logo
‘Big beautiful bill' is a budget-busting boondoggle

‘Big beautiful bill' is a budget-busting boondoggle

Gulf Today2 days ago

Patricia Murphy,
Tribune News Service
Days before the House passed President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' Moody's Ratings agency had an ominous warning about the US economy. Because of America's recent history of running up huge debts and deficits, and no change in sight, 'the United States' fiscal performance is likely to deteriorate' relative to similar countries. As a part of that warning, Moody's downgraded the country's credit rating from its AAA score to AA1. Despite that red flag, House leaders forged ahead, passing their 10-year tax-and-spend plan, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, by a single vote. Unfortunately, the bill not only ignores Moody's debt warning, it looks more like one big, beautiful boondoggle.
Included in the gargantuan bill are $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, more than $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid, food stamps, and other social programs, and significant boosts in spending for defense and immigration enforcement. Costs of some social programs, including food stamps, are also shifted to states by the House. My colleague Tia Mitchell reported this week that Georgia officials could now be on the hook for more than $800 million in food spending if the GOP bill goes through. Other states that expanded Medicaid under Obamacare will absorb more of those costs, too. All of the cuts to social safety net programs came, in part, to help pay for the tax cuts in the bill, which are heavily weighted toward high-income earners. For example, the working-class tax breaks that Trump promised on the campaign trail, namely eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay, and car loan interest, will only last through the end of Trump's term in 2028. But the income tax cuts, including for the richest Americans, as well as tax breaks for estates and investment income all become permanent.
The House also stuffed loads of perks for special interests into the 1,100-page bill. One measure bans states from passing new regulations on artificial intelligence for 10 years. So if Georgia lawmakers decide they want to limit the use of AI in Georgia classrooms, like they did with cellphones this year, the Big Beautiful Bill Act would stop that until 2036. It would also mean Georgia lawmakers could not pass SB 9, a bill to ban deepfakes in political ads, which passed the state House and Senate earlier this year, but did not get to final passage. A different measure, this one for gun dealers, was put into the bill by Georgia's U.S. Rep. Andrew Clyde. The Republican from Athens owns two large gun stores, which both sell gun silencers. Clyde flipped from a 'no' to a 'yes' after the $200 tax on silencers was eliminated, at a cost of $1.4 billion.
'My Democrat colleagues have asked, 'How did it get in the bill, what was in the deal and who asked for it?'' Clyde said during the House debate. 'No deal. I believe (Speaker Mike Johnson) with the purest of motives wanted to restore a constitutional right. Who asked? Me, I asked.' Of all of the special interests in the bill, the most special of all seems to be Trump himself. The bill mentions Trump's name 52 times. It also creates new $1,000 savings accounts for babies born during Trump's second term called 'Trump Accounts.' It even has language to make it harder for federal courts to enforce injunctions against executive branch officials, a lot like the injunctions Trump has run into as he tries to expand his own powers in the White House.
Every spending bill is a political document, of course, and a Republican Congress cutting taxes and rolling back Biden-era climate measures is no surprise. But what is a surprise is the bill's price tag, $3.94 trillion, which will all get piled onto the nation's $36 trillion debt that Moody's just warned about. For every tax cut and spending measure that may be a good idea on its merits, it's all getting paid for with more borrowed money. It's a long way from the Tea Party movement, which exploded onto the scene in 2009 after Congress passed big bailouts for banks following the 2008 financial crisis. The national debt then was $13 trillion, one third of what it is today. Republicans then promised they would finally tackle the debt and the deficit. This bill does the opposite.
Even Elon Musk, the mastermind of the Department of Government Efficiency, said so on his last day as a government employee this week, adding that the bill 'undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.'
'It can be big or beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both,' he said. If I was a House Republican at the beginning of this year, I had one job — to reduce the debt and deficit. With Trump in the White House, Republicans in control of Congress, and Musk promising to modernize and remake the federal government, the House bill was supposed to be the vehicle for all of that to happen. Instead, they just passed one big, beautiful boondoggle.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wall Street ticks higher as tech boost offsets economic worries
Wall Street ticks higher as tech boost offsets economic worries

