King's Birthday Honours Recognise Significant Contributions Of Māori
Press Release – New Zealand Government
The impressive mahi of Mori recipients this year are too numerous to mention. They have been honoured for achievements across many fields it is my privilege to recognise all of them today and to highlight just some examples, Mori Development …
Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka today recognises the significant achievements of the Māori recipients in the King's Birthday 2025 Honours List, for their dedicated mahi and outstanding contributions across various important areas.
'The impressive mahi of Māori recipients this year are too numerous to mention. They have been honoured for achievements across many fields, coming from Iwi right across New Zealand – it is my privilege to recognise all of them today and to highlight just some examples,' Mr Potaka says.
'The King's Birthday Honours recognise the commitment and the passion that the recipients have shown, along with what has come from their dedication to their work and their causes.
'Among those recognised are, Mrs Deborah (Debbie) Davis, who has done extensive work to bring so much good, including through He Iwi Kotahi Tātou Trust, the grassroots organisation transforming the community of Moerewa in Northland, along with her husband, Mr Ngahau Davis (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Manu, Kohatutaka)
'Mrs Davis (Ngāti Pāhauwera, Ngāti Kahungunu) has worked, through the Trust since 1987, to address challenges including housing, food security within the community, and youth engagement. Her and her husband's work helped to provide insulation and heating solutions to more than 12,000 Northland homes since 2008.
'They have developed food rescue programmes and have introduced cultural and sports programmes that blend physical activity with the preservation of Māori traditions. They have expanded whānau support services to offer counselling, school programmes, and drug and alcohol programmes. Over the past 15 years, they have been involved in the establishment of a rehabilitative-focused sentencing in Kaikohe, Matariki Court.
'Hon Dover Samuels is recognised for services as a Member of Parliament and his achievements and what he progressed in that time, including as Minister of Māori Affairs.
'Mr Samuels (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Kura, Ngāti Rēhia) was a Labour MP and MP for Te Tai Tokerau, working across various portfolios, including not least Māori Affairs, where his care and ability made considerable gains that continue to benefit Māori today. He also helped establish Rawini Health Hub for a rural Māori community and led the Rainbow Warrior project to sink the wreckage of the vessel and erect a memorial on Matauri Hill. He is kaumatua of several organisations.
'Mrs Elizabeth (Liz) Graham, who has dedicated more than 40 years to her community and to Māori education.
'Mrs Graham (Ngāti Kahungunu, Ngāi Toroiwahi), has contributed to her community in many ways – that includes through the education of our tamariki and to the education sector through many roles across her career, work she continues today as a teacher at Te Aute College. She helped guide her community through the Treaty Settlement process, and her knowledge of traditions, values, and customs, has helped the marae in hosting funerals, weddings, gatherings, and other events for over 20 years.
'The Honourable Sir Mark Cooper KC, High Court Judge, Court of Appeal Judge and President of the Court of Appeal, who was Chairperson of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failure caused by the Canterbury Earthquakes.
Sir Mark (Ngāti Mahanga, Waikato-Tainui) chaired 33 public hearings to deliver four reports, all of these under intense time pressure and public scrutiny. The detailed findings and recommendations of those reports helped avoid delay to the Canterbury rebuild and helped provide a resolution to the community.
Amongst some of his other work has been his leadership in resource management and local government law, and his work that helped integrate various councils into one North Shore-based Council.
I want to thank all of today's recipients, those mentioned here and all others who I trust will be celebrated by their people and their communities, and all the people who have worked with them along the way.
'Ko te amorangi ki mua, ko te hāpai ō ki muri.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Hawke's Bay iwi Ngāti Kahungunu protest sale of ancestral mountain
Members of Ngāti Kahungunu protest the sale of Kahurānaki Station which includes the mountain of the same name. Photo: Supplied/Myra Lynn Barber Members of Hawke's Bay iwi Ngāti Kahungunu have gathered on Monday at Kahurānaki Station to protest the recent sale of the station which includes the ancestral mountain of the same name. Kahurānaki Station - a 1156 hectare sheep and beef farm south of Havelock North - came up for sale earlier this year, the first time the station had been on the market for over 100 years. The iwi launched a fundraising campaign to buy it, including the 'He Maunga Ka Taea' horse trek from Māhia to the summit of Kahurānaki over 10 days, but were unsuccessful in their bid. Ngāti Kahungunu Iwi Chair and Waimārama Marae spokesperson, Bayden Barber said they didn't advertise the protest but the 'kūmara vine' did its work and about 70 whānau turned up. "From our point of view it's unacceptable that we're not the ones being negotiated with to buy back Kahurānaki Station, simple as that," he said. Barber said the station owner unexpectedly met the protest at the driveway and shared some information with the whānau who joined. It's been a month since the iwi bid was unsuccessful and the preferred purchasers had yet to engage with the iwi, he said. "We want to have an engagement, a conversation, so that they understand the importance of Kahurānaki to us. We'd love to buy it off them, we'd actually love for the settlement not to happen." Ngāti Kahungunu Chair Bayden Barber (center) at a protest against the sale of Kahurānaki Station. Photo: Supplied/Myra Lynn Barber Barber said the iwi is hopeful that the purchasers will engage in open dialogue about how the aspirations of marae and hapū can be met, but