Proposal to enhance Texas' pioneering junk science law approved by Texas House
Over a decade ago, the Texas Legislature passed a groundbreaking law to provide justice when the scientific evidence for a criminal conviction has changed or been discredited.
But in a report examining appeals ruled upon in the decade since, the Texas Defender Service found last year that the so-called junk science law 'is not operating as the Texas Legislature intended,' and that the courts were applying a burden of proof that made it nearly impossible for appellants to meet. For some lawmakers, Texas death row inmate Robert Roberson became the face of that failure.
On Wednesday, the Texas House sought to rectify those shortcomings. Lawmakers preliminarily approved, 118 to 10, House Bill 115 — legislation that would codify a number of recommendations advocates made to ensure the junk science law is working as intended.
'I do want to stress that this is a critical bill, and would appreciate your favorable consideration,' Rep. David Cook, R-Mansfield and author of the bill, said during a late-night committee hearing last month.
The measure, which must pass another vote in the House as a formality, does not have a companion in the Senate, making its path to law unclear.
The proposal emerged out of a contentious interim period of the Legislature last year, during which the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee confronted Roberson's case, seen by some lawmakers as the face of Texas' failure to properly implement the junk science law. The argument for Roberson's innocence became a political lightning rod, as committee members took extraordinary steps to delay his October execution while Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton pushed back and stood behind the conviction.
Roberson was convicted of capital murder in 2003 for the death of his 2-year-old daughter Nikki, who was diagnosed with shaken baby syndrome. He was one of the first death row inmates to have his conviction set for further review under the junk science law in 2016, when the Court of Criminal Appeals directed a lower court to take a second look at his case.
But in 2023, after the state argued that the science had not changed that much and a trial court agreed, the Court of Criminal Appeals upheld Roberson's conviction and set an Oct. 17, 2024 execution date.
Lawmakers, concerned that the courts had not meaningfully engaged with the evidence and properly applied the junk science law, managed to force a stay of execution in October. Roberson's execution date has not yet been reset, and he has a pending appeal.
Still, proponents of HB 115 said the bill was meant to address broader deficiencies in the law — regardless of its application to Roberson's case. If passed, its provisions would not go into effect until December 1.
The junk science law — Article 11.073 in Texas' criminal code — meant to provide a way for convicted people to obtain new trials if they can show that the underlying scientific evidence in their conviction was flawed. Lawmakers overwhelmingly approved the bill in 2013 after two failed attempts to do so.
'It stood as a commitment to Texans that science in our criminal trials was not just a sword of the state, but also a shield for the wrongfully convicted and the unfairly prosecuted,' Chase Baumgartner, an attorney at the Innocence Project of Texas, testified to the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee last month. 'House Bill 115 reaffirms that commitment and shores up where our current law has fallen short.'
The measure would address many of the interim committee's concerns with the law. It would entitle low-income defendants to an attorney in junk science appeals and require the state's highest criminal court to issue a written opinion when denying a junk science appeal.
It would also allow the court to consider junk science appeals even if they do not meet certain procedural requirements, a provision meant to address a finding that the Court of Criminal Appeals rejected almost 40% of petitions on procedural grounds, without considering the merits of the claims.
It would also clarify that the junk science law requires appellants simply to show that their conviction was based on discredited science — not to prove their innocence. The bill changes the standard of proof to a 'reasonable likelihood' that the evidence 'could have affected' a person's conviction or sentence.
That is a lower bar for convicted people to clear than the law's current standard, which says that 'on the preponderance of evidence,' the defendant 'would not have been convicted' based on the debunked science. Critics said that that was virtually the same standard required to prove 'actual innocence' — a difficult case to make, especially for people behind bars.
'The current standard has been interpreted by the Court of Criminal Appeals to essentially require the elimination of any rational basis for the conviction, which is the legal actual innocence standard,' Burke Butler, executive director of the Texas Defender Service, told the committee last month. 'This is not at all what legislators intended when they originally passed the law, and for various reasons, that standard is actually impossible for most innocent people to meet.'
And the bill would extend the junk science law to accept relevant evidence that was 'not reasonably available' to the defendant at trial, and that 'tends to negate' scientific evidence 'relied on by the state' at trial.