Al Etihad

time38 minutes ago

  • Al Etihad

Wall Street ticks higher as tech boost offsets economic worries

4 June 2025 19:00 (REUTERS)US stocks edged higher on Wednesday, as strength in technology shares offset declines driven by weak economic data that deepened concerns about the impact of the Trump administration's erratic trade US services sector contracted for the first time in nearly a year in May, while businesses paid higher input prices, a reminder that the economy was still at risk of experiencing a period of very slow growth and high ADP National Employment Report showed US private employers added the fewest number of workers in more than two years in May. Investors are awaiting Friday's nonfarm-payrolls data for more signs on how trade uncertainty is affecting the US labour doubled tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% on Wednesday, the same day by which President Donald Trump wanted trading partners to make their best offers to avoid other punishing import levies from taking effect in early focus is squarely on tariff negotiations between Washington and its trading partners, with Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping expected to speak sometime this week as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest was the best month for the S&P 500 index and the tech-heavy Nasdaq since November 2023, thanks to a softening of Trump's harsh trade stance and upbeat earnings S&P 500 remains less than 3% away from its record highs touched in joined a slew of other brokerages in raising its year-end price target for the S&P 500, pointing to easing trade uncertainty and expectations of normalised earnings growth in 10:36 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 88.09 points, or 0.20%, to 42,605.07, the S&P 500 gained 17.36 points, or 0.29%, to 5,987.73 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 58.41 points, or 0.31%, to 19, of the 11 major S&P 500 sub-sectors rose, led by communication services with a 1.2% rise, while information technology stocks gained 0.4%.Shares of Hewlett Packard Enterprise rose 1.1% as demand for the company's artificial-intelligence servers and hybrid cloud segment helped it beat estimates for second-quarter revenue and rose 2.2% after the chip manufacturer announced plans to increase its investments to $16 dropped 3.8%. The electric-vehicle maker's sales dropped for the fifth straight month in big European Fargo shares rose 1.2% after the U.S. Federal Reserve removed a $1.95 trillion asset cap imposed in 2018 following years of of cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike slumped 4.7% after it forecast quarterly revenue below Tree fell 10.2% after the discount store operator forecast second-quarter adjusted profit would be as much as 50% lower than a year ago due to tariff-driven issues outnumbered decliners by a 2.02-to-1 ratio on the NYSE and by a 1.41-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 19 new 52-week highs and no new lows while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 63 new highs and 23 new lows.

US service sector unexpectedly contracts in May; inflation heats up
US service sector unexpectedly contracts in May; inflation heats up

Zawya

timean hour ago

  • Zawya

US service sector unexpectedly contracts in May; inflation heats up

The U.S. services sector contracted for the first time in nearly a year in May while businesses paid higher prices for inputs, a reminder that the economy remained in danger of experiencing a period of very slow growth and high inflation. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) said on Wednesday its nonmanufacturing purchasing managers index (PMI) dropped to 49.9 last month, the first decline below the 50 mark and lowest reading since June 2024, from 51.6 in April. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the services PMI rising to 52.0 following some easing in trade tensions between the United States and China. A PMI reading below 50 indicates contraction in the services sector, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the economy. The ISM associates a PMI reading above 48.6 over time with growth in the overall economy. The ISM on Monday reported that manufacturing contracted for a third straight month in May, with suppliers taking the longest time in nearly three years to deliver inputs amid tariffs. President Donald Trump's import duties, which at times have been implemented in a disorderly manner, have sowed confusion among businesses. Economists say the tariff uncertainty was making it difficult for businesses to plan ahead. Businesses from retailers, airlines to motor vehicle manufacturers have either withdrawn or refrained from giving financial guidance for 2025. While economists do not expect a recession this year, stagflation is on the radar of many. The ISM survey's new orders measure dropped to 46.4 from 52.3 in April, likely with the ebbing of the boost from front-running related to tariffs. Services sector customers viewed their inventory as too high in relation to business requirements, which does not bode well for activity in the near term. Suppliers' delivery performance continued to worsen. This, together with lengthening delivery times at factories, points to strained supply chains that could drive inflation higher through shortages. Businesses are also seeking to pass on tariffs, which are a tax, to consumers. The ISM survey's supplier deliveries index for the services sector rose to 52.5 from 51.3 in April. A reading above 50 indicates slower deliveries. A lengthening in suppliers' delivery times is normally associated with a strong economy. Delivery times are, however, likely getting longer because of bottlenecks in the supply chains. That was reinforced by a surge in the survey's measure of prices paid for services inputs to 68.7, the highest level since November 2022, from 65.1 in April. Most economists anticipate the tariff hit to inflation and employment could become evident by summer in the so-called hard economic data. Services sector employment picked up. The survey's measure of services employment rose to 50.7 from 49.0 in April. The government is expected to report on Friday that nonfarm payrolls increased by 130,000 jobs in May after advancing by 177,000 in April, a Reuters survey of economists showed. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at 4.2%, with greater risks of a rise to 4.3%. (Reporting By Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama )

South Korea's Lee Jae-myung is the right man to deal with Donald Trump
South Korea's Lee Jae-myung is the right man to deal with Donald Trump

