Samsung tries to justify the Galaxy S25 Edge's shortcomings
Samsung's recently launched Galaxy S25 Edge is an impressive feat of engineering. At the same time, a few compromises had to be made to achieve its thin form factor. This has led to the handset becoming one of the most polarizing Android phones of this year. A new interview has now shed some light on why certain trade-offs were made.
Speaking with Tom's Guide , Blake Gaiser, the director of smartphone product management at Samsung Electronics America, provided some insight into some the most controversial decisions Samsung made when developing the Edge. The executive also uses the interview as an opportunity to defend the device against its naysayers.
One of the biggest points of contention with the Edge is the battery, which has a capacity of 3,900mAh. For comparison, the base-level Galaxy S25 features a 4,000 mAh battery, while the larger Plus offers 4,900mAh. In response to this criticism, Gaiser mentions that he thinks customers only care about 'all-day' battery life:
I think enough battery life for most customers is just an all-day usage. You don't want to find yourself at lunch with an empty battery. And what we've seen with this device is that it has worked as well or better than the S24 base model and very close to the S25 base model.
And so as long as you can live with it from sun up to sun down without having any issues, we think that's a great experience. And personally, I haven't had much of an issue with the battery life whatsoever.
When asked why the company opted not to use a silicon carbide battery to get more capacity in the same amount of space, Gaiser stated:
Samsung's always looking at every new emerging technology that's out there. So it's something that we're definitely not keeping our eyes off of. But with that new chipset, with agentic AI helping with performance and efficiencies of these batteries, we really felt that going with our traditional lithium-ion battery was the right move for this device.
Samsung also made the decision not to include a dedicated telephoto lens in the Edge. While it's not a necessary feature, it's something that would've been nice to have. Gaiser's answer for why the telephoto lens was skipped is related to how often people use that particular lens:
We are just so far ahead in our camera tech that people don't really understand the quality of their photos that they're getting. Not only is it things like optical zooms, but it's also the agentic AI that we have built in, from the chipset up, utilizing cognitive-aware engines so that your camera understands what you're taking photos of and is able to utilize AI to give you that perfect shot.
But when we're looking at the usage of our cameras with our customers, we know a couple of things. We know that the most popular zooms that our customers use are the 0.6X to get those really wide macro views, the 1X, 2X and 3X.
Is it nice to have the 100X Space Zoom at times? Absolutely. Sure. But is it something that you're going to use every day or even every month? When you're doing side-by-side comparisons, I think customers are really going to see that you're getting fantastic quality that meets or beats our competition.
It's fair to say these answers feel somewhat lacking, especially for the battery question. But what's done is done. Here's to hoping Samsung will fix these flaws in the next iteration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar General Stock Just Popped, but Is the Worst Really Behind It?
Dollar General is starting to benefit from more affluent customers trading down on their shopping choices. However, its core customer base remains under pressure. The stock, meanwhile, is no longer in the bargain bin after a strong rally. 10 stocks we like better than Dollar General › Dollar General (NYSE: DG) has struggled in recent years, as inflationary pressures hurt its lower-income consumer base. However, the stock staged a strong rally following its fiscal first-quarter earnings report. As of this writing, it is up 50% in 2025. Let's take a closer look at its most recent earnings report and commentary to see whether this rally is sustainable or if the worst is not really behind it just yet. On the surface, tariffs would seem to be a big negative for a company like Dollar General. After all, the retailer's core customer base was already feeling pressure from higher prices due to inflation, and it looked like it was losing share to big-box price leader Walmart (NYSE: WMT). However, the company has begun to see more higher-income consumers frequent its stores in search of value. The retailer said it plans to minimize the impact of tariffs on its gross margins as much as possible without raising prices, although it could increase prices as a last resort. It plans to do this by working with vendors to cut costs, moving some manufacturing to other countries, and tweaking its product lineup by making changes or swapping out certain items. It noted that a mid- to high-single-digit percentage of its overall purchases are directly imported from China, but about double that percentage comes indirectly from the country. The inroads with higher-income consumers contributed to a 2.4% increase in same-store sales in the quarter. While traffic fell by 0.3%, its average checkout ticket rose by 2.7%. Growth came from gains in the food, seasonal, and home & apparel categories. Same-store sales is a very important metric for Dollar General, as it has said in the past that it needs to grow its comparable-store sales by around 3% for it to leverage its expenses and grow its earnings. However, the composition matters, and growth from high-margin areas, such as seasonal items, helped power its earnings higher. This appears to be largely a reflection of higher-income consumers shopping at its locations, as well as its efforts to improve the customer experience and offer better merchandising in categories such as seasonal decor and home items. The company also said that its newer pOpshelf store concept -- which is meant to provide a fun and affordable shopping experience with a focus on home goods, seasonal decor, and party supplies -- performed well, exceeding expectations. Overall, Dollar General's revenue rose 5% year over year to $10.4 billion, while its earnings per share (EPS) jumped 8% to $1.78. That was well ahead of the analyst consensus of $10.3 billion in revenue and adjusted EPS of $1.48. Gross margin increased 78 basis points to 31%, helped by lower shrink and higher inventory markups. Shrink is the amount of merchandise that gets lost, damaged, spoiled, stolen, or just generally can't be sold, and the company has been working hard to improve this metric. Looking ahead, Dollar General raised its full-year guidance. It now expects revenue to grow between 3.7% and 4.7%, with same-store sales increasing between 1.5% and 2.5%. That's up from a prior outlook of revenue growth of 3.4% to 4.4% on comparable-store growth of 1.2% to 2.2%. Meanwhile, it raised the low end of its full-year EPS guidance to a range of $5.20 to $5.80, up from a previous forecast of between $5.10 and $5.80. It said that the guidance assumes that current tariff rates remain in place. Metric Prior Guidance Current Guidance Revenue growth 3.4% to 4.4% 3.7% and 4.7% Same-store sales growth 1.2% to 2.2% 1.5% and 2.5% Earnings per share $5.10 to $5.80 $5.20 to $5.80 Source: Dollar General. The company is also looking to add 575 new store openings in the U.S. this year and up to 15 in Mexico. Dollar General appears to be benefiting from the trade-down effect this year. This is something Walmart has been experiencing