In its report, the Texas Defender Services found that no one on death row has successfully used the junk science law to obtain a new trial. The report also found that the Court of Criminal Appeals had applied a higher standard of proof than required by the law, rejected a significant portion of appeals on procedural grounds and produced a 'pervasive lack' of written opinions explaining its rationale, Butler said.
'No innocent person should ever serve out a prison sentence without having their case considered on the merits,' she said. 'The fixes in HB 115 would ensure that innocent people convicted based on junk science have a genuine pathway for relief.'
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Tinderholt: Favorable map ‘nudged' decision to run for Tarrant commissioner
Minutes after it was approved by county commissioners, the newly the configured Tarrant County Commissioner Precinct 2 had a Republican candidate: State Rep. Tony Tinderholt. Tinderholt, an Arlington Republican serving his sixth term in the Texas House of Representatives, announced his retirement from the Texas Legislature on June 2, the final day of the latest legislative session. He told his House colleagues that he'd finish out his term, but wouldn't not seek reelection, in favor of staying closer to home with his family. He didn't rule out running for another elected office in an interview with the Star-Telegram, and by the afternoon of June 3 he was a candidate for the newly reconfigured Precinct 2. Tinderholt knew a few months back that he was retiring from the Texas Legislature, he said in a June 4 interview. He and his family began looking at places where he could serve locally, or at the prospect of retiring totally, he said. 'The opportunity presented itself for the county commissioner position, so we decided that we would — if the maps were drawn properly and the outcomes were what they are — then we would definitely announce to run,' Tinderholt said. If the maps hadn't been redrawn, Tinderholt said he may have still sought the Precinct 2 seat. 'We were seriously considering running for the commissioner position, but the vote certainly nudged it a little bit,' Tinderholt said. Tinderholt said he and his family were watching the June 3 commissioners court meeting. They were preparing a news release about his bid as the vote was happening, he said. 'Once the vote happened, I asked my family 'OK, do you guys want to move forward?' and the consensus was 'yes,'' Tinderholt said. Tinderholt said he has not had conversations with commissioners about the proposed maps or his bid. An address listed for Tinderholt in public election records falls within the precinct's current and newly proposed boundaries. House District 94 sits in Tarrant County and includes parts of of Arlington, Bedford, Euless, Hurst, Fort Worth and all of Pantego and Dalworthington Gardens. The district and redrawn Precinct 2 overlap some, but the Commissioners Court seat doesn't go as far north and stretches farther west Politically, the new boundaries are more favorable to Republican candidates than Democrats, a shift from the precinct's current leaning. Cheryl Bean announced a bid for Tinderholt's house seat early Tuesday morning. She ran for House District 97 in the 2024 Republican primaries but moved to House District 94 in search of a home that's bigger and more centrally located to family members, she said. Tinderholt has endorsed her for the House district. Bean said she and Tinderholt are aligned politically. 'I've always had a great deal of respect, and he's done a lot for this state, I think, in starting more of a conservative movement,' Bean said. 'We're both Christians. We're both, you know, just fiscally conservative, as well as social conservative.' Tinderholt, who is among the most conservative members of the Texas House, said he hopes to help Tarrant County grow and wants to bring 'mutual respect and decorum' back to the precinct. He referenced a photo of Precinct 2 County Commissioner Alisa Simmons pointing her middle finger during the Tuesday meeting. 'We're going to campaign the same way we always have,' Tinderholt said. 'And we're going to reach out to voters. We're going to be knocking on doors, talking to the people that vote, and we will, we're not just going to knock on the doors people think we're going to knock on.' Simmons commented on Tinderholt's bid in a June 3 text message to the Star-Telegram, writing: 'No one is surprised that Tony Tinderholt announced AFTER a new map was adopted. He was terrified of a race under the current lines. He knows, and Tim O'Hare knows, that he would lose badly. To give Tony a prayer, they had to shred Precinct 2 and illegally destroy the voting rights of its minority citizens. It's cowardly, it's racist, and it's sadly what we expect from Tim and Tony.' Tinderholt didn't weigh in on concerns that the maps are racially gerrymandered. 'I'm not a current elected commissioner,' Tinderholt said. 