logo
Mark Carney's promise to ‘build, baby, build' has some Canadians fearing the worst

Mark Carney's promise to ‘build, baby, build' has some Canadians fearing the worst

OTTAWA—Prime Minister Mark Carney is on a mission to 'build, baby, build.' And he wants to do it fast.
It's a goal that was central to the Liberal leader's pitch in an election campaign dominated by U.S. President Donald Trump's economic aggression towards Canada.
Seized by a desire to Trump-proof the Canadian economy and supercharge its growth, Carney has vowed to speed up resource development and streamline federal project approvals, all while maintaining environmental standards and respecting the rights of Indigenous groups and getting them a share of the wealth from the resources on their lands.
But while some Indigenous groups see the Carney government's agenda as an economic opportunity, others are concerned it could cost them of years of hard-earned progress on reconciliation.
'The concern is that these Crown governments are going to get together and make unilateral legislation without Indigenous Peoples,' said Sara Mainville, a managing partner at JFK Law, which represents Indigenous communities. 'And that is an old approach that hasn't worked in the past, and it won't work in the future.'
In Canada, governments have a duty to consult and accommodate Indigenous groups before allowing activities that could impact their treaty lands, but throughout the country's history, that often hasn't been the case.
Now, in several provinces, a renewed push to cut red-tape and unleash projects is drawing pushback from Indigenous groups with this history in mind.
Premier Doug Ford, for example, has tabled
new legislation
aimed at fast-tracking approvals for mining and infrastructure projects, with an eye on the mineral-rich Ring of Fire. Bill 5, which would limit environmental assessments and create 'special economic zones' exempt from many municipal and provincial rules,
has garnered widespread criticism
from Indigenous groups, municipalities and environmentalists, who say it could destroy endangered species' habitats and curtail consultations with First Nations communities.
And in B.C., Premier David Eby has been accused of undermining progress on reconciliation over two bills that give the provincial government the power to override local regulations to speed up significant projects.
'I hope they are looking at what's happening right now,' Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler of Nishnawbe Aski Nation said of the federal government in an interview with the Star, minutes after testifying at a Queen's Park hearing into Ford's Bill 5. The Prime Minister's Office did not return a request for comment Friday.
Carney vowed during the election to approve projects faster through a new 'major federal project office' that streamlines the assessment process. The goal is to get final decisions done in a maximum of two years, faster than the typical five-year timeline under the previous government.
And it's also aiming to sign agreements in the next six months with willing premiers and Indigenous leaders that would move away from requiring multiple project assessments and toward a 'one project, one review' system.
'No more asking, 'Why build?' The real question is, 'How do we get it done?'' Tim Hodgson, the new energy and natural resources minister, told the Calgary Chamber of Commerce Friday. 'That means breaking apart barriers and cutting through red tape. It also means doing things responsibly the first time, meeting our duty to consult so Indigenous Peoples are true partners and protecting our environment so we don't have to clean up mistakes later.'
Proponents of these efforts, which include some Indigenous groups, say they are critical to reducing Canada's reliance on Trump's U.S. and growing our economy, and see an opportunity for First Nations to cash in as well. Part of the pattern in this nationwide push, and a hope for Carney's Liberals, is that Indigenous groups will be more willing to allow resource development in their territories if they get an ownership stake.
'Indigenous Peoples want to be part of the Canadian economy,' said Mark Podlasly, the CEO of the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, who also called for 'early, fast' engagement and co-investment opportunities. 'That's the only way.'
That's why one of the first actions Carney took as prime minister was announcing he would double Ottawa's Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program to $10 billion from $5 billion while widening its scope.
'When I hear 'build, baby, build,' I hear building capacity, building communities and building partnerships,' said Michael Fox, the CEO of Indigenous Community Engagement who also leads regional consultations on the Webequie Supply Road Project, a proposed all-season road connecting Webequie First Nation to current and potential future Ring of Fire mineral projects.
'I think we're in a different era today where, you know, the spirit of reconciliation, I think, is going to be the guiding star for public policy.'
Still, with no legislation tabled yet, and the Carney government mum on the tensions in Ontario and B.C., there is concern about this new agenda. It's not just Indigenous groups with questions about the details of the government's resource development and energy goals: environmentalists and industry players have charged the government is
sending mixed signals
on fossil-fuel pipelines.
For his part, Carney has said over and over again this agenda won't include any backtracking on the government's duty to consult.
'Really this goes to a fundamental issue, which is that partnership with Indigenous Peoples, partnerships with First Nations, has to be at the centre of our actions,' Carney told First Nations chiefs in an AFN forum days ahead of the April 28 election, as he asserted that faster decisions also mean saying 'no' more quickly when a project does not meet environmental standards or 'appropriate partnership' with First Nations.
Fiddler said right now, those are 'just words,' and they need meaningful action.
Mainville said it's 'crystal clear' the federal government is trying to align itself with provinces in the face of American aggression, but she's worried this new alliance could leave Indigenous groups behind, especially after the progress on reconciliation made under the Trudeau government.
'It can't be like a clean slate approach,' Mainville told the Star.
Liberal MP Marc Miller, who was minister of Crown–Indigenous Relations from 2021 to 2023, told the Star that any government that resorts to inadequate consultations with Indigenous communities in an effort to speed up approvals will pay for it later, with delays and poor relationships. He pointed to the infamous Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project that was mired in delays and became a thorn in the side of the Trudeau government as one recent example.
Long a source of tensions and protest, the Federal Court of Appeal in 2018 overturned the Trudeau government's approval of the project and halted its construction, the same day its owners approved a pending $4.5 billion sale to Ottawa.
'
If we hadn't gotten it wrong in the first place, that project perhaps would have gone a bit faster,' Miller told the Star.
'There is a road map for engagement with communities that is relatively sophisticated at this point, and the question for the federal government is: does it observe it or does it decide to cut corners?' Miller said. 'If it cuts corners, we will find out quite quickly through the court system that that will actually delay projects. So let's get it right the first time.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.
Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.

