Pope Leo calls for journalists to be released from prison
Pope Leo XIV has called for the release of imprisoned journalists in his first address to members of the media at the Vatican. He expressed solidarity with journalists who were jailed "for seeking and reporting the truth" and said their suffering "challenges the conscience of nations and the international community". Press freedom must be defended, he said. The media must ensure that the "precious gift" of free speech is protected. The Committee to Protect Journalists said 361 journalists were in jail in 2024.
Pope Leo, who was chosen as the new leader of the Catholic Church on Thursday, also highlighted the role journalists can play in bringing attention to injustice and poverty in the world. He urged the media to focus on reporting the truth instead of taking part in partisan divisions, and not to give space to "fanaticism and hatred."Speaking in the Vatican's Paul VI audience hall, he said "the way we communicate is of fundamental importance: we must say 'no' to the war of words and images, we must reject the paradigm of war.""We do not need loud, forceful communication," he said, "but rather communication that is capable of listening and of gathering the voices of the weak who have no voice."The new pope also raised concerns about artificial intelligence, telling the assembled media they should use AI with "responsibility and discernment."Reporters should ensure that AI can be used for the "benefit of all of humanity," he said.
Leo XIV spoke mainly in Italian, but opened with a quip in English about the huge round of applause he received when he walked into the room. "Thank you for this wonderful reception," he said. "They say that when they clap at the beginning, it doesn't matter much. If you're still awake at the end and still want to applaud, thank you very much."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Ralph Fiennes felt ‘flattered' when he learned Pope Leo XIV had watched Conclave
Conclave actor Ralph Fiennes said he felt 'flattered' when he learned the new Pope had watched the Oscar-winning film that sees his character arrange a papal gathering to elect the next head of the Catholic Church. Pope Leo XIV made history as the Church's first American pontiff when he was elected leader in early May, following the death of Pope Francis on Easter Monday. Advertisement The Pope's older brother, John Prevost, told NBC News that the former cardinal watched the movie before voting in the conclave began – so he would know 'how to behave'. Pope Leo XIV waves at the end of a Mass for the Jubilee of Families in St. Peter's Square, at the Vatican (Andrew Medichini/AP) In an appearance on The One Show, Fiennes was asked about the film and whether he felt surprised at the news Pope Leo XIV had watched the movie. 'Didn't his brother suggest he watch it, so he could learn how a Conclave went or something? And I was of course flattered,' he told the show. Asked what he said to his brother before the conclave, Mr Prevost told NBC News in May: 'I said: 'Are you ready for this? Did you watch the movie Conclave, so you know how to behave?'' Advertisement 'And he had just finished watching the movie Conclave, so he knew how to behave,' he said with a laugh. Fiennes, 62, played Cardinal Lawrence in the film, also starring Stanley Tucci and John Lithgow, that was adapted from Robert Harris's novel of the same name. He was nominated for leading actor gongs at the Oscars and Baftas earlier in the year, but missed out both times to Adrien Brody – who won for his role playing Laszlo Toth in historical epic The Brutalist. Ralph Fiennes, Isabella Rossellini, Stanley Tucci and Edward Berger attends the BFI London Film Festival gala screening of Conclave (Ian West/PA) Overall, however, the film performed well during awards season and won the adapted screenplay Oscar and four Baftas for best film, adapted screenplay, editing and outstanding British film. Advertisement Fiennes, also known for playing Lord Voldemort in the Harry Potter film series, appeared on the show to discuss Theatre Royal Bath's new staging of William Shakespeare play As You Like It, which he is directing. He said: 'I've done a lot of serious Shakespeare tragedies and histories with a lot of blood and gore and angst, and I just felt compelled by As You Like It. 'It's a wonderful play of spontaneous young love. And I've not been in it, so I have no baggage about having been in it. 'I've seen it before, and it's something about young love, young people transformed by love, by desire, in the context of a forest where, like in A Midsummer Night's Dream, their personalities, who they are, their sense of themselves, is changed by love and by nature.' Advertisement
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK issued ominous warning of 'enemies at our door' as PM unveils defence plan
The Prime Minister said the long-awaited strategic defence review would make the UK 'safer and stronger, a battle-ready, armour-clad nation' amid Russian threats Britain will move to "war-fighting readiness" and every citizen must play their part, Keir Starmer said as he unveiled a battle plan for the nation's defence. The Prime Minister said the long-awaited strategic defence review (SDR) would make the UK "safer and stronger, a battle-ready, armour-clad nation" amid Russian threats in the air, at sea and online. Speaking at a BAE Systems' shipyard in Govan, in Glasgow, Mr Starmer said the front line "is here" - with threats facing the UK "more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable" than any time since the Cold War. In an ominous warning, Lord Robertson, who co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review, said Britain's enemies "are at our door". "Cyber attacks, assassinations, election interference, disinformation campaigns" are all activities that are already happening," he told LBC. The Labour ex-Defence Secretary said: "Our enemies are at our door. They're already there. And when you've got a question about welfare or warfare, you know, what happens if a cyber attack stops our hospitals from working? What if it turns our power off? "What happens if it stops the cars, the police cars in the street? These things are real and alive. And some cases are actually happening today." He warned: "Tomorrow's war could be much nastier, much crueller, much more brutal." His warning came as the PM faces questions over how his defence commitments would be funded after he refused to spell out when his ambition to ramp up defence spending to at least 3% of GDP would be met. The PM promised in February to hike the amount the country spends on defence to 2.5% of economic output by 2027 - with an ambition to hit 3% in the next Parliament. But NATO chief Mark Rutte has already said that allies need to spend considerably more than 3%. Paul Johnson, from the respected IFS think-tank, said: "Bluntly, it really does seem to me that the only choice that is available, if we're going to go through all of those things, is some really quite chunky tax increases to pay for it." Lord Dannatt, former head of the British Army, said that vague commitments to defence spending "does not cut the mustard". He