Leftover missile money? US Air Force spends ICBM funds to revamp Qatar's gift jet to Trump
How much will Trump's temporary Air Force One cost?
Live Events
When will Trump's gift jet be ready for use?
Why is this plane gift from Qatar so controversial?
Foreign gift laws: Accepting a multimillion-dollar gift from a foreign government may violate the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Accepting a multimillion-dollar gift from a foreign government may violate the of the U.S. Constitution. Congressional oversight: Several lawmakers argue that the administration sidestepped Congressional approval and transparency requirements.
What are the national security concerns?
Advanced military communication systems
Missile defense countermeasures
Shielded avionics and cybersecurity
Frequent security sweeps to ensure no espionage vulnerabilities exist
How does this impact the Sentinel missile program?
Is the Qatar-donated jet really ready to serve as Air Force One?
How much would it really cost to convert the Qatari jet into Air Force One?
Can the Qatari 747 be made secure enough for the president?
What features would this plane lack compared to the VC-25B?
Will this quick fix delay the actual Air Force One even more?
FAQs:
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
U.S. Air Force is redirecting leftover funds from its nuclear missile program to retrofit a luxury jet—originally gifted by Qatar—for President Donald Trump. The move is stirring up a whirlwind of political, ethical, and budgetary controversy.The Air Force confirmed it's repurposing surplus funds from the Sentinel ICBM modernization program—formerly the LGM‑35A—to begin modifying a Boeing 747‑8 jet gifted by Qatar to President Trump. The funds, labeled as "excess to need," were left over from fiscal year 2024, according to Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink.He emphasized that the reallocation doesjeopardize the Sentinel program, which remains "fully funded" and on track to replace the aging Minuteman III missile system.Retrofitting the Qatar-gifted 747 is expected to cost approximately, according to official Air Force estimates. However, critics—including members of Congress—warn that the actual cost could balloon to nearlyonce communication systems, defense tech, and presidential security upgrades are factored in.For context, this temporary aircraft will serve as an interimuntil the much-delayedis ready—now expected in 2027 or later.The overhaul is projected to take just under a year, positioning the aircraft for use starting in. If the timeline holds, President Trump could use it for roughlybefore the new VC-25Bs enter service. After that, the plane is expected to be transferred to the, adding another layer to the ongoing debate over its necessity.The aircraft was originally gifted by the Qatari royal family in what critics call an unprecedented gesture toward a sitting U.S. president. Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, have raised seriousSen. Chris Murphy labeled the decision "one of the bigger wastes of taxpayer money in recent memory," pointing to the aircraft's limited projected use.Experts say retrofitting the Qatar jet to matchis no small feat. It involves:Critics argue the process is risky and expensive—especially when the VC-25Bs are already in the pipeline.Despite the optics, the Air Force insists the Sentinel ICBM program won't suffer. The funds being redirected were part of an overestimated allocation in FY2024 and won't delay missile upgrades or modernization efforts.Still, critics question whether those funds should have been returned to the federal budget or used for more pressing defense priorities.The Boeing 747-8 offered by Qatar is luxurious, no doubt. But experts say luxury isn't what defines Air Force One. Richard Aboulafia, managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory and a renowned defense aviation expert, warns this move misunderstands the aircraft's purpose.'If it's just about having a flying palace, this might work,' Aboulafia said. 'But Air Force One is a flying command center, built for worst-case scenarios, including nuclear war. This plane is not designed for that.'The existing VC-25B aircraft, originally planned for delivery in 2024, are still years from being completed. Now, officials are looking into the possibility of modifying the Qatari 747 in a much shorter timeframe—but experts warn it's not that simple.Though the aircraft itself may be a donation, converting it into a full Air Force One could end up costing taxpayers 'billions and billions,' according to Aboulafia.Upgrading a jet to meet presidential standards means far more than adding a few secure phones. The aircraft must support encrypted global communications, aerial refueling, defense systems, hardened electrical systems, a medical bay, and total information security—capabilities that are built into the VC-25B aircraft, but completely missing from the donated plane.L3Harris, the defense firm selected to begin converting the jet in Texas, is reportedly working to finish the conversion by the end of this year. But the timeline has raised eyebrows across the defense community.Security experts are extremely wary about the origins of the aircraft. Coming from Qatar's royal family, the plane would need to be completely stripped down and thoroughly inspected for any hidden surveillance devices or vulnerabilities.Aboulafia stressed, 'It would present a major security concern.' The aircraft would likely undergo deep forensic examination, disassembly, and re-engineering to meet U.S. presidential standards—processes that could take years.Air Force One is often referred to as the most secure flying communications and command platform in the world. Any vulnerabilities could have grave consequences in times of crisis.The Qatari jet, though a Boeing 747-8 like the VC-25B, lacks critical features. For instance, while aerial refueling was scrapped from the VC-25B for cost reasons, it would likely also be missing from the Qatar plane—limiting the president's ability to stay airborne in emergencies.Doug Birkey, executive director of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, explained how advanced Air Force One's communication capabilities are. 'It functions as a command and control center under some of the most trying conditions imaginable,' he said. 