logo
Trump administration's funding, staff cuts spark concerns over Colorado River

Trump administration's funding, staff cuts spark concerns over Colorado River

The Hill09-03-2025

Federal funding freezes and staffing cuts are setting off alarms about the future of the Colorado River, a critical artery that supplies water to some 40 million people in 30 tribes and seven states across the U.S. West, as well as in Mexico.
The Trump administration's efforts to slash the federal budget and workforce coincide with a pivotal point in Colorado River history, as the region's states negotiate the long-term operational guidelines for the 1,450-mile artery. The current interim rules, set in 2007, will expire at the end of 2026.
Policymakers warn that a loss of funds and Bureau of Reclamation employees could disrupt programs important for sustaining the drought-strained river — and complicate the negotiations that will steer its course for years to come.
'The level of uncertainty is greater than it's ever been, and the challenges are greater than they've ever been,' Tom Buschatzke, Arizona's lead Colorado River negotiator, told The Hill.
The Trump administration's day-one pause on certain disbursements from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which earmarked $4 billion for water management in the region, is raising particular concern among stakeholders about the fate of key conservation projects that keep the Colorado River flowing.
Earlier this week, Senate Democrats from the region's Lower Basin states — California, Nevada and Arizona — urged the Department of the Interior to end the freeze, arguing that the disappearance of these funds could endanger the river's water supply.
They expressed particular concern over the future of a conservation program aimed at increasing basin-wide efficiency and 'the Colorado River system's reservoirs from reaching dangerously low levels that threaten water deliveries and power production.'
Two of the same senators, California's Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, then sent another letter on Thursday to the Interior Department, demanding a halt to further workforce cuts to the Bureau of Reclamation — the federal agency that is party to Colorado River operations and negotiations.
They noted that Reclamation is already slated to lose about 100 California employees, or around 10 percent of regional personnel. Emphasizing the constant monitoring required to maintain dams and reservoirs, the lawmakers warned that 'without adequate staffing, the risk of infrastructure failures increases.'
Meanwhile, the negotiations over the river's long-term operations are ongoing. The final structure of the guidelines remains unclear, with the Lower Basin states and their Upper Basin peers — Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming and Utah — at odds over the details. The Biden administration tried to hasten the process by issuing a bullet-point list of five options in late November and a longer version in mid-January, while state-level talks have continued in parallel.
In their initial appeal to the Interior Department, the Senate Democrats stressed the critical role their conservation program has played in shaping past agreements among vying states. Under such an arrangement last year, they explained, the Lower Basin states pledged to conserve 3 million acre-feet of water, with the goal of stabilizing the system until post-2026 guidelines materialized.
For reference, a century-old allocated 7.5 million acre-feet to each basin on an annual basis. The average American household, meanwhile, consumes about 1 acre-foot of water every year.
A cessation in funding, the lawmakers warned, could jeopardize conservation targets, local economies and ecosystems, while also 'undermining future multistate agreements.' Their message followed a similar appeal sent to President Trump by Rep. Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.), who described current conditions as an 'absolute breaking point.'
The short-term reductions in water usage — the 3 million acre-feet arranged in last year's consensus — are not only large in volume, but they also have significant economic and political impacts, according to Buschatzke, the Arizona negotiator.
Previously, he explained, cuts were typically limited to big consumers like the Central Arizona Project, the massive system that brings water to more populous areas across the state. But if extremely dry conditions were to strike the region, the burden would spread to other Arizonans.
