logo
Disunited Irishmen - Frank McNally on the year Shankill Road protestants paid tribute in Bodenstown and were attacked by the IRA

Disunited Irishmen - Frank McNally on the year Shankill Road protestants paid tribute in Bodenstown and were attacked by the IRA

Irish Times15-05-2025
Two years after his
failed libel action
, Peadar O'Donnell enjoyed arguably the finest hour of his political life when inspiring a contingent of Belfast Protestants to attend the 1934 commemoration of Wolfe Tone at Bodenstown.
A busload from the Shankill Road among them, they were there under the umbrella of O'Donnell's short-lived Republican Congress, formed when he and others of socialist leaning were expelled from the IRA.
On the way to Kildare, according to the next day's Irish Press, 'three dozen Protestant workers' stopped off at Arbour Hill, Dublin, to lay a wreathe in honour of James Connolly.
Presented by a 'Mr G McVicar', it read: 'To the memory of Connolly and his heroic comrades of Easter Week, 1916. On to the Workers' Republic.'
READ MORE
En route to the Workers' Republic, they then drove to Bodenstown, where the Belfast banners included one, in echo of the 1790s, proclaiming 'United Irishmen 1934'.
Alas for unity, the first item on the agenda in Bodenstown was a split, or at least an expression of the split that had already forced O'Donnell and his associates out of the IRA.
The Irish Press played down the subsequent drama in a three-part headline that dwelt mainly on the event's overall success. '17,000 in Pilgrimage to Grave of Tone', read the top line. 'Biggest Tribute Yet Paid,' read the second. Then came 'Many Protestants in Six-County Group', followed by a colon, and after the colon, ominously: 'A Scene.'
The 'scene' arose from the insistence of the main IRA organisers that there should be no 'unauthorised banners'. That turned out to refer to the Belfast ones, including – in a bitter irony – the 'United Irishmen', as well as those of the Congress generally.
First there were angry words. Then, reported the Press, 'fifty or sixty members of the Tipperary Battalion of the IRA were called upon to aid the stewards and blows were exchanged with members of the Congress Groups.
'In the course of the struggle, which lasted for several minutes, the identity scroll of the Congress and the two flags of the Belfast clubs were torn.'
Recalling the event decades later, veteran communist Michael O'Riordan, who had been there, noted that job of attacking the Northerners 'was given to the Tipperary people because they were the most conservative. The Dublin IRA did not join in at all'.
O'Donnell reached a similar conclusion on the day itself. As paraphrased by the Press, he said: 'The IRA leadership was afraid of the Congress, and they had used as their tools that day poor, deluded workers from the Midlands. They would not ask the Dublin workers to attack the Congress flags because [the Dubliners] were finding out their leadership.'
O'Donnell went on to suggest that along with the Belfast flags, a 'mask had been torn from hypocrisy' at Bodenstown. He blamed himself and fellow Congress leader George Gilmore that it had not happened earlier: that for years, by their presence in the IRA, they had 'kept this treachery from exposing itself'.
But he was optimistic now. The attack would bring 'thousands more to [the Congress] banner,' he predicted. Furthermore: 'The presence of their Belfast comrades that day was a momentous happening, and the laying of the foundation of unity in the future.'
Such optimism proved to be unfounded. At its first conference, held at Rathmines in September 1934, the Congress itself split over tactics, with O'Donnell and Gilmore on one side and Roddy Connolly, son of James, on the other.
Thereafter it went into steep decline, apart from a last stand fighting for the republican side in the Spanish Civil War, where both Gilmore and O'Donnell took part. Some Belfast Protestants fought in that too. But there were no more massed outings from the Shankill to Bodenstown.
Gilmore's life was a remarkable journey in its own right. Born in Howth, Co Dublin, in 1898, he was descended from Portadown unionists. But despite a home education, he and his brothers all became republicans.
George joined Fianna Éireann as a teenager, fought in the War of Independence, took the anti-Treaty side in the Civil War and, after escaping from prison, worked as secretary for a future Fianna Fáil Taoiseach Seán Lemass.
He and Lemass helped organise a mass jailbreak from Mountjoy in 1925 and Gilmore remained close with some of the leadership of Fianna Fáil even while supporting O'Donnell's hard-left Saor Éire (1931) and then helping lead the Republican Congress.
O'Donnell was known to complain that Éamon de Valera 'took the best republicans with him into Fianna Fáil and left us with the clinkers'.
But after the Congress's dissolution, he and Gilmore combined in organising tenant leagues, which influenced Fianna Fáil's slum clearance and State housing programme of the 1930s.
Gilmore later stood as a socialist republican in a South Dublin byelection in 1938 and lost by only 200 votes. Thereafter, he was less prominent in Irish politics.
Both men survived to visit Bodenstown again on the 50th anniversary of the 1934 commemoration. O'Donnell was 91 by then and lived another two years. Gilmore was 86 and died 11 months later, 40 years ago this June.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Israel, stop killing journalists': Protest held in Dublin after killing of Gaza reporters
‘Israel, stop killing journalists': Protest held in Dublin after killing of Gaza reporters

