logo
Post-DEI, who will be the next Americans to walk on the moon?

Post-DEI, who will be the next Americans to walk on the moon?

The Hill30-03-2025

President Trump's campaign to excise Diversity Equity and Inclusion from the federal government has had some controversial effects on NASA messaging. According to Ars Technica, language referring to the 'first woman and the first person of color' to walk on the moon has been removed from the Artemis program website.
The idea that the first moonwalker since Apollo 17 would not necessarily be a white male began during the first Trump administration, when then NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine referred to the next moonwalkers as 'the first woman and the next man' to accomplish this feat. The Biden administration quietly changed the phrase to 'the first woman and the first person of color' to the mission statement.
The statement in advance that the next American moonwalkers would include others besides white men was rooted in the perceived necessity to impose diversity among NASA's space explorers. America's space agency is a political organization. The old adage is that rockets fly as much on funding as they do on rocket fuel. Funding is generated by political support.
The announcement that one of the next moonwalkers would be a woman paid dividends during an August 2019 conference that took place at NASA Ames. Then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) addressed Bridenstine when she said, 'As far as having a woman step foot on the moon, our hopes are riding on you.'
Pelosi is as left wing a politician as exists in the U.S. She would ordinarily not be expected to support any program proposed by Trump, a man she loathes and despises on a personal level. But that a woman was slated to be one of the next moonwalkers won her over.
The Biden administration's addition of 'a person of color' to the anticipated next moonwalkers was, no doubt, motivated by DEI ideology. But the decision would also address a problem that bedeviled the Apollo program, the last time Americans landed on the moon.
The Apollo 11 mission was one of the most significant technological and inspirational feats in history. Mostly forgotten, though, the launch of the first human expedition to the moon was the setting of a protest march led by a civil rights leader named Rev. Ralph Abernathy, asserting that the Apollo program was being conducted at the expense of the African American community.
Around the same time, the Black poet Gil Scott-Heron composed an anti-Apollo protest spoken word song entitled 'Whitey on the Moon.'
'A rat done bit my sister Nell
(with Whitey on the moon)
Her face and arms began to swell.
(and Whitey's on the moon)'
The inclusion of a 'person of color' among the next moonwalkers is intended to shut down such complaints. Representation can work wonders for garnering political support for the return to the moon.
So, why is the Trump administration scrubbing DEI from the federal government, which has resulted in removing 'the first woman and first person of color' from the Artemis mission statement? According to the White House, 'The Biden Administration forced illegal and immoral discrimination programs, going by the name 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' (DEI), into virtually all aspects of the Federal Government.'
Therefore, the Trump administration will implement the 'termination of all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities in the federal government.'
The new policy does not mean that the next moonwalkers are now going to be all white males. NASA has balanced both diversity and merit in its astronaut corps since the late 1970s, when it chose an astronaut class that included women such as Sally Ride and Judith Resnick and African Americans such as Guion Buford and Ron McNair.
More recently, NASA chose a group of 18 astronauts called the Artemis Group slated for future moon missions. The group includes Christina Koch and Victor Glover, an African American, who have been chosen for the Artemis II circumlunar mission to take place in 2026. All of the Artemis Group are well trained, many with spaceflight experience.
Just by the law of averages, the next moonwalkers of Artemis III will be a diverse crew. And, according to Space.com, a NASA spokesperson stated, enigmatically, 'it is important to note that the change in language does not indicate a change in crew assignments.'
Thus, the crew of Artemis III will probably not only reflect the diversity of America but also be as qualified to walk on the moon as were Armstrong and Aldrin, all those decades ago.
Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers
Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers

Miami Herald

time5 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers

Last week, a social media post from Elon Musk caused many people to stop what they were doing and look down at their phones. Even for the Tesla (TSLA) CEO, known for his controversial and bold opinions, what they saw seemed surprising. Musk had previously announced plans to cease his political spending. But only a few days later, he accused Trump of having direct ties to notorious criminal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged that without his help, the Republican president would not have won last year's election. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Since then, Tesla has been in the spotlight, as the dispute between two of the world's most powerful men continues. While TSLA stock initially plunged on news of the argument, it has since regained some of its momentum. Even as shares slowly trend upward, though, experts speculate that short sellers may regard the Musk-Trump fallout as an opportunity to bet against the stock. Over the past few months, Musk's behavior has sparked a global backlash against Tesla's brand, causing sales to fall across the U.S. and Europe. This clear indication of consumer sentiment toward him has caused some financial experts, including Tesla shareholder and fund manager Ross Gerber, to call for him to step down. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward When Musk announced that he would be stepping back from his role with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), TSLA stock surged, and some investors speculated that the company's troubles were over. But now his falling out with Trump has generated further uncertainty. When a prominent company starts showing signs of weakness or instability, short sellers are likely to start closing in. So far, Tesla's recent declines have been highly profitable for those willing to bet against it. The Wall Street Journal reports that as TSLA stock plunged last week, short sellers pocketed up to $4 billion, noting: Betting against an industry-leading company like Tesla will always carry some risk, regardless of how bleak its prospects may appear. But experts see a case for shorting TSLA stock, provided investors understand its volatile nature, which includes surging unexpectedly. "I think Musk dragged Tesla into a political spectacle," Galileo FX CEO David Materazzi tells TheStreet. "That creates perceived instability. Short sellers don't need real damage, just the illusion of it. Volatility invites them in. When the CEO becomes the story, the stock turns into a target." Financial education platform First Information's CEO Vince Stanzione holds a short position in TSLA. He says his reasons are "business not personal," however, citing the company's high valuation and questionable market share over the feud between Musk and Trump. More Tesla News: The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsAnalyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price targetElon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment "The P/E ratio is over 100 and growth the last few years has been near zero," he says of Tesla. "The bulls will say you're paying for the future and Elon Musk's brilliance, and I am not disputing that Tesla could have some future hits in the pipeline, but Elon Must is very good at promising "jam tomorrow" which never seems to materialize, or if and when it does, it's not the flavour he promised." Stanzione also raises a concern regarding Tesla's foray into robotics, something on which Musk has hinged a lot of the company's prospects. This part of Tesla's business just became more complicated due to the abrupt departure of one of its leaders. Related: Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 "Unless robotaxis start showing up en masse by the end of this year, then investors will keep selling," states Stanzione. "I am very bullish on robotics. It's something I have been investing in for over a decade, especially in medical and military uses, however, Tesla is not the only game in town." He names rivals such as Hyundai Motor Group and Boston Dynamics, both of which are making notable advances in the robotics field that could threaten Tesla's progress. Chief Analyst Dan Buckley also highlights the potential valuation problem, stating "Tesla short sellers may see their edge in the long-term mismatch between its ~$1 trillion valuation and the current reality of its business – i.e., nearly all auto-based revenue – and the uncertain viability of its highly speculative emerging tech bets." That said, Buckley advises investors considering a Tesla short to "treat political feuds as a volatility amplifier rather than a directional signal" and highlights the importance of caution when betting against such an unpredictable stock. Related: Billionaire fund manager, skeptical of AI, backs shocking stock The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests
'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests

USA Today

time9 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests

'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests Show Caption Hide Caption Demonstrations critical of ICE near Twentynine Palms Marine base The protesters gathered along Highway 64 along the route between the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms and Los Angeles. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is not holding back as top Republican officials criticize his handling of the increasingly hostile protests over President Donald Trump's immigration policies. In addition to his ongoing feud with Trump, who suggested the Democrat be arrested, Newsom has responded to sweeping criticism by Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas and other GOP officials. The tension between the Golden State and federal regulators comes after the Trump Administration deployed National Guard troops to crack down on violent protests against immigration raids in LA. Around 700 U.S. Marines and 2,000 National Guardsmen have been ordered to mobilize protestors in the area after the president already authorized the deployment of 2,000 guardsmen. The San Francisco native criticized the president's comment Monday, June 9 that "it would be a great thing" for border czar Tom Homan to arrest him. "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America," he wrote on X. "I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Newsom for most of the day fired back with all tools in his arsenal, including 800 additional police officers, a lawsuit and invectives warning Trump is acting like a 'dictator.' 'Los Angeles: don't take Trump's bait. Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' Newsom said in a post on X. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' White House Communications director Stephen Cheung took to social media to accuse Newsom of being "the biggest cuck in American politics," a centuries-old insult that the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines in a few different ways, none of them flattering. Cheung accused Newsom of allowing "domestic terrorists to desecrate and defile communities across CA." Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the Marines are being sent "due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty... are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order." "We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers - even if Gavin Newsom will not," Hegseth said. The post was viewed more than 3 million times within four hours. Trump and Newsom have often clashed but the showdown over Los Angeles marks a new low in their heated relationship. In a lawsuit, Newsom says the Trump administration is violating California's sovereignty. 'One of the cornerstones of our Nation and our democracy is that our people are governed by civil, not military, rule,' the lawsuit says. Trump 'used a protest that local authorities had under control to make another unprecedented power grab." Newsom used the official governor of California website to skewer the president over sending federal troops to the state without the governor's consent, saying he would send 800 state and police officers "to clean up President Trump's mess." Here's a breakdown of who Newsom has clashed with on social media. Vice President Vance urged the California governor control the chaos that escalated in the state himself before blaming Trump or the White House's action. "Do your job. That's all we're asking," Vance wrote. Less than two hours later Newsom replied "Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California." Vance later responded to a video shared by Homeland Security's official X account of a masked demonstrator holding a Mexico flag while standing on top of a graffitied vehicle as burning cars line the street. "This administration will not be intimidated by lawlessness," he wrote. "We will stand by the FBI agents tracking down violent criminals, by the guardsmen, local police, and Marines restoring order, and by the ICE agents enforcing our immigration laws. President Trump will not back down." Tom Cotton Senator Cotton blamed the Democratic party for violence that escalated in LA Sunday. "They demand open borders, or they will riot. And Dem politicians like Newsom will back them," the U.S. Senator from Arkansas wrote on X. "It won't work. We must never tolerate this lawlessness." Newsom replied on X writing: "The only one supporting lawlessness is you and every one of Trump's minions who are allowing him to illegally militarize our city and incite violence." Cotton replied with a photo of the demonstrator holding the Mexico flag writing "What kind of governor blames police officers and the National Guard for 'inciting' this violence? Your policies created this mess. And California deserves a lot better." Jim Jordan Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio indirectly addressed LA protestors waving flags for Mexico or other countries writing: "We fly the American flag in America. Newsom later quoted the X post with pictures rioters from the Jan. 6 insurrection storming the US Capitol in 2021 holding American flags. "Like this?" Newsom quipped. While Jordan did not reply to the governor's comment, he continued to address the situation in LA writing "President Trump is deporting CRIMINAL illegal aliens. And the Left is burning down Los Angeles." "Republicans back law enforcement. Leftist rioters throw rocks at them," he later wrote. Tommy Tuberville Newsom later responded to a Florida's Voice report of U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville from Alabama echoing Trump's call to arrest the California governor. "Lock him up," Tuberville told Florida's Voice. "LA looks like a third world country — anarchists are in charge, law enforcement is being attacked, and the rule of law is nonexistent." Newsom replied to the retired college football coach citing that Alabama has three times the higher homicide rate of California. According to most recent CDC data, in 2022 Alabama had a homicide rate of 14.9 with over 700 deaths while California had a rate of 5.9% with over 2,300 deaths. "Its murder rate is ranked third in the entire country," Newsom wrote. "Stick to football, bro." Contributing: Dinah Voyles Pulver

Lefty lawmakers' war on cows is another senseless progressive beef with upstate farmers
Lefty lawmakers' war on cows is another senseless progressive beef with upstate farmers

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Lefty lawmakers' war on cows is another senseless progressive beef with upstate farmers

Progressive legislators want to dictate Upstate cow populations, because of course they know better than anyone who actually lives anywhere near a dairy farm. Is it any wonder why Upstaters hate New York City, at least the jerks we elect? Animal-rights obsessive Manhattan Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal has teamed-up with Brooklyn Democratic Socialist state Sen. Jabari Brisport to push a limit of 700 cows per farm — a move that would slam an important industry and not help the environment one whit. Advertisement The barns for younger cows and calves on Stein Farm in Le Roy, New York, outside of Rochester pictured on November 2, 2022. Annie Wermiel/NY Post The two Democrats claim that their bill protects the environment and preserves small, family-owned farms from becoming corporate 'factory farms.' Except upstate farmers face no such threat and want nothing to do with these lawmakers and the big-city condescension. Advertisement 'Placing a cap on the number of cows on a dairy farm means placing a cap on growth and success,' argues the New York Farm Bureau. Nor did Rosenthal or Brisport visit any actual farming communities before moving to 'fix' them: Their measure relies on a 2024 report from Food & Water Watch, an offshoot of Ralph Nader's lefty Public Citizen funded by a slew of progressive charities. The lefty legislators plainly also know nothing of the state Department of Environmental Conservation's work in ensuring dairy farms adhere to the nation's most stringent standards and land-management practices. Sign at North Harbor Dairy farm reading 'Make Milk Great Again,' featuring a cow designed in the style of the American flag. Spectrum News 1 Advertisement But they surely do know that countless urban 'environmentalists' are convinced that cow flatulence is a prime cause of global warming. Gov. Kathy Hochul reportedly calls the measure 'insane' and no doubt annoyed that the Rosenthal-Brisport fantasy comes as Great Lakes Cheese, Fairlife and Chobani are investing billions in upstate dairy communities. So the bill won't become law this year — but if progressives keep growing their majorities in the Legislature, anything goes: Knowing nothing never stops the progs from imposing their ideas whenever they have the power. Advertisement The result, of course, would simply be forcing consumers to get more milk from producers in Midwest states without such nutty laws — continuing the long hollowing-out of Upstate. Hmm: That population loss would further boost progressives' power in the Legislature; they'll be running everything by the time they completely destroy the entire state.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store