Indigenous Australians lose climate change case against government
July 15 (UPI) -- An Australian federal court ruled Tuesday that Indigenous residents of the Torres Strait Islands are not owed environmental protections from the nation's government.
Justice Michael Wigney said in his dismissal that "changes wrought by the escalating impacts of global warming and climate change in the Torres Strait have had, and continue to have, a devastating impact on the traditional way of life of Torres Strait Islanders."
However, he concluded that the case brought by island community elders Pabai Pabai and Paul Kabai "failed because the law in Australia as it currently stands provides no real or effective avenue through which the applicants were able to pursue their claims."
Wigney further explained that current common Australian law is not written in a way that the plaintiffs could seek relief in regard to what they considered a failure of the federal government.
The elders, Pabai Pabai and Paul Kabai, launched legal action in 2021 against the government for allegedly failing to protect the Torres Strait Islands from the impact of climate change.
The plaintiffs charged that governmental negligence interfered with the completion of Ailan Kastom, customary practices unique to Torres Strait Islanders that relate to a spiritual connection to the islands and surrounding waters.
"I thought that the decision would be in our favor, and I'm in shock," said Kabai Tuesday.
"My heart is broken for my family and my community," said Pabai.
There are around 4,000 residents of the Torres Strait Islands, with 90% who identify as Indigenous.
Wigney concluded his ruling with a notation that any future, similar lawsuits will also fail "until the law in Australia changes."
He then added that until it does, "the only recourse that those in the position of the applicants and other Torres Strait Islanders have is recourse via the ballot box."
Australian Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen released a joint statement with the Minister for Indigenous Australians Malarndirri McCarthy Tuesday in regard to the case.
The release noted ways the current government has attempted to deal with climate change, and that it "remains committed to both acting to continue to cut emissions and adapting to climate impacts we cannot avoid."
As for Tuesday dismissal of the case brought by Pabai and Kabai, it concluded that "As the Commonwealth is carefully considering the detailed judgment, it would not be appropriate to comment on the specific findings while this occurs."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
43 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump announces creation of 'AI economy' during innovation summit
July 15 (UPI) -- Pennsylvanians and the nation will benefit from $100 billion in energy- and artificial intelligence-related investments announced on Tuesday to energize the nation's growing AI economy. The investments should create tens of thousands of new jobs for Pennsylvanians in the energy and AI sectors while helping the United States improve its economy and global AI standing, President Donald Trump said during Tuesday's inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit in Pittsburgh. "We're here today because we believe America's destiny is to dominate every industry and be the first in every technology," Trump told attendees. "That includes being the world's No. 1 superpower in artificial intelligence," he added. The president said the United States is "way ahead of China" in AI development and has many plants under construction. "China and other countries are racing to catch up to America having to do with AI," Trump said. "We're not going to let them do it," he said. "We have the great chips [and] the great everything." Trump said the United States is "going to be fighting them in a very friendly fashion," adding that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping have a "great relationship." "Remaining the world's leader in AI will require an enormous increase in energy production," Trump told the audience. He said "clean, beautiful coal" and oil production will be a key element in producing more electrical power to support AI endeavors in the United States and to stay ahead of China in AI development. More than $56 billion in new energy infrastructure and $36 billion in new data projects were announced on Tuesday, the president said. A $15 billion investment by Knighthead Capital Management will create the largest natural gas-fired power generation plant in North America in Homer City, Pa. Google also is investing "billions and billions" to revitalize two hydropower facilities in the commonwealth, Trump added. Westinghouse officials also have announced that the company will build several nuclear power plants throughout the nation to ensure the AI economy has ample energy available. "A lot more than that will be announced in the coming weeks and months," Trump added. The president said 20 "leading technology and energy companies" are poised to invest in Pennsylvania to develop an AI economy that utilizes the commonwealth's energy and technology assets, CBS News reported. Many firms are investing elsewhere in the country, too, in order to support the nation's AI economy, according to the New York Post. Trump spoke for about 30 minutes during the hour-long Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit, which was organized by Sen Dave McCormick, R-Pa., and held on the campus of Carnegie Mellon University. Pennsylvania's Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro and others joined Trump and McCormick to discuss energy matters and the growth of AI in the United States.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Snubs and scrambles ahead of Carney's major projects meeting with First Nations