Such curtailments could 'cut into even higher-priority users, like my young farmers,' said Buschatzke, who is also the director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
'That's the same thing in other states,' he warned. 'The risk is greater.'
If such drastic effects do come to fruition — and without the compensation that the frozen funds could have provided — future collaboration could become more difficult, according to Buschatzke.
Short-term losses, he added, could also have long-term effects by 'eroding confidence that creative tools like the conservation programs can actually be put into implementation moving forward.'
Of specific concern to Buschatzke was the financial viability of a concept proposed in the post-2026 alternatives, which involves creating 'pools' for water savings within the basin's two largest reservoirs, Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Just how much money would be necessary to create these pools, he explained, remains unclear amid 'a lot of moving parts.'
Responding earlier this week to a query from The Hill about the funding freeze, an Interior Department spokesperson, declined to comment, only noting that that agency's 'policy is to not correspond with members of Congress through the media.'
Amid sporadic cuts and cancellations, the Trump administration's approach to the Colorado River remains elusive. The Bureau of Reclamation last month announced that 'a decision was made to reschedule' a meeting of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, the body responsible for overseeing downstream flows from the Lake Powell reservoir.
Meanwhile, Anne Castle, a Biden-era appointee to the Upper Colorado River Commission, departed at the behest of the Trump administration a week after inauguration. In her resignation letter, Castle described an 'existential time,' in which stakeholders 'who rely on and care about the river' are working on guidelines 'that will govern our lives and our economies for decades.'
Castle also commended Interior Department public servants for their dedication and professionalism 'despite being vilified by the very administration they serve,' while blasting shifts in employment terms as 'explicitly designed to result in a wave of resignations.'
'This broad brush, unfocused purge in furtherance of the stated goal of liberating large corporations from regulation they do not care for will result in attrition of expertise, damage to the American public, and specifically, a more disordered and chaotic Colorado River system,' she added.
Jay Lund, director of the Center for Watershed Sciences at the University of California, Davis, told The Hill that he sees the federal government as playing an important role in Western water in general. In the Colorado River basin, he explained, this means providing money, setting environmental regulations, and administering projects and interstate agreements.
At the same time, however, Lund stressed that 'almost all decisions in this basin are at local and regional levels, plus state water rights and some tribal rights.'
As far as President Trump's rationale behind the $4 billion pause is concerned, Lund reasoned that 'this could fit as part of his widespread freezes on funding, some or many of which will likely be reversed or altered over time as they see fit.' Alternatively, he suggested that Trump could be 'collecting points of leverage on parties in the basin for later negotiations.'
'Money not yet spent is always a potentially useful lever. But it is unclear what he really wants,' Lund said.
Buschatzke, meanwhile, offered some optimism in that most of the federal employees involved in the Colorado River's post-2026 environmental review process were 'still in their jobs.'
'In the broader scheme of things, there are many Reclamation people that we rely on,' he said, referring to experts such as 'modeling gurus' and administrative contractors.
'All those people fit together in a way that enables us to get our collective work done,' Buschatzke added. 'How much of that is going to be impacted, I don't think anyone can tell you, and I certainly can't.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nikkei Down 1.3%, Dragged by Electronics, Auto Stocks
Nikkei Down 1.3%, Dragged by Electronics, Auto Stocks

Wall Street Journal

time6 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Nikkei Down 1.3%, Dragged by Electronics, Auto Stocks

0030 GMT — Japanese stocks are lower as geopolitical tensions escalate in the Middle East and uncertainty persists over U.S. tariffs. Electronics and auto stocks are leading the declines. Tokyo Electron is down 4.3% and Sony Group is 2.6% lower. Toyota Motor is down 2.5% and Subaru is 4.1% lower after President Trump said he might raise tariffs on imported automobiles. USD/JPY is at 142.90, down from 143.73 as of Thursday's Tokyo stock market close. Investors are closely watching any developments related to Iran nuclear talks and U.S. tariffs. The Nikkei Stock Average is down 1.3% at 37681.03. ( @kosakunarioka)

Hegseth's long week on Capitol Hill
Hegseth's long week on Capitol Hill

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hegseth's long week on Capitol Hill

The Big Story Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday closed out his third and final day of hearings on Capitol Hill. © Associated Press The final day was not without its fireworks, with several clashes with lawmakers as he dodged questions on invading Greenland, Ukraine aid, his use of the app Signal, and troop deployment in Los Angeles. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the House Armed Services Committee, was quickly hit with queries from panel Democrats, starting with ranking member Adam Smith (Wash.). Smith pressed the Pentagon chief on whether it is the Defense Department's policy that the U.S. military be prepared to take Greenland or Panama by force. Hegseth would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of the Arctic territory and Central American country, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon could have such plans and that the U.S. has an interest in protecting both areas from Chinese influence. The Defense Department 'plans for any particular contingency,' he said, adding that 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' The answer caused Smith to scoff, replying: 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland. I'm going to go out on a limb on that one.' Hegseth was later pressed by Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), who implored him to confirm that 'it is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct? Because I sure as hell hope that it is not that.' Hegseth would only repeat that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) took his five minutes to supply Hegseth with the most direct questioning he's yet faced on whether he shared classified information on U.S. attack plans in Yemen via the Signal messaging app. Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) then lambasted the Defense secretary as an 'embarrassment,' demanding he resign over a range of issues including the Signal group chat, deploying Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and his views on Russia's war in Ukraine. 'I have called for your resignation. I didn't think you were qualified before your confirmation, and you have done nothing to inspire confidence in your ability to lead competently,' Carbajal said. The hearing caps off Hegseth's long week on Capitol Hill, which began on Tuesday with a relatively quiet House Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing. But on Wednesday, Hegseth faced heated questions from the Senate's version of the Appropriations panel, which bombarded Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, the Pentagon's delays in delivering budget information and the administration's focus on Greenland in its Arctic strategy. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guides to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: Rain, thunderstorms forecast for DC military parade Rain and thunderstorms are forecast for Saturday in the nation's capital, where a day of festivities and a military parade are scheduled to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th birthday — which happens to coincide with President Trump's 79th birthday. The daylong festivities in Washington will take place mostly on the National Mall, where a fitness event will be held at 9:30 a.m. and a festival will kick off at 11 a.m. The festival … US troops begin detaining migrants on border defense zone U.S. troops at the southern border started detaining migrants last week as part of the 'Deep South Campaign' to prosecute individuals found trespassing in National Defense Areas (NDAs). President Trump has currently designated the U.S.-Mexico stretches between El Paso to Fort Hancock, Texas, as an NDA alongside the land line marking the country's boundaries in New Mexico. U.S. Army Lt. Col. Chad Campbell said three individuals … Newsom says Trump never discussed sending National Guard: 'Stone cold liar' California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said in a podcast episode Thursday that President Trump did not discuss sending the National Guard to Los Angeles when the two recently spoke to each other before Trump's announcement. 'He lied, he lied. On my mother and dad's grave. I don't mess around, when I say this, he lied. Stone cold liar,' Newsom said on The New York Times's 'The Daily.' Host Michael Barbaro had said the … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: Senate Democrats calls for Noem to resign Multiple Senate Democrats on Thursday called for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign after Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was forcibly removed and later handcuffed for interrupting a press conference Noem held in Los Angeles. 'Kristi Noem should resign in disgrace,' Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) … On Tap Tomorrow Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Republicans lay groundwork for 'total tax cliff' at end of Trump's term Congressional Republicans are laying the groundwork for a tax cliff at the end of President Trump's term in office. While the conference is pushing … Read more Trump on 'No Kings' protests during military parade: 'I don't feel like a king' President Trump was asked Thursday to respond to planned counterprotests that will coincide with a military parade in the nation's capital to … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

Live updates: Israel attacks Iran's capital with explosions booming across Tehran
Live updates: Israel attacks Iran's capital with explosions booming across Tehran

Associated Press

time9 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Live updates: Israel attacks Iran's capital with explosions booming across Tehran

Israel attacked Iran's capital early Friday, with explosions booming across Tehran. The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. Update: Date: 2025-06-13 00:54:47 Title: The Israeli official said Iran is posing three threats to the state of Israel Content: First, he alleged that the Iranian government is advancing a 'secret program' to develop nuclear weapons. The U.S. intelligence community assesses that Iran is not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon. Secondly, the Israeli official said, Iran has thousands of ballistic missiles. Finally, he said Iran has been distributing weapons and arms to proxy groups across the region, like Hezbollah and Hamas. Update: Date: 2025-06-13 00:52:03 Title: Iran halted flights at Imam Khomeini International Airport outside of Tehran, state TV says Content: Iran has closed its airspace in the past when launching previous attacks against Israel during the Israel-Hamas war. Update: Date: 2025-06-13 00:44:50 Title: Trump on White House lawn as explosions begin Content: As the explosions in Tehran started, President Donald Trump was on the lawn of the White House mingling with members of Congress. It was unclear if he had been informed but the president continued shaking hands and posing for pictures for several minutes. Earlier in the day, Trump said an Israeli attack over Iran's nuclear program was not imminent 'but it looks like it's something that could very well happen.' The U.S. has been preparing for something to happen, pulling some diplomats from Iraq's capital and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of U.S. troops in the wider Middle East. The White House did not have an immediate comment Thursday night.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store