Irish Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

‘Israel, stop killing journalists': Protest held in Dublin after killing of Gaza reporters

More than 250 people attended a protest outside the GPO in Dublin on Monday evening organised in response to the killing by Israeli forces of six Palestinian journalists in Gaza . The Al Jazeera journalists, including prominent reporter Anas Al Sharif, were killed in a targeted drone attack on their tent near Gaza City's Al-Shifa Hospital. The Israeli military said it carried out the attack, accusing Mr Sharif of leading a Hamas cell, an allegation he had previously denied. To chants of 'Israel, stop killing journalists; Israel, stop killing civilians; Israel, stop killing children', Emma O Kelly of the broadcasting branch of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) called for those present to make noise in protest at attempts to silence their work. READ MORE NUJ Irish secretary Séamus Dooley said the protest was 'hugely important' and there was a danger in underestimating the power of solidarity. He said other events had been organised by journalists in Belfast, Derry and Edinburgh, which was important. Séamus Dooley, Irish secretary of the National Union of Journalists, taking part in the protest on O'Connell Street in Dublin on Monday. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni Mr Dooley said he had been talking to colleagues at Al Jazeera and they were 'taking great heart from this'. 'We're not foolish enough to think that it's going to change anything on its own. But is a powerful symbol and I think it's the fact that so many people are turning up is important.' He added that 'what happened was shocking', but the NUJ and International Federation of Journalists had been highlighting 'Israel's targeting of journalists for many years'. Palestinian journalist Dr Asad Abushark said he knew Mr Sharif, who was one of more than 200 journalists killed by Israel's forces since the war began. [ Constant threat of targeting and dire conditions take toll as deaths in Gaza of Palestinian journalists spiral Opens in new window ] 'Every day they are killing. They don't want journalists to tell the truth about the butchering and mass killing,' he said. The protest was also attended by representatives of other trade unions. Greg Kerr, secretary of the INTO's Palestine Ambassadors Group, said 'the Irish Government is not doing nearly enough' and the Occupied Territories Bill 'needs to be passed ASAP'. A large contingent of pro-Palestine activists waved flags and led the crowd in chants of 'from the rivers to the sea, Palestine will be free'. Earlier, Tánaiste Simon Harris encouraged protests in Israel against the Netanyahu administration, saying he wanted people to differentiate between the government of Israel and the Israeli people. Mr Harris, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, repeatedly referenced the protests against the intensification of the military campaign in Gaza announced by the Israeli government at the weekend. Asked if he would encourage the protests, he said: 'I encourage everybody to use their voice and speak up and speak out against what is genocidal activity in Gaza. [ Israel has 'no choice' but to attack Gaza City, says Netanyahu, as hostage families call strike Opens in new window ] 'There is no doubt in my mind there must be so many people in Israel disgusted at the actions of their government.' Mr Harris said he had been involved in positive recent conversations with Arab nations and European countries around a plan for the future of Gaza. '[It is] a plan that has no future for Hamas, none whatsoever. The Palestinian Authority is clear about that, Arab nations are clear about that, the European Union is clear about that: Hamas can have no future in the running of Gaza,' he said. 'But you can't get to this point of the future of Gaza until the killing stops, until the genocide stops, until they stop starving children and the hostages are, of course, released.' Asked about the Occupied Territories Bill, Mr Harris said it had not been sufficiently acknowledged that Slovenia had recently decided to similarly ban trade with illegal Israeli settlements and Belgium had signalled its intention to do so. He said commentary from abroad made it appear Ireland was alone in pursuing such a course of action, but he was pleased to see a growing number of EU countries 'who recognise that the International Court of Justice matters and what it says matters and international law matters'. [ Occupied Territories Bill: US Congress group asks that Ireland be added to list of countries boycotting Israel Opens in new window ] The Government, he continued, would proceed with the legislation, which was about the illegally occupied territories and not about trade with Israel. There is nervousness in Government circles about the potential economic cost of a growing campaign against the Bill among US politicians , while pro-Palestinian campaigners were seeking to have the scope of the legislation expanded. Asked about the possible inclusion of services in the scope of the Bill – which could hit companies like Airbnb – Mr Harris said he expected decisions to be made when the next Dáil term begins in the autumn. He said Government decisions 'will be grounded on the advice of the Attorney General'.

