
STEVE FINAN: Why is it costing incredible amount of money to build new Dundee Blackness Road flats?
It didn't make sense to demolish the tenements at Nos 219 to 245 in the first place.
The stairs, reportedly unsound, could have been replaced and the interiors refurbished, properly insulated, with eco-friendly heating installed.
This would have cost a quarter of what the council is about to spend on a rebuild.
And the consultation, which found that residents favoured demolition, was bizarrely badly handled too.
Landlords were counted as residents.
Did no one think to check these people's home addresses?
That should have been question one of a 'residents' consultation.
Now, after many an unexplained delay, the city is to build 24 new flats at a projected cost of £8.52 million.
That works out at more than £355,000 per flat.
New flats at Keiller's Rise in Clepington Road are being marketed at £210,000 – that's a £145,000 difference.
And, bear in mind, the Blackness Road land didn't have to be purchased.
It previously had tenements too, so sewers and services are nearby.
And there will likely be VAT exemptions on a rebuild, making the project cheaper than a newbuild.
That £355k per flat figure is ridiculous.
Exactly what issues are costing such an incredible amount of money?
The worst thing about all this is that we'll probably never know the answers.
Because Dundee's councillors are too frightened to ask meaningful questions about it.
They just accept whatever they are fed by planning officers – yes sir, no sir, three bags full, sir.
They are too weak to object or challenge or even murmur.
A constituent-focused councillor would be tackling this head on.
Such a person would ask questions, dig deep, then explain it all – transparently and honestly – in ways everyone can understand.
It is a councillor's duty to do this on behalf of constituents. It is their job to scrutinise planning reports.
If they don't do that, they are showing arrogant disrespect for the people who voted them in.
They should do it no matter who tries to shut them down. No matter that they aren't toeing the party line.
Do we have anyone on the council with the personal integrity to do that?
Please, will that councillor step forward?
No? No one?
Is there not one on the ruling group (because anyone else would be voted down) who thinks constituents deserve better?
Do they all believe their party unity is more important than their people?
How depressingly unsurprising.
Where are you, SNP group councillors?
When you are spending so much of Dundee's money, Dundee has a right to know why.
The next local elections can't come quickly enough.
I keep saying this: I don't care which party you support (personally, I don't like any of them) but vote, I beg you, for individuals who have the character and courage to do the job properly.
None of the current councillors do.
They whinge if they think they are being insulted, but their backbone wilts when the hard stuff needs done.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Transgender actress Laverne Cox under fire from her woke fans after revealing 'MAGA cop' boyfriend
Transgender actress Laverne Cox is under fire from her own fans after admitting that she secretly dated a Trump-supporting police officer for four years. The star, 53, who is known for her extremely progressive politics, enraged her woke fanbase after dropping the bombshell about her love life in a video to promote her upcoming one-woman show. She also admitted that her cop lover was 22 years younger than her. 'He was 26, I was 48,' she explained. 'He is a blonde hair, blue-eyed MAGA Republican voter who is a New York City police officer.' While they're no longer dating, Cox admitted that they were 'madly in love' during their time together. She also gushed about how 'hot' he was, but insisted that she never adopted any of his conservative political views. The post was met with extreme backlash from fans of the Orange Is the New Black star, with many expressing complete shock and disbelief that she could date a Republican while publicly preaching her progressive politics. 'You should've taken this to the grave babe,' wrote, while another commented, 'So you recorded this, edited, and STILL pressed upload? A third commented, 'It's the smiling with pride, that's bothering me. As if it were a badge of honor.' Another said, 'Sooooo the morals are dismissed when he's hot. Got it.' After feeling the fury from her fanbase, Cox attempted to fix the situation by releasing a 53-minute video diving into her own politics as well as the reality of the relationship. She also said that some of her fans were 'dehumanizing people with different political beliefs', which she said was 'not consistent with my values'. On top of that, the star insisted that she wasn't MAGA and had 'never' voted for Trump. 'What was beautiful about the relationship I had with my ex is that for three and a half of the four years we dated it was amazing and we would agree to disagree, and managed to still have fun, managed to still see each other's humanity and love each other across these differences,' she said. Despite her clarification, Cox still received backlash from her progressive followers. 'Respectfully, why are you navigating a relationship with a blonde, blue-eyed, MAGA, Republican?' asked one. A second commented, 'He voted against YOU! He voted against who you are and what you stand for, your basic rights! He voted against who you advocate for, your trans community. You may have 'loved' him, but he most certainly did NOT love you.' 'Respectfully.....I think you need to love yourself more. Because you SIGNIFICANTLY lowered yourself to be with a man who did not deserve you,' wrote a third. Last November, Cox publicly stated that she and her transgender friends were considering moving out of the country due to Donald Trump's presidency. 'We're doing research on different cities in Europe and in the Caribbean,' she told Variety. Cox went as far as comparing the Trump administration's anti-LGBTQ rhetoric to the German Reich of the early 1900s. 'There was this a thriving community of queer people in Berlin pre the rise of Nazism. They attacked Jewish folks. They attacked immigrants, they attacked queer and trans people,' she said. 'I don't want to be in too much fear, but I'm scared. As a public figure, with all my privilege, I'm scared, and I'm particularly scared because I'm a public figure,' she continued. 'I feel like I could be targeted. I think they spent close to $100 million on anti-trans ads. It's deeply concerning.'