the iwi can't do anything if they don't know who they are talking to. Tamatea Pōkai Whenua Trust tendered the bid on behalf of the iwi, chair Pohatu Paku said both the trust and wider community were disappointed by the sale of the station to an undisclosed buyer. "We undertook an exhaustive due diligence process engaging with a wide range of stakeholders and conducting thorough investigations in our bid to repatriate this taonga for our people. The overwhelming support from Kahungunu whānau, marae and hapū was a powerful testament to the collective desire to see Kahurānaki returned. Initiatives like He Maunga Ka Taea for example, along with various other fundraising efforts were expressions of that shared commitment. "We are however deeply disappointed that the tender process itself did not allow for the kind of open and transparent dialogue that is essential to honouring the true significance of this whenua. The process was inherently limited, leaving little room for meaningful negotiation or the type of engagement we believe is necessary to safeguard the interests of our people." Paku hoped the preferred purchasers of Kahurānaki Station would engage with Tamatea Pōkai Whenua in good faith. "This is not just about reclaiming land, it is about restoring a deep cultural connection, and we believe there is a real opportunity to work together, honouring the mana of this maunga. By engaging with us, the preferred purchasers will not only acknowledge the ancestral significance of this whenua, but also contribute to a positive and lasting relationship, built on respect and collaboration. We would value the opportunity to share our history and outline our aspirations and expectations as a Trust and explore how we can move forward together in a way that again, honours the true significance of this whenua." He Maunga Ka Taea fundraising campaign organiser, Kelly Aroha Huata said this is not a normal land acquisition. "This is not a straight land and sale purchase. This is whakapapa. Do the right thing. Return the whenua to those who have a deep spiritual, cultural & emotional connection to the land. Come forward and let us buy Kahurānaki back." Kahurānaki Marae and Ngāti Kahungunu kaumātua Jerry Hāpuku said "my ancestor Te Hapuku's dying wish in 1878 was to be placed so that his eyes could close watching the sacred Kahurānaki mountain. To us this is not about the money, but the mana or prestige that Kahurānaki gives our people." Barber said this is the first time in a century that there has been a chance to buy back the mountain. There are 23 marae and over 50 hapū that have a direct connection to Kahurānaki and they won't give up on it, he said. "At the end of the day our final outcome, the only outcome, is for that mountain to be back in Māori hands, Māori ownership." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Iwi Chairs Launch Anti-Racism Website
Press Release – PAPARA The launch of the PAPARA website provides a much-needed, community-driven response a living toolkit to challenge racism, amplify resistance, and help hold institutions accountable. The Iwi Chairs Forum-led People's Action Plan Against Racism Aotearoa (PAPARA) Launches Timely Website to Tackle Racism Head-On From harmful policy being pushed through Parliament, to Māori artists facing public ridicule for using haka on national and international stages — racism in Aotearoa is constant, visible, and intensifying. These experiences are headline news, viral content, and a daily reality for our people. The launch of the PAPARA website provides a much-needed, community-driven response — a living toolkit to challenge racism, amplify resistance, and help hold institutions accountable. The National Iwi Chairs Forum's antiracism working group Maranga Mai will launch the website for PAPARA – the People's Action Plan Against Racism Aotearoa on Wednesday 4 June at 7:00pm with an online webinar open to the public. The launch of signals a new chapter in Aotearoa's response to racism, led by iwi and communities, after the Government abandoned its own commitments to a national action plan. PAPARA is a living, independent movement and resource hub designed to track, challenge, and respond to racism in all its forms – especially colonial and institutional racism. The website features: A public repository of resources for communities, educators and researchers Advice on staying safe during times of racial hostility Updates on the racist impacts of policy and legislation A reporting and contact tool for public input into the action plan The working group includes a rangatahi caucus to support strong youth input into the plan, and is overseen by Kahurangi Dame Naida Glavish, Rahui Papa and Pou Tikanga co-chairs Professor Margaret Mutu and Aperahama Edwards. Both Dame Naida and Rahui Papa have expressed their deep concern at the direction of the current government and the continued and urgent need for this kaupapa. 'When a government turns its back on a commitment to eliminate racism – a commitment made not only to Māori, but to the world through the United Nations – it becomes our responsibility to step forward,' said Dame Naida. 'This plan is not just about responding to racism – it's about confronting its root: colonisation, and restoring the dignity of tangata whenua and all communities impacted.' 'PAPARA is one of our many responses to political neglect,' added Rahui Papa. 'We will not allow silence to be mistaken for consent. This kaupapa will gather stories, evidence, and solutions from the ground up. It is by the people, for the people – and it will endeavor to hold power to account while educating and informing communities.' The Ministry of Justice, in partnership with the National Iwi Chairs Forum, began developing a national action plan against racism in 2022, following recommendations under the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. It was also a key response requested by the working group on the recommendations of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the 2019 Attack on Christchurch Mosques. However, in early 2024, after attempts by Minister Paul Goldsmith to diminish the plan's focus on colonial and institutional racism, the Tangata Whenua caucus to the action plan withdrew from the process, declaring the partnership untenable. From that point on, the government has failed to progress its own action plan against racism, abandoned all action on hate speech and hate crimes, and has concluded its response to the Royal Commission of Inquiry, leaving multiple recommendations unmet. These matters have become even more relevant in light of the Regulatory Standards Bill currently being advanced by the Government. The bill has raised alarm for its potential to undermine Te Tiriti o Waitangi and roll back protections against structural racism. This is just one attempt of many by this government to try and erode human rights in Aotearoa. A draft of the independent People's Action Plan Against Racism is expected to be completed by October 2025. To attend the launch webinar on 4 June at 7pm and learn more about PAPARA, register at
