Best Dyson fans to keep you cool this summer, tried and tested
There's something really satisfying about using a Dyson fan when the summer months roll around. They're super powerful; boast a suave bladeless design; sound whisper-quiet, so they don't stop you from sleeping; and I can't resist the way Dyson integrates its air-purifying tech into its fans.
Unlike regular fans, Dyson's bladeless models don't just chop the air up and blast it in your direction. They suck air in through the base, amplify it and then push it back out through the loop, so you aren't left feeling like you're just being buffered by harsh wind. It's a smooth, continuous stream of cool air that's really gentle.
But with so many to choose from – and some costing more than your rent – it can be hard to know which one is actually worth it, especially when they all look pretty much the same. I've tested the lot, from its all-new desk fan to its classic do-it-all bladeless models. Nearly all of them purify these days too, which is a nice bonus. Here's what I'd recommend.
How we tested
I tested each Dyson fan at home over a month-long period, during warm nights, stuffy days and the occasional sweaty heatwave. I looked at how powerful the airflow felt, how noisy (or not) each model was, and how easy it was to adjust the settings. Some of them you can control through the Dyson app, as well as with a remote.
I also paid attention to how quickly it cooled me down, how much space it took up, and whether extra air purification features were useful, or unnecessary bolt-ons.
The best Dyson fans of 2025 are:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
40 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Android 16 vs. iOS 26: The Design vs. Usability Showdown
The ongoing rivalry between Android and iOS has reached a pivotal stage with the release of Android 16 and iOS 26. These two operating systems embody distinct philosophies in design, functionality, and user experience. Both aim to deliver exceptional performance, yet they approach the balance between form and function in unique ways. This raises an important question: Which platform better aligns with your individual needs and preferences? The video below from Techmo gives us a look at the two mobile operating systems. Watch this video on YouTube. Design Philosophy: Minimalism or Personalization? Android 16 and iOS 26 reflect contrasting approaches to design. iOS 26 adheres to a minimalist philosophy, offering a clean, consistent interface that emphasizes simplicity and visual harmony. Its intuitive layout is designed to appeal to users who prioritize predictability and ease of use. This approach ensures a seamless experience, particularly for those who prefer a straightforward, no-frills design. Conversely, Android 16 champions personalization. It provides extensive customization options, allowing you to modify nearly every aspect of your device, from widgets and themes to layouts and app arrangements. This flexibility enables users to craft a unique experience tailored to their preferences. However, this level of customization comes with a trade-off: a potentially steeper learning curve, which may feel daunting for individuals less familiar with technology. Customization vs. Curation When it comes to functionality, Android 16 stands out for its unmatched customization capabilities. You can adjust app icons, fine-tune system settings, and even modify the user interface to reflect your personal style. This level of control is ideal for users who enjoy experimenting with their devices and tailoring them to their specific needs. On the other hand, iOS 26 takes a curated approach to functionality. While recent updates have introduced limited customization options, such as widgets and lock screen personalization, the platform remains focused on delivering a polished and uniform experience. This consistency ensures ease of use and reliability but limits the degree of personalization available. For users who value a streamlined and cohesive interface, iOS 26 offers an appealing solution. Performance and Optimization Both platforms excel in performance, but their strategies differ significantly. iOS 26 benefits from tight integration with Apple hardware, resulting in exceptional system optimization. This synergy enables smooth multitasking, faster app launches, and longer battery life. The close relationship between software and hardware ensures that iOS devices consistently deliver a high-quality user experience. Android 16, designed to operate across a wide range of devices, faces challenges due to hardware fragmentation. However, advancements in machine learning and adaptive performance have significantly improved its efficiency. These updates allow Android 16 to perform competitively across various devices, from budget smartphones to premium flagships. The platform's ability to adapt to diverse hardware configurations makes it a versatile choice for users with varying needs and budgets. Device Compatibility and Ecosystem Strength Device compatibility is another area where Android 16 and iOS 26 diverge. Android 16 supports a broad spectrum of devices, making it accessible to a wide audience. Whether you're using an entry-level smartphone or a high-end flagship, Android offers a solution tailored to your requirements. This inclusivity ensures that users across different price points can benefit from the platform's features. In contrast, iOS 26 is exclusive to Apple devices, creating a tightly controlled ecosystem. This exclusivity enables seamless integration between devices such as iPhones, iPads, and Macs. Features like Universal Control and AirDrop highlight the strength of Apple's ecosystem, offering