logo
"This Is A Sad Day For America" — MAGA Supporters Have A LOT To Say About Trump's "Big, Beautiful" Tax Bill, And It's Not What I Was Expecting

"This Is A Sad Day For America" — MAGA Supporters Have A LOT To Say About Trump's "Big, Beautiful" Tax Bill, And It's Not What I Was Expecting

Yahoo22-05-2025

Donald Trump's self-described "big, beautiful" tax bill has officially passed the House of Representatives and is now headed to the Senate.
The legislation extends tax cuts that primarily benefit the highest earners, increases funding for the military and immigration enforcement, eliminates taxes on tips and overtime, reduces funding for Medicaid and food stamps, and ends tax incentives for clean energy.
Per an NBC report, the Congressional Budget Office expects the bill to add $2.3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade, as the cost of tax breaks and new spending far exceeds savings.
The bill squeaked through by a single vote (215 to 214). All Democrats opposed it, joined by just two Republicans: Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.
Ahead of the vote, Massie warned of the bill's consequences, calling it a "debt bomb ticking." He said, "I'd love to stand here and tell the American people, 'We can cut your taxes and we can increase spending and everything's going to be just fine.' But I can't do that because I'm here to deliver a dose of reality."
C-SPAN / @RepThomasMassie / Via Twitter: @RepThomasMassie
"This bill dramatically increases deficits in the near term but promises our government will be fiscally responsible five years from now," he continued. "Where have we heard that before? How do you bind a future Congress to these promises? This bill is a debt bomb ticking."
To my surprise, Massie was not the only conservative speaking out about the bill. In the hours following the vote, a wave of conservative voices took to social media to express their thoughts — and they're not too thrilled, either. Here's what they had to say:
1."Where's the spending cuts we were promised?"
—Vag-etarian
Related: People Are Obsessed With Pope Francis's Final, Resounding Message To JD Vance After His Visit To The Vatican
2."So adding to the debt is good now that we're in power?"
—Blown89
3."Oh boy, more needless spending."
—Nero_Ocean
4."Great. I like how they're just avoiding that it doesn't balance the budget. What are we even doing at this point with that? Just spending ourselves into oblivion? Fine. I'll say the unpopular thing — if that's where we're going, I might as well vote Democrat so it happens faster. I'm so incredibly discouraged at this point."
"It's great that we're getting a lot of this culture war stuff; I'm big on that, too, but if we don't get the deficit under control fast, all the rest of that won't matter in relatively short order. I need to start teaching my kids how to farm their own food at this rate because the depression that is starting to look increasingly inevitable with our fiscal behavior will make what happened in the 1930s look like the boom in the '50s."
—deadzip10
5."I think Trump could do it, if anyone had the momentum and control to drastically lower the deficit over time, I think it's this administration. Disappointed that isn't the case. The rich continue to get richer, that money exists out there, and it's not 'trickling down' anymore."
"We can't fix our country's problems by taxing Elon Musk more alone, but I feel like a change needs to happen in how we approach extravagant wealth. But poor people from West Virginia don't win elections; the rich do. I'm so jaded. Come on, Trump and co., you can do this!"
—MapleMonstera
Related: From Kamala Harris Back In '01 To Joe Biden As A Youngish Man, Here's What 11 Politicians Looked Like Back In The Day
6."I encourage everyone to read the language of the bill, it feels rather reckless and does virtually nothing to help the middle/lower class."
—Simmumah
7."I'm all for lowering taxes, but drastically lowering them AND increasing spending is a recipe for disaster. It's like trading in your full-time job for a part-time job, and at the same time upgrading from a two-bedroom apartment to a mansion. Lowering revenue and raising spending is asinine."
—Zaphenzo
8."I'm a strong Republican and, in general, a big fan of Trump, but this is a sad day for America. Adding to the deficit is unacceptable."
—r_barchetta
9."This bill won't pass in its current form in the Senate, which is fine, I don't think it should. I don't know why we're masking the increase in spending with cuts to programs that benefit the poor. I encourage people to read the language on the work requirements part, it's very vague and hard to navigate when it comes to reporting."
"I'm all for cutting waste, fraud, and abuse on Medicaid and SNAP, but there are better ways to go about it than work requirements (I'm also all for those able-bodied being put to work, but the disabilities listed don't cover anywhere near all disabilities that could prevent someone from working). I think if the Medicaid/SNAP changes go through as is, the GOP will get mauled in the midterms. This bill is pretty reckless and feels like it's just trying to push something through ASAP, maybe Chip Roy was right (even though he folded under pressure)."
—Simmumah
10."If we just agreed that Republicans care nothing for fiscal responsibility in 2025, this bill would be easier to swallow. Yeah, a couple nuggets of good for the working class, but by and large, the only thing it really accomplishes is increasing the deficit and spending across the board."
—d_rek
11."Unfortunately, this is basically just more tax cuts for wealthy."
—superduperm1
12."STOP FUCKING SPENDING! Edit: I love the no tax on OT and no tax on tips."
—milezero13
13."I'm extremely disappointed with this bill because it adds [$2.3 trillion] to the debt over 10 years. Our country is heading rapidly into a debt crisis that will crush American living standards."
—RedditThrowaway-1984
14."After this bill, we're done spending and we're going to start paying down the deficit for real, right guys? Guys?"
—triggernaut
Well, I'm glad we can all agree on...something. But let us know your thoughts down in the comments.
Note: Some responses have been edited for accuracy and grammar.
Also in In the News: "WHY ARE PEOPLE SO STUPID": This MAGA Supporter Shared 10 Reasons Why They Regret Voting For Trump, And The Internet Is Not Impressed
Also in In the News: Donald Trump Claims The US Will "Take Over" Gaza, And MAGA Supporters Are FINALLY Realizing What They Voted For
Also in In the News: 15 Extremely Difficult Things People Do Not Understand About The United States, And, Honestly, They Got A Point