'I wasn't involved in those. I'm not involved in them.' One way to compare how far left or right a political district leans is to look at results from recent statewide elections. Take the 2024 presidential race between President Donald Trump, the Republican candidate, and former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate. Trump won House District 94 with 53.9% of votes to Harris' 44.3% in the November 2024 general election, according to the Texas Legislative Council, which assists the state with the redistricting process. Trump lost Precinct 2 as currently drawn by 6.7 percentage points, with 45.8% of votes to Harris' 52.5%. If that election had occurred under the newly adopted boundaries, Trump would have won with 52.4% of votes to Harris' 46.1%, according to an analysis on Tarrant County's website. Here's how Trump and Harris would have fared in Precinct 2 in the 2024 presidential election under each of the seven proposed maps: Current: Harris- 52.5%, Trump- 45.8% Option 1: Trump- 54.8%, Harris- 43.8% Option 2: Trump- 52.6%, Harris- 45.9% Option 3: Trump- 51.6%, Harris- 46.8% Option 4: Trump- 51.4%, Harris- 47% Option 5: Trump- 52.2%, Harris- 46.2% Option 6: Trump- 52.4%, Harris- 46% Option 7: Trump- 52.4%, Harris- 46.1% Staff Writer Rachel Royster contributed to this report.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Texas Legislature passes bill protecting utility workers from assaults, harassment during disasters
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Those who would attack, harass or impede utility workers following a natural disaster will face enhanced criminal charges when a recently passed bill becomes law in September. Senate Bill 482 would apply higher charges to any person who, with 'criminal negligence,' 'interrupts, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes' with utility workers performing their duties. The bill passed out of the Texas Legislature on May 20. These protections already apply to emergency services workers and their service animals, animal control workers and public health inspectors while they perform their duties. The law neatly adds utility workers to that list. Under Texas law, a misdemeanor assault against one of these workers gets enhanced to a third-degree felony. Also, charges of harassment or obstruction of public duties would also be enhanced under SB 482. 'This bill is bipartisan, pro-worker, and common sense,' said Texas AFL-CIO President Rick Levy in a press release. 'Our utility workers shouldn't be subject to threats and harassment on the job — no one should. These front-line workers deserve our respect and protection.' SB 482 author Sen. Carol Alvarado, D-Houston, cited incidents that occurred during recovery efforts after Hurricane Beryl as to why she filed the bill this session. 'In the wake of Hurricane Beryl, utility workers restoring power faced not only the physical challenges of repairing downed power lines but also alarming hostility from some members of the public,' she wrote in her statement of intent. 'These workers were met with harassment, verbal threats and, in some cases, physical assaults that put their safety at risk. They persisted in their essential work despite these dangers, highlighting the need for stronger legal protections for utility workers during emergencies.' AP: Anger over Houston power outages after Beryl has repair crews facing threats from some residents Hundreds of workers, including Austin Energy crews, responded to Houston following Beryl. Ed Allen, financial secretary for the Houston local of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW 66), said the union's members 'went through hell' in the aftermath of Beryl. 'Our members went through hell following Hurricane Beryl — enduring threats and even assault — all while trying to get the power back on for folks,' said Allen in a press release. 'This is about safety. Our repair crews work tirelessly during natural disasters, and this bill will keep them a bit more protected.' Texas AFL-CIO Financial Secretary Leonard Aguilar said utility workers were assaulted, and some had guns pointed at them by residents. 'It took a while for the power to come back on, no fault of IBEW local 66, it was just, it was such a large area that had to have power restored. The people were getting upset, and rightfully so, but they didn't have to take it out on those workers that were out there every day, basically 24 hours a day,' he said. 'Just many different ways of just being difficult with the workers and making it difficult for them to do their jobs.' Workers restored power to 98% of Houston after 10 days, according to electric company CenterPoint Energy. That outpaced recovery efforts following Hurricane Ike in 2008; power was restored to only 74% of customers by the 10-day mark. No one testified against the bill when it was in the Texas Senate's Criminal Justice Committee, according to legislative records. Representatives from utility companies and labor unions testified alongside each other in support of the bill. The bill ultimately passed 30-1 in the Texas Senate and 130-16 in the Texas House of Representatives — Aguilar said this is what's necessary to help keep Texas' workers safe. 'This is the way it's supposed to be done across the street at the Texas Capitol. This should be an example of how we should be moving forward to protect workers,' Aguilar said. Aguilar also said the bill is a good step towards protecting Texas' workers, but that more is needed as the state can be 'difficult' for workers. 'Workers are putting it on the line, day in and day out; not just during disasters, but just when they wake up every day to go to work. Texas is a difficult state to work in,' he said. 'We have to do better as a state to make sure we are protecting the workers. Without the workers, we can't keep the state running.' The bill is now before Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. Unless vetoed, SB 482 takes effect Sept. 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Voters will have final say on billions of tax cuts for Texas homeowners, businesses