a cohesive and interconnected experience for users invested in multiple Apple products. For those who value seamless device integration, iOS 26 provides a compelling advantage. Innovation vs. Refinement Both platforms continue to push the boundaries of mobile technology, but their focus areas differ. Android 16 emphasizes innovation, introducing innovative features such as advanced AI tools and expanded support for foldable devices. These advancements cater to users seeking the latest technology and experimental features, making Android 16 an attractive option for early adopters and tech enthusiasts. Meanwhile, iOS 26 prioritizes refinement over experimentation. Its updates focus on enhancing existing features, such as improved privacy controls and streamlined workflows. This approach emphasizes practicality and user-centric improvements, appealing to those who value reliability and polished functionality over novelty. For users who prefer a stable and predictable experience, iOS 26 delivers consistent performance. Choosing the Right Platform for Your Needs Deciding between Android 16 and iOS 26 ultimately depends on your priorities and preferences. If you value customization, flexibility, and a wide range of device options, Android 16 offers a compelling choice. Its ability to adapt to diverse hardware and user needs makes it an excellent option for those who enjoy personalizing their devices. On the other hand, if you prefer a cohesive ecosystem, seamless device integration, and a polished user experience, iOS 26 may be the better fit. Its focus on refinement and consistency ensures a reliable and intuitive experience, particularly for users already invested in Apple's ecosystem. Both platforms excel in their unique ways, catering to different user needs and expectations. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each operating system, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your lifestyle and technological preferences. As mobile technology continues to evolve, the balance between form and function remains a critical consideration for users worldwide. Advance your skills in Android 16 by reading more of our detailed content. Source & Image Credit: Techmo Filed Under: Android News, Apple, Apple iPhone, Mobile Phone News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
London Tech Week 2025: Spotlight on the U.K.'s AI Revolution: By Neil O'Connor
I had the opportunity to attend London Tech Week this week, and it offered a front-row seat to the rapid evolution of technology and its growing influence across every sector. AI dominated the conversation, and the three-day event made one thing clear: AI is no longer just a tech trend—it's a national priority. The Prime Minister unveiled a series of policy announcements, including a £2 billion investment programme in AI and the launch of a new AI tool to modernise the planning system. Meanwhile, the Financial Conduct Authority revealed it is using NVIDIA technology to power its Supercharged Sandbox - enabling safe, secure experimentation with AI in the financial sector. So, what does this mean for business? This is the year to move from curiosity to capability. AI must be embedded into strategy, operations, and customer experience with purpose and responsibility. Here's how organisations can start: Prioritise Data Quality: AI's power lies in its ability to process and unify vast amounts of information to generate meaningful insights. But its effectiveness depends entirely on the quality of the data it's trained on. Models need relevant, complete, and clean data to deliver reliable outcomes. This was a key theme in the panel I joined at the event—highlighting that strong data foundations are non-negotiable. Build AI Literacy Across the Business: As AI becomes more embedded in daily operations, it's essential that both employees and customers understand its capabilities. The government's £187 million 'TechFirst' programme, announced during the week, aims to boost digital and AI skills in classrooms and communities. Businesses must complement this by offering internal training, external learning opportunities, and hands-on experience to build confidence and competence across teams. Encourage Innovation—Responsibly: Creating space for experimentation is vital to unlocking AI's potential. When employees are given the space to test new ideas and explore AI-driven solutions, it can lead to breakthrough solutions and stronger engagement. This must be balanced with clear governance though. Establishing ethical guidelines, safety protocols, and transparent policies ensures that innovation happens responsibly. With the UK now ranked as the third-largest AI market globally and home to more than 3,000 AI companies, the momentum is undeniable. At Experian, we're seeing this shift in real time—from developing tools that help businesses unlock insights through automation, to exploring GenAI solutions that provide consumers with real-time financial guidance. The integration of AI, when combined with trusted data and insight, is becoming the foundation to how value is created and delivered. AI capabilities will also continue to evolve at pace, so it's crucial for businesses to stay informed and adapt. Ultimately, those who can balance ambition with responsibility will lead the next wave of innovation.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Futurist who predicted the iPhone reveals date humans will cheat death
