If Trump recognizes Crimea, the biggest losers are Ukraine — and the US, experts say
As Ukrainian, American, and European officials meet in London to discuss a U.S. peace plan that includes recognizing Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea, experts warn that formally giving Crimea up to Russia would breach international law and potentially open the door for further global conflicts.
Other experts go further, saying the U.S. peace proposal — which also reportedly includes the de facto recognition of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory and a ban on NATO membership for Ukraine, while asking little of the Kremlin in return — amounts to the U.S. rewarding Russia for its invasion and Ukraine's capitulation.
'This isn't negotiation, this is surrender,' said Aaron Gasch Burnett, security expert and senior fellow at Democratic Strategy Initiative.
'The Russians get everything they want,' he told the Kyiv Independent, adding that 'the U.S. is essentially trying to negotiate Ukraine's surrender, and the U.S. is surrendering its own international leadership by doing it.'
Speaking to journalists on April 23, U.S. Vice President JD Vance called the plan 'very fair,' before threatening both Russia and Ukraine to say yes to the proposal or the U.S. would walk away from negotiations.
Russia illegally annexed Crimea in 2014 in the wake of the Euromaidan Revolution that was set off by then-President Viktor Yanukovych's decision to pull out of an association agreement with the EU.
In response, the U.S. and 99 other member states in the United Nations General Assembly voted on a resolution declaring the annexation illegal.
Formally recognizing Russia's illegal annexation now 'would be a clear violation of international law,' said Stefan Wolff, professor of international security at the University of Birmingham.
'It is unlikely that a majority of Ukraine's remaining allies would follow suit, but other countries more closely aligned with Russia already might,' Wolff told the Kyiv Independent.
Leaving Crimea in Russia's hands would 'open up a can of worms on all kinds of potential global conflicts,' Burnett said.
'Authoritarians will learn that all they really have to do is invade their neighbor, stick it out, and then eventually they'll be rewarded for it — that imperialism pays,' he added.
Even if a cascading effect of other invasions and annexations as a result of the U.S. formally recognizing Crimea remains to be seen, several candidates could take Russia's example like Venezuela with Guayana, Morocco with Western Sahara, Rwanda and the eastern DRC, Sudan or South Sudan and the Abyei territory, according to Wolff.
'Those countries might feel emboldened,' Wolff said. 'But it doesn't mean that they would necessarily get away with it because their neighbors, regional and global, might feel disinclined to tolerate such illegal land grabs.'
Ukraine's neighbors in Europe also have the necessary resources to oppose the U.S. proposal, according to Burnett.
'If (the U.S. recognizes Crimea as Russian), that's on Europe,' he said. 'It will become an indictment of how far Europe has fallen if it agrees to this sort of deal.'
'(They could react by) increasing their own willingness to support Ukraine with military kit, with boots on the ground in some form, or most consequentially, in my view, to finally seize the $300 billion in frozen assets and transfer them to a compensation fund for Ukraine,' Burnett added.
Read also: Europe must finally take charge of its security — starting in Ukraine
During his first term in office, U.S. President Donald Trump reaffirmed the U.S.'s opposition to Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea by adopting the Crimea Declaration.
The declaration, issued by then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, stated that, 'The United States rejects Russia's attempted annexation of Crimea and pledges to maintain this policy until Ukraine's territorial integrity is restored.'
Trump's current plan to reverse the course upheld by his own previous administration and the international community appears less of a negotiating tactic than a capitulation to Russia's demands, experts say.
'The idea that you would have both recognition of Crimea and no NATO for Ukraine on the table is ridiculous,' Burnett said.
'It may be different if the U.S. were offering (that Russia) can have Crimea, but the rest of Ukraine is coming into NATO. (At least) there would be actual negotiation happening there,' he added.
'The U.S. is not asking Russia to give up anything.'
Experts say that a peace proposal that gives up too much to Russia sacrifices its international leadership by threatening its own interests, which include a peaceful, stable Europe.
