After a century of logging, lands along California's Klamath River returned to tribe
The effort, which unfolded gradually over the last 23 years, culminated in May as Western Rivers Conservancy turned over 14,968 acres to the Yurok Tribe. It was the last portion of 47,097 acres that the nonprofit group acquired and transferred to the tribe in what is thought to be the largest 'land back' deal in California history.
Members of the tribe say they are celebrating the return of their ancestral lands along Blue Creek, a major tributary that meets the Klamath about 40 miles south of the Oregon border. Blue Creek holds cultural and spiritual significance for the Yurok, and its cold, clear waters provide a refuge for salmon.
'We are salmon people,' said Joseph L. James, chairman of the Yurok Tribe. 'The river takes care of us, and it's our job to take care of the river.'
Read more: Klamath River dam removal brings hope for threatened salmon
In all, the tribe now owns an additional 73 square miles along the lower Klamath River, including much of the Blue Creek watershed. The conifer forests, which were heavily logged over the last century, will be managed by the tribal government as two protected areas, the Blue Creek Salmon Sanctuary and the Yurok Tribal Community Forest.
Yurok leaders say regaining stewardship of these lands contributes to larger efforts to revive the ecological health of the Klamath watershed, where last year the removal of four dams farther upstream restored a free-flowing stretch of the river and enabled salmon to reach spawning areas that had been inaccessible for more than a century.
'This land is back home with us now, and we'll continue that work that we have done as Yurok people to protect the land, protect the streams, provide for our people and provide for the environment,' James said.
In addition to Blue Creek, the land includes other streams that flow into the Klamath.
The tribe plans projects to create healthier stream habitats for fish, and to restore meadows and prairies. In the forests, they plan to use controlled burns to thin vegetation that has built up.
Some old logging roads are being decommissioned, while other roads are set to be upgraded.
'We're going to continue to work to bring back our wildlife population, our fish population,' James said. 'It's going to take a lot of work, but a lot of people are going to benefit from this.'
Beyond the local benefits, James said the effort serves as an example for the Land Back movement, in which Native people in many areas are seeking to regain ancestral lands that were taken from them generations ago.
'This is what it looks like when we talk about land back,' James said. 'Land back means giving the land back to its original people with no strings attached. Let them provide their traditional knowledge to heal the land, the environment.'
Read more: The Klamath River's dams are being removed. Inside the effort to restore a scarred watershed
He said reaching this successful conclusion involved years of efforts by leaders of the tribe and Western Rivers Conservancy, as well as help from other partners. He said the deal should start more discussions nationwide about how other tribes can advance toward regaining their traditional lands.
'It's a big win for Indian Country,' he said. 'Here is a model that people could use, from our experience, to get land back.'
The effort has more than doubled the tribe's landholdings. The lands were previously owned by Green Diamond Resource Co. and its predecessor Simpson Logging Co., which harvested timber there for nearly a century. The last time logging occurred on the property was in 2007.
Western Rivers Conservancy, a Portland, Ore.-based nonprofit, signed a purchase agreement with Green Diamond in 2008 after five years of negotiations and efforts to identify funding. The lands were gradually acquired by the group between 2009 and 2017, and were transferred to the tribe in multiple phases.
The conservation group used an innovative funding strategy, assembling $56 million from foundations, corporations and philanthropists, as well as other sources such as tax credits, public grants and the sale of carbon credits.
State funding and support for the effort came from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and the California State Coastal Conservancy, as well as other agencies.
'We put together this mosaic of different funding sources,' said Nelson Mathews, president of Western Rivers Conservancy. 'This is the result of commitment, persistence and tenacity.'
Mathews' organization focuses on protecting rivers for fish, wildlife and the public, and was drawn to the project for its conservation benefits. By establishing the salmon sanctuary in Blue Creek, the deal safeguards a vital cold-water habitat for fish including Chinook salmon, coho salmon and steelhead.
'With climate change, cold water is at a premium for these rivers, and it's critical,' Mathews said. 'So having complete protection of that watershed is important.'
He said the deal shows how conservation goals and tribes' efforts to regain lands can align in ways that bring tremendous benefits.
'It's good for the soul to protect these rivers, and it's a double benefit to see the tribe get their land back,' Mathews said.
Read more: A California tribe was twice robbed of its land. A 77-acre purchase brings hope
Members of the Yurok Tribe say this effort and others like it are a critically important step in grappling with the lasting effects of colonization.
During the 1800s, California's Native population was decimated by diseases, displacement and violence, including state-sponsored killings.
The Yurok reservation was established by the federal government in 1855, confining the tribe to an area that covered only a tiny fraction of their ancestral territory. In the late 1800s, white settlers and speculators found ways to secure additional lands along the Klamath River where they could extract valuable redwood, in some cases by bribing U.S. General Land Office officials as they fraudulently acquired thousands of acres of timberlands.
Today, the Yurok Tribe is the largest tribe in California, with more than 6,400 enrolled members.
'We are trying to recover from colonization,' said Amy Bowers Cordalis, a lawyer for the tribe and executive director of the Ridges to Riffles Indigenous Conservation Group. 'And we are just now getting into a place where we are starting to see some of the fruits of our efforts, between dam removal and now land back efforts.'
Regaining these lands enables the tribe 'to start rebuilding and to start taking care of our land and our resources,' she said. 'We are strongly committed to living in a balance with the natural world.'
She said for members of the tribe, visiting the cold, clear waters of Blue Creek is a spiritual experience. 'It's one of the most wild places in all of California, and it is glorious.'
It's possible to see some of the area by boat, traveling from the Klamath River to the mouth of Blue Creek. But for now, access to the area is limited.
James said that could change in the future, once restoration and other work is completed.
'At some point in time, we have an opportunity to turn that into a big, beautiful park,' James said. 'We've got to heal it first, put our resources in it, and it's going to take some time.'
He said the tribe's members feel delighted to be once again stewarding these lands and waterways, as their ancestors once did.
'It's a beautiful feeling knowing that we'll have this land in our hands moving forward for the next seven generations, for our Yurok people and our grandchildren.'
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Atlantic
5 days ago
- Atlantic
Dear James: I Can't Keep My Mouth Shut at Work
Editor's Note: Is anything ailing, torturing, or nagging at you? Are you beset by existential worries? Every Tuesday, James Parker tackles readers' questions. Tell him about your lifelong or in-the-moment problems at [email protected]. Don't want to miss a single column? Sign up to get 'Dear James' in your inbox. Dear James, I can't seem to shut up at work, and I keep putting my foot in my mouth. I am a naturally brusque person—a get-to-the-point kinda gal—but I am not a complete boor. Over the years I have learned to temper my directness with watercooler niceties and 'please' and 'thank you' in my emails. But, sometimes, when faced with inadequate meeting agendas, disorganized communication, and paper-pushing bureaucracy, I can't help but speak up about our team-wide inadequacies. (My other colleagues are much more reserved.) I oscillate between wanting to shut up and act my wage, yet also wishing we would hold ourselves to higher standards. By God, can't we do better here? This is not a new feeling in the office for me, and I am starting to question whether I'm the common denominator. Is it time to throw in the towel? Or should I do more to restrain my critical instincts? Dear Reader, I think your questions answer themselves. In the workplace, you should never restrain your critical instincