Cory Booker Nears Senate Record—Passing 19 Hours—For Speech Blasting Trump
In this image provided by Senate Television, Sen, Cory Booker, D-N.J. speaks on the Senate floor, ... More Tuesday morning, April 1, 2025. (Senate Television via AP)
Booker said on social media he aimed 'to lift the voices of Americans who are being harmed and not being heard in this moment of crisis.'
His speech—which reportedly stands at the sixth-longest in Senate history—Booker criticized the Trump administration for 'putting profits over people,' 'trying to gut Medicaid and Medicare,' threatening changes to social security, dismantling the Education Department, accidentally deporting a Maryland resident and more.
Booker has yielded to questions from other Democrats to get a break from speaking, but has not given up the floor and remained standing to comply with Senate rules, the Associated Press reported.
Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.
'I rise with the intention of getting in some good trouble'—a reference to the expression used by civil rights leader and politician Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga.—'I rise with the intention of disrupting the normal business of the United States Senate for as long as I am physically able,' Booker said Monday night. 'I rise tonight because I believe sincerely that our country is in crisis.'
Technically, no. According to the Senate, filibuster is a 'loosely defined term for action designed to prolong debate and delay or prevent a vote on a bill, resolution, amendment, or other debatable question.' No legislation or nomination is actually being blocked.
Booker took the floor at 7 p.m. EDT Monday night and was still talking 19 hours later at 2 p.m. EDT.
Sen. Strom Thurmond, a lawmaker from South Carolina who was a Democrat before switching parties, holds the record for the longest speech from an individual on the Senate floor. In 1957, he spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes to protest the Civil Rights Act of 1957. There have been longer speeches and all-night sessions throughout the Senate's history, but many have included multiple lawmakers.
Booker was first elected as a senator in 2013 as part of a special election, and prior to that he served as mayor of Newark, New Jersey. He had an unsuccessful run for president in 2020 and dropped out of the race after he failed to meet the requirements for a debate in January 2020. Booker, 55, is a former Stanford University football player, which one of his colleagues, Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., credited for his ability to hold the floor for so many hours.
52,711. That's how many people were watching Booker's livestreamed speech on YouTube as he hit the 19-hour mark at 2 p.m. EDT Tuesday. The Senator's X page showed there have been more than 374,000 views on his livestream as of 2 p.m. EDT, as well.
New Jersey Sen. Booker presses his marathon speech against Trump's agenda past 18 hours and counting (Associated Press)
Cory Booker's marathon speech ranks among the Senate's longest (Axios)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Democrats frustrated over lack of a heads-up from Hakeem Jeffries on delaying Trump's spending bill
Democrats were flustered that they didn't get a heads-up that Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries would delay President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" on Thursday with an hours-long speech on the House floor. "No one is upset Hakeem wanted to do this, but to not tell members, 'be prepared, book multiple flights, be flexible,'" a House Democrat told Axios, who was reportedly upset about the challenge of rebooking flights so close to the Fourth of July. Another House Democrat told Axios that a "heads up would have been nice." On Thursday afternoon, Jeffries beat the record for a House floor speech, speaking for eight hours and 44 minutes, starting before 4 a.m. and ending around 1:30 p.m. Jeffries went over the record previously held by former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., which was eight hours and 32 minutes. During his remarks, the minority leader read from a binder that he said had stories of people who could lose their Medicaid coverage under Trump's spending bill that were compiled from constituents of states that have Republican lawmakers. "I think it's important for the American people to process… SNAP on average provides $6 per day," Jeffries said. "At the same time, Elon Musk, his federal contracts, as we understand it, amount to $8 million per day. Mr. Speaker, if Republicans were really serious about targeting waste, fraud and abuse in the United States of America, start there – $8 million per day, start right there." Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill," which passed the House on Thursday afternoon after Jeffries yielded the floor and now awaits the president's signature, advances his border security measures and permanently extends the income tax brackets lowered by his 2017 Tax Cuts Jobs Act (TCJA).
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After House Republicans ignored her appeals, Lisa Murkowski's vote looks even worse
Three Senate Republicans balked at their party's domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act — but opponents of the far-right package needed a fourth. They thought Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska would rescue the nation from the consequences of the radical legislation, but GOP leaders offered a series of carve-outs and schemes that would help shield her home state from the effects of the party's agenda. But after Murkowski cast the deciding vote, she did something unexpected. In fact, she took two unexpected steps. First, the Alaskan trashed the reconciliation package shortly after voting for it, which was every bit as odd as it sounds. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told NBC News. The senator added, by way of social media: '[L]et's not kid ourselves. ... While we have worked to improve the present bill for Alaska, it is not good enough for the rest of our nation — and we all know it.' Second, Murkowski effectively asked the Republican-led House not to pass the bill she had just voted for. 'My sincere hope is that this is not the final product,' she wrote online. 'This bill needs more work across chambers and is not ready for the president's desk. We need to work together to get this right.' That came on the heels of related comments the GOP senator made to reporters on Capitol Hill. 'We do not have a perfect bill by any stretch of the imagination. My hope is that the House is going to look at this and recognize that we're not there yet.' Not only did House Republican leaders ignore Murkowski's appeals, they never even considered the possibility. Politico reported: House GOP holdouts who wanted a last-minute rewrite of President Donald Trump's megabill never had a chance, Majority Leader Steve Scalise said in an interview Thursday. 'For a long time, there were members that really thought there was a chance the bill was going to get opened up again to amendment,' the Louisiana Republican said as the House neared a final vote on the bill. 'It became clear from the president's meeting at the White House to further conversations later that, for all the back and forth, you know, the bill's closed, there's going to be no more amendments to the bill.' And that, of course, makes Murkowski's decision look even worse. The Alaska Republican not only had an opportunity to derail the most regressive proposal in at least a generation, she also had an opportunity to use her considerable leverage to make it better. Instead, Murkowski passed the buck, hoping the House might help clean up the mess. These misguided wishes led her to vote for a bill that, by her own admission, 'is not good enough' for the nation and 'not ready' to be signed into law. Too many GOP lawmakers somehow convinced themselves that the party's megabill had real merit and would deliver great results. Murkowski, however, knew better — and she chose to advance it anyway. History will not be kind. This article was originally published on
Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Bill Delivers Near-Term Economic Boost, Longer-Term Risks
For all the fireworks over President Trump's $3.4 trillion 'big, beautiful' tax-and-spending bill, the economic impact will be modest at first—too little for most people to notice, economists predict. Starting this year, more money will be spent on the military and border enforcement. Many people who earn tips, work overtime or are over 64 will pay lower taxes as soon as this year. The bill also reduces projected spending on Medicaid through provisions that will disqualify several million people from benefits starting in 2027, as well as food stamps.
