Newly launched Access to Information review is flawed, transparency advocates say
The Treasury Board Secretariat announced the government review, which takes place every five years, in a news release late Friday.
The release says officials will seek input from a broad range of Canadians, Indigenous groups, experts and other interested people in the coming weeks and months.
For a $5 fee, people can use the access law to ask for federal documents — anything from internal emails to policy memos — but the law is widely seen as out of date and poorly administered.
Several concerned groups and individuals recently said the review should be overseen by an independent panel — not the government — to avoid a conflict of interest.
University of Ottawa professor Matt Malone, who was among those advocating an independent review, says the exercise is flawed from the start and will waste precious government resources.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 23, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
3 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
'Nothing to fear' from Sunshine Coast land deal: NDP
VICTORIA — When the New Democrats concluded a secret agreement with the Sunshine Coast shíshálh Nation a year ago, they included commitments regarding private land that remain secret to this day. The 44-page agreement was withheld from the public until after the 2024 provincial election and not released until January of this year. The province provided the shíshálh with $104 million over five years, the transfer of six square kilometres of Crown land, and committed to expedite exclusive decision-making and Aboriginal title for the nation. But even then, significant passages were redacted, including two full-page schedules detailing tracts of private land that were also targeted for acquisition and/or protection. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Other blanked out passages left one guessing as to what exactly was up. For instance: 'The province recognizes that the (blank) lands are invaluable to the shíshálh Nation and is committed to work collaboratively with shíshálh Nation to seek to ensure the protection of the (blank) lands for future generations.' Also: 'The province has (blank) provided funding directly to shíshálh Nation to allow the shíshálh Nation to attempt to acquire the (blank) lands on a willing-seller, willing-buyer basis and to cover due diligence and transaction costs and expenses, including fees and taxes.' The latter commitment was set out in a separate Lands and Funding Agreement, which was also kept confidential. The province further agreed to 'make reasonable efforts to purchase the (blank) lands within 18 months' of the signing of the agreement on Aug. 16, 2024, meaning by February of next year. The secrecy combined with the sense of urgency generated a lot of questions when the government organized two online information sessions about the agreement in March of this year, months after the deal was struck behind closed doors. Sunshine Coast residents wanted to know what the government was hiding behind the redactions. What private land and how much private land was included? What would it cost to acquire those lands and transfer them to the Indigenous nation? What would then be the status of the formerly private land? Would the public still have access? The ministry of water, land and resource stewardship responded to the more than 300 questions posed by the public with written assurances and explanations, some more persuasive than others. Most of the redacted passages 'relate to commitments made by the province to support shíshálh Nation in protecting certain privately owned land parcels,' said the statement from the ministry. 'These lands hold significant cultural importance for shíshálh Nation.' 'Information on the current property owner or owners is being kept confidential, so as not to divulge the location of the lands being discussed, given that they are extremely sensitive cultural sites (and) to safeguard these lands from any potential disturbance or desecration.' The ministry said it was also standard practice 'to not release information about private property owners during sales to protect their interests as well.' I'm guessing that protection would only apply if the private land owners had already been approached with offers to purchase. There was no word from the ministry on what those purchases would add to the total cost of the agreement. 'We do not have an estimate of the potential cost to protect some of these parcels yet.' The province also tried to assure Sunshine Coast residents that owners of private land had nothing to fear from the move to expedite recognition of Aboriginal title within the traditional territory of the shíshálh Nation. 'The recognition of Aboriginal title by B.C. will respect and protect private lands — private landowners will have the same rights, privileges, and obligations that they do now,' the statement read in part. 'The province does not include fee-simple lands in any land return agreement except on a willing-buyer, willing-seller basis.' Negotiations on recognizing Aboriginal title had not yet begun, so 'it is too early to determine the scope of a potential shíshálh Aboriginal title agreement (and) it is not possible to answer detailed questions about what will be in such an agreement.' As for the secrecy that had characterized the negotiations up to this year, the New Democrats now promised that 'negotiation of an Aboriginal title agreement will require engagement with local government, interest holders, overlapping First Nations, and the public.' Believe it when you see it, as they must be saying on the Sunshine Coast. The NDP's assurances on private property can be seen in a different light in the wake of the recent B.C. Supreme Court decision that questioned what remains of private property title once Aboriginal title has been recognized. Justice Barbara Young, thinking out loud, suggested that in such cases 'the hardship will be borne by non-Indigenous Canadians.' Her findings may make it difficult to sell private land in the part of Richmond where she recognized Aboriginal title. On the Sunshine Coast, the New Democrats maintain that the only transfers of private land will take place on a willing-buyer, willing-seller basis. But if the province fails to overturn Justice Young on appeal, the unwilling-to-sell owners of private property could someday find their land captured by a court-finding of Aboriginal title. vpalmer@