'It would also be unprecedented in the sense that Washington would be siding with Russia to an extent that even Beijing has not,' Wolff said.
'All the sticks are for Ukraine, and carrots only exclusively for Putin,' said Oleksandr Merezhko, a top MP from President Volodymyr Zelensky's party. 'It looks unfair, it looks ridiculous. As a result of this, Trump looks weak, definitely not strong, not great.'
'The only thing it really does is it signals to the world that America is keen to wash its hands off of this whole thing,' Burnett said.
There is no constitutional mechanism for the Ukrainian government to accept a breach of territorial integrity, according to lawmakers. The Constitution of Ukraine says that issues of altering the territory of Ukraine, which legally includes Crimea, are to be resolved exclusively by nationwide referendum.
Recognizing Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea is a highly unpopular decision among Ukrainians. Accepting the U.S. proposal would likely be political suicide for anyone in Ukrainian leadership.
'No Ukrainian government has a mandate to recognize Crimea as Russian.'
'Recognizing Crimea as Russian not only contradicts Ukraine's official position — that it is a clear red line — and it would never be accepted by the Ukrainian people,' said Halyna Yanchenko, a Ukrainian lawmaker from President Volodymyr Zelensky's Servant of the People Party.
'No Ukrainian government has a mandate to recognize Crimea as Russian,' she told the Kyiv Independent. 'There is simply no chance such a deal would pass a vote in Ukraine's Parliament.'
Nariman Dzhelyal, deputy chairman of the Mejlis, a representative body of indigenous Crimean Tatars who have faced persecution by Russia in Crimea, said that Crimean Tatars have always supported Ukraine's territorial integrity and European integration.
'The firm statements of our leadership about their intention to continue the struggle for the liberation of Crimea are the only thing that gives Ukrainian citizens in Crimea a sense of hope for the future,' Dzhelyal, former political prisoner who was released in an exchange in 2024 after three years in a Russian prison, told the Kyiv Independent.
Since the start of the full-scale Russian invasion, polls have shown that Ukrainians largely refuse to give up Crimea.
In March 2022, 80% of respondents in a poll by the independent group Rating said Ukraine should do everything possible to bring Crimea — and the Russian-occupied eastern Donbas — back under Ukraine's control.
Some in Ukraine have grown to accept the idea of territorial concessions in exchange for peace over the course of the full-scale invasion. But according to a nationwide poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology in 2024, no more than 32% of Ukrainians agreed to consider giving away some territories to Russia.
'Our people will not accept a frozen conflict disguised as peace. We will never recognize the occupation of Crimea,' said Yuliia Svyrydenko, Ukraine's first deputy prime minister and economy minister, on April 23.
Chris York contributed reporting to this article.
Hello, this is Natalia Yermak, the author of this piece. In our newsroom, it's "all hands on deck" in the days like this, when Ukraine's fate is decided on a global level. Your support is essential to our coverage – please consider supporting the Kyiv Independent by becoming a member. Thank you!