As First Nations leaders head to Gatineau for a high-stakes summit with Prime Minister Mark Carney, tensions are running high over the federal government's handling of Bill C-5 — a sweeping new law that accelerates approvals for major infrastructure and resource projects. Indigenous leaders say the process has left their communities out and broken promises to respect their rights, protect the environment and seek free, prior and informed consent. 'We worked hard to get the prime minister to agree to this meeting,' said national chief Cindy Woodhouse-Nepinak, calling it a 'historic' gathering. 'First Nations cannot be on the sidelines in the year 2025.' But many see the haste with which the July 17 meeting was assembled as a reflection of the flaws in the bill itself. The July 17 summit at the Canadian Museum of History is the first in a series of promised meetings between Carney and Indigenous leaders, put together after increasing criticism of Bill C-5. Invitations, agenda and venue details landed in chiefs' inboxes with barely a week's notice, forcing communities to scramble for travel and messaging strategy. Abram Benedict, Ontario regional chief for the Chiefs of Ontario said the lead-up was 'chaotic,' with little chance for communities to develop a clear message. 'We didn't have a national position on C-5. Every region, every community faces different realities. How can we possibly have a unified message for the prime minister when there's been no real chance to come together and talk?' Woodhouse-Nepinak said chiefs will be arriving with diametrically opposing goals and viewpoints, depending on their communities. 'Many chiefs are very concerned about Bill C-5,' said Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'Other chiefs are saying they want to proceed quickly with projects and resource revenue sharing.' The meeting with Carney and federal ministers is also limited to four hours — a timeframe seen insufficient for substantive dialogue. 'The challenge we are going to face [with] several hundred First Nation leadership or delegates in a room with the prime minister for four hours, I hope accomplishes more, but I'm going to be encouraging our leadership that we have a single message to the prime minister, and that four hours is not going to achieve enough,' Benedict said. One collective priority the national chief identified is the infrastructure gap separating life on reserves from the rest of the country. 'Canadians win by fast-tracking the construction of modern schools in First Nations, and housing in First Nations, by fast tracking clean water systems, all-season road access and reliable internet service.' She named 'a commitment to closing that infrastructure gap, with timelines' as a top priority for the meeting in Gatineau. Carney hasn't associated Bill C-5 with those priorities to date. Instead, he's sold the bill as a way to accelerate approvals for major projects — pipelines, mines, ports — deemed in the 'national interest.' The government touts the law as essential for economic growth and international competitiveness, but Indigenous leaders say the process sidelined their voices, undermined environmental protections, and broke faith with commitments to free, prior and informed consent under UNDRIP. Senator Paul Prosper, former chief of the Paqtnkek (Afton) Mi'kmaw Nation, said that trust is 'the cornerstone of the relationship with government' for many First Nations and is concerned that the expedited process for Bill C-5 represents a setback due to the lack of real involvement from First Nations leadership. Russell Diabo, Indigenous policy analyst pointed out that some BC chiefs did not receive invites. 'I feel like the feds are purposely selecting those chiefs who will be favourable towards this Canada Act initiatives,' said Mike Christian, chief of Splatsin First Nation in BC. He said he recently got the registration link from another chief. Wet'suwet'en Hereditary chief Na'Moks was also not formally invited to the summit. 'This exclusion is not only disrespectful — it undermines the very foundation of Nation-to-Nation relationships,' said Na'Moks in a press release. 'Decisions made at this summit will impact our lands and people. We will not be silenced or sidelined.' A successful meeting, according to Benedict, would require the government to acknowledge the rushed and 'very disrespectful' process of Bill C-5 and commit to 'more solid engagement' with First Nations going forward. He said if the government is truly committed to working with First Nation leaders, then just holding national meetings about Bill C-5 isn't enough. He hopes Carney will promise a process with more direct regional engagement. Not all chiefs are opposed to the spirit of Bill C-5. 