'Even day-to-day, that thing is hyper-connected.'This level of infrastructure is the result of years of engineering and classified work, which cannot be rushed or duplicated easily.The original VC-25B aircraft were supposed to be delivered in 2024. Due to the pandemic, supply chain issues, and internal setbacks at Boeing, that date has already been pushed to 2029. However, recent reports say the Pentagon may revise requirements to potentially speed up delivery to 2027.President Trump, frustrated by the repeated delays, has previously criticized Boeing for its slow pace and cost overruns. That's partly why the idea of an interim aircraft became appealing. But aviation analysts warn that this "shortcut" may only create further delays and deeper complications.Starting over with a second 747-8 might require the same, if not more, time and investment as finishing the VC-25B aircraft already under construction.While the Qatar-donated Boeing 747-8 may seem like a cost-saving gift on the surface, experts say the risks of converting it into a new Air Force One far outweigh the perceived benefits. From massive upgrade costs to deep security concerns and strategic capability gaps, the jet may turn out to be more of a burden than a blessing.Air Force officials have not confirmed how the plane will be handled, and both Boeing and L3Harris have declined to comment. For now, all eyes are on the Trump administration's next move—and whether America's next Air Force One will truly be fit for the job.It may cost billions and pose major security risks.Experts say it could take several years, possibly into the 2030s.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Zelenskiy, flanked by Europe, heads to Washington as Trump presses for Russia deal
Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders will meet Donald Trump in Washington. They will discuss a peace deal. This meeting happens amid concerns about Trump's potential pressure on Kyiv. European leaders aim to support Zelenskiy during this crucial time. They want to prevent a repeat of past tensions. Trump will meet Zelenskiy and then the European leaders. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Russian peace proposal Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders will meet Donald Trump in Washington on Monday to map out a peace deal amid fears the U.S. president could try to pressure Kyiv into accepting a settlement favourable to leaders of Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Finland, the European Union and NATO hope to shore up Zelenskiy at a crucial diplomatic moment in the war and prevent any repetition of the bad-tempered Oval Office encounter between Trump and Ukraine's leader in will meet first with Zelenskiy at 1:15 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (1715 GMT) in the Oval Office and then with all the European leaders together in the White House's East Room at 3 p.m. EDT (1900 GMT), the White House rolling out the red carpet for Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, Trump said an agreement should be struck to end the 42-month-long war which has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions."President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," Trump said on his Truth Social platform, using an alternate transliteration of the Ukrainian leader's Zelenskiy has already all but rejected the outline of Putin's proposals at that meeting, including for Ukraine to give up the rest of its eastern Donetsk region, of which it currently controls a quarter."We need real negotiations, which means we can start where the front line is now," the Ukrainian leader said in Brussels on Sunday, adding that his country's constitution made it impossible for him to give away concerning for him is the fact that Trump, who previously favoured Kyiv's proposal for an immediate ceasefire to conduct deeper peace talks, reversed course after the summit and indicated support for Russia's favoured approach of negotiating a comprehensive deal while fighting rumbles on."I am grateful to the President of the United States for the invitation. We all equally want to end this war swiftly and reliably," Zelenskiy said on the Telegram messaging app after arriving in Washington late on Sunday. "Russia must end this war - the war it started. And I hope that our shared strength with America and with our European friends will compel Russia to real peace."The outline of Putin's proposals, reported by Reuters earlier, appears impossible for Zelenskiy to accept. Ukrainian forces are deeply dug into the Donetsk region, whose towns and hills serve as a crucial defensive zone to stymie Russian part of any peace deal, Kyiv wants security guarantees sufficient to deter Russia, which took Ukraine's Crimean peninsula in 2014 and launched a full invasion in 2022, from attacking that they would be shut out of the conversation after a summit to which they were not invited, European leaders held a call with Zelenskiy on Sunday to align on a common strategy for the meeting with Trump on presence of key European allies to back Zelenskiy may alleviate painful memories of Zelenskiy's last Oval Office visit."It's important for the Europeans to be there: (Trump) respects them, he behaves differently in their presence," Oleksandr Merezhko, a Ukrainian lawmaker from Zelenskiy's ruling party, told Reuters.U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to CBS, dismissed the idea that the European leaders were coming to Washington to protect Zelenskiy."They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskiy from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans," he said. "We invited them to come."Relations between Kyiv and Washington, once extremely close, have been rocky since Trump took office in Ukraine's pressing need for U.S. weapons and intelligence sharing, some of which have no viable alternative, has forced Zelenskiy and his allies on the continent to appease Trump, even when his statements appear contradictory to their the battlefield Russia has been slowly grinding forward, pressing home its advantages in men and firepower. Putin says he is ready to continue fighting until his military objectives are hopes that the changing technological nature of the war and its ability to inflict massive casualties on Moscow will allow it to hold out, supported by European financial and military aid even if relations with Washington collapse.
