COVID-19 Led to Decline in Life Expectancy in India, Reveal Three Analyses
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Top Stories
COVID-19 Led to Decline in Life Expectancy in India, Reveal Three Analyses
Banjot Kaur
17 minutes ago
Since the 1970s, life expectancy in India had continued to increase by a couple of years to a few decimal years on a year-on-year basis.
Medics prepare a ward for COVID-19 patients at Gandhi Hospital. Photo: PTI
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
New Delhi: The year-on-year trend of increasing life expectancy in India, observed for the last few decades, declined for the first time in 2021, albeit marginally. From 2016-20, the life expectancy in India was 70 years. From 2017-21, the recorded life expectancy dropped to 69.8 years, according to SRS abridged life tables.
Since the 1970s, the life expectancy had continued to increase by a couple of years to a few decimal years on a year-on-year basis. For example, the life expectancy 69 years between 2013-17, 69.4 years (2014-2018), 69.7 years (2015-19) and 70 years (2016-20) as per SRS abridged tables.
Between 2017-21, this trend changed and life expectancy dropped to 69.8 years from 70 years in 2016-20, a difference of 0.2 years.
According to a World Health Organisation (WHO) update, life expectancy in India was 70.7 years in 2019, 70.2 in 2020 and 67.3 in 2021, clearly revealing the impact of the pandemic.
The life expectancy recorded in 2010 was 67.5 years, according to the WHO, in India. Thus, COVID-19 brought the life expectancy down to what it was 15 years ago.
The preliminary results of another recent study, which is yet to be published, conducted by researchers at International Institute for Population Sciences pointed out that life expectancy in 2021 declined by 1.6 years in the deadly second wave of COVID-19 in India. The study, as reported in Times of India, found that Gujarat, Punjab and Haryana witnessed the sharpest decline, where life expectancy dropped by 3 years.
This preliminary analysis came in the backdrop of the Union government releasing Samples Registration System and Civil Registration System data for 2021 which revealed that the official death count of COVID-19 in India was seven times lesser than the estimated deaths.
Also read: Covid Excess Death Study Revives Debate on Government's No-Undercounting Claim
This decline in life expectancy was in line with the global trends as far the COVID-19 years are concerned. In fact, according to the WHO, Covid-19 eliminated a decade of progress in life expectancy around the world.
'Between 2019 and 2021, global life expectancy dropped by 1.8 years to 71.4 years (back to the level of 2012),' the WHO said.
'The 2024 report also highlights how the effects have been felt unequally across the world. The WHO regions for the Americas and South-East Asia were hit hardest, with life expectancy dropping by approximately 3 years and healthy life expectancy by 2.5 years between 2019 and 2021,' the WHO added.
Life expectancy decline in line with other health indicators
The decline in life expectancy in India in 2021 is also in line with the decline in other major health indicators of the country. For example, COVID-19 reversed decades of progress India had made in TB elimination. The notification of TB cases – or the number of TB cases that went undiagnosed – increased across the world in 2020 and India was hit the hardest.
Similarly, the childhood immunisation rates dropped sharply, pushing India several years back. The number of children missing key vaccines in India lead to significant drop in overall immunisation coverage. The coverage of some of the vaccines in 2020 reached 2010 levels. In subsequent years, the rates improved as the impact of COVID-19 faded and the routine healthcare services resumed.
Another case in point is the malaria elimination programme. Malaria cases and deaths rose greatly in 2020. In Southeast Asia, which accounted for 2% of the global cases, India accounted for 83% of them alone.
Leading causes of deaths in 2021
The leading cause of deaths in India in 2021 was COVID-19 according to the WHO. It caused 221 deaths per 100,00 population. COVID-19 was followed by Ischemic heart diseases, which caused 110.8 deaths per 100,000 population. The impact of COVID-19 on death figures is evident in the fact that it caused more than twice as many deaths as the second leading cause.
The third leading cause was Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease, which caused 70.5 deaths per 100,000 population. Other causes included strokes (53.5 deaths per 100,000 population), diarrheal diseases (34.3 deaths per 100,000 population), lower respiratory infections (27.8 deaths per 100,000 population), tuberculosis (25.4 deaths per 100,000 population), diabetes mellitus (23.1 deaths per 100,000 population), liver cirrhosis (18.9 deaths per 100,000 population)) and falls (16.5 deaths per 100,000 population).
