by organic fluctuations in viewer enthusiasm and warrant further scrutiny,' the letter reads, warning that the increasing number of broadcasters questioning their own data points to a deeper, systemic issue. 'This is not an isolated concern: it signals a broader problem that must be addressed,' Nemec said. The MEPs have called on the EBU to take specific actions, including releasing complete voting data, authorising an independent audit, and enforcing safeguards to prevent political interference in the contest. 'Without answers and accountability, Eurovision risks losing the trust of its audience and becoming a stage not for unity, but for manipulation,' Nemec warned, adding that the European public deserves full transparency on this year's voting process. Eurovision Song Contest director Martin Green has issued an open letter addressing concerns about transparency and the integrity of the voting process. Green acknowledged the issues raised by broadcasters and confirmed that they would be discussed at the upcoming EBU Reference Group meeting. He noted that while promotional efforts by participating countries are permitted and common in the music industry, the EBU is reviewing whether such campaigns could unduly influence public voting. He also pointed out that Eurovision's voting system incorporates 'multiple security layers' and is overseen by over 60 professionals across Cologne, Vienna, and Amsterdam, while the voting is managed by Once Germany GmbH and independently verified by EY (Ernst & Young). Regarding the current rule limiting votes to 20 per payment method per person, Green stated that there is no evidence this affects the results. Nonetheless, the issue will be re-examined as part of the post-contest review process.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store