told Times Radio: "It's a little bit like saying in 1938 to Adolf Hitler, please don't attack us till 1946, because we're not going to be ready. Well, frankly, if we'd behaved like that, we wouldn't be speaking English this morning, would we?" The government has accepted all 62 recommendations in the review, which include building extra attack submarines, six new munitions factories, £15billion on nuclear warheads and thousands of new long-range weapons. The plans will help the army become "10 times more lethal", with greater use of AI and drones. The armed forces will move to "war-fighting readiness" and cash will be ploughed into defence to create jobs across the country. But the SDR laid bare how the military had been hollowed out under the Tories. It found that the armed forces were not currently fit to fight Russia or China, with inadequate weapons stockpiles, recruitment issues and problems with morale. The PM said Britain must prepare for war if it wants to avoid it. He said: "Every part of society, every citizen of this country, has a role to play because we have to recognise that things have changed. In the world of today, the front line, if you like, is here. "The threat we now face is more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the Cold War. We face war in Europe, new nuclear risks, daily cyber attacks, growing Russian aggression in our waters, menacing our skies. "Their reckless actions driving up the cost of living here at home, creating economic pain and hitting working people the hardest. A new era in the threats we face, demands a new era for defence and security, not just to survive in this new world but to lead." Mr Starmer said he was "100% confident" that the blueprint can be paid for. Defence Secretary John Healey, who last week said he expected to hit the target by 2034, last night told MPs: 'I am totally confident that we will meet the ambition of 3% in the next Parliament." But questions have been raised about a recruitment and retention crisis on the frontline. Mr Healey said the SDR will mark an end to an era of "hollowing out" of the armed forces. He told MPs he wants to see the British Army rise to at least 76,000 full-time soldiers in the next Parliament - 2029 to 2034. He told MPs: 'For too long our army has been asked to do more with less. We inherited a long-run recruitment crisis, 14 Tory years of cuts to full-time troops. "Reversing this decline will take time, but we are acting to stem the loss now and aiming to increase the British Army to at least 76,000 full time soldiers in the next Parliament. For the first time in a generation, we are a Government who want the number of regular soldiers to rise." Mr Healey was challenged by MP Zarah Sultana over how the Government was finding money for defence at the same time as 'slashing disability benefits, keeping millions of children in poverty through the two-child benefit cap and cutting winter fuel support for pensioners'. 'The first duty of any government is to defend the country and keep its citizens safe,' he replied. 'We invest in defence in order to deter and prevent a war that brings such extreme human and economic costs. 'If we can't defend the country, where will we be with an NHS without power, with submarine cables that mean data doesn't work? Strong national security is fundamental to a stable economy, a strong society.'
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
The Yes movement itself has dreamed up barriers to independence
His perceived problem with the direct route to independence (briefly, making a UK General Election a plebiscite by a simple manifesto seeking a majority of Scottish votes for Scotland to become independent, and undertaking to implement it on such a majority, if necessary by declaration of the Scottish MPs) is that 'Westminster doesn't have to accept our legal argument in that vote, as the election is for a UK Parliament and Scotland would not be able to generate a majority of votes in Scotland alone ... Westminster can in theory prevent us from leaving ... the majority of English MPs have a veto on what Scotland does or doesn't do.' He simply fails to grasp what the direct route is all about, in viewing it as a procedure of the Union parliament and attributing to England a role and a power which it does not have. READ MORE: The lesson for the SNP as new poll puts independence support at 54% Given that a referendum is prohibited, the one and only way which actually exists for the people of Scotland to vote for the country to become independent is by plebiscitary election. If the Scottish MPs, the highest representatives of the people, are elected as indy members by the majority of votes of the people of Scotland, they will occupy virtually all the Scottish seats, mandated by those votes to take Scotland out of the Union. Legal argument does not come into it. It is an election. The purpose and result of an election is the filling of seats. English votes and English seats do not come into it, since their make-up is neither here nor there for Scottish independence, and they have no part to play. The Scottish members would have the legal, constitutional and democratic right and authority (and indeed the duty?) to fulfil the democratic imperative and carry out their mandate irrespective of other parts of the UK (reversing, this time democratically, the step into union taken three centuries ago by their predecessors). There is no prohibition of such a course. If Mr Potts or anyone else can find one, I would be interested to know. In those circumstances, the declaration of Scottish independence by its MPs cannot properly be viewed as occurring either while Scotland is part of the Union or while it is independent. It is rather the deed of an instant marking the transition from one status to the other, a normal operation in steps of great legal effect. READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: Why I stand by my claim after fierce debate that followed it I imagine that London will actually negotiate the mechanism and details of independence with Edinburgh, but only after Scotland has voted for it and our representatives plainly demonstrate their resolve to carry it through at their own hand if necessary. Mr Potts' position is far from unique in the independence movement, most of which may indeed be with him. Heaven help us, but the fixation with English omnipotence and the barriers it can place in Scotland's way is a concoction of the movement itself, as if we were determined not to succeed. No such claim has ever emerged from London, where any rare UK Government statement on the issue has been to the effect that Scotland may go if it no longer consents to the Union. Alan Crocket Motherwell AMIDST the ongoing chaos, let it be known that Scotland's hydro, wind and other renewable energy sources are helping to keep this broken UK afloat. Yet in return, energy-rich Scotland, pays among the highest bills in the UK and indeed Europe. The SNP and all independence campaigners cannot remain silent about this grossly unfair situation. It's time for the people of Scotland to take back control, believe, stand up and deliver independence. Grant Frazer Newtonmore