Atlantic

time27 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.

Ukraine's drone strikes deep into Russia delivered a humiliating blow to Moscow last weekend. Kyiv's defenders celebrated the attack as a triumph of modern warfare and a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the extraordinary operation got a different response inside the White House: anger. Donald Trump has openly vented in recent weeks about Putin's unwillingness to end the war. But since Sunday's attack, which hit a series of Russian military airfields, the president has privately expressed frustration that the strike could escalate the conflict, according to three administration officials and an outside adviser to the White House. (They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.) These sources told me that the drone strike has reignited the president's long-held displeasure with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and prompted a new debate in the White House about whether the United States should abandon Ukraine. Throughout the war, Trump has deemed Zelensky a 'bad guy' and a 'hothead,' the outside adviser said—someone who could be pushing the globe toward World War III. Trump privately echoed a right-wing talking point this week by criticizing Zelensky for supposedly showboating after the drone attacks; according to the adviser, Trump was impressed with the audacity of the strikes but believes that Zelensky's focus should have been on Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul. Trump spoke with Putin yesterday, and, in a readout of the call on Truth Social, the U.S. president relayed the Kremlin's plans to strike back against Ukraine. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin against retaliating, and two of the administration officials told me that he has not decided on his next steps. Officials have presented him with options that include sanctioning Russia and reducing American aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump told aides this week that he does not believe a summit with him, Zelensky, and Putin—which he once hoped would be a way to bring the war to a close—will happen any time soon, one of the administration officials told me. Trump, who on the campaign trail last year vowed to end the war within his first 24 hours in office, made a renewed push for a peace deal last month. While Zelensky agreed to an immediate cease-fire, Putin rejected the offer and ratcheted up his bombing of Ukrainian cities. That led Trump to threaten to walk away from peace talks, and to flash some rare ire at Putin. The president had hoped that some progress would be made in this week's talks in Turkey, but the meeting was overshadowed by the drone strikes and went nowhere. The White House has said that the U.S. was not told in advance about the surprise attack, which was carried out by drones hidden across five of Russia's time zones that hit nuclear-capable bombers and inflicted billions of dollars in damage, according to a preliminary estimate from the White House. Steve Bannon and other influential MAGA voices have berated Ukraine for the attack and are attempting to push Washington further from Kyiv. On his podcast this week, Bannon blamed Ukraine for, in his view, sabotaging peace talks while potentially provoking a massive response from Russia. 'Zelensky didn't give the president of the United States a heads-up to say he's going to do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can, on the day before your meeting in Turkey?' Bannon said. 'On the eve of peace talks or cease-fire talks, he takes the Japanese role in Pearl Harbor—the sneak attack.' Bannon has conveyed similar messages to senior West Wing advisers, a fourth administration official told me. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine envoy, warned on Fox News that 'the risk levels are going way up' because the drones struck part of Russia's 'national survival system'—its nuclear program—potentially pushing Moscow to retaliate in significant ways. Trump has not increased aid to Ukraine since taking office again in January, and he has yet to endorse a bipartisan Senate push, led by his ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, to impose harsh economic penalties against Russia and countries that do business with it. There have been other recent signs that the White House is distancing itself from Ukraine, too. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend a meeting of 50 defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. In the past, the meeting has been an important venue for coordinating military aid for Ukraine. Hegseth was the first U.S. defense secretary to skip the event in three years. The Pentagon cited scheduling issues for his absence. When I asked a White House spokesperson for comment about the drone strikes, she pointed me to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing-room remarks on Tuesday, when Leavitt said that Trump 'wants this war to end at the negotiating table, and he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately.' In public remarks about the strikes, Putin downplayed the chances of a cease-fire, asking, 'Who has negotiations with terrorists?' But Zelensky told reporters that the operation over the weekend, code-named Spider's Web, would not have been carried out if Putin had agreed to a U.S.-proposed truce. 'If there had been a cease-fire, would the operation have taken place?' Zelensky asked. 'No.' Exasperated with the conflict, Trump continues to muse about walking away from any sort of diplomatic solution. In his Truth Social post about his call with Putin, the president seemed eager to change the subject to focus on ending a different international crisis. 'We also discussed Iran,' Trump wrote about ongoing talks regarding Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.'

Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill
Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill

Forbes

time28 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill

Elon Musk directly jabbed President Donald Trump over his policy bill Thursday— in his most pointed attack on Trump himself—over the legislation Musk has previously mostly blamed Republican lawmakers for. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. (Photo by ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images) Musk reposted a 2013 tweet from Trump that said he was in disbelief and 'embarrassed' Republicans were extending the debt ceiling, captioning the repost 'wise words.' Trump on Wednesday said the debt limit should be 'entirely scrapped' as a provision of his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which would raise the debt ceiling ahead of its expected expiration date in August. This is a developing story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store