‘No more fun' for HairFun: Hair salon chain admits luring elderly with cheap haircuts, then pressuring them into costly treatment packages
SINGAPORE: Hair salon chain HairFun has admitted to luring elderly customers with cheap haircuts and then pressuring them into costly treatment packages they didn't ask for. Now exposed, commenters quipped it's 'no more fun' now, while others questioned, 'Why do local salons like to use this kind of tactic?'
In October last year, the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) launched an investigation after receiving multiple complaints from the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) regarding the sales tactics employed by HairFun employees.
Surprise visits to three HairFun outlets later revealed that staff had been targeting elderly customers with free or low-cost haircut offers, priced between S$4 and S$10, only to mislead them into buying unnecessary and expensive treatment packages.
In one case, an elderly man got an S$8 haircut at the Ang Mo Kio outlet but was told by a HairFun employee that his scalp was 'haemorrhaging' midway through the haircut. The staff then applied a powder to wash his hair and later charged him nearly S$1,000 for treatments and a 10-session hair treatment package he never agreed to. The elderly customer only realised he was deceived when his doctor confirmed there was no haemorrhaging in his head. See also Man finds dead rat in mutton soup from well-known stall
In a Facebook post on Wednesday (Jun 4), CCCS said that HairFun directors Mr Roland Teo Jian Hao and Mdm Chiong Hong Hioh have admitted to engaging in unfair trade practices.
The salon chain and its directors also committed to stopping all unfair trade practices, cooperating with CASE to resolve complaints, and offering a five-day cooling-off period for customers to cancel and get a refund on any prepaid packages. They also agreed to refund affected customers.
So far, HairFun companies have refunded nearly S$12,500 to customers, mostly elderly residents living in the neighbourhood.
Still, some online questioned whether the move was enough. One commenter asked, 'What? No jail?' Another pointed out, 'They are repeat offenders with a new company name doing the same unethical things. How can a refund be enough?' /TISG
Read also: Singaporeans cancel Netflix subscriptions after price hike of up to S$4 monthly
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Air Canada to resume flights after directive ending strike
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Air Canada's flight attendants are required to return to their duties by 2am Singapore time, a directive said. Air Canada plans to resume flights on Aug 17 after the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) acted on a directive from the country's Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu to end a cabin crew strike that caused the suspension of around 700 daily flights. The CIRB directed Air Canada to resume operations and for all Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flight attendants to return to their duties by 2pm Eastern time (2am Singapore time), the airline said in a statement. The directive came after the government on Aug 16 moved to end the strike and require binding arbitration to break a contract impasse, an action that the country's largest carrier had sought but unionised flight attendants fiercely opposed. Thousands of Air Canada cabin crew walked off the job on Aug 16 for the first time since 1985, after months of negotiations over a new contract. In anticipation of the stoppage, the airline began cancelling flights on Aug 15 , forcing more than 100,000 travelers to scramble for alternatives or stay put. Air Canada said flights would restart on the evening of Aug 17, but some would still be cancelled over the next seven to 10 days as the schedule stabilises and returns to normal. REUTERS
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Three Sengkang Green Primary 3 students suspended after threatening to kill classmate and her family
SINGAPORE: Sengkang Green Primary School has suspended three Primary 3 students after they sent death threats to a classmate's mother who reported them for bullying her daughter. In a post on Thursday (Aug 14), a Facebook user named Ni Yin claimed to be the victim's mother and detailed the alleged bullying that led to the threats against her and her family. She also uploaded an audio clip she received. In the clip, a person said: 'I might dissect her. I might dissect her into pieces like you. So which one do you want me to do? Dissect her? Or end her life in school? Choose one. Either don't want one, I will kill you instead and your husband.' The mother said her daughter had been bullied "multiple times" and called for stronger action from the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the school. In response to CNA's queries, Sengkang Green Primary School said it has engaged with the parents of the three students on their actions, and the students who made the calls and threats were immediately suspended. Given the severity of their actions, the school will review and mete out further disciplinary consequences, which may include caning, after police investigations, said the school. The students have also been counselled. 