News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
Zelenksyy wants to end war quickly and reliably as he arrives in Washington
Washington, DC [US] August 18 (ANI): Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy who on Monday arrived in the US capital ahead of his high-stakes meeting with President Donald Trump shared a 'strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably", stressing that peace with Russia must be 'lasting". 'I have already arrived in Washington, tomorrow I am meeting with President Trump. Tomorrow we are also speaking with European leaders. We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably. And peace must be lasting. Not like it was years ago, when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part of our East–part of Donbas–and Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack," Zelenskyy posted on X.
News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
Test For Trump, Gamble For Zelenskyy, Stakes For Europe: Why Washington Could Outweigh Alaska
After an inconclusive summit in Alaska, US President Donald Trump hosts Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House today, joined by Europe's leaders in a bid to shape Ukraine's future When US President Donald Trump hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week, the encounter was billed as a potential breakthrough in the Ukraine war. Instead, the Anchorage summit ended with no ceasefire, no sanctions relief, and no peace deal. Yet, it still delivered Putin something valuable: time. With Ukraine bracing for another difficult winter and Russia seeking battlefield gains before the weather stalls advances, the lack of an agreement gave the Kremlin space to keep pressing ahead. Now attention shifts to Washington, where Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will meet Trump at the White House. This time, he will not be alone. Several European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, will be by his side. Their presence signals that this round of talks could be far more consequential than the high-profile but inconclusive Alaska summit. Alaska Summit: A Non-Deal That Gave Putin Time The Alaska meeting was striking for its optics: the red carpet, Trump and Putin riding together in the US presidential limousine, and a joint podium appearance. But beneath the ceremony, little substance emerged. Trump appeared to avoid a hastily drawn 'land-for-peace" deal that would have been seen as capitulation to Moscow. At the same time, he dropped earlier public demands for a ceasefire, a move that unsettled Kyiv and Europe. For Putin, the outcome was manageable. No deal meant no immediate concessions, and more importantly, no interruption to his forces' slow but steady territorial gains in eastern Ukraine. According to military experts cited by the BBC, Russia has until mid-October, before weather conditions worsen, to turn costly micro-advances into more strategic holdings. Each week without a ceasefire works to Moscow's advantage. From Kyiv's perspective, the Alaska summit was not a disaster. There was no surprise backroom agreement that cut Ukraine out. But it was not a success either. It left Zelenskyy facing new pressure: Trump signalled that whether or not to accept Russian terms was 'Ukraine's decision," effectively shifting the burden onto Kyiv. Why Washington Could Prove Decisive The Washington talks are fundamentally different from Alaska because of who will be in the room. Last week was a one-on-one stage for Trump and Putin, with Ukraine and Europe watching from the sidelines. This week, Zelenskyy will be flanked by Western leaders determined to ensure that Kyiv is not excluded from negotiations about its own future. For Europe, the stakes extend beyond Ukraine's borders. The war has already reshaped the continent's security environment, driven up energy prices, and deepened NATO's role. By appearing jointly in Washington, European leaders aim to demonstrate that their unity is not negotiable and that any peace formula must be built with Ukraine, not imposed on it. Their message to Trump is two-fold: no peace deal without Ukraine's direct involvement, and any settlement must be backed by cast-iron security guarantees. This is also about Europe's relationship with Trump. Many governments in the EU are wary that his rapport with Putin could lead him to accept Russian demands. By converging on Washington, they hope to exert collective influence and anchor Trump within a transatlantic consensus. Zelenskyy's High-Risk Gamble For President Zelenskyy, the Washington meeting represents both opportunity and peril. He will arrive backed by European allies, avoiding the isolation he felt in February when he faced a hostile Oval Office encounter with Trump. Yet, the risks are immense. Ukraine's constitution forbids ceding territory, and Zelenskyy has consistently ruled out surrendering land. But with Russia holding Crimea and most of Donbas, and demanding even more, pressure to 'be pragmatic" is mounting. If Trump pushes him toward concessions, Zelenskyy risks appearing weak at home