'There are those that want to get economic development going, they do want the jobs, the skills and training, they want the revenue sharing, the equity agreements in place where they're part of it and ownership of it on their own terms,' said Robert Phillips, a political executive of the First Nations Summit, part of the First Nations Leadership Council. 'But we can't have these agreements going ahead with 'trust us we will take care of you' and it can't be after the fact — we have to be at the table now.' With Carney suggesting that a pipeline to the coast is 'highly likely,' leaders in BC are seeking clarity on what projects are being considered and how decisions will be made. 'If the Liberal government wants to continue with reconciliation it has to follow its own laws. First Nations are very concerned, not only in terms of the law itself but significant procedural and substantive concerns with the bill,' Phillips said. 'We want to see our rights and interests met, not just be brought in after the fact.' A related challenge leaders want Carney to address in Gatineau is that many nations lack the resources to fully participate in project consultations. This makes it hard for them to make informed decisions or advocate for their interests during the development and implementation of major infrastructure initiatives. 'Without additional resources … we're going to end up in the same situation,' Benedict said. The PMO wrote in an email to Canada's National Observer that it has committed to establishing an Indigenous Advisory Council as part of the office managing the major projects under C-5, and that it will allocate $40 million to 'strengthen Indigenous Peoples' capacity to participate in implementing the Building Canada Act.' 'Forty million sounds like a lot, but spread across more than 600 First Nations? It's not nearly enough,' said Benedict. On Tuesday – two days before the Gatineau meeting – news broke that nine First Nations in Ontario are challenging the constitutionality of Bill C-5 in court; they're also seeking an injunction to block the bill until the court reaches a decision on their challenge. 'There is no standalone obligation to consult [Indigenous peoples] on proposed legislation,' explains Bruce McIvor, a Métis lawyer and the founder of First Peoples' Law firm. Governments routinely pass laws without consulting Indigenous groups – for instance, the tax cut Carney passed in June – which doesn't automatically raise any legal issues. 'But if you pass a law and that law has the effect of infringing Aboriginal and treaty rights, the law itself can be challenged. And if you didn't adequately consult before the law was passed, that's one of the things that the courts will take into account.' While challenging the law itself may be an uphill battle, First Nations have a long track record of defeating specific industrial projects in court. 'No projects in Canada will go ahead without the support of First Nations,' said the national chief, though she declined to comment on the constitutional challenge against C-5 itself. McIvor sees the moment when cabinet's uses its self-appointed power to define the 'national interest' as one critical legal flashpoint. 'My expectation is, when that occurs, if there's a court challenge, the court will look at whether the constitutional obligation to consult and accommodate was fulfilled up to that decision point.' Now that the legislation has passed, the government is focusing its consultation efforts on the projects themselves. In an email response to Canada's National Observer, Pierre-Alain Bujold, a spokesperson for the Privy Council Office, confirmed this approach. 'The Building Canada Act ensures that Indigenous Peoples whose rights — including treaty rights — may be affected are consulted at key stages: before a project is designated as being in the national interest, before the issuance of the conditions document, and before any amendment to the conditions document.' That may be enough for some nations. But the history of major industrial projects in this country – pipelines in particular – is that some Indigenous communities support them while others don't. A perfect example is the Coastal GasLink pipeline, which feeds the LNG Canada export terminal in Kitimat. That pipeline was supported by several First Nations whose territories it crossed; it also sparked the historic Wetsuwet'en protests that dragged on for years, briefly spread across the country, and provoked a violent RCMP response that made international headlines . Hereditary chief Na'moks, who wasn't invited to Gatineau, was a key leader of those protests. The government hasn't clarified what it would do should this scenario repeat itself, as appears likely if a new pipeline to BC makes the Major Projects list. This is the nightmare outcome for Indigenous leaders, opening the door for the 'divide-and-conquer' politics invoked by Robert Phillips. 'First Nations are united in an understanding that we have always supported economic development and prosperity for all,' said national chief Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'But not at the expense of our rights.' The future of Carney's bill is in the chiefs' hands going into Thursday's meeting. He's got a lot of ground to cover in four hours. Sonal Gupta / Local Journalism Initiative / Canada's National Observer and Arno Kopecky. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Federal departments fall short of Ottawa's 5% Indigenous procurement target