'In the course of the school's investigations, we found that the affected student had also engaged in hurtful behaviours. This too will be addressed to ensure the students continue to learn the values of respect and responsibility,' Sengkang Green Primary School added. Since the incidents were reported to the teachers, the school has been supporting the affected student and engaging her parents, it said, adding that a safety plan has been put in place for her. ALLEGED BULLYING In her post, the Facebook user said her daughter, who is in Primary 3, came home on Jul 24 and told her she wanted to stop going to school. She said she had been "persistently bullied" by three students in her class for almost six months. The student's mother also said that her daughter had reported the bullying to her teachers multiple times. After she contacted the mother of one of the boys who bullied her daughter, the students' form teacher said both sides had been asked to "apologise to each other". On Jul 26, the mother said they completed a detailed written complaint and sent it to the school as well as the relevant teachers. Hours later, the student's mother began receiving a series of calls from unknown numbers, harassing her, she said. 'The threat came from one of the boys accused of bullying my daughter, who stated in the message that this was revenge for me contacting a friend's mother to complain about my daughter being hit,' she wrote in her post. After receiving the death threats, the family made a police report, while continuing to receive calls, said the student's mother. They also raised the issue with the Ministry of Education (MOE) and their Member of Parliament (MP). The police confirmed with CNA that a report was lodged over the incident. The minimum age of criminal responsibility in Singapore, which is the minimum age a person can be held criminally responsible for their actions, is 10 years old. This means that anyone aged under 10 cannot be held responsible for their actions, even if they have committed an offence. Three days later, the same student who had issued the death threats attempted to assault her daughter again on school grounds, she said, claiming that the school was unaware of the incident. The family emailed the school to express their concerns about retaliation from the girl's bullies, she said. The girl was then attacked another three times, she said. "My daughter is now too afraid to return to school and has been absent for four consecutive days. She is currently receiving professional psychological support," she wrote in her Facebook post. She called on MOE to allow her daughter to transfer schools, as well as to take the appropriate disciplinary action and counselling for the students behind the bullying and death threats. In a Facebook post on Saturday night, the girl's mother responded to the school's statement that was published by Chinese media outlet Lianhe Zaobao. She said she had not received any written replies or concrete plans for her daughter's safety as of Aug 16, and was shocked that the school claimed her daughter had also engaged in inappropriate behaviour that harmed others. She called on the school to provide evidence for their claim. 'If my daughter did engage in misconduct, I will not cover it up and will fully support MOE's procedures,' she wrote. The mother said the school's statement about her daughter's behaviour "deeply harms the victim, diverts public attention, and shifts blame onto the child".
Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘Drivers helped build this company, and now… drivers no longer partners?' — PHV drivers react to Grab investing in WeRide to bring robotaxis to Southeast Asia
SINGAPORE: Step aside, human drivers. Your new colleague doesn't need sleep, snacks, or small talk. Grab, Southeast Asia's ride-hailing juggernaut and reigning superapp, has just made a Press Release announcement of a strategic equity investment in Chinese autonomous driving giant WeRide . The move, also revealed in a joint announcement reported by Tech in Asia, is aimed at rolling out Level 4 robotaxis and autonomous shuttles across Southeast Asia — and possibly reshaping urban transport as we know it. That's the future knocking. Robotaxis. In Southeast Asia. The region that's famous for chaotic traffic, street food stalls in the fast lane, and grabby Grab drivers (pun intended). What's level 4 autonomy? Level 4 means the vehicle can drive itself without human input — in specific conditions or geofenced areas. No driver's hands. No nervous brake-pumping. Just sensors, software, and sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI). Think Tesla, but with less hype and hopefully fewer exploding batteries. According to WeRide 's CEO, Dr. Tony Han, their vision is ambitious: 'WeRide's vision for Southeast Asia is to deploy thousands of Robotaxis across the region, through a progressive rollout aligned with local regulations and societal readiness.' And who better to partner with than Grab, whose app is already embedded into the daily life of millions from Singapore to Jakarta? But are Southeast Asia's roads ready for it, anyway? While WeRide has proven itself in China and the Middle East, Southeast Asia presents a unique challenge — and perhaps a reality check for any AI-driven vehicle. The potholes have personalities. Motorbikes don't obey lanes. And crossing pedestrians, sometimes they don't even walk — they glide between cars like action movie stars. But Grab seems confident. 