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
In The Spirit Of Natural Justice
Having recently resigned from my executive positions within the National Party, I write this as someone who has seen the inner workings of the organisation up close. I joined the Party in 2023, during the election year that saw strong leadership return National to power. To be transparent, I had never voted Blue before. For many years, I strongly opposed the policies of the National Party for a range of reasons—but this felt different. Under the leadership of Judith Collins, National introduced candidates in the Māori electorates. As a Māori person, this was a promising development. The inclusion of the Treaty of Waitangi within the Party's values signalled a direction I felt I could support. After a conversation over a glass of wine with a then list MP, I was on board. A month later, I had the privilege of attending the launch of the Māori electorates for National at Parliament. I witnessed more than 20 years of history in the making, and I've stood present for the official launches of both Te Tai Hauāuru and Tāmaki Makaurau inside the House. However, following a recent internal disagreement with some of the Māori members of the Party, I resigned from my executive positions—and ultimately, from the Party itself. It is off this backdrop that I now write. Recently, Te Pāti Māori members were summoned to the Privileges Committee. Exercising their democratic rights, they declined to appear. Contrary to the rhetoric from ACT, attendance is not compulsory. Members of Parliament are not obligated to appear. That crucial point has been lost in much of the commentary. The report was presented before the House for debate. I listened carefully as Minister Collins, Chair of the Committee, spoke. Initially, her delivery was measured—clear, coherent, and seemingly factual—until it wasn't. The Committee, by majority (not consensus, which diverges from the usual practice), accused Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer of using 'gun gestures,' pointing toward ACT Party members, and saying 'e noho' following a haka performed in the House. I do not dispute that the performance disrupted proceedings. It did interrupt the business of the House and halted both sides of the vote—blocking parties on both the left and right from recording their stances. But in the spirit of democracy and natural justice, a report of this magnitude should be entirely factual. It should not rely on circumstantial or interpreted evidence. Let's be clear—the haka did happen. This isn't about 'haka.' It is about process. Whether you agree with the actions taken or not, due process matters. In my view, the report contains errors. Some of the accusations are false; others are framed through subjective interpretation. Two claims in particular stand out: In my view, the report is incorrect, accusations in the report are either false or interpretations and noted by subjective language. The accusations that are either interpreted to suit a narrative or false are: 'Ms Ngarewa-Packer … simulating a firing motion, said 'e noho' (sit down) Audio/visual evidence of the word clearly spoken was ' kino,' not 'e noho,' and the gesture was described as a 'wiri' (a trembling expression) or even a point, not a gun simulation. This indicates a potential factual inaccuracy in transcription and cultural interpretation. There is no evidence that points directly to intent of a gun motion. The word 'kino' has multiple translations and the committee relied on interpretation of their own, or did not seek assurances without consulting Māori experts to validate meaning or intent. Therefore, with this understanding, this section of the report is false. 'Particularly unacceptable for Ms Ngarewa-Packer to appear to simulate firing a gun…' This is a subjective interpretation of a cultural gesture. No independent verification was cited, nor was expert Māori input accepted. Te Pāti Māori refuted this interpretation and stated it was not a firearm simulation but an expressive haka gesture. There is no one way of simulating a firearm – after asking 10 kids, 2 in 10 showed the same as Ngarewa-Packer. With an understanding of the word 'kino' it is more likely that Te Pāti Māori MP pointed towards the Act Party calling them 'kino' and unlikely to be a 'fire arm simulation'. It is under this report that the committee has proposed a level of sanction that this country has never seen. Let's be clear, the report is not accurate. You can clearly argue both sides of this – however, in the evidence of fact, can parliament really accept the recommendations with false evidence. With the facts of the report being called into question, one, in the spirit of democracy, must ask the question, is the report valid to affirm the recommendations and sanction 3 of Te Pāti Māori MPs to the high level this country has ever seen? In the presence of 'doubt' and natural justice, can such a harsh sentence be handed down? Can the current government of New Zealand, stand on moral ground in the future and hold another government to account on the validity of their decisions if they choose to impose the recommendations of this report? Or, does the government have the political courage to stand up, say the report is flawed, and accept that the stand down period has occurred and the house and can get back to business for the people of this beautiful country?
