Canada calls for immediate resumption of UN-led aid in Gaza
'Israeli military operations against WHO staff and facilities, World Food Programme aid convoys, & the ongoing killing of Palestinians seeking urgently needed food and water are unacceptable,' the Canadian foreign ministry said on X.
'Hunger in Gaza has reached catastrophic levels ... Canada calls for the immediate resumption at scale of UN-led aid,' the ministry added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
UN expert on torture demands end to ‘lethal, inhumane, degrading' starvation of civilians in Gaza
NEW YORK CITY: The UN's special rapporteur on torture, Alice Jill Edwards, on Wednesday expressed grave concern over the growing number of starvation-related deaths among Palestinians in Gaza. She described the starving of civilians as 'lethal, inhumane and degrading,' and called for the rapid and unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid to the battered enclave. 'Depriving people of food, water and dignity has been a serious and recurring violation of this war and it must end,' she said, citing 'shocking' reports of people being killed while queuing for food, as well as widespread hunger and malnutrition. The risk of all-out famine in Gaza is escalating, she added, stressing that all parties to the conflict have legal obligations under international law to ensure civilians under their control have access to food and water, and to facilitate humanitarian operations. 'They must not steal, divert or willfully impede the distribution of aid,' Edwards said. She detailed the 'catastrophic physiological consequences' of prolonged calorie deprivation, including malnutrition, organ failure and death, particularly among vulnerable groups such as infants and pregnant women. 'The psychological impact of being deprived of food and water is inherently cruel,' she added. 'Constantly changing rules, militarized distributions and daily and hourly uncertainty about when one is going to access these basic necessities is causing utter despair, stress and trauma.' She welcomed a recent announcement by Israel of humanitarian pauses in military operations to allow the World Food Programme to deliver aid throughout Gaza over a planned three-month period, but said 'more must be done' to end the hostilities and establish long-term peace based on a two-state solution. 'No one should have to suffer the humiliation of being forced to beg for food, and especially not when there are ample supplies waiting to be provided,' she said. Edwards also reiterated her call for the unconditional and immediate release of all hostages, the release of arbitrarily detained Palestinians, and for independent investigations into allegations of torture, ill-treatment and other potential war crimes by all parties. She said she has raised her concerns repeatedly with relevant authorities and continues to press for full accountability. Special rapporteurs are part of what is known as the special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council. They are independent experts who work on a voluntary basis, are not members of UN staff and are not paid for their work.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Malta says it will recognize the state of Palestine, joining France and possibly Britain
UNITED NATIONS: Malta told a high-level UN meeting Wednesday that it will formally recognize the state of Palestine in September, joining France and the United Kingdom in stepping up pressure to end the nearly 80-year Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Christopher Cutajar, the permanent secretary at Malta's Foreign Ministry, made the announcement at the UN General Assembly's meeting on a two-state solution to the conflict which has been extended to a third day because of the high number of countries wanting to speak. Cutajar said Malta has long supported self-determination for the Palestinian people, and 'as responsible actors, we have a duty to work to translate the concept of a two-state solution from theory into practice.' 'It is for this reason that the government of Malta has taken the principled decision to formally recognize the state of Palestine at the upcoming UN General Assembly in September,' he said. Malta says it wants a 'lasting peace' in Mideast Malta's Prime Minister Robert Abela earlier announced the decision by his country, a former British colony, to recognize a Palestinian state on Facebook, saying it is part of the nation's efforts 'for a lasting peace in the Middle East.' The Mediterranean island nation and European Union member will join more than 145 countries, including over a dozen European nations, in recognizing the state of Palestine. Just delivered the message that Malta will recognise the Palestinian State on the margins of #UNGA80 in September. Stressed the importance of unhindered humanitarian access and an immediate ceasefire to work towards peace with the aim of having two states living side by side. — Christopher Cutajar (@chriscutajar) July 30, 2025 French President Emmanuel Macron announced ahead of this week's meeting that his country will recognize the state of Palestine at the annual gathering of world leaders at the 193-member General Assembly which starts Sept. 23. United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Tuesday that Britain would recognize the state of Palestine before September's meeting, but would refrain if Israel agrees to a ceasefire and long-term peace process in the next eight weeks. France and Britain are the biggest Western powers and the only two members of the Group of Seven major industrialized nations to make such a pledge. Israel opposes a two-state solution and is boycotting the meeting along with its closest ally, the United States. Israel's UN ambassador, Danny Danon, on Tuesday sharply criticized about 125 countries participating in the conference and new recognitions of a Palestinian state, saying 'there are those in the world who fight terrorists and extremist forces and then there are those who turn a blind eye to them or resort to appeasement.' 'While our hostages are languishing in Hamas terror tunnels in Gaza, these countries choose to engage in hollow statements instead of investing their efforts in their release,' Danon said. 'This is hypocrisy and a waste of time that legitimizes terrorism and distances any chance of regional progress.' Malta's Cutajar countered that 'recognition is not merely symbolic – it is a concrete step toward the realization of a just and lasting peace.' Quick action is urged High-level representatives at the UN conference on Tuesday urged Israel to commit to a Palestinian state and gave 'unwavering support' to a two-state solution, and they urged all countries that haven't recognized the state of Palestine to do so quickly. The seven-page 'New York Declaration' sets out a phased plan to end the Israel-Palestinian conflict and the ongoing war in Gaza. The plan would culminate with an independent, demilitarized Palestine living side by side peacefully with Israel, and their eventual integration into the wider Mideast region. A separate one-page statement titled the 'New York Call' approved late Tuesday by 15 Western nations says they have recognized, 'expressed or express the willingness or the positive consideration ... to recognize the state of Palestine, as an essential step toward the two-state solution, and invite all countries that have not done so to join this call.' It included six that have recognized the state of Palestine and nine others including Malta, Andorra, Australia, Canada, Finland, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Portugal and San Marino.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