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

South Korea's Lee Jae-myung is the right man to deal with Donald Trump

South Koreans went to the polls to choose a new president on Tuesday, and they handed Lee Jae-myung of the Democratic Party a clear victory with 49.4 per cent of the vote. But even before Mr Lee was sworn in at the country's Parliament the following morning, he appeared to be surrounded by a whirlwind of questions, accusations and warnings. 'The first task facing South Korea's next leader: Handling Trump' was one headline, referring not just to the 25 per cent tariffs Seoul may have to deal with from Washington, but also Mr Lee's willingness to improve relations with China and North Korea, a shift from the very pro-US and Japan outlook of former president Yoon Suk-yeol, who had plunged the country into chaos by briefly declaring martial law last December. It may indeed be quite the challenge if Mr Trump listens to one self-appointed adviser, the hardcore Maga activist Laura Loomer, who posted on X: 'RIP South Korea. The communists have taken over and won the presidential election today. This is terrible.' Mr Lee faces a country with deep political divides, and the two other candidates, both on the right, won a combined total of just over 50 per cent. So even though the election was widely seen as being driven by anger at Mr Yoon's self-implosion – for which he was impeached, arrested and driven from office – which hindered the candidacy of Kim Moon-soo, who is from the same People Power Party as Mr Yoon, 'the conservative tally outweighed Lee's support even after the debacle of Yoon's martial law decree', as one analyst put it. Not enough young people support Mr Lee, say some. He faces legal charges – which he says are politically motivated – although they may be suspended until after his five-year term as President ends. Others accuse him of being a showy populist who has used fiery and – they would say – irresponsible rhetoric about US troops stationed in the country. How will he cope with an economy that is 'sputtering'? Oh, and to top it all, he apparently doesn't even have a proper place to work, since Mr Yoon moved the presidential office out of the Blue House, the official residence, to a military compound that none of the candidates said they liked. There are other ways to look at Mr Lee's victory, of course. The 6 per cent margin of his win over Mr Kim was more than emphatic enough in a three-way race, and with his Democratic Alliance partners holding 173 out of the 300 parliamentary seats, there should be none of the logjam between the executive and the legislature that led Mr Yoon to make such a rash (and career-ending) move. Mr Lee has called for 'national unity' and said on election night that he wanted South Korea to be a country 'where we live together with mutual recognition and co-operation rather than hatred and loathing'. All of this should reassure investors, while the new President has a $25 billion stimulus package up his sleeve, plans for labour and corporate governance reforms, and wants to go all-out on stimulating domestic demand. As for Mr Trump, despite Ms Loomer's wild characterisation of Mr Lee as a 'communist' – the adjectives 'liberal' and 'centrist' are more commonly preferred – the two leaders may be more likely to hit it off than some have suggested. They are both populists: Mr Lee made a point of being filmed when he climbed over barriers to enter the National Assembly to vote against Mr Yoon's imposition of martial law last December, and he has been referred to as 'Korea's Bernie Sanders', but also as 'Korea's Trump', for his candid speech and ability to connect with the grassroots. On North Korea, if Mr Trump enters negotiations with Pyongyang again, as he did during his first term, the two could be very in tune. In fact, this February Mr Lee's party sent a letter to the Nobel Committee urging them to nominate Mr Trump for this year's peace prize in the hope that he 'continue his peace-building efforts during his second term', as a party official put it. That was a canny move that will surely have been brought to Mr Trump's attention. Both men have survived assassination attempts. Mr Lee was stabbed in the neck in January 2024 and was airlifted to hospital. Just like Mr Trump, Mr Lee drew inspiration from his survival, saying: 'Since my life was saved by our people, I will dedicate the rest of it solely to serving them.' And when it comes to trade discussions with the US, not only has Mr Lee said it is 'the most important issue' for him, after 'overcoming people's hardships and recovering from the current turmoil', but he seems prepared both to stand his ground and to show the US President whatever deference is required. 'Diplomacy between independent countries can be mutually beneficial,' Mr Lee said on Korean radio last Monday. 'We have plenty of cards to play. There's room to give and take, and that's what we must do well.' Asked how he would react to tough words from Mr Trump, Mr Lee was ready. 'That's just the way powerful countries operate,' he said. 'Any humiliation or pressure is not about me personally – it's about the entire nation. If it's necessary, I'll crawl under his legs. What's the big deal?' So for sure, Mr Lee faces challenges. But with a clear mandate, allies dominating Parliament, and being seen as the person bringing back stability after the tumult of the past six months, he has a lot going for him too. Navigating better relations with China while maintaining the treaty alliance with the US won't perhaps be easy, but he won't be the only leader having to thread that needle. Above all, his pragmatism may end up being his greatest strength. Take his concluding words about his possible approach to Mr Trump: 'An hour of the president's time is worth 52 million hours of the Korean people's time,' he said. 'If the president has to bend briefly so that 52 million people can stand tall, then that's what must be done.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store