logo
Cancer surgeries are getting delayed at Orange Hospital to hit waitlist targets, doctor claims

Cancer surgeries are getting delayed at Orange Hospital to hit waitlist targets, doctor claims

Inside one of NSW's largest regional hospitals doctors allege there are patient care breaches that contravene NSW health policy.
Those alleged breaches include downgrading the urgency of cancer patients and delaying their surgery without clinical justification.
Doctors say hospital management is to blame and also accuse them of not bringing on an extra breast cancer surgeon because it would create more demand.
Doctor Rob Knox is a general surgeon and the current director of the surgical department at Orange Hospital.
He first suspected something was not right in early 2024 as he prepared to operate on some of his cancer patients.
While checking patient notes he saw that the urgency of their operations had been changed from the highest to the lowest priority.
"When I've rocked up on the day I've seen a different category against these patients' names," Dr Knox told 7.30.
"So I've questioned [hospital] management and said, 'Well hang on, what's happened here'?"
He had allocated his cancer patients a Category One surgery, which meant their operations must be done within 30 days.
He says those surgeries had been changed to Category Four, which means the patients were "not ready for care".
"When directly challenging senior management they've dug in their heels and they've said, 'Actually no, we're allowed to do this,'" Dr Knox said.
The encounter prompted Dr Knox to start keeping records of discrepancies and he asked his fellow surgeons to do the same.
"We started documenting these issues and challenging management and, unfortunately, rather than advocate for patient care, decisions were taken and responses given that seem to be more protective of the system than of the patients we're supposed to be serving," he said.
Since then the surgeons say they have fielded numerous requests from hospital management to change the patients' clinical urgency status, so they don't "breach" their recommended waiting time.
In some instances operations have been reclassified without the doctors' approval.
7.30 has seen emails sent to doctors at Orange Hospital, which include requests to suspend an operation and to make a patient "not ready for care".
Another surgeon was contacted to seek approval to extend a patient's 30-day wait to 90 days due to a lack of theatre space.
Dr Knox says the re-categorisations contravene NSW Health policy.
"The policy is quite clear that it should not be influenced by the availability of hospital resources or even the surgeon's availability."
The NSW Health policy lists five options that must be considered by hospitals to avoid breaching waiting times.
These include providing additional theatre time or referring a patient to another doctor.
"Postponements or delays to surgery must be avoided and only occur when all alternative options are exhausted," the policy states.
In an email to a senior manager in February 2024, Dr Knox challenged the hospital's actions.
"Whilst we don't really make a noise if non-cancer cases breach their clinical urgency by a few days, we should and do for cancers," he wrote.
He says health data shows a four-week delay in surgery can result in a five per cent increased mortality rate.
"It's very hard to say that a delay of one to two to five days makes a difference, but undoubtedly on a broader level it does, and to one individual, it is going to make a difference."
The Orange Health Service declined 7.30's request for an interview but in a statement a spokesperson for the Western NSW Local Health District (LHD) said it "rejects claims that surgeons have been asked to reclassify surgical procedures and prioritise waiting list targets over patient care".
"The five options described in NSW Health policy to assist in managing patients within the required time-frames are activated where possible but may be affected by … the availability of surgical and other staff, appropriate theatre facilities," the spokesperson said.
The LHD said the number of patients waiting longer for a planned surgery than clinically recommended did not "constitute a wait time blow out".
NSW Health Minister Ryan Park said he had been assured by the hospital that it was complying with the guidelines.
"I want to be clear that shouldn't be happening, that's against clinical guidelines. We have a framework in place," Mr Park told 7.30.
"My advice is that that hospital and the staff have been following that.
"If there are issues where that has not been the case, then I'd want them investigated.
"What we expect is patients' clinical care to be first, second and third KPI. That's what I expect as the health minister."
One patient who faced an anxious wait is Katrina Reiss.
The young mother was diagnosed with breast cancer in June 2024 and underwent chemotherapy and immunotherapy before being booked in for surgery last December.
She had worked in the hospital's surgery admissions office for 19 years, before leaving in 2021. She knew she could expect her surgery date within days of handing in her form.
Her fears escalated when she did not have a date more than a week later.
"I knew that it wasn't exactly the way that it was supposed to go," Ms Reiss told 7.30.
"I was starting to get concerned, because we were coming up to the Christmas closure time as well.
"I was really worried that I wasn't going to be getting my surgery within the 30-day period.
"I knew the policy so well, and I knew how the system should have worked. I was able to advocate for myself, and I was confident enough to be able to go to my surgeon and say, 'this isn't right, can you help me?'
Ms Reiss had her surgery within the 30-day time-frame last December and is now cancer free.
But it is this lead up to Christmas which is when surgeons are under the greatest pressure.
"There's a lot more cancer diagnosis that happens at that time," urological surgeon Dr Clair Whelan said.
"People put off their diagnosis, something they've been ignoring a lump, bleeding, and then by the time they get to December they finally decide to go to their GP and get that thing sorted.
"Those are the times when we're most stretched to be able to get cases done in theatre and to be asked to re-classify patients according to urgency."
Dr Whelan was director of surgery before Dr Knox and shares his concerns about how waiting lists are being managed.
She says while she has never had patients re-categorised without her approval, any requests she does receive put her in an impossible position.
"Sometimes it becomes really difficult, particularly when we are talking about those cancer patients, to say, 'well, I can't pick that one of these cancers is going to be more urgent,' because sometimes we don't know that until after the [surgery]," she said.
Dr Whelan said some patients have taken the matter into their own hands.
"We certainly had examples of patients towards the end of last year who removed themselves from the public hospital waiting list, and what the hospital sees is, 'great, those patients no longer need their operation,'" she said.
The latest data from the Bureau of Health Information in late 2024 shows 37 patients waited longer for their surgery at Orange Hospital than the recommended time-frame, which is an increase since the previous reporting period.
But Dr Knox said the doctors' own records showed the hospital's figures did not reflect what they were seeing.
Dr Knox says the wait begins from the time people are referred to a specialist surgeon.
"That waiting time has increased significantly," he said.
"We've looked at the data here and the average in Australia is that about 39 per cent or 35 per cent of patients wait more than one month to see a specialist," he said.
Dr Knox's waiting list records, seen by 7.30, also show that for diagnostic procedures, such as colonoscopies, many patients could not be treated within the recommended time-frame.
"It's what we often would term the 'hidden wait list,"' he said.
The surgeons believe the waiting list pressures are being caused by access to operating theatres and doctor vacancies.
Orange recently lost its only vascular surgeon and one of Dr Whelan's colleagues moved interstate, leaving her and one other urological surgeon servicing a large swathe of western NSW.
When Dr Knox asked at a hospital clinical council meeting in August 2024 about the appointment of an additional breast cancer surgeon to cope with demand, he was shocked by a senior manager's reply.
"Obviously we're not generating pathology out there in the community. We're not walking around with ray guns, zapping people to try and generate pathology.
"The meaning of that is that we will generate a waitlist of patients and move this hidden waitlist into a very visible waitlist that then becomes the hospital's liability to deal with.
"The obvious question is, who benefits from this? It's not patients, it's not clinicians, it's the health system."
The spokesperson for the Western NSW Local Health District said "a business case was being prepared to examine the current and future vascular surgical demand".
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police raids find trend of larger volumes of illegal tobacco in country stores
Police raids find trend of larger volumes of illegal tobacco in country stores

