Texas Legislature passes bill protecting utility workers from assaults, harassment during disasters
Senate Bill 482 would apply higher charges to any person who, with 'criminal negligence,' 'interrupts, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes' with utility workers performing their duties. The bill passed out of the Texas Legislature on May 20.
These protections already apply to emergency services workers and their service animals, animal control workers and public health inspectors while they perform their duties. The law neatly adds utility workers to that list.
Under Texas law, a misdemeanor assault against one of these workers gets enhanced to a third-degree felony. Also, charges of harassment or obstruction of public duties would also be enhanced under SB 482.
'This bill is bipartisan, pro-worker, and common sense,' said Texas AFL-CIO President Rick Levy in a press release. 'Our utility workers shouldn't be subject to threats and harassment on the job — no one should. These front-line workers deserve our respect and protection.'
SB 482 author Sen. Carol Alvarado, D-Houston, cited incidents that occurred during recovery efforts after Hurricane Beryl as to why she filed the bill this session.
'In the wake of Hurricane Beryl, utility workers restoring power faced not only the physical challenges of repairing downed power lines but also alarming hostility from some members of the public,' she wrote in her statement of intent. 'These workers were met with harassment, verbal threats and, in some cases, physical assaults that put their safety at risk. They persisted in their essential work despite these dangers, highlighting the need for stronger legal protections for utility workers during emergencies.'
AP: Anger over Houston power outages after Beryl has repair crews facing threats from some residents
Hundreds of workers, including Austin Energy crews, responded to Houston following Beryl.
Ed Allen, financial secretary for the Houston local of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW 66), said the union's members 'went through hell' in the aftermath of Beryl.
'Our members went through hell following Hurricane Beryl — enduring threats and even assault — all while trying to get the power back on for folks,' said Allen in a press release. 'This is about safety. Our repair crews work tirelessly during natural disasters, and this bill will keep them a bit more protected.'
Texas AFL-CIO Financial Secretary Leonard Aguilar said utility workers were assaulted, and some had guns pointed at them by residents.
'It took a while for the power to come back on, no fault of IBEW local 66, it was just, it was such a large area that had to have power restored. The people were getting upset, and rightfully so, but they didn't have to take it out on those workers that were out there every day, basically 24 hours a day,' he said. 'Just many different ways of just being difficult with the workers and making it difficult for them to do their jobs.'
Workers restored power to 98% of Houston after 10 days, according to electric company CenterPoint Energy. That outpaced recovery efforts following Hurricane Ike in 2008; power was restored to only 74% of customers by the 10-day mark.
No one testified against the bill when it was in the Texas Senate's Criminal Justice Committee, according to legislative records. Representatives from utility companies and labor unions testified alongside each other in support of the bill.
The bill ultimately passed 30-1 in the Texas Senate and 130-16 in the Texas House of Representatives — Aguilar said this is what's necessary to help keep Texas' workers safe.
'This is the way it's supposed to be done across the street at the Texas Capitol. This should be an example of how we should be moving forward to protect workers,' Aguilar said.
Aguilar also said the bill is a good step towards protecting Texas' workers, but that more is needed as the state can be 'difficult' for workers.
'Workers are putting it on the line, day in and day out; not just during disasters, but just when they wake up every day to go to work. Texas is a difficult state to work in,' he said. 'We have to do better as a state to make sure we are protecting the workers. Without the workers, we can't keep the state running.'
