Minister says one group won't get Winter Fuel Payments despite U-turn
Minister says one group won't get Winter Fuel Payments despite U-turn
Treasury minister Darren Jones said winter fuel payments will 'still be targeted'
Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury
Millionaires should not get 'subsidy for their energy bills from the Government', a Treasury minister has said. Darren Jones has said that winter fuel payments will 'still be targeted to those that need it the most'.
Sir Keir said at Prime Minister's questions last week that he wants to restore the payments to more pensioners, following pressure from campaigners, signalling a partial U-turn on one of Labour's first announcements in Government. He claimed that the UK's improving economic prospects could allow for the move at the next fiscal event. The partial U-turn came as ministers are continuing to face calls to scrap the two-child benefit cap.
Speaking to Sky News on Thursday evening, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Mr Jones was asked about Reform UK's commitments on both the winter fuel and benefit cap policies. 'All of those things cost money,' Mr Jones said. 'It's right that we set out the detail and how we're going to pay for those in a proper and orderly way.'
He added: 'We're sticking to the principle that millionaires shouldn't be getting subsidy for their energy bills from the government, so winter fuel payments will still be targeted to those that need it the most.'
Mr Jones also touched on the Government's approach to child poverty, telling the same programme that 'we're a Labour government we want child poverty to be falling in this country, not rising'. 'Of course, we want to help families lift themselves out of poverty.'
Last summer, Rachel Reeves announced that the previously universal winter fuel payment would be means-tested. The policy was blamed for the party's collapse in support since last year's general election, and campaigners were challenged about it on the doorsteps during May's local elections.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage confirmed earlier this week that his party would support scrapping the two-child benefit cap and also reverse the winter fuel payment cuts. Sir Keir said he is looking at 'all options' to drive down child poverty when asked if he would like to get rid of the two-child benefit cap on Thursday.
Speaking on a visit to the North West, the Prime Minister said: 'There isn't a single bullet, but I'm absolutely determined that we will drive this down, and that's why we'll look at all options, always, of driving down child poverty.'
Article continues below
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has accused the Labour and Reform leaders of asking people to fund 'unlimited child support for others' by scrapping the two-child cap. Writing in the Daily Mail, she said that the Conservatives are the 'only serious party of sound money'.
'Britain deserves party leaders who don't treat economics like a branch of showbiz, an announcement for a nice headline and forget about the deficit,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves in stand-off over Labour's spending plans
Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves are at loggerheads over the crucial spending review as the deputy prime minister's department passed an unofficial deadline to settle its budget until the next general election without securing an agreement. With the spending review set to be unveiled on 11 June, departments have told The Independent that the Treasury wanted their plans agreed by the start of this weekend. But The Independent understands that Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) is one of a number of departments yet to settle with Ms Reeves and her deputy Darren Jones. The clash at the top of the Labour government comes as ministers resist cuts to their departments and marks a distinct clash over political philosophy between the two most senior women in the government. Ms Rayner wants a more progressive higher tax approach with fewer cuts, while Ms Reeves is being accused of wanting ' austerity 2.0'. Ms Reeves has also been struggling to reach deals with Yvette Cooper's Home Office; Steve Reed's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; and Ed Miliband's Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. Only defence with a spending package of 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product, and health budgets are protected, with others expected to find efficiency savings to help Ms Reeves balance the books. Sources have said that claims Ms Rayner stormed out of a meeting last weekend, slamming the door, were 'not true', but admitted conversations, while 'cordial', have 'not been easy'. Now it is understood that her demands for a proper settlement for local government in England, as well as funding for the affordable homes scheme beyond 2026, have left her at loggerheads with the chancellor. Trade unions are also taking a very close look at the settlement for councils which will be tied closely to pay demands over the coming years. Already councils like Birmingham have been facing potential bankruptcy because of tight budgets and wage demands. The stand-off comes just a week after a memo from Ms Rayner to Ms Reeves was leaked to the Daily Telegraph in a move which allies of the deputy prime minister described as 'poisonous'. In it she suggested eight different wealth taxes as an alternative to cuts as well as limiting benefits for migrants and reintroducing a payback scheme for middle class families claiming child benefit which was originally introduced by former Tory chancellor George Osborne and then ditched by Jeremy Hunt. An ally of the deputy prime minister noted that 'she is at least make the progressive case' for an alternative to Ms Reeves' strategy. The row comes amid concerns by Labour MPs that Ms Reeves is 'pushing for austerity 2.0'. Already the chancellor has been forced into accepting a U-turn on cutting winter fuel payments to pensioners. She and Sir Keir Starmer are also facing a rebellion from Labour backbenchers on cutting disability benefits. The chancellor has also had her hand forced on investment for red wall constituencies where Labour MPs are under threat of losing their seats to Reform. There have been reports that she plans to splurge on projects in the north of England and midlands by tweaking her strict borrowing rules. Ms Reeves is under added pressure because of the strict borrowing rules she has imposed on herself to maintain economic credibility as well as the election promises not to raise employee national insurance contributions, income tax or VAT. A Treasury source noted: 'More than half of departments have settled [funding agreements] three weeks out from the spending review, which is pretty unusual and the fact you'd always expect negotiations to go on.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Government WILL meet its target of hiking defence spending to three per cent of GDP by 2034, Defence Secretary insists