and losing legitimacy among Ukrainians who have sacrificed enormously to defend their country. At the same time, rejecting Trump outright could land him in the US President's crosshairs, potentially jeopardising vital American support. It is a delicate balancing act for a leader whose nation's survival depends on both holding territory and maintaining allies' backing. Europe's United Front In Washington What makes Washington different is the coalition Zelenskyy brings with him. Leaders like UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and NATO chief Mark Rutte are seen as figures Trump listens to and respects. Their role may be to frame Ukraine's case in terms that appeal to Trump's instincts, emphasising strength, deterrence, and strategic necessity rather than abstract principles. Macron and von der Leyen may find a colder reception. Trump has criticised Macron's push to recognise Palestinian statehood and has long viewed EU institutions with suspicion. Still, the optics of unity matter: by appearing together, European leaders blunt Putin's long-standing playbook of divide-and-rule inside the West. Their message is consistent: no deal without Kyiv at the table, and no settlement without firm, enforceable security guarantees. That is intended to box Trump into a position that acknowledges Ukraine's sovereignty while keeping the door open for creative diplomatic solutions. The Core Trade-Off: Land Vs Security Guarantees At the heart of negotiations lies a fundamental question: can Ukraine trade land for security? Putin insists that Crimea and most of Donbas are non-negotiable. Ukraine, backed by Europe, argues that international borders cannot be changed by force. According to BBC, some in the West have floated the idea of NATO-style security guarantees for Ukraine, which could deter future aggression even if some territory remains under Russian control. Kaja Kallas, the former Estonian prime minister and now the EU's foreign policy chief, told the BBC that victory for Ukraine 'does not have to be exclusively about reconquering occupied land" — it can also mean securing the country's independence over the long term. But this is a hard sell in Kyiv. Thousands have died defending those lands, and any concession risks undermining morale and public trust. Even a carefully crafted 'compromise peace" is fragile if it appears to lock in Russian gains without ironclad protections against renewed aggression. Trump's Credibility Test For Donald Trump, Washington is also a personal test. CNN noted that Trump's behaviour in Alaska, fawning over Putin without securing tangible results, fuelled concerns that he was ceding ground. If Washington repeats that pattern, doubts about his diplomatic instincts will deepen. Trump built his return to the White House on a pledge to end the Ukraine war in '24 hours." The reality of Putin's demands has already forced him to recalibrate. Washington may show whether he has truly absorbed the risks of appeasement, or whether he continues to believe personal rapport with Putin can deliver outcomes where strategy cannot. His credibility is at stake not just with Ukraine and Europe, but with American voters who expect him to defend US interests without appearing to bow to Moscow. The Long Shadow Of Putin's Patience Even if Washington produces a framework for peace, the longer-term question remains: can Putin be deterred from trying again? According to military experts cited by the BBC, a pause in fighting would only give Putin the chance to reconstitute his army, build more weapons, and potentially strike again within three to four years. This is why European leaders insist that Ukraine must be turned into what Ursula von der Leyen called a 'steel porcupine" — bristling with weapons, training, and defences that make any future invasion prohibitively costly. Security guarantees must be credible and lasting, not mere paper assurances. Why This Meeting Matters For Europe Too top videos View all Ultimately, the Washington meeting is not only about Ukraine's fate. It is about Europe's security order and the credibility of the West as a whole. For European leaders, the risk of Trump cutting a bilateral deal with Putin is existential: it would unravel decades of collective defence thinking and embolden other powers that seek to redraw borders by force. By showing up together in Washington, they hope to send Trump a message: Europe stands united with Ukraine, and any peace must reflect that unity. Whether Trump is persuaded, and whether Putin allows meaningful progress, will shape not just the war's endgame, but the continent's balance of security for years to come. About the Author Karishma Jain Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @ More Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Alaska Donald Trump - Vladimir Putin russia-ukraine conflict view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 18, 2025, 12:27 IST News explainers Test For Trump, Gamble For Zelenskyy, Stakes For Europe: Why Washington Could Outweigh Alaska Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