The bill is now before Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. Unless vetoed, SB 482 takes effect Sept. 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Austin mayor ‘disappointed' with cost of some tax rate election proposals
AUSTIN (KXAN) — After Austin city council members laid out their proposals for a tax rate election Thursday, Mayor Kirk Watson told KXAN he doesn't like the cost to taxpayers in some of those plans and will only vote to send a tax rate election to voters if the money will fund core city services. 'I must admit that right now I'm disappointed that the numbers we're talking about are higher than I would feel comfortable voting for,' Watson said. 'There could be something that I would vote for that's higher than what my proposal is, but it would have to be funding core basic services in a way that I felt comfortable with.' Austin leaders lay out tax rate election proposals — how much could it cost you? Because of a 2019 state law, taxing entities cannot raise the property tax rate more than 3.5% from the year prior without triggering a tax rate election (TRE). That's where the city manager's base budget sits right now — at the 3.5% rate allowed without triggering a TRE — which would still mean a total monthly increase of $18.18 per month or $218.16 annually for the 'average' ratepayer and taxpayer. Some Austin city council members are calling for the overall impact to taxpayers to be much higher than that — at the highest end, $267.20 more annually. That's on top of the base budget and would bring the annual increase for the average homeowner and rate payer to as much as $485.36. Those council members want the city to put money toward homelessness, housing, parks maintenance, wildfire mitigation and other services. You can find a full list of proposals and what they would fund here. 'Absolutely. This is a process and we are looking to see where we can come together, what number that might be,' Austin City Council Member Ryan Alter said when asked if he would be willing to come down on the amount requested from taxpayers. He's one of the council members proposing the most expensive tax rate election. Watson also put forward a proposal that calls for a 3.5-cent tax increase, which would raise the average homeowner's property taxes by $138.54 over the city manager's base proposal. Most of the money in that proposal would go toward fully funding the Homeless Strategy Office's plan. 'What I really want us to prioritize, what I want to see a real emphasis on… is now that we have the plan, let's use that plan, let's fund that plan,' Watson said. All of the proposals on the table, with the exception of one, look to fully fund the Homeless Strategy Office's plan. Wildfire mitigation and parks maintenance also appear to be common themes in those proposals. Austin city council will take up their budget and tax rate starting on Wednesday. 'If I'm going to ask voters to raise their taxes to pay for those services I want to be able to ask them to do it for basic, core services and I'm going to be very stingy about that on their behalf,' Watson said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Texas Senate passes bill targeting makers of abortion-inducing drugs
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Senate Bill 6, which aims to 'protect unborn children,' passed the Texas Senate on Tuesday. SB 6 would prohibit the manufacture, distribution, mailing, transporting, delivery and prescribing of abortion-inducing pills, as well as allow private citizens in Texas to file suit against people or companies that manufacture or distribute abortion-inducing pills in the state. Abortion is already almost totally banned in Texas. The bill was filed by Sen. Brian Hughes, R-Tyler. A similar bill passed the Senate during the regular session; however, it died in the House. 'The moms are victims here,' Hughes said. 'What we will go after with SB 6 is the manufacturers and the distributors of these drugs that are making them for the purpose of illegal abortions.' In response to the bill's passage, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said protecting life was a priority of his and the Texas Senate. 'We passed SB 6 … to ensure that abortion-inducing drugs are not distributed in Texas for the purpose of obtaining an illegal abortion,' Patrick said. 'The Texas Senate will continue passing this pro-life protection each legislative session.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Texas redistricting fight with Democrats ‘could last years', threatens Greg Abbott
