Thai PM faces censure motion as opposition takes aim at father's influence
BANGKOK, March 24 (Reuters) - Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra faces a no-confidence motion in parliament starting on Monday, with the opposition set to grill her over an underperforming economy and her powerful father's perceived influence over her administration.
Despite lukewarm ratings in opinion polls, Paetongtarn comes into the debate in a firm position, with no signs of turmoil in a ruling coalition that commands a parliamentary majority, making it unlikely the motion will prosper when it goes to a vote on Wednesday.
The opposition People's Party has accused Paetongtarn of taking direction from her father, divisive political heavyweight Thaksin Shinawatra, a billionaire former premier who is banned from holding office over a conviction for conflicts of interest and abuse of power that kept him in self-exile for 15 years.
Thaksin, Thailand's most influential and polarising politician, has loomed large over Thai politics for the past 24 years. He returned home in 2023 and spent six months in detention in hospital under a government led by the Pheu Thai Party he founded, before being released on parole.
He has spoken openly and frequently about policies that include legalising gambling and adopting cryptocurrency and championed a $14 billion handout scheme to stimulate the economy, all of which the Pheu Thai-led government has pursued.
Paetongtarn has insisted her government is not under anyone's influence, while Thaksin, 75, has said he is retired and only offers advice.
The government's economic measures so far have yet to spur significant growth in Southeast Asia's second-largest economy, with last year's 2.5% expansion far adrift of regional peers.
The anchors to growth including structural issues and household debt of 16.34 trillion baht ($486 billion), or 89.0% of gross domestic product, among the highest ratios in Asia, which the opposition says the government is not addressing.
Lawmakers will be unable to name Thaksin during the motion due to parliamentary rules that say outsiders should not be mentioned. After weeks of debate on the issue, the house speaker has allowed "family member" to be used.
"The opposition's tactic to delegitimise Paetongtarn's leadership is not new because she already faces criticism from society," said Yuttaporn Issarachai, a political scientist at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University
"The focus on Thaksin's role and interference makes it too political and not beneficial to public, instead of raising issues on the economy and security," Yuttaporn said.
Paetongtarn, 38, took over as premier in August after political ally Srettha Thavisin was ousted by a court over an ethics violation. She is the fourth member of the Shinawatra family to hold the top post.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU to force companies to share details of Russian gas deals, document shows
BRUSSELS, June 13 (Reuters) - European Union companies will be required to disclose details of their Russian gas deals to the EU, under upcoming European Commission proposals to ban Russian gas imports by the end of 2027, an internal Commission document, seen by Reuters, showed. The Commission is preparing to propose legal measures to completely halt the EU's Russian gas imports by the end of 2027, and ban new Russian gas deals by the end of this year. The proposals are due to be published on June 17. An internal European Commission analysis of its upcoming proposals, seen by Reuters, said they will require companies to disclose information including the duration, annual contracted volumes, destination clause and date of conclusion of their Russian gas contracts.
Leader Live
42 minutes ago
- Leader Live
SNP's wish to ‘throw open our borders' would risk security
Writing in the Daily Mail ahead of the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch said the SNP's position 'is not remotely serious'. The Scottish Government is much more liberal than both the UK Labour Government and the Tories on immigration, repeatedly calling for more people to be allowed to come to Scotland, but Holyrood does not have the powers to make changes. Ministers have pushed for a shift in the system on a number of occasions, going so far as to propose a separate Scottish visa in 2020 under Nicola Sturgeon – a pitch which was quickly rejected by the Conservative-led government of the time. Mrs Badenoch wrote: 'We need a new, sustainable system that only admits a strict number of people who come here legally, do the right thing, and who contribute to society. 'That means we must introduce a strict numerical cap on legal migration, ensure there is zero-tolerance for foreign criminals, and pass the Deportation Bill to remove those who should not be here. 'The left-wing parties at Holyrood – not just the SNP, but also Labour and the Lib Dems – don't believe tougher action is necessary. Scottish Conservative Party Conference is now in full swing. Follow along to see how @RussellFindlay1 is bringing common sense to Scottish politics 🏴🇬🇧#SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 13, 2025 'On immigration, those parties have policies student politicians would be ashamed of. 'The SNP's stance, in particular, is not remotely serious. 'If they ever got their way, they would put our citizens' security at risk. It's the nationalists' view that we should just throw open our borders, without any checks or limitations on who comes into the country.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
SNP's wish to ‘throw open our borders' would risk security
Writing in the Daily Mail ahead of the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch said the SNP's position 'is not remotely serious'. The Scottish Government is much more liberal than both the UK Labour Government and the Tories on immigration, repeatedly calling for more people to be allowed to come to Scotland, but Holyrood does not have the powers to make changes. Ministers have pushed for a shift in the system on a number of occasions, going so far as to propose a separate Scottish visa in 2020 under Nicola Sturgeon – a pitch which was quickly rejected by the Conservative-led government of the time. Mrs Badenoch wrote: 'We need a new, sustainable system that only admits a strict number of people who come here legally, do the right thing, and who contribute to society. 'That means we must introduce a strict numerical cap on legal migration, ensure there is zero-tolerance for foreign criminals, and pass the Deportation Bill to remove those who should not be here. 'The left-wing parties at Holyrood – not just the SNP, but also Labour and the Lib Dems – don't believe tougher action is necessary. Scottish Conservative Party Conference is now in full swing. Follow along to see how @RussellFindlay1 is bringing common sense to Scottish politics 🏴🇬🇧#SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 13, 2025 'On immigration, those parties have policies student politicians would be ashamed of. 'The SNP's stance, in particular, is not remotely serious. 'If they ever got their way, they would put our citizens' security at risk. It's the nationalists' view that we should just throw open our borders, without any checks or limitations on who comes into the country.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
