SC is now a hands-free state. What that means, what to know
South Carolina's new hands-free law is here and that means no more texting, scrolling or holding your phone while behind the wheel.
Gov. Henry McMaster signed into law the South Carolina Hands-Free and Distracted Driving Act on May 12, marking a significant step toward enhancing road safety across the state.
While this act does not take effect until Sept. 1, this legislation aims to reduce accidents caused by mobile device distractions, aligning South Carolina driving laws with over 30 other states.
So before you buckle up and hit the gas, make sure your phone's out of sight.
According to the latest available traffic collision data from the South Carolina Department of Public Safety, there was a total of 143,426 traffic collisions reported across the state in 2022.
The total number of collisions caused by distracted driving in South Carolina adds up to a total of 9,240 accidents.
What about Beaufort County?
In Beaufort County, 3,726 total traffic collisions were reported in 2022, with 877 accidents caused by distracted drivers, accounting for 23.5% of accidents.
Distracted driving makes up one of the top three causes of accidents in Beaufort County, according to the SCDPS.
While the Palmetto State has banned texting and driving since 2014, this new law prohibits drivers from using mobile electronic devices while operating a motor vehicle, with specific exceptions.
A 'mobile electronic device' is defined as any portable electronic device capable of providing data or voice communication, including smartphones, tablets, GPS receivers, electronic games or other stand-alone devices.
Under the law, drivers are not permitted to:
Hold or support a mobile device with any part of their body. This does not prohibit the use of an earpiece or device worn on the wrist used for 'voice-based communication.'
Use a mobile device to write, send or read text-based communications.
Watch motion, including a video, movie, game or video call.
Violating the provisions of the Hands-Free Act can result in the following penalties:
First Offense: A fine of $100.
Second or Subsequent Offenses: A fine of $200 and the addition of two points to the driver's license.
The law takes effect on Sept. 1 to allow residents time to adjust to the new requirements and ensure compliance.
During the first 180 days after the law takes effect, officers will only issue warnings for violations.
Violations of this act are classified as summary offenses and do not lead to arrest unless the individual fails to appear in court or pay the imposed fine.
While South Carolina is cracking down on distracted drivers, the Hands-Free Act includes several exceptions for the use of mobile devices. The exceptions include:
Using a device in a voice-activated or hands-free mode.
Using a mobile device to listen to audio-based content, such as navigation services, music or podcasts, provided the device is not held or supported by the driver.
Using a mobile device to report a traffic accident, hazardous road conditions or a medical emergency.
The law does not apply to law enforcement officers, firefighters or emergency medical services personnel while performing official duties.
These exceptions are in place to ensure that the law does not impede necessary communication during emergencies or official duties.
The SCDPS offers tips and guidelines to encourage and support drivers to avoid distractions of all kinds. These include:
Put away your phone when behind the wheel.
Avoid arguments and stressful or emotional conversations with passengers.
Avoid eating while driving.
Be sure children are properly and safely buckled up.
Properly secure pets in a pet carrier or portable kennel.
To learn more about the South Carolina Hands-Free and Distracted Driving Act, click here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ex-sheriff accused of shooting judge in chambers says state skirted law, should toss murder case: report
The attorneys representing the former Letcher County, Kentucky sheriff who stands accused of murdering the county's judge in his chambers have filed a new motion to have their client's indictment dismissed, according to a report. Former sheriff Shawn "Mickey" Stines' lawyers say the state failed to record a November 2024 meeting between state prosecutors and the Letcher County grand jury that eventually indicted Stines, according to a court filing obtained by KAVE. The filing says the grand jury was "deprived of information known to the Commonwealth [of Kentucky], sought in question by grand jurors, but not disclosed." Stines allegedly shot District Judge Kevin Mullins in Mullins' own chambers in the Letcher County Courthouse on Sept. 19, 2024. The incident, which rocked the tiny rural town, was caught on a surveillance camera. Both Stines and Mullins were well-known pillars of the community for decades. Specifically, the motion filed by attorney duo Jeremy and Kerri Bartley says the grand jury was denied information about an ongoing civil lawsuit, in which Stines is named as a defendant, that could provide context for the shooting. The lawyers also claim that testimony before the grand jury from Kentucky State Police Detective Clayton Stamper, the lead investigator in the case, was unfairly prejudicial. Stines' attorneys claim that allegations of sexual abuse plagued the Letcher County Courthouse. Just three days before the shooting, Stines was deposed in a civil case against his former deputy, Ben Fields, who is currently serving prison time for raping a woman inside the courthouse in exchange for removing her ankle monitor while she was on home confinement during criminal proceedings. Jeremy Bartley told Fox News Digital that the sheriff had threatened to keep his mouth shut in the civil case, and that he feared for the safety of his wife and daughter. "On the day that this [shooting] happened, my client had attempted multiple times to contact his wife and daughter, and he firmly believed that they were in danger," Bartley said. "He believed that they were in danger because of what he knew to have happened within the courthouse. And there was pressure, and there were threats made to him to sort of keep him in line, to keep them from saying more than these folks wanted him to say." "I think one of the big things is that my client felt there had been pressure placed on him not to say too much during the deposition, and not to talk about things that happened within the courthouse, particularly in the judge's chambers," Bartley said. Body camera footage from the immediate aftermath of the shooting shows a paranoid Stines afraid for his life while being questioned by police. "Come on, be fair to me now," Stines can be heard saying to Stamper. "I seen the look… Y'all come on now, don't kill me. Don't punish me, you know. Let's be fair. Don't shoot me, nothing like that." "Y'all are gonna kill me, aren't you?" he asked. "Y'all are gonna kill me, I know you are. Let's just get it over with. Let's just go." Bartley is planning an insanity defense. Experts have denounced that defense as "frivolous." Fox News Digital reached out to Bartley and prosecutor Jackie Steele for comment.


CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Lost DoorDash driver ends up on the tarmac at O'Hare Airport
Surveillance video shows a DoorDash delivery driver accidentally entering an 'unauthorized secured area' at Chicago O'Hare Airport, according to police. The driver pulled up near parked planes before being stopped by airport staff.


CNN
33 minutes ago
- CNN
Lost DoorDash driver ends up on the tarmac at O'Hare Airport
Surveillance video shows a DoorDash delivery driver accidentally entering an 'unauthorized secured area' at Chicago O'Hare Airport, according to police. The driver pulled up near parked planes before being stopped by airport staff.