‘Don't underestimate this guy': Who is Gareth Sheridan, the pharma millionaire running for president?
‘Don't underestimate this guy': Who is Gareth Sheridan, the pharma millionaire running for president?

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

‘Don't underestimate this guy': Who is Gareth Sheridan, the pharma millionaire running for president?

Gareth Sheridan is, in one respect, the face of the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs. The share price of Nutriband, the business he cofounded in 2012, has dropped by almost 10 per cent in the past month, affected by the US tariffs uncertainty. For the year to date, it's still up by 57 per cent and the pharma company has a market value of $80 million (€69 million) – it was valued at $100 million in January. Nutriband has yet to generate any revenue and is awaiting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for its technology, which is designed to prevent abuse of patch medications. Sheridan has talked about the technology in the second quarter of next year, if not before, subject to FDA approval. READ MORE Sheridan wants to be the next president of Ireland, having announced his plans to seek the nomination through local councils. He needs the support of four local authorities to get on the ballot paper. The 35-year-old, from Terenure, south Dublin, lacks the support from the Oireachtas of Mairéad McGuinness or Catherine Connolly , or the name recognition of Michael Flatley or Conor McGregor , both of whom have indicated interest in running for the office. As an unaffiliated unknown, the road to Áras an Uachtaráin looks to be a long one for the entrepreneur. The challenge gets tougher when you consider that Seán Gallagher's second-place finish in 2011, with 28.5 per cent of first preference votes, is the best performance by any candidate to go the council route in the election. Gallagher, as it happens, is executive chairman of Nutriband. [ Pharma businessman Gareth Sheridan enters presidential race as Independents compete for nominations ] The Technological University Dublin (TU Dublin) graduate's lack of name recognition or party support means that even getting on the ballot is a daunting prospect. It's one that he has likely prepared for, says Dr Siobhán Killion, head of management at TU Dublin's school of management, people, and organisations. 'Don't underestimate this guy,' Killion says. 'I mentioned his name to a few people on Sunday. They didn't have a clue who he was. His biggest obstacle is to become known, but he's no fool and he'll rise to the challenge. There'll be very few people in Ireland come November that won't have heard of him. 'He's such a busy guy, but it doesn't surprise me. He seems to be the king of time management. He's very much on top of his game.' Sheridan did his undergraduate degree at TU Dublin while in the process of establishing Nutriband. 'It was at the expense of my grades,' he told The Irish Times in February. 'My dad wears a patch for heart medication. I figured patch technology could be expanded. As I wrote my thesis, it felt more like a business plan,' he says. Killion got to know him at TU Dublin. 'He knows how to juggle commitments. His ability to keep all the balls in the air successfully is something he's got in spades,' she says. 'He was the guy that didn't attend classes because he was working on his business idea. That's okay because not everybody's academic journey is the same. He did what he needed to do to get where he needed to be.' Killion has stayed in contact with Sheridan since, inviting him back to speak to students in TU Dublin. 'Gareth, being an alum of TU Dublin, has freely given his time to encourage entrepreneurship among our students. Any time I've reached out to him, he's come back without hesitation to help,' she says. 'He's a great mentor to students. These are undergrads, your typical 20-year-olds, and he's in there with them advising and encouraging them.' In February, Sheridan said his goal was to 'put manners' on the largest pharmaceutical companies in the US. Nutriband has developed a system to change the way patches of painkillers such as fentanyl and other opiates work. The aim is to reduce abuse and prevent risk of accidental exposure. 