ABC News

time9 hours ago

  • ABC News

Police raids find trend of larger volumes of illegal tobacco in country stores

On today's show: Police in South Australia's Riverland have seized more than 1,000 illegal cigarettes, 500 vapes and 15 kilograms of loose tobacco. Multiple businesses received 28-day closure notices and on-the-spot fines as a result. The SA Minister for Consumer and Business Affairs says the illicit tobacco task force will continue to adjust their tactics to adapt to new organised crime gang models. Reporter: Amelia Walters (Renmark) Demolition of a popular lookout in Lancelin has begun due to the risk of it crumbling into the ocean. Local governments in Western Australia's Midwest are fighting coastal erosion as it eats away at public infrastructure. A coastal engineering lecturer Arnold Van Rooijen says governments need to tailor erosion management programs for individual towns. Reporter: Chris Lewis (Geraldton) A coroner has ruled a dementia patient who disappeared from a regional Queensland hospital in 2023, never to be seen again, died from dehydration. Major changes to the hospital's security followed but they have not stopped similar incidents occurring. It has prompted calls for change from the man's family and advocacy groups. Reporter: Katrina Beavan (Rockhampton) A Busselton widow has shared her experience of WA's struggling public health system. Jenny Cross says her husband Kevin was left bleeding while ramped in an ambulance and moved between hospital beds prior to his death in July. AMA president Kyle Hoath wants the state government to acknowledge problems with the system. Reporter: Pip Waller (Bunbury)

Dr Vahid Reza Adib gives evidence at first day of inquest into the death of his patient Rosemarie Campbell
Dr Vahid Reza Adib gives evidence at first day of inquest into the death of his patient Rosemarie Campbell

ABC News

time10 hours ago

  • ABC News

Dr Vahid Reza Adib gives evidence at first day of inquest into the death of his patient Rosemarie Campbell