Defence Secretary John Healey has insisted the Government will reach its target of hiking defence spending to three per cent GDP by 2034. It comes after the Government previously set out a goal to reach the target during the next Parliament, after meeting its promise of increasing spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by April 2027. However the Defence Secretary has promised a 'certain decade of rising defence spending', according to The Times, and said there was 'no doubt' the UK would meet its target. Mr Healey told the newspaper: 'It allows us to plan for the long term. It allows us to deal with the pressures.' The Government is looking at the roles, capabilities and reforms required by UK armed forces as part of its strategic defence review (SDR). It will explore 'deliverable and affordable' solutions 'within the resources available to defence within the trajectory of 2.5 per cent'. Earlier this year, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced the targets, where he said 'increasing the resilience' of Britain was 'vital' 'in an ever more dangerous world.' 'In an ever more dangerous world, increasing the resilience of our country so we can protect the British people, resist future shocks and bolster British interests, is vital,' he said The new defence money will be found by reducing UK overseas aid from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of GNI (gross national income), according to the Government. This move was one , which prompted then-international development minister Anneliese Dodds to resign. 'You have maintained that you want to continue support for Gaza, Sudan and Ukraine; for vaccination; for climate; and for rules-based systems,' she told the Prime Minister. 'Yet it will be impossible to maintain these priorities given the depth of the cut.' NATO heads of government are set to meet in The Hague, in the Netherlands, next month. Addressing the alliance's parliamentary assembly in Dayton, USA this month, NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte said he assumed The Hague would agree 'on a high defence spend target' of 5 per cent. A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: 'This Government has announced the largest sustained increase to defence spending since the end of the Cold War - 2.5 per cent by 2027 and 3 per cent in the next parliament when fiscal and economic conditions allow, including an extra £5 billion this financial year. 'The SDR will rightly set the vision for how that uplift will be spent, including new capabilities to put us at the leading edge of innovation in Nato, investment in our people and making defence an engine for growth across the UK - making Britain more secure at home and strong abroad.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britons risk being forced to take part in ‘jobs census'
Britons could be forced to give details of their jobs, earnings and health status to officials as a slump in responses to surveys undermines Whitehall's ability to judge the state of the economy. Professor Denise Lievesley, who ran a major review of statistics for the Government, said the proposal could ensure that Britain's economic data – which is critical to making decisions on policies including interest rates – could be relied upon. Members of the public can currently be fined £1,000 if they fail to complete the census, while businesses which refuse to complete surveys for the Office for National Statistics can be taken to court and charged £2,500. However, there is no such incentive to fill in the Labour Force Survey (LFS). A plunge in response rates to the vital questionnaire since the pandemic has left the Treasury, the Bank of England and City economists struggling to gauge the strength of the jobs market, the risks to inflation and the health of the wider economy. The census was completed by 97pc of households in 2021. By contrast only around one fifth of those approached for the jobs market survey responded, a share which has fallen by roughly half since the pandemic struck. Professor Lievesley said in an interview with Bloomberg that compelling Britons to respond was 'a last resort option', but that 'we may have got to that stage'. She added: 'It's not that we actually use the mandation to impact on individuals but I think in the case of the LFS it would help the survey interviewers and I think it helps the enumerators in the census. 'It raises the profile that this is important. If they're asked, 'do we have to do this?' Well, I'm sorry, but I'm afraid you do. I think it works mainly through the confidence of the interviewers.' It is understood that the UK Statistics Authority and the Cabinet Office have been studying ways to compel people to respond to the survey, but have not yet concluded what consequences there could be for households which fail to fill in the questionnaire. Such a step would require legislation, rather than being decided by statisticians. The ONS has sought ways to improve the number of responses to the survey, including by sending it to more households. The agency has also trialled offering respondents a £20 voucher, instead of the usual £10 incentive, which was already up from £5 before Covid. It is also introducing a new online version of the survey next year. Officials at the Bank of England have attempted to get around the issue by seeking other sources of data, including by designing their own surveys for an alternative perspective on the economy.