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta Invests Nearly $15 Billion in Scale AI to Kick-Start Superintelligence Lab
Meta Invests Nearly $15 Billion in Scale AI to Kick-Start Superintelligence Lab

New York Times

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Meta Invests Nearly $15 Billion in Scale AI to Kick-Start Superintelligence Lab

Meta said on Thursday that it planned to invest nearly $15 billion in Scale AI, a start-up that works with data to train artificial intelligence systems, in a deal that Meta hopes will add needed muscle to its disappointing A.I. division. As a condition of the deal, Alexandr Wang, Scale AI's 28-year-old chief executive, plans to join Meta in a top leadership role in the new division, which Meta is calling its Superintelligence lab. Mr. Wang, whom people inside Meta have taken to calling a visionary leader, will also bring a team of employees from Scale AI to work at Meta. The move to invest billions in Scale AI, an amount equal to about 10 percent of Meta's revenue in 2024, would be Meta's first major minority investment in an outside company. It is Meta's second-largest deal, after the $19 billion acquisition of the messaging app WhatsApp about 11 years ago. Meta is scrambling to catch up with A.I. competitors such as Google, Microsoft, OpenAI and Anthropic, as industry executives jockey for an edge in what they believe will be the most transformative technology in a generation. 'Meta has finalized our strategic partnership and investment in Scale AI,' a spokesperson for Meta said in a statement. 'As part of this, we will deepen the work we do together producing data for A.I. models, and Alexandr Wang will join Meta to work on our superintelligence efforts.' Meta's investment with Scale AI is unusually structured. Meta will take a minority stake in the start-up and receive little control over its direction. The structure was intentional. Executives at Meta and Scale AI were worried about drawing the attention of regulators. Meta is waiting on a federal judge's decision in an antitrust case scrutinizing its earlier acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. The Federal Trade Commission under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was skeptical of big technology acquisitions, and Lina Khan, who led the agency at the time, scrutinized multibillion-dollar investments in A.I. companies. The structure of those deals — which included Amazon's investments in Anthropic and Microsoft's backing of OpenAI — allowed the big companies to form close ties with smaller rivals while dodging regulatory issues. It is unclear if the F.T.C. under its new chairman, Andrew Ferguson, will continue down that path. But Mr. Ferguson has shown few signs of changing course. OpenAI kicked off the A.I. movement in late 2022 with the release of its chatbot ChatGPT, compelling companies like Google and Meta to build similar technologies. Meta found an important niche when it chose to open source its systems, freely sharing the underlying tech with developers and businesses. But its latest system, called LLAMA4, has not matched the technologies produced by its biggest rivals. Among technologists, superintelligence is a futuristic goal of A.I. development. OpenAI, Google and others have said their immediate aim is to build artificial general intelligence, or A.G.I., a machine that can do anything the human brain can do. Superintelligence, if it can be developed, would go beyond A.G.I.

Meta Announces Scale AI Investment, Recruits CEO to AI Unit
Meta Announces Scale AI Investment, Recruits CEO to AI Unit

Bloomberg

time16 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Meta Announces Scale AI Investment, Recruits CEO to AI Unit

Meta Platforms Inc. said it finalized a multibillion-dollar investment in Scale AI and recruited the startup's chief executive officer to help oversee its artificial intelligence efforts — an unusual deal that signals a heightened push by the social media giant to catch up on AI development. Meta said Thursday that it has backed Scale, without including details. The size of the investment was $14.3 billion, according to a person familiar with the matter. The new $29 billion valuation includes the money raised, said the person, who asked not to be idenified discussing private information.

Trump vows to bring together India, Pakistan to 'solve anything'
Trump vows to bring together India, Pakistan to 'solve anything'

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump vows to bring together India, Pakistan to 'solve anything'

US President Donald Trump insisted Thursday he would bring India and Pakistan to the table together after recent fighting, saying he can "solve anything." US diplomacy last month helped bring a ceasefire that ended four days of fighting between the nuclear-armed adversaries triggered by an attack on civilians in the Indian part of divided Kashmir. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in announcing the ceasefire that the two nations had agreed to "start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site." The statement was welcomed by Pakistan, which has long sought an international role over Kashmir, but India -- which has a warm relationship with the United States -- was more circumspect. Asked whether there remained plans for talks between India and Pakistan a month after the ceasefire, Trump said: "We're going to get those two getting together, you know?" "I told them, India and Pakistan -- they have a longtime rivalry over Kashmir -- I said, I can solve anything. I'll be your arbitrator," he told reporters. India refuses any outside mediation on Kashmir, the scenic Himalayan region which has a Muslim majority but a sizable Hindu minority. "Any India-Pakistan engagement has to be bilateral," Indian foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told reporters on May 29. "At the same time we are clear that talks and terror don't go together." Gunmen on April 22 massacred 26 tourists in Kashmir, most singled out as Hindus, in the deadliest attack on civilians in decades in the region which has seen a long-running insurgency. India has accused Pakistan of backing the assailants and launched military action in response. Pakistan denies involvement and accuses India of escalating tensions. sct/jgc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store