'They're competitors. We're coming in aggressively and to put manners on an industry that has ignored a major issue for a long time. I am baffled that the industry has let prescription rates drop so much without attempting a fix,' he said at the time. The route to getting the business off the ground and on to the Nasdaq stock exchange in New York involved Sheridan working in food delivery and other gig economy roles to keep the company functioning while awaiting approval to get listed. The company is based in Orlando, Florida, and he has resided in Salt Lake City, Utah, his wife's home city, but is in the process of moving back to Dublin. Sheridan documented his journey in his autobiography, From No to Nasdaq, which came out earlier this year. The bullish approach came as no surprise to Aonghus Shortt, cofounder of FoodMarble. Shortt's company is working on gut health, having raised €8 million to date. He met Sheridan in 2022. 'He approached me via LinkedIn. He was listed on Nasdaq [in 2021] and for a company that size it was somewhat unprecedented among Irish start-ups. I'm sure one million people told him it was a horrible idea, but he made it work,' Shortt says. 'When we met up, he was encouraging me to consider listing. We didn't, but I was impressed he did. He's a very confident guy and an independent thinker. I found him quite impressive.' Sheridan is stepping back from his role with Nutriband, where he owns 18 per cent of the business, during his presidential run. Were he to win, he would have to remain detached from the company. His co-founder, Serguei Melnik, is taking charge in his absence. 'He [Sheridan] seems nice and transparent, but what he did [with Nutriband] was audacious. It's weathered some storms,' Shortt says. 'It's another audacious move. It's not a very big company or stock, so it's not like all eyes in the US will be on what he does, but you can imagine some shareholders might be wondering why he's doing this.' Sheridan is one of 24 finalists chosen to compete for the title of EY Entrepreneur of the Year awards. He has been chosen along with seven others in the established category. The winner of that category would then vie with the two other category winners (emerging and international) for the overall title. One of Nutriband's shareholders is Jim Breen. The PulseLearning founder met Sheridan on an EY Entrepreneur of the Year CEO retreat to Japan earlier this year. Breen was a nominee in 2007. 'There were around 140 of us in Japan for a week. It was my first time meeting him. He's got a special kind of mentality that mixes humility with confidence. He's a learner, but he's also experienced. The part that impressed me most was that he's had knock-backs, but has resilience about him,' Breen says. Having invested in the company based on that meeting in Japan, Breen acknowledges that it is less than optimal to have Sheridan stepping away from the business for a run at the Áras. 'It's not ideal from an investor perspective. However, he's got the thing well thought through. A Nasdaq-listed company has a team of people in place, it doesn't depend on just one person,' Breen says. 'With some things in business and life, you just work them out.' A spokesman for Sheridan told The Irish Times that he 'holds dual citizenship' for the US and Ireland. A statement said: 'As regards holding or contesting for the office of president of Ireland there are clear precedents regarding Ireland-USA dual citizenship holders. 'In 1959, Éamon de Valera , a USA citizen (by birth), was nominated and elected president of Ireland.' On Newstalk on Monday Sheridan denied he had renounced allegiance to Ireland as the oath on taking up US citizenship requires. Queried by The Irish Times, his spokesman acknowledged that 'as tens of thousands of Irish people before him faced with the choice of being undocumented or 'legal' in the US, Gareth Sheridan was 'naturalised', taking dual citizenship, he pledged allegiance to the USA. That to him meant allegiance while resident in the US, albeit involving renouncing his allegiance to any other 'power'. 'However, he and all Irish people of dual citizenship with the USA continue to be Irish citizens. While residing in the US for seven years he retained and used his Irish passport. He and his family are now legal residents of Ireland.' Perhaps there is an echo of de Valera's 'empty formula' taking the oath of allegiance on entering the Dáil in 1926. But otherwise, following in de Valera's footsteps appears a long shot. He first needs to get himself on the ballot paper, which will be challenging in itself. But Sheridan has never lacked ambition in business and he will seek to apply his skills as an entrepreneur to the political arena. Additional reporting by Pat Leahy

Online pornography: Age verification is en route - but the devil's in the detail
Online pornography: Age verification is en route - but the devil's in the detail

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Online pornography: Age verification is en route - but the devil's in the detail