The Texas governor, Greg Abbott, has stepped up his war of words with Democratic lawmakers who have left the state to foil an aggressive redistricting plan aimed at giving his Republican party five additional seats in Congress, saying on Sunday that the fight 'could literally last years'. Abbott issued his new threat on Fox News Sunday, saying that he would use his powers to call a special session of the Texas legislature to extend the battle indefinitely. The special session lasts 30 days, he said, 'and as soon as this one is over, I'm going to call another one, then another one, then another one, then another one'. Whenever the absent Democrats return to Texas, Abbott said, they would be arrested for violating their oath of office. 'If they want to evade that arrest, they're going to stay outside Texas for literally years,' he remarked. 'And they might as well start voting in California or Illinois, or wherever they may be.' Related: Can the FBI arrest the Democratic Texas lawmakers who left the state in protest? Sunday's TV political talkshows were dominated by the increasingly acrimonious dispute over Texas's audacious gerrymandering plans, which were instigated at the direct behest of Donald Trump. The move to flip five US House seats to the Republicans is being made as polls indicate that the US president's party will struggle to hang on to its razor-slim majority in the chamber in next year's midterm elections. The Republicans currently hold a margin of just three seats. The stakes could not be higher: were Trump able to hang on to his narrow control of Congress, he could cement the attacks on democratic and constitutional norms that he has begun in the first six months of his second presidency. As the crisis reaches a crunch, more than 50 Texas Democrats have left the state, heading to Democratic-controlled states, including Illinois and New York. The relocation is designed to deprive Republicans of a quorum needed to pass the new gerrymandered maps in the Texas legislature in Austin. Democratic governors went on the political shows on Sunday to launch their own barrage of words threatening counter-action. The strong language deployed was the latest indication that the leadership of the Democratic party, which has floundered in the face of Trump's radical authoritarian-leaning tactics, is determined at this point to take a stand. New York's Democratic governor, Kathy Hochul, accused Abbott on Fox News Sunday of being a 'lap dog' for Trump. 'Knock it off,' she told her counterpart in Texas. 'Let's get back to governing.' She added that if Texas continued with what she called 'these games', 'we're not going to sit on the sidelines – we're New Yorkers. We fight back.' New York's room for maneuver, however, is more limited than that of Texas. The state has an independent redistricting commission that oversees the drawing of its electoral maps which has been the subject in recent years of much court action. Hochul said that the restrictions would not hold New York back. 'We amend constitutions – we did it a few years ago,' she said. 'We can put it to the people. I'm not going to let our democracy be eroded away because there's a blatant power grab in our nation's capital.' JB Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois where many of the Texas Democrats are holed up in an undisclosed hotel outside Chicago, unleashed his own verbal volley on NBC's Meet the Press. He accused Trump of being a cheater, saying: 'He cheats on his wives. He cheats at golf. And now he's trying to cheat the American people out of their votes.' Pritzker was dismissive of claims by the Texas US senator John Cornyn that the FBI had been brought in to help find the missing Democrats. 'Texas law does not apply in the state of Illinois, and there's no federal law that would allow the FBI to arrest anybody that's here visiting our state,' Pritzker said. 'So, it's a lot of grandstanding.' As the governors were thrashing it out in the TV studios, lawsuits continued to fly around Texas's courts as both sides seek to gain the upper hand legally. Texas's attorney general, Ken Paxton, is suing a sample group of 13 of the Democratic lawmakers claiming that the 'runaways' have officially vacated their offices. Paxton is now asking the state's supreme court to remove the 13 from their seats. Beto O'Rourke, the former Democratic presidential candidate from El Paso, Texas, has also waded into the fray. On Friday, a state court in Fort Worth blocked his political action committee, Powered By People, from using its funds to support the fleeing lawmakers. O'Rourke has counter-sued, arguing that Paxton was trying to 'intimidate' a potential rival in next year's US Senate race. Speaking at an event in New Orleans on Friday, he accused the Republicans of being 'would-be fascists' and warned that if they got away with their plan to maintain power in Congress in 2026 'the consolidation of authoritarian control in the hands of Donald Trump will be nearly unstoppable'. Trump's ruse to create more winnable congressional seats is being taken so seriously in Democratic circles that it has gelled even diehard opponents of party political gerrymandering to come out in favor of counter-measures. Bernie Sanders, the independent US senator from Vermont, is a fierce critic of the redrawing of electoral maps for partisan benefit. Yet he told CNN's State of the Union that the Democratic party had no option but to fight fire with fire, saying: 'Democrats have got to fight back. I think it's pathetic, but I think that's what they've got to do.' Asked whether his position was defensible, given his years of opposing gerrymandering, Sanders said: 'What we have now is terrible, and Republicans are making it worse. Well, what do you do if Republicans are doing it? You have to respond. It's pathetic, but I think you have to respond.'