Metro
21 minutes ago
- Metro
Trans senator says 'f*** Rowling' and openly breaks Supreme Court toilet ruling
The Spanish senator 'fondly broke the law' by using the women's bathroom (Picture: A transgender Spanish senator stuck her middle finger up in the women's bathroom at Gatwick Airport after defying the Supreme Court's trans ruling. Carla Antonelli, Spain's first out trans senator, said 'f*** Rowling' as she 'fondly' defied guidelines not to use the women's bathroom. In April the Supreme Court ruled that the definitions of 'sex' and 'woman' in Equality Act 2010 refer to 'biological sex'. The Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) then recommended in a interim guidance that 'trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities' in public spaces. Lily Allen's hit 'F*** You' is playing in the background (Picture: Sign up for all of the latest stories Start your day informed with Metro's News Updates newsletter or get Breaking News alerts the moment it happens. With Lily Allen's hit 'F*** You' playing, Antonelli attacked the new rules after using the women's toilets at Gatwick Airport. She said: 'According to English law, I have just broken the law. 'I just entered the toilets of my sex – woman. 'But I am going back in because I am very fond of breaking the rules. 'Now I am going to wash my hands.' The 66-year-old senator then walks back inside the toilets with her suitcase and can be seen sticking up her middle finger to the camera. The video's thumbnail shows the senator, with the text '#f*** Rowling' plastered over it. JK Rowling praised the Supreme Court's ruling (Picture: Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images) JK Rowling, who is also known for her controversial campaigning for women's rights, said she was 'so proud' over the Supreme Court ruling in April. In a post on X, the Harry Potter author wrote: 'It took three extraordinary, tenacious Scottish women with an army behind them to get this case heard by the Supreme Court and, in winning, they've protected the rights of women and girls across the UK. @ForWomenScot, I'm so proud to know you.' Five judges were tasked with deciding whether the legal understanding of 'woman' includes trans women with gender recognition certificates (GRC). The Scottish Government said this definition includes trans women with a GRC, a document that shows a person's affirmed gender is legally recognised. While For Women Scotland (FWS), which campaigns against trans rights, said this should only be for 'biological women'. Carla Antonelli has passionately defended trans rights in her career (Picture: ZUMA Press Wire/Shutterstock) While presenting the Supreme Court's decision, Lord Hodge said: 'The terms 'woman' and 'sex', in the Equality Act 2010, refer to a biological woman and biological sex. 'But we counsel against reading this judgement as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.' The ruling adds that a trans woman can claim sex discrimination because they are perceived to be a woman. Antonelli, who is a member of the left-wing political party Más Madrid, went viral in February after a stirring speech in defence of trans rights in her country's parliament. She made history as the first publicly transgender person elected to the Cortes Generales. The former actress said: 'Trans people – we are everyone's topic of conversation. Everyone has to have an opinion about us. If we are trans, what we are, what we are not. She continued: 'Do we get surgery or not? Do we mutilate ourselves or not? Just leave us alone, for god's sake!' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. Arrow MORE: Fury as mum-of-six reserves sun beds then leaves Spanish resort for breakfast Arrow MORE: Swimmers flee in terror after woman suffers wound from mystery creature Arrow MORE: easyJet's summer 2026 sale is here – these are the best destinations to book now


Powys County Times
21 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Irish premier calls for end to war in Gaza describing it as ‘horrific'
Irish premier Micheal Martin has called for the war in Gaza to end, describing the images of starving children as 'horrific'. Mr Martin called for a surge in humanitarian aid to be allowed into Gaza. It comes following reports of children dying due to malnutrition and starvation in recent days. Palestinians in Gaza are facing severe shortages of food, water and aid. It comes after Tanaiste Simon Harris was one of 26 signatories to a joint statement on Monday, which calls for an end to the war in Gaza. Mr Harris, who is also Minister for Foreign Affairs, said the 'suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths'. The situation in Gaza is horrific. The suffering of civilians and the death of innocent children is intolerable. I echo the call by Foreign Ministers of 28 countries for all hostages to be released, and for a surge in humanitarian aid. This war must end and it must end now. — Micheál Martin (@MichealMartinTD) July 22, 2025 In a social media post, Mr Martin said: 'The situation in Gaza is horrific. The suffering of civilians and the death of innocent children is intolerable. 'I echo the call by foreign ministers of 28 countries for all hostages to be released, and for a surge in humanitarian aid. 'This war must end and it must end now.' UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described Gaza as a 'horror show with a level of death and destruction without parallel in recent times'. He told the Security Council: 'Malnourishment is soaring. Starvation is knocking on every door. 'Now we are seeing the last gasp of a humanitarian system built on humanitarian principles. 'That system is being denied the conditions to function. Denied the space to deliver. Denied the safety to save lives.'