for a while, but something dollar stores like Dollar General had previously been missing out on. It was only last year that these companies were talking about how the current environment was one of the most difficult periods in their histories. And for dollar stores' core customer bases, things may actually be worse now with tariffs than they were last year. As such, whether Dollar General can continue to turn the corner likely depends largely on whether it can keep the higher-income customers that have begun to visit its stores and continue to attract new ones. Right now, the company is seeing these new customers visit more often and spend more money per visit. Its remodeling efforts, along with initiatives like its mobile app and own same-day delivery service and partnership with DoorDash, are also likely helping attract more affluent consumers. From a valuation perspective, the retailer now trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 20 based on analyst estimates for fiscal year 2025 (ending January 2026). That valuation shows the stock is no longer in the bargain bin. While Dollar General has made a lot of progress -- with its core consumer still very stressed -- I don't want to chase this rally at its current valuation. Before you buy stock in Dollar General, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Dollar General wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends DoorDash and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Dollar General Stock Just Popped, but Is the Worst Really Behind It? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homes in Franklin County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
Newly released data from for March shows that potential buyers and sellers in Franklin County saw higher home sale prices than the previous month's median of $259,000. The median home sold for $265,000, an analysis of data from shows. That means March, the most recent month for which figures are available, was up 2.3% from February. Compared to March 2024, the median home sales price was up 4.4% compared to $253,750. sources sales data from real estate deeds, resulting in a few months' delay in the data. The statistics don't include homes currently listed for sale and aren't directly comparable to listings data. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Here is a breakdown on median sale prices: Looking only at single-family homes, the $263,000 median selling price in Franklin County was down 3.7% in March from $273,000 the month prior. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes was up 2% from a median of $257, single family homes sold for $1 million or more during the month, compared to zero recorded transactions of at least $1 million in March 2024. Condominiums and townhomes increased by 26.8% in sales price during March to a median of $265,000 from $209,000 in February. Compared to March 2024, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes was up 28.5% from $206,300. No condominiums or townhomes sold for $1 million or more during March. In March, the number of recorded sales in Franklin County rose by 25.8% since March 2024 — from 128 to 161. All residential home sales totaled $61 million. Across Pennsylvania, homes sold at a median of $265,000 during March, up 1.9% from $259,998 in February. There were 9,945 recorded sales across the state during March, down 3.3% from 10,287 recorded sales in March 2024. Here's a breakdown for the full state: The total value of recorded residential home sales in Pennsylvania increased by 18.7% from $2.7 billion in February to $3.2 billion this March. Out of all residential home sales in Pennsylvania, 2.33% of homes sold for at least $1 million in March, up from 2.29% in March 2024. Sales prices of single-family homes across Pennsylvania increased by 1.9% from a median of $260,000 in February to $265,000 in March. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes across the state was up 6% from $250,000. Across the state, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes rose 2% from a median of $255,916 in February to $261,000 during March. The median sales price of condominiums and townhomes is up 6.1% from the median of $245,892 in March 2024. The median home sales price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. The median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average sales price, which would mean taking the sum of all sales prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high sale. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on Waynesboro Record Herald: Homes in Franklin County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homes in Washington County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
Newly released data from for March shows that potential buyers and sellers in Washington County saw higher home sale prices than the previous month's median of $299,500. The median home sold for $324,900, an analysis of data from shows. That means March, the most recent month for which figures are available, was up 8.5% from February. Compared to March 2024, the median home sales price was up 8.5% compared to $299,500. sources sales data from real estate deeds, resulting in a few months' delay in the data. The statistics don't include homes currently listed for sale and aren't directly comparable to listings data. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Here is a breakdown on median sale prices: Looking only at single-family homes, the $342,500 median selling price in Washington County was up 12.3% in March from $305,000 the month prior. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes was up 2.2% from a median of $335, single-family homes sold for $1 million or more during the month. Condominiums and townhomes decreased by 10.2% in sales price during March to a median of $247,000 from $274,999 in February. Compared to March 2024, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes was down 2.8% from $254,000. No condominiums or townhomes sold for $1 million or more during March. In March, the number of recorded sales in Washington County rose by 26.1% since March 2024 — from 142 to 179. All residential home sales totaled $59.9 million. Across Maryland, homes sold at a median of $398,894 during March, up 2.4% from $389,423 in February. There were 6,417 recorded sales across the state during March, down 1.8% from 6,534 recorded sales in March 2024. Here's a breakdown for the full state: The total value of recorded residential home sales in Maryland increased by 22.8% from $2.9 billion in February to $3.6 billion this March. Out of all residential home sales in Maryland, 7.14% of homes sold for at least $1 million in March, down from 7.73% in March 2024. Sales prices of single-family homes across Maryland increased by 4.5% from a median of $440,000 in February to $460,000 in March. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes across the state was slightly up from $457,600. Across the state, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes is at a median of $325,000, the same as February. The median sales price of condominiums and townhomes is down 1.6% from the median of $330,333 in March 2024. The median home sales price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. The median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average sales price, which would mean taking the sum of all sales prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high sale. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on The Herald-Mail: Homes in Washington County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