New York conference ends US monopoly on Palestine issue
It has been decades since the international community sent a decisive message of unity and clarity on the need to resolve the question of Palestine through the two-state solution. Co-hosted by Saudi Arabia and France, a conference at the UN headquarters in New York and attended by delegates from no less than 125 countries issued such a message this week. The final communique presented a comprehensive and unanimous approach to ending the war in Gaza, establishing tools to protect the Palestinian people while rejecting unilateral changes to the demography and geography of the Occupied Territories. But most importantly, it underlined that the only just and viable resolution to the conflict is through ending the occupation and implementing the two-state solution. The international conference, boycotted by the US and Israel, was a collective response by a majority of members of the UN's General Assembly to Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, its declared intention to carry out ethnic cleansing through the forced displacement of Palestinians and its plan to annex Palestinian territories. The final communique was anchored in international law and UN resolutions, as well as on the public positions of an overwhelming majority of states regarding the two-state solution. While Israel's immediate rejection of the conference's message and intentions can be understood in the context of the policies of the country's most radical government in history, it is the position of the US that is both disappointing and puzzling. For decades, successive American administrations have had a monopoly over the workings of the so-called Middle East peace process. That process, which began with the Madrid Conference in 1991 and culminated with the signing of the Oslo Accords, failed to deliver on its initial goal: a final status settlement of the conflict. America's exclusive sponsorship of the peace process and negotiations between the Palestinians and Israel, which ended with President Barack Obama's first term, was corrupted by Washington's grim failure as an honest broker. The US did nothing to hold Israel accountable for its aggressive policy of building and expanding illegal settlements in the West Bank. The US stood aside as a far-right Israeli government unleashed a wave of settler terrorism against Palestinians. It did nothing when Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Oslo was dead and that the Palestinian Authority must be disbanded. It did nothing when Netanyahu declared on more than one occasion his intention to annex the West Bank and bury the hopes of Palestinian statehood for good. President Donald Trump's first term offered little to the Palestinians. During his second term, Israel has caused the most horrific humanitarian crisis in Gaza, while massacring civilians and carrying out their ethnic cleansing. Netanyahu used the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack as an excuse to speed up the liquidation of the Palestine question. He offered nothing to the Palestinians as Israeli extremists roamed the West Bank, killing and injuring native inhabitants while carrying out a campaign of state-sponsored terror. But by carrying out wholesale war crimes in Gaza, Netanyahu has caused Israel great harm in the international arena. The world can no longer stomach the horrific scenes coming out of the Gaza carnage. Public opinion has shifted against Israel and weekly protests put pressure on Western leaders to take a stand. This is when Riyadh and Paris decided to end the current stalemate. Saudi Arabia made it clear that the lack of a just solution to the Palestine issue was the root cause of regional instability. Netanyahu and his far-right partners have no answer to the nagging question: what to do with the Palestinians? Oct. 7 was a milestone that brought agony to Israel and a second Nakba to the Palestinians. For both people not to go through another Oct. 7, a just settlement must be implemented. Israeli officials will use subterfuge, hubris and threats to debunk calls for Palestinian statehood. They will claim that France and the UK — both of which plan to recognize Palestinian statehood in September — are only rewarding Hamas and hampering an end to the war. They will join the more than 140 countries that have already done so. But Palestinians, more than 12 million of them around the world, have earned their right to self-determination. The only assurance of Israel's security is a Palestinian state next to it, living in peace and harmony. The New York conference was a moment of awakening across the globe. This is a blow to Netanyahu and his extremist partners. But they are still in a position to do harm. Netanyahu has so far rejected any permanent end to the Gaza war. He is still banking on US support to help him extend the bloodbath in the hope of driving millions of Gazans out of the war-torn enclave. To keep his coalition alive, he could go as far as to implement a recently adopted Knesset resolution to annex most of the West Bank. He could also pull out of Oslo and disband the PA. But he could only do so if he knew that the US would have his back. All such illegal acts will only deepen Israel's political isolation and may create an international backlash of sanctions. By carrying out wholesale war crimes in Gaza, Netanyahu has caused Israel great harm in the international arena. Osama Al-Sharif A few weeks ago, Netanyahu looked at the region and proudly announced that Israel had created a new Middle East. He had humbled Hezbollah, helped bring the Assad regime down and dealt a painful blow, with America's assistance, to Iran's nuclear program. But despite all these critical geopolitical achievements, his war on the Palestinians has not been won. Israel's war crimes in Gaza and use of mass starvation as a weapon have failed to fulfill the fundamental goals of the war, while triggering an unprecedented wave of anti-Israel sentiment across the world. The fact that Britain, of all countries, is now ready to recognize Palestinian statehood is a symbolic form of delayed justice. Netanyahu is taking Israel into a dark place from which it may never return. The Saudi-French initiative is already creating momentum that promises to get stronger by the day because of the terrible choices that Israel and the US are making. While Palestinians suffer and are forced to pay a heavy price, leaving decent people around the world angry and supportive, Israel is now isolated and vindictive. But the choice at the end of the day is Israel's. It can choose to live in peace with the Palestinians and ensure an end to decades of enmity, or it can allow zealots and radicals to push it into a corner. That would be the wrong choice.