It must be noted that due to the shutdown of major services, it is likely that many deaths due to reasons other than COVID-19 could have gone unrecorded.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
India's Net Foreign Direct Investment Plummets by 96.5% to Reach Record Low
The Small Peak in COVID-19 Cases in South East Asia Is No Cause For Panic
We Must Assess Sudden Deaths Which Took Place as a Consequence of COVID-19
The Many Failures of Operation Sindoor
Undercounting of COVID Deaths: Two Million More People Died in 2021 Compared to 2020, Shows Govt Data
SIPs, Usually Popular, See Decline in New Registrations
India in Bottom 10-20% Bracket on Academic Freedom Index, Ranks 156th Globally
Trump, Tariffs and a 200-Year Old Warning About the Tyranny of the Majority
India's Outreach to Kabul Amid Simmering 'Pashtunistan' Demand Could Give It Leverage Over Pakistan
View in Desktop Mode
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Rise in COVID-19 Cases: 7 essential medical gadgets for home use
Covid cases India India is witnessing a resurgence of COVID-19 cases , with active infections now exceeding 1,000. This means, it becomes all the more essential for you to have regular health checkups and keep certain essential medical gadgets handy at home to monitor vital signs . Collecting personal health data can aid in quicker diagnosis and treatment. Several low-cost devices are available to track vitals like blood pressure, blood oxygen levels, respiration rate and pulse rate. Daily tracking can provide insights into personal health trends and help doctors detect irregularities early. Stay ready with these 7 essential medical gadgets as COVID cases rise Before you buy: Doctor's consultation recommended Before listing them, it is highly recommended to consult a doctor for advice on selecting suitable medical gadgets for personal use. All treatment, medication, and symptom tracking should be discussed with a medical professional. It is also important to note that this information is for general awareness of available devices and does not recommend specific brands or provide medical advice. Always consult your doctor or a medical professional regarding correct usage, accuracy and potential interference with other medical devices like pacemakers. Here are some essential medical gadgets to consider amid rise in Covid cases Contactless IR Thermometer: This device is crucial for quickly checking body temperature without physical contact. Consult a medical professional for model recommendations. Automatic Electronic Blood Pressure Monitor : An essential gadget for monitoring blood pressure and, ideally, pulse rate. Seek medical advice for suitable device recommendations. Fingertip Pulse Oximeter : A small, affordable device that measures blood oxygen saturation and pulse rate by simply inserting an index finger. Glucometer: Used to measure blood glucose levels. Portable Personal ECG Monitor: These devices, often with smartphone companion apps, allow for daily ECG recordings, providing vital information for doctors to detect heart irregularities early. Medical Alert System: Particularly useful for elders, these systems allow users to call for help with the press of a button during an emergency, offering a simpler alternative to finding and dialing a phone. Pain Relief Devices: Various devices like hot pads, massagers, or nerve stimulators can offer at-home pain relief. Consult your doctor to select the appropriate device for your needs. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
WHO Is Finalising A New Treaty To Prep For The Next Pandemic, But US Isn't Signing
On March 20, 2025, members of the World Health Organization adopted the world's first pandemic agreement, following three years of 'intensive negotiations launched by governments in response to the devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.' The U.S., however, did not participate, in part because of its intention to withdraw from the WHO. Global health experts are hailing the agreement as a historic moment. What does the agreement mean for the world, and how can it make everyone safer and more prepared for the next pandemic? The Conversation asked Nicole Hassoun, a professor at Binghamton University and executive director of Global Health Impact, to explain the pandemic accord, its prospects for advancing global health, and the significance of the U.S.'s absence from it. What will the pandemic agreement do? The accord will bolster pandemic preparation within individual countries and around the world. Countries signing onto the agreement are committing to improve their disease surveillance and grow their heath care workforces, strengthen their regulatory systems and invest in research and development. It encourages countries to strengthen their health regulations and infrastructure, improve communication with the public about pandemics and increase funding for preparation and response efforts. It also includes new mechanisms for producing and distributing vaccines and other essential countermeasures. Finally, it encourages countries to coordinate their responses and share information about infectious diseases and intellectual property so that vaccines and other essential countermeasures can be made available more quickly. The agreement will take effect once enough countries ratify it, which may take several years. Why isn't the US involved? The Biden administration was broadly supportive of a pandemic agreement and was an active participant in negotiations. Prior to Donald Trump's reelection, however, Republican governors had signed a letter opposing the treaty, echoing a conservative think tank's concerns about U.S. sovereignty. The U.S. withdrew from negotiations when President Trump signed an executive order to withdraw from the WHO on the day he was inaugurated for his second term. Why could the lack of US involvement be beneficial for the world? The lack of U.S. involvement likely resulted in a much more equitable treaty, and it is not clear that countries could have reached an agreement had the U.S. continued to object to key provisions. It was only once the U.S. withdrew from the negotiations that an agreement was reached. The U.S. and several other wealthy countries were concerned with protecting their pharmaceutical industry's profits and resisted efforts aimed at convincing pharmaceutical companies to share the knowledge, data and intellectual property needed for producing new vaccines and other essential countermeasures. Other negotiators sought greater access to vaccines and other treatments during a pandemic for poorer countries, which often rely on patented technologies from global pharmaceutical companies. While most people in wealthy countries had access to COVID-19 vaccines as early as 2021, many people in developing countries had to wait years for vaccines. How could the agreement broaden access for treatments? One of the contentious issues in the pandemic agreement has to do with how many vaccines manufacturers in each country must share in exchange for access to genetic sequences to emerging infectious diseases. Countries are still negotiating a system for sharing the genetic information on pathogens in return for access to vaccines themselves. It is important that researchers can get these sequences to make vaccines. And, of course, people need access to the vaccines once they are developed. Still, there are many more promising aspects of the agreement for which no further negotiations are necessary. For instance, the agreement will increase global vaccine supply by increasing manufacturing around the world. The agreement also specifies that countries and the WHO should work together to create a mechanism for fairly sharing the intellectual property, data and knowledge needed to produce vaccines and other essential health products. If financing for new innovation requires equitable access to the new technologies that are developed, many people in poor countries may get access to vaccines much more quickly in the next pandemic. The agreement also encourages individual countries to offer sufficient incentives for pharmaceutical companies to extend access to developing countries. If countries implement these changes, that will benefit people in rich countries as well as poor ones. A more equitable distribution of vaccines can contain the spread of disease, saving millions of lives. What more should be done, and does the US have a role to play? In my view, the best way to protect public health moving forward is for countries to sign on to the agreement and devote more resources to global health initiatives. This is particularly important given declining investment and participation in the WHO and the contraction of other international health initiatives, such as USAID. Without international coordination, it will become harder to catch and address problems early enough to prevent epidemics from becoming pandemics. It will also be imperative for member countries to provide funding to support the agreement's goals and secure the innovation and access to new technologies. This requires building the basic health infrastructure to ensure shots can get into people's arms.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Vaccines can cause the disease? Doctor busts 5 myths about vaccination, shares facts
Vaccination is a vital preventive measure that helps protect against potentially life-threatening diseases. It acts as a shield, preparing the body to fight infections effectively. However, widespread misconceptions and misinformation often lead people to hesitate or avoid getting vaccinated, putting their health at risk. Also read | Vaccine misinformation: A lasting side effect from Covid In an interview with HT Lifestyle, Dr. Anusuya Shetty, physician at Apollo Clinic in Koramangala busted several myths associated with vaccines. Fact: Extensive research shows vaccines do not cause autism, and vaccinated children develop autism at the same rate as non-vaccinated children. Numerous big, well-controlled studies involving more than a million children discovered no link between immunizations and autism. The scientific consensus is unequivocal: vaccinations are safe and do not cause autism. Fact: Live vaccines use weakened viruses or bacteria to safely train and strengthen the immune system. These microorganisms do not cause disease, but they do help the body produce antibodies for future protection. Mild symptoms may appear, but they are normally innocuous unless the individual has a weakened immune system. Virus shedding is uncommon and unlikely to infect others; immunisation protects vulnerable individuals. Also read | New vaccine offers broad protection against coronaviruses that haven't even emerged yet: Study Fact: The public can distinguish between legitimate vaccine information and misinformation online by evaluating the source of information, the publication date, and whether the item was written by a competent medical professional. Fact: Vaccine content on social media frequently supports anti-vaccine narratives, which receive more attention than pro-vaccine comments. According to studies, misinformation spreads rapidly, particularly during large events such as disease outbreaks, and is magnified by bots and trolls. These inorganic accounts can establish a misleading equilibrium between pro- and anti-vaccine positions. As a result, social media can amplify misinformation and undermine effective public health messaging. Fact: The flu vaccine cannot give you the flu since it includes a dead virus. Any symptoms, such as a hurting arm or weariness, are transient and unrelated to influenza. The vaccine is completely safe and does not cause disease. Also read | Heart attack cases not rising due to Covid vaccine, but stress and other traditional factors, says cardiologist Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.