A surgeon who performed weight loss surgery on a woman three days before she died from complications has been grilled at an inquest into the 62-year-old's death. Rosemarie Campbell died at her Gold Coast home in February 2022 in the days following a gastric bypass surgery at The Wesley Hospital in Brisbane. The operation was carried out by Dr Vahid Reza Adib, the partner of former Queensland premier Annastacia Palaszczuk. She also had an earlier gastric sleeve procedure carried out by Dr Adib in 2020, and her treatment by him and other healthcare staff is being examined at a coronial inquiry in Brisbane. A coroner will also look at the appropriateness of the second surgery offered to Ms Campbell and the circumstances of her discharge from hospital. During a preliminary inquest conference earlier this year, the court heard Ms Campbell died from sepsis after acquiring acute bacterial peritonitis from a strangulated hernia and pneumonia, however on Monday a forensic pathologist amended his statement. Dr Isaac Han told the court via video link that on review of an initial report there was "not sufficient" evidence there was movement of bacteria from her bowel into her blood stream, which is what causes sepsis. "We were unable to show that in the autopsy," he said. Dr Adib also gave evidence and was questioned at length about his treatment of Ms Campbell for both surgeries, including a lack of records of his consultations with her after the 2020 procedure. He told the court he would have had a post-operative review with her in the first two weeks, alongside a dietician, but accepted there were no clinical notes from the time made by him. "It's usually a joint consultation and I am always present," he said. "I regularly, without fail send a letter to the general practitioner (GP) [after] that visit." When asked why there was no separate entry in his medical system, he told the court "[the letter] is my record". Dr Adib was also asked about prescription repeats he wrote for Ms Campbell for medication to treat reflux, after an initial one-month supply ran out. He told the court he could not recall when a further script was issued but believed it would have followed either a telehealth or phone consultation as it was during the COVID-19 pandemic. "We did not have a lot of access direct face-to-face, and we were learning how to adopt our medical records to telehealth or phone consultations," he said. He told the court, reflux was a "very common" symptom in sleeve gastrectomy patients and some required medication for six to 12 months after the procedure. The court heard in January 2022 Ms Campbell had complained to her GP about ongoing reflux and this was raised with Dr Adib. However, Dr Adib told the court prior to this, it had not been raised by a dietician at her 12 month post operative review. "If there are areas of concern … [the dietician] would raise it with me and I would arrange a personal review," he said. Mr Adib accepted there were "shortcomings" with the medical record keeping system he used, and that some things were not being included in patient files or inaccurate things were being recorded. However, he was adamant if Ms Campbell made complaints about ongoing reflux at the 12-month review or after this, he would have been made aware regardless of the record keeping. After the GP contacted him in January 2022, the court heard Dr Adib had a consultation with Ms Campbell to discuss the ongoing reflux. During this consult he said she had also complained that her weight loss had stabilised and her weight had stared to increase, and she wished to lose further weight. "We had a good chat about her symptoms, I asked her certain questions," he said. He told the court he discussed options with her including general advice to assist with improving her reflux, as well as a possible endoscopy procedure. The court heard a further weight loss procedure was ultimately decided and a gastric bypass was booked for the following month. Following this, Dr Adib accepted he signed a letter to support the release of part of Ms Campbell's superannuation to fund the second surgery. The court heard that letter contained incorrect information about Ms Campbell including inaccurate BMI and current comorbidities and that her current condition was life threatening. Dr Adib told the court this was the result of a "clerical error". "This is a template generated by my front desk, I accept full responsibility," he said. "Unfortunately, I did not update the template." Dr Adib told the court in 2020 Ms Campbell's BMI had initially been at more than a "class 3" obesity level, and after her first surgery it had dropped to the "overweight" range. At the time of her second surgery, the court heard she was back to "class 1" obesity. Dr Adib told the court this alone was not the only reason for suggesting the second surgery. He said she was suffering a "very poor quality of life" due to the ongoing reflux, and a gastric bypass procedure was "gold standard" in treating that condition. "That is not readily available in the public system … this was the only way to help her out of her situation," he said. Dr Adib was also asked about a letter he submitted about Ms Campbell's treatment to the coroner's office in the months after her death. It was put to Dr Adib this letter was inaccurate, as it said her treatment had been prepared by a "team" of dieticians and psychologists, and she had been seen by a nurse practitioner. "That statement is not false," he said. Dr Adib told the court she had access to multiple dieticians he worked with, had been given details for psychologists which she chose not to engage in, and had seen a nurse practitioner when she was being prepped for surgery. He also denied it was false to state in that same letter that her choice of foods had caused her weight gain. Dr Adib was asked what he was told by nursing staff at hospital on the day he approved Ms Campbell's discharge. He said they told him over the phone she vomited a couple of times, and they were initially worried she had thrown up her medication but was "otherwise stable". "They said she was overall feeling better and was very keen to get home because of the Brisbane floods," he said. "I said, 'If she's meeting the discharge criteria and the [clinical] pathways, she can go.'" When asked if he queried specifically about her vitals or pain, he said no, and that it was "routine practice" that nursing staff should be reporting any concerns to him, particularly if her deterioration score was listed as a zero. "I am supposed to be told," he said. "I was not asked about any deterioration, there was no deterioration recorded. "Had that alarm had been made with me I would have definitely and immediately seen that patient." Under cross examination by lawyers for the nurses on staff that day, it was put to Dr Adib there was no "discharge criteria" in place at the hospital at the time, and he was being called because there was a concern about Ms Campbell. "What I was told is she is feeling slightly better … and her observations were stable and she's keen to get out," he said. "If I was aware of her deterioration, accurately, I would not be happy for the discharge." The court heard he wrote a prescription for her for anti-nausea medication before she left hospital. The inquest continues on Tuesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store