'We look forward to working with WeRide to extensively test their vehicles across diverse Southeast Asian environments,' Tan said. And if those tests pass, you might be hailing your next ride in Singapore or Malaysia only to be greeted by… well, no one, except for a screen and a robotic voice. Not all PHV drivers are on board (literally or figuratively) with the idea, though Reactions among current Grab drivers have been… mixed. In the Professional PHV Drivers Singapore group, comments ranged from sceptical to savage: 'If SEA governments are smart, don't let them come in. Don't create unemployment like what China is facing now,' warned one. 'Robotaxi… Grab takes 100% fare… pays tax to the government… this will be the future. It's only a matter of time…' another made a reminding statement. 'Drivers helped build this company, and now… Cross the bridge and dismantle it,' read one frustrated comment. And another, probably in fear of what the future holds for PHV drivers, nervously asked: 'Are drivers no longer partners?' It's clear that while Grab is painting a picture of coexistence between man and machine, some drivers feel they're being left at the kerb. When superapp and superbrain join forces… Grab's investment is set to close by the first half of 2026, pending all the usual due diligence and timing preferences from WeRide . But beyond the money, this partnership is all about tech and traction. Together, the two companies plan to: Integrate WeRide's AV tech into Grab's ride-hailing network Collaborate on fleet management, dispatch, routing, and remote monitoring Train and upskill Grab's driver-partners for new high-value roles in the AV sector (translation: not firing them… if they're willing to upgrade themselves) According to Grab CEO Anthony Tan: 'We believe AVs can complement our driver network and be deployed in cities with significant driver shortages.' That's corporate speak for: 'We're not replacing you… We're augmenting you.' (This is the part you still get nervous glances from human drivers.) The big picture: Why does this matter if it works… or not Autonomous vehicles aren't just about tech innovation — they're about how societies evolve around it. Grab 's move is part of a global trend, but its implementation in the diverse, developing, and sometimes unpredictable cities of Southeast Asia will be a true litmus test. If it works, robotaxis could: Reduce accidents (no more road rage or sleepy drivers) Provide 24/7 access in underserved areas Ease the pressure from driver shortages Create new jobs in AV maintenance, fleet ops, and supervision But if it flops, expect traffic chaos… and similar viral TikToks again. From MOU to major milestone If this sounds sudden, it's not. The deal builds upon a March 2025 Memorandum of Understanding, where both companies agreed to explore AVs' feasibility in the region. Less than a year later, that idea has gone from handshake to headline. Behind the scenes: A whole lot of geeky integration The Grab–WeRide collaboration is not just a front-end show of flashy AVs. Under the hood, it's a full-stack marriage of hardware, software, and cloud infrastructure. The partnership will work on: Dispatch & Routing: Matching cars with riders using AI, not fingers Matching cars with riders using AI, not fingers Uptime Maximisation: Charging, maintaining, and keeping those bots rolling Charging, maintaining, and keeping those bots rolling Safety Performance: Because dodging street animals and unpredictable GrabFood riders takes skill Because dodging street animals and unpredictable GrabFood riders takes skill Remote Monitoring: Teleoperations to handle emergencies when a robot doesn't know what to do Teleoperations to handle emergencies when a robot doesn't know what to do Customer Support: Because even AI needs help when it ends up in the wrong neighbourhood Because even AI needs help when it ends up in the wrong neighbourhood Human Upskilling: Through WeRide 's AV training programs and GrabAcademy's career modules In short, this isn't just a pilot project — it's a long game to redefine what 'ride-hailing' means in the age of AI. So what happens next? The road ahead is long (and full of roadblocks), but with this investment, Grab and WeRide are officially driving in the same direction. And whether you're a tech geek, a nervous driver, or just someone who hates small talk during a ride, the future of mobility in Southeast Asia just got a major update. So for now, buckle up — or don't, your next autonomous car ride might just do that for you. In other news, unlike robotaxis—which don't take things personally or throw a tantrum over passengers' air-conditioning requests—one human PHV driver did otherwise. When his passenger asked to 'increase the air-con,' the driver, clearly not in the mood for thermostat diplomacy, snapped with a sharp: 'Go ahead and get out!' Let's just say: AI may lack emotions or feelings, but at least it won't yell at you. Catch the full real-life PHV drama over here: 'Get out! Get out! This is my car; I'm asking you to get out!' — Tada driver ejects passenger for asking to 'increase air-con speed'