There's an old joke about the internet: nobody knows you're a dog, nobody knows you're a teenager, and nobody knows whether the boxes you've ticked saying 'I am a human' and 'I am over 18' mean anything at all. But legislators across the democratic world have finally decided the punchline isn't funny any more. Governments are moving from finger-wagging to mandates: if you host pornography or other adult content, you must put something sturdier than a checkbox between minors and the material. The push is not new, but the momentum feels different. Political patience for vague commitments from platforms has worn thin. The conversation now is about enforcement, not aspiration. In Ireland, Coimisiún na Meán 's online safety code now requires video-sharing platforms hosting pornography and similar material to deploy genuinely effective mechanisms to keep minors out. READ MORE The words 'genuinely effective' are doing some heavy lifting here, covering a menu of options including third-party verification tokens, privacy-preserving age estimation, device-level parental settings and more. The unresolved question is whether enough services will choose solutions that satisfy regulators without frightening off users – and how fast sanctions will follow if they don't. Across the Irish Sea, the UK is deep in implementation. The Online Safety Act passed two years ago by the Conservative government requires services that make pornography available to implement 'highly effective' checks. In practice, that means adult content sites will have to block UK visitors unless they pass an age test. Critics argue these mandated checks threaten anonymity, create honeypots of sensitive data and inevitably overshoot, sweeping in sexual health resources, LGBTQ+ information or art that crude filters misclassify. They also fear a creeping extension of age limits to other types of content deemed inappropriate for minors. Proponents say these risks can be managed. The argument has acquired a partisan edge, with the Labour government and the opposition Reform UK hurling insults at each other . The political mood music will colour both enforcement and whether the British model is exported or quietly abandoned. Elsewhere in the EU, the same debate is playing out. France has moved fastest, introducing its own age-verification law for pornography with fines for noncompliance, while Germany has long had age-gating rules that are now being updated in light of new EU-level discussions under the Digital Services Act. Several member states, watching the UK's early moves and legal wrangles, are waiting to see whether the approach survives contact with the courts before committing themselves. In the US, the absence of a federal law has encouraged states to experiment. Louisiana's law kicked things off, followed by others. Some require site-by-site checks; others, notably Utah and Texas, have gone for the more ambitious route of imposing verification duties on app stores themselves, so that Apple 's App Store and Google Play would check ages and obtain parental consent at the point of download, passing only an age 'signal' to the app. That model is gathering attention abroad, because it could, in theory, standardise age checks across thousands of services. This brings us to one of the underlying tensions in the entire debate: who should be responsible, and therefore liable, for making the checks? Meta argues that app stores are the logical choke point – the bouncer at the club door – since they already control installation, payment and in many cases device-level settings. Apple and Google prefer to push the responsibility down to individual apps, warning that centralised checks could mean overcollection of data and disadvantage smaller developers. Behind the polite disagreement, the row is about who takes the blame when something goes wrong. Meanwhile, Apple has been quietly developing its own privacy-friendly verification system, using on-device processing and cryptographic proof to confirm age without revealing identity. Whether it chooses to roll that out broadly may depend as much on politics as on engineering. [ Age verification won't stop children accessing porn online Opens in new window ] Underpinning all of this is a fast-growing commercial ecosystem. Third-party age-verification providers – some specialising in facial analysis, others in document scans, others in reusable 'digital ID' credentials – have attracted billions of dollars in investment over the past five years. Investors are betting that regulatory momentum is irresistible: if one country mandates verification, others will follow, and platforms will prefer to buy in expertise rather than build their own. The sums involved show that industry insiders expect this to become a routine part of online life. But the fact remains that nobody wants to show their passport to a porn site, however encrypted the process. The most thoughtful proposals try to separate the question 'are you over 18?' from 'who are you?', using privacy-preserving techniques such as zero-knowledge proofs, third-party attestations and cryptographic tokens. In principle, these approaches can give a binary answer without leaking personal details. In practice, systems are built under time and budget pressure by companies with varying incentives, and data that 'shouldn't' be retained sometimes is, simply because it is convenient. If all this is going to work, a few principles will need to hold. Data should be minimised and retained for as close to zero time as possible. Verification services should be independent of the content platforms they serve. Adults should have a choice among privacy-preserving methods, and teenagers should not be pushed into darker corners of the internet by clumsy design. And there should be real accountability – audits, penalties and transparency, when things go wrong. Age checks will not, by themselves, fix the internet for children. They can make some harms less accessible, but they can also create new risks if treated as a magic key. The question now is not whether the age checkers are coming – they are – but whether they will be established on terms set in the interests of users or of companies which, despite their protestations, don't give a damn about children's welfare.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store