Read also: The 2014 annexation of Crimea — How Russia stole Ukraine's peninsula
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump warns America ‘could get involved' directly in Israel-Iran conflict
President Trump warned Sunday that the US could get directly involved in the Israel-Iran conflict if things continue to escalate. While Trump predicted that Iran and Israel will 'make a deal' to end the deadly violence that has seen the Jewish state and Islamic republic exchange countless missiles since Friday, the president said the US may find itself involved if a truce doesn't happen. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News. 3 President Trump said Sunday that the US could get directly involved in the war between Israel and Iran. via REUTERS Advertisement 3 Iran continues to launch waves of retaliatory attacks on Tel Aviv after Israel's preemptive attack on it Friday. ATEF SAFADI/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Trump suggested that his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, could serve as a mediator between Israel and Iran, both of which the Kremlin has maintained relations. 'He is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation,' Trump said, referring to Putin's ongoing war in Ukraine. 'This is something I believe is going to get resolved.' Advertisement Despite Trump's denial that the US is already involved in the Mideast conflict, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters in Tehran on Sunday that it is clear Israel has been coordinating its attacks with the 'agreement and support of the United States. 'We have received messages from the US through various channels over the past two days stating that the US had no involvement and will have no involvement in this attack,' he said. 'As I said, we don't believe the US's claim.' 3 Smoke billows over Tehran during a wave of Israeli airstrikes Sunday. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement As the attacks between Israel and Iran escalate, the US State Department said it has authorized the 'voluntary departure of family members and some non-emergency U.S. government employees' from Israel. 'US citizens who wish to depart should not delay in taking advantage of commercial transportation options,' the State Department said in a memo, adding that the embassy's shelter-in-place order remains in effect until further notice. With Post wires


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
GOP lawmakers push bill touting dads for Father's Day — and calling out crisis of 1 and 4 kids growing up without one
Two Republican reps unveiled a resolution in time for Father's Day aimed at drawing attention to the millions of kids growing up without fathers — roughly one in four US children — and underscoring the important roles that dads play in American society. Reps. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) and Burgess Owens (R-Utah) introduced the resolution in the House earlier this month and urged policymakers to back solutions that encourage fatherhood. 'I'm blessed with six children and 17 grandchildren — they are the heartbeat of everything I do,' Owens, 73, explained about the resolution. 'We know that when fathers are engaged, children thrive, succeed in school, stay out of trouble and build brighter futures. 'This Father's Day, I'm proud to reintroduce this resolution to recognize the power and purpose of fatherhood, and to send a clear message: America is stronger when families are strong, fathers are present, and parents are empowered.' The resolution, HR 487, which hasn't received a vote yet, declares that 'fatherhood is essential to the development of all children.' 3 The GOP reps are hoping the House will adopt the resolution that highlights the importance of fatherhood. Getty Images 3 Rep. Burgess Owens has six children and seventeen grandchildren. Getty Images About 18.4 million children — roughly a quarter of American kids — live without any father in the home — including a biological, step or adoptive dad, according to US Census Bureau data. Roughly 80% of single-parent households are run by single moms, one study from 2022 found. 'A father's impact is truly incalculable,' Donalds, who is running for Florida governor, said in a statement. 'It is fundamental for growth and development throughout a child's life. Fathers are providers, protectors, teachers, mentors, role models, and so much more.' 'Too many children across our country have been robbed of this lasting influence and we must do everything we can to end the tragic cycle of fatherlessness in America. I'm proud to partner with Congressman Owens to express the importance of this timeless institution.' The resolution is also being championed by former Minnesota Vikings and University of Minnesota football player Jack Brewer, whose eponymous foundation has worked to combat the fatherhood crisis in the US. Last week, the Jack Brewer Foundation celebrated the grand opening of its National Fatherhood Center in Washington, DC. 'We should be embarrassed as the most fatherless nation in the world and declare war on this crisis in America,' Brewer said. 3 Jack Brewer's eponymous foundation opened its National Fatherhood Center in Washington, D.C. last week. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'Too many vulnerable children and families have been devastated, and we must address all policies that contribute to dismantling homes, ensuring that both a mother and a father are present to support their children.' The resolution also draws attention to the impact of fatherlessness in minority communities and pushes for solutions such as workforce reentry initiatives for incarcerated parents, mentorship programs, and tax incentives for parents. The measure also hails the First Step Act, opportunity zones and historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUS) for helping to address fatherlessness in minority communities. 'Fatherlessness and the lack of important role models in the lives of children today are a root cause of the violence and unrest we are witnessing in our Nation,' the resolution warned.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