Several of Canada's federal departments didn't meet the mandated target for Indigenous procurement in 2023-2024, according to government documents obtained by Canada's National Observer through an Access to Information request. The policy, introduced in 2021, requires that at least five per cent of all federal spending must go to Indigenous businesses to address economic gaps and increase Indigenous participation in government supply chains. Although the federal government as a whole awarded more than $1.24 billion in contracts to Indigenous businesses last year — representing 6.1 per cent of all eligible contracts — the documents show significant variation in the awarding of federal contracts between departments. An Indigenous business is defined as one owned and operated by elders, band and tribal councils, businesses in the Indigenous Business Directory or on modern treaty beneficiary lists. Key organizations did not reach the five per cent threshold for the period — including Transport Canada, Global Affairs Canada, National Defence, the Public Health Agency of Canada, Statistics Canada, the Canadian Space Agency, Public Services and Procurement Canada, the Canada Border Services Agency, Canadian Heritage and the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). Departments that did not meet the target cited several persistent challenges: a lack of Indigenous businesses in highly technical sectors, legacy contracts signed before the five per cent rule, contracts set aside for Indigenous businesses that received no bids and the complexity of the federal procurement process. Transport Canada, in an email response to Canada's National Observer, confirmed it did not meet the target last year, citing 'delays and structural challenges within procurement processes' that limited Indigenous business participation. The department said new training and engagement tools are being implemented and it remains committed to reaching the target by the end of the current fiscal year. The NRC also fell short, pointing to a limited pool of Indigenous suppliers for specialized scientific and technical equipment. It launched an Indigenous procurement strategy and action plan in September 2024, focusing on partnerships with Indigenous organizations, events and changes to the tender process. 'Meeting our target requires that we address the challenge of the current level of Indigenous business activities in supplying many of the products and services we procure, particularly those of a specialized nature,' the NRC said. Statistics Canada awarded just 2.75 per cent of its contract value to Indigenous businesses in 2023–2024. In its response, it said it fell short of its target in 2023-24 because 85 per cent of its 'informatics professional services' contracts were awarded through Public Services and Procurement Canada, which determines the procurement strategy, and 13 per cent of contracts were issued before the agency's Indigenous procurement plan took effect. Of the three new contracts awarded within Statistics Canada's delegation, two were designated for Indigenous businesses, but no bids were received for those opportunities. The agency said it saw an increase to 11 per cent in the current fiscal year after implementing a new procurement plan and boosting outreach to Indigenous suppliers. Public Services and Procurement Canada said while it missed its five per cent Indigenous contracting target for 2023-24, it is working to boost Indigenous participation through Indigenous subcontracting, training and Indigenous-by-default procurement by next fiscal year. The Public Health Agency of Canada said it is still working with other departments to improve Indigenous procurement, after missing its 2023-24 target and awarding only 1.5 per cent of 2024-25 contracts to Indigenous businesses — a figure not yet publicly released. Other departments that did not meet the five per cent target by the end of 2023–2024, including Global Affairs Canada and National Defence, have not yet provided responses to Canada's National Observer request for comment and clarification. Indigenous Services Canada told Canada's National Observer the results for the 2024–25 fiscal year are not yet available. The department continues to support Indigenous businesses through initiatives such as the Aboriginal Entrepreneurship Program, The Strategic Partnerships Initiative and the Indigenous Business Navigators. These programs do not focus on specific sectors, but offer economic opportunities, tools, and support for capacity-building for Indigenous entrepreneurs in the industries it has chosen to develop, said Anispiragas Piragasanathar, a spokesperson for Indigenous Services Canada. Sonal Gupta / Local Journalism Initiative / Canada's National Observer Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