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
B.C. names facilitator to help Okanagan Falls become municipality, name to be decided
OKANAGAN FALLS – British Columbia's government has appointed a facilitator to help create the province's first new municipality in 15 years, after residents of Okanagan Falls in the southern Interior voted to incorporate five months ago. The Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs says in a statement that the facilitator will help finalize the 'letters patent' which serves as the founding document of an incorporated municipality. Details that need to be worked out include the name of the community, with Chief Clarence Louie of the Osoyoos Indian Band saying in the ministry statement that the process should comply with the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Other issues to be addressed in the letters patent include the new municipality's boundaries, the size of council, and incorporation date. The ministry says it expects the letters patent to be finalized by next spring, with the first election for the new mayor and council in October 2026 when local elections take place across B.C. It says 'many different perspectives' have emerged about the community's name and other aspects of incorporation during consultation with the Osoyoos Indian Band and community representatives. The ministry says it 'recognizes discussion at the local level will continue.' Louie is quoted in Thursday's statement as saying the band is committed to working with the province and the Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen that includes Okanagan Falls. He says incorporation should be a process that is 'compliant with the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, and that addresses our priorities on the naming and boundaries of the proposed new municipality.' Campbell Watt, vice-chair of the district, says in the statement that the district was committed to working with the band and the province. Residents of Okanagan Falls, south of Penticton, B.C., voted in favour of incorporation on March 22. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 21, 2025.
Cision Canada
4 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Statement by Minister MacDonald following meeting with representatives from the Government of Saskatchewan and canola industry leaders
OTTAWA, ON, /CNW/ - The Honourable Heath MacDonald, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food issued the following statement after meeting with representatives from the Government of Saskatchewan and leaders from the Canadian canola sector: "Today, along with my colleagues the Honourable Buckley Belanger, Secretary of State (Rural Development), and the Honourable Kody Blois, Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, I had the opportunity to meet with Premier Scott Moe, Agriculture Minister Daryl Harrison, Trade and Export Development Minister Warren Kaeding and key canola industry stakeholders and exporters to discuss the challenges faced by the canola sector, including the recent preliminary anti-dumping duty imposed by China on imports of canola seed from Canada. "Earlier this month, China announced a preliminary anti-dumping duty on imports of canola seed from Canada of 75.8%, which entered into force on August 14, 2025. This was in addition to existing trade measures resulting from China's anti-discrimination investigation, including the 100% tariffs on Canadian canola oil and meal. Our hard-working producers provide world-class canola products to Canadians and international trading partners and the Government of Canada is profoundly disappointed with China's announcement. "At today's meeting, we agreed on the importance of working together to ensure fair market access for the canola industry and engaging in constructive dialogue with Chinese officials to address each other's respective trade concerns. Our discussion also touched on support options for producers, including the government's suite of business risk management (BRM) programs and how Canada is developing a comprehensive industrial strategy to help businesses develop new export opportunities in international markets. "Canola is one of our most valuable agricultural exports and an important driver of the Canadian economy. We are steadfast in our commitment to defend and diversify Canadian trade and we will stand shoulder to shoulder in our support for Canada's hard-working canola producers, workers and exporters." Quick facts Canola is Canada's second-largest acreage crop, with over 21 million acres produced annually. Canola seed production in Canada generated $12.9 billion in farm cash receipts in 2024, making it the most valuable principal field crop. China is the largest export market for Canadian canola seed, representing 67% of total canola seed exports and totaling 5.9 million tonnes in 2024, worth approximately $4 billion. Follow us on X, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn Web: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada SOURCE Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