LA rioters join the Democratic pantheon of honored haters and criminals
The entire career of race-baiter Al Sharpton was founded on falsehoods about the Tawana Brawley scam. Nearly everything the left told us about the Trayvon Martin fight was false. The 'hands up, don't shoot' Ferguson fable and the Covington Kids myth were quickly exposed. Advertisement The Duke Lacrosse and Jussie Smollett melodramas were laughable. Russian 'collusion,' 'laptop' disinformation, and Joe Biden 'fit as a fiddle' gaslighting were utter lies. But more recently, the hard left has lost its mind championing a host of violent, unsavory characters. Advertisement The illegal alien and El Salvadorian national, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, was portrayed as a victim of unfair deportation in the left's larger, losing war for open borders. Abrego Garcia became a 'Maryland Man': a supposed poor victim of Trump overreach. He was constructed as a family man engaged in construction to feed his family, who somehow forgot to become 'documented' and was deported. In truth, Garcia is now facing felony indictments for human trafficking. Advertisement He was a likely MS-13 gang member, a violent and bullying woman-beater, and rarely employed gainfully in construction. Luigi Mangione was a rich, spoiled kid who dabbled in Jacobin politics. Posing as a revolutionary, Mangione ambushed Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare. He murdered him in cold blood near a New York hotel. Instantly, some on the left embraced Mangione as a revolutionary hero who delivered justice to a supposedly greedy corporate capitalist. Advertisement Mohammed Sabry Soliman, like Garcia, was a violent illegal alien. He bragged about his hatred of Jews in general and Israel in particular. Soliman made some Molotov cocktails and tried to incinerate Jewish marchers advocating on behalf of Israeli hostages still held by Hamas. Soliman's wife and five children, to whom Soliman filmed a video explaining his dedication to violent jihad, were also illegal aliens. Soliman may well have preferred to burn Jews to remind us of the fires of the Holocaust ovens. In the mind of the mainstream liberal media, the Soliman family was cruelly detained by the evil Trump administration that was considering returning the illegal aliens to their Middle East homes. But during the Los Angeles riots, the left went completely crazy as the entire Democrat Party and California state officials sided with violent protesters and illegal aliens. The open-border rioters soon got the message that left-wing California officials were on their side. So throngs began burning cars. Protesters spat on law enforcement and pelted them with rocks, firecrackers and concrete blocks. Advertisement Stores were looted. Critical freeways were swarmed and shut down. And for what? To protest the legal efforts of ICE to serve deportation warrants to a few hundred of some 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens who illegally swarmed into the United States during the Biden administration's four-year destruction of immigration law. California Gov. Gavin Newsom damned the federal immigration efforts as 'chaotic' and 'reckless' and seemed obsessed only with Trump. Advertisement Then Newsom dared ICE to arrest him. Like some antebellum, neo-Confederate states' rights activist, Newsom threatened to withhold California's federal income taxes from the federal government — a possible felony. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass — recently infamous for junketing in Ghana while Pacific Palisades burned down — warned ICE, 'We will not stand for this.' What did her threat mean? Did she intend to use force to support the street thugs against her fellow American officers? Advertisement California Democrat Rep. Norma Torres screamed at overwhelmed ICE agents seeking to issue arrest warrants with the obscene threat, 'Get the f*** out of LA!' As the mob violence increased and public outrage grew, a desperate and now embarrassed Newsom could only double down on his obsessions with Trump. What has caused Newsom's Trump derangement? Is it because Trump called out the National Guard and Marines to aid an overwhelmed Los Angeles Police Department and stop the violence that left-wing officials and the media had appeased? Advertisement In sum, is the left once again trying to commit political suicide? Polls showed overwhelming public support for deporting those who illegally entered and reside in the US, especially the nearly half a million believed criminals. Trump's own most supportive demographic in recent polls has been Hispanics. Like all Americans, they are appalled by violent thugs and illegal aliens waving Mexican flags who have no wish to return to Mexico — yet burn American flags as they demand illegally to stay. The more the incoherent left claimed the protests were 'peaceful' and damned the Trump administration for sending them help, the more the violence continued. And the more the public was relieved that Trump was trying to stop the riots. Democrats currently lack sane and effective leaders. But that is no excuse to swoon over creepy gang-bangers, spoiled-brat assassins, antisemitic burners of Jews, and illegal aliens breaking the law and damning America — while waving Mexican flags. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.