Voters will be asked to approve property tax cuts for Texas homeowners and businesses in November. If voters agree, homeowners will see increased breaks on the taxes they pay toward school districts, with those above the age of 65 or living with disabilities seeing even bigger cuts, if Texas voters approve them in November. Business owners will get help, too, on the taxes they pay on their inventory. Gov. Greg Abbott, a champion of tax cuts, said Friday he plans to sign the deal, one more procedural step before the fall election. Abbott urged voters to approve the increases. 'Never before has the Texas Legislature allocated more funds to provide property tax relief than they did this session,' Abbott said in a news release. Texas lawmakers plan to put $51 billion toward cutting property tax cuts — maintaining ones enacted in previous years as well as enacting new ones — over the next two years. That's a gargantuan figure, state budget analysts and some lawmakers worry will come back to haunt the state. Legislators tapped once-in-a-lifetime multibillion-dollar budget surpluses, the result of inflation and massive influxes of federal stimulus dollars during the COVID-19 pandemic, to pay for tax cuts in recent years. Those federal dollars are all but spent. Though Texas' economy is healthy, it has slowed. Uncertainty around the Trump administration's back-and-forth tariff policies, lower levels of immigration, lower oil prices and federal spending cuts could make matters worse for the state's economy, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas said in May. The state budget, which lawmakers approve every two years, could take a hit as a result, said Shannon Halbrook, a fiscal policy expert at the left-leaning Every Texan. Tax cuts may not be on the chopping block, but other government services would be. 'I don't think we're going to have a lot of extra money lying around next time,' Halbrook said. 'The conversation is not going to be, 'how do we spend all this extra revenue?' It's going to be, 'How do we deal with a really tight environment? What do we cut? How do we go from here?'' Texans who own their home are slated to see a boost in the state's homestead exemption, or the slice of a home's value that can't be taxed to pay for public schools. Lawmakers raised the exemption from $100,000 to $140,000. The owner of a typical Texas home — valued at $302,000 last year, according to Zillow — would have saved about $490 on their school property taxes had the higher exemption been in place last year, a Tribune calculation shows. Those savings result from a combination of the increased homestead exemption and $2.6 billion in cuts to school tax rates in the state's upcoming two-year budget. Homeowners over the age of 65 or those with disabilities would see even greater savings under a proposal to raise a separate homestead exemption for those owners from $10,000 to $60,000. Business owners, too, will see breaks. Lawmakers approved legislation to exempt up to $125,000 of businesses' inventory from being taxed by school districts, cities, counties or any other taxing entity. Under current law, businesses don't have to pay taxes on that property if it's worth $2,500 or less. The state would pick up the tab for the amount of property tax revenue school districts would have collected from businesses if not for the increased exemption. Other taxing entities like cities and counties will either have to raise tax rates to make up for the lost revenue, or simply go without it. Voters must have the final say for those breaks to take effect because each involves changing the Texas Constitution. Texas lawmakers signed off on smaller tax breaks than they did two years ago. For one, legislators had a smaller budget surplus to pay for tax cuts than in 2023. Tax cuts they greenlit two years ago also wound up costing more than they initially anticipated. Abbott said earlier this year that voters should have the final say on every tax-rate increase proposed by any local government that collects property taxes. State lawmakers didn't go that far this year, but they made other tweaks intended to curb property tax bills. Legislators put tighter restrictions on local officials' ability to raise property taxes in response to a natural disaster. That ability came under scrutiny last year after Harris County officials used it to hike property taxes in order to respond to severe weather events including Hurricane Beryl. They also put tighter limits on school districts' ability to seek higher tax rates. Cities, counties and other taxing entities must now include ballot language that read 'THIS IS A TAX INCREASE' if they ask voters to approve a tax-rate increase or bond proposition under a bill lawmakers approved. Left out of lawmakers' tax-cut efforts are the state's 9.8 million renters. Tax-cut proponents have argued renters benefit from cuts to school tax rates. Unlike homeowners and businesses, state lawmakers didn't send direct tax relief to renters. Disclosure: Every Texan has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