A leading futurist who accurately predicted the rise of the iPhone has now set the date for humanity's most phenomenal breakthrough yet, the ability to cheat death. Ray Kurzweil, a former Google engineering director, has long been known for his bold predictions about the future of technology and humanity. His forecasts often focus on the convergence of biotech, AI, and nanotechnology to radically extend human capabilities. Now, Kurzweil claims humanity is just four years away from its most transformative leap yet, achieving 'longevity escape velocity' by 2029. While some experts remain skeptical, Kurzweil's influence in Silicon Valley ensures his predictions continue to shape the broader conversation around life extension and the future of human health. Longevity escape velocity (LEV) is a hypothetical scenario where the rate of medical advancement outpaces the aging process, leading to an ever-increasing life expectancy. Kurzweil believes that threshold is within reach because of recent exponential growth in the fields of line gene editing, mRNA vaccines, drug discovery led by artificial intelligence, and synthetic biology. He pointed to the development of COVID-19 vaccines as proof of humanity's rapid progress. 'We got the COVID vaccine out in 10 months,' he said in an interview with Bessemer Venture Partners. 'It took two days to create it. Because we sequenced through several billion different sequences in two days,' Kurzweil added. The controversial idea has long stirred debate in tech and scientific circles, with many gerontologists and longevity experts warning that the science is not yet close to achieving such a feat. In recent study, researchers noted that while some treatments have extended lifespan in animals, translating those results to humans remains a major challenge. Others, like Charles Brenner, a biochemist at City of Hope National Medical Center known as a 'longevity skeptic,' have cautioned against the hype surrounding claims of defeating aging and life-extension theories. We can't stop aging, he told the crowd. We can not use longevity genes to stay young because getting older is a fundamental property of life. But Kurzweil insists the world is on the verge of achieving it, pointing to exponential advances in AI, nanotechnology, and regenerative medicine as indicators that 'longevity escape velocity' could be reached within the decade. The concept hinges on cutting edge medicine becoming universally accessible, something many experts warn is far from guaranteed. While it does not promise immortality, it does suggest that death from old age could be delayed indefinitely, as technology advances over time. 'There's many other advances happening,' Kurzweil said. 'We're starting to see simulated biology being used and that's one of the reasons that we're going to make so much progress in the next five years.' Kurzweil has built a career on predicting the future, with many of his past forecasts coming true during the exact year he stated it would happen. He correctly foresaw the rise of portable computing in the 1990s, predicted the internet boom in the mid-1990s, and a computer would defeat a chess grandmaster by 1997. A milestone reached when IBM's Deep Blue defeated Garry Kasparov that year. Still, critics argue that forecasting a future without death, is far more complex than spotting tech trends. Venki Ramakrishnan, a Nobel Prize winning biologist, explained in his book ' ' that aging happens because of many connected biological factors, not just one cause. This makes it a very complex problem. Unlike technology, which usually improves in clear and predictable steps, the process of aging is much harder to understand and predict. Even if longevity escape velocity is technically possible by 2029, experts warn that widespread access could be limited by socioeconomic and ethical challenges. The technology needed to extend life in this way, such as genetic reprogramming, precision medicine, or nanobots, is expensive and still largely experimental. Medical advancements have significantly improved life expectancies, but achieving longevity escape velocity is not the same as achieving immortality. Kurzweil acknowledged that broad adoption is a massive hurdle. 'This doesn't mean you're going to live forever. A 10-year-old might have decades of potential, but they could still die tomorrow,' he said. There are limits. Randomness still plays a role. Cancer, for example, isn't a single disease but hundreds of mutations with no universal cure. While self-driving cars may reduce accidents, they won't eliminate them. Equally concerning is the disparity in global health care. Diseases like tuberculosis, which has a known cure, still kill more than a million people annually because treatments are unevenly distributed. The last few years have seen major breakthroughs in life-extension science. mRNA technology is now being adapted for cancer vaccines. CRISPR gene editing is being used in clinical trials to treat hereditary blindness and sickle cell disease. Meanwhile, researchers are growing entire organs in labs and experimenting with reversing aging in mice using cellular reprogramming techniques. AI is also accelerating biology. DeepMind's AlphaFold project solved one of biology's biggest puzzles, predicting how proteins fold in a feat that could revolutionize drug discovery. These advances are what Kurzweil cites as evidence that the human clock may soon start ticking backwards. Still, the idea of LEV captures something deeper, a human desire to defy mortality, to stay a step ahead of the inevitable. Kurzweil is not promising a magic pill or overnight change. He is predicting a tipping point in the near future, when medical progress starts to outpace aging in small, accumulating ways. If his timeline holds true, the early 2030s could mark the beginning of a very different relationship with aging, one in which dying of old age is no longer an assumed endpoint.
