logo
California mayor wants to give homeless people 'all the fentanyl they want': 'Need to purge these people'

California mayor wants to give homeless people 'all the fentanyl they want': 'Need to purge these people'

Yahoo21-04-2025
A Southern California mayor said he wants to eliminate his city's homeless population by "giving them all the fentanyl they want," a controversial comment he doubled down on by saying he supports a federal "purge" of homeless people.
Lancaster Mayor R. Rex Parris, a Republican, made the comments during a city council meeting on Feb. 25 when a resident questioned him about the city's plan to address the homeless crisis by "enclosing" the homeless population in a single encampment in an abandoned golf course near a residential neighborhood.
"What I want to do is give them free fentanyl. That's what I want to do," Parris responded.
"I want to give them all the fentanyl they want," he reiterated.
Neckties In Dress Codes May Be Next To Face A Ban In California, If Mayor's Proposal Gains Traction
The resident replied that the mayor's approach "was not kind."
Read On The Fox News App
The mayor is now facing a recall effort following his comments at the city council meeting, although it has only collected 6% of its goal of 20,000 signatures. He has faced past scrutiny over his controversial moves, including his decision to extend mayoral terms from two years to four.
"For too long, Mayor R. Rex Parris has prioritized personal gain over the well-being of residents. His administration has been marked by mismanagement, controversial policies, and a disregard for transparency," a recall petition reads.
"Lancaster deserves leadership that listens, serves, and uplifts the community – not one that divides and exploits it," it adds.
But Parris has reaffirmed his position about wanting to give homeless people the illicit drug that kills thousands of Californians per year. He told Fox 11 on Friday that he has no regrets about his remarks and that he was referring to homeless criminals who "refuse" to seek help.
"I made it very clear I was talking about the criminal element that were let out of the prisons that have now become 40 to 45% of what's referred to as the homeless population," Parris said.
"They are responsible for most of our robberies, most of our rapes, and at least half of our murders," he continued. "There's nothing that we can do for these people."
The mayor did not provide data to back up his claims about the number of crimes homeless people are responsible for.
Parris said he did not expect his comments to be taken "literally," telling the outlet that fentanyl is "so easy" to obtain on the streets that it would not make a difference if the city offered the opioid to homeless people for free.
The mayor sought to credit Lancaster for providing more "innovative" solutions to the homeless crisis than other U.S. cities and floated the idea of a federal "purge" to cut down on the homeless population.
Homeless Man Wins $1 Million On Lottery Scratcher From California Liquor Store: Report
"Quite frankly, I wish that the president would give us a purge. Because we do need to purge these people," Parris said.
"Now, is it harsh? Of course, it is harsh," he continued. "But it's my obligation as the mayor of the city of Lancaster to protect the hardworking families that live there, and I am no longer able to do it… It's an untenable situation, and I'm open to any solution… I want these people out of our city."
Parris, who has been mayor since 2008 and won re-election last year, also made a controversial move in 2018 when he proposed banning workplace dress codes that require wearing neckties over claims that they restrict blood flow to the brain.Original article source: California mayor wants to give homeless people 'all the fentanyl they want': 'Need to purge these people'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center
Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center

Los Angeles Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center

MIAMI — A federal judge in Miami dismissed part of a lawsuit that claimed detainees were denied access to the legal system at the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz' and moved the remaining counts of the case to another court. Claims that the detainees were denied hearings in immigration court were rendered moot when the Trump administration last weekend designated the Krome North Processing Center near Miami as a site for their cases to be heard, U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz said in a 47-page ruling Monday night dismissing a 5th Amendment count. The judge granted the state defendants a change of venue motion to the Middle District of Florida, where the remaining claims of 1st Amendment violations will be addressed. Those include allegations of delays in scheduling meetings between detainees and their attorneys and an inability for the detainees to talk privately with their attorneys by phone or videoconference at the facility whose official name is the South Detention Facility. ACLU lawyer Eunice Cho, the lead attorney for the detainees, said the federal government reversed course only last weekend and allowed the detainees to petition an immigration court because of the lawsuit. 'It should not take a lawsuit to force the government to abide by the law and the Constitution,' Cho said. 'We look forward to continuing the fight.' The judge heard arguments from both sides in a hearing earlier Monday in Miami. Civil rights attorneys were seeking a preliminary injunction to ensure detainees at the facility had access to their lawyers and could get a hearing. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration raced to build the facility on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland two months ago in order to aid President Trump's efforts to deport people who are in the U.S. illegally. The governor has said the location in the rugged and remote Everglades was meant as a deterrent against escape, much like the island prison in California that Republicans named it after. The detention center has an estimated annual cost of $450 million. The state and federal government had argued that even though the isolated airstrip where the facility is located is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's Southern District was the wrong venue since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's Middle District. Judge Ruiz had hinted during a hearing last week that he had some concerns over which jurisdiction was appropriate. Attorneys for the detainees had argued that Ruiz's court was appropriate since the detainees were under the oversight of federal officials in the Miami regional office. Any transfer to another venue would cause a delay in a court decision. Ruiz noted the facts in the case changed Saturday when the Trump administration designated the Krome facility as the immigration court with jurisdiction over all detainees at the detention center. The judge wrote that the case has 'a tortured procedural history' since it was filed July 16, weeks after the first group of detainees arrived at the facility. 'Nearly every aspect of the Plaintiffs' civil action — their causes of action, their facts in support, their theories of venue, their arguments on the merits and their requests for relief — have changed with each filing,' the judge wrote. The state and federal government defendants made an identical argument last week about jurisdiction for a second lawsuit in which environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe sued to stop further construction and operations at the Everglades detention center until it's in compliance with federal environmental laws. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in Miami on Aug. 7 ordered a 14-day halt to additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing that wrapped up last week. She has said she plans to issue a ruling before the order expires later this week. She had yet to rule on the venue question. Detainees at the facility have said worms turn up in the food, toilets don't flush, flooding floors with fecal waste, and mosquitoes and other insects are everywhere. Civil rights attorneys also said officers were going cell to cell to pressure detainees into signing voluntary removal orders before they're allowed to consult their attorneys, and some detainees had been deported even though they didn't have final removal orders. Along with the spread of a respiratory infection and rainwater flooding in tents, the circumstances had fueled a feeling of desperation among detainees, the attorneys wrote in a court filing. Fischer, Schneider and Frisaro write for the Associated Press. Frisaro reported from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Schneider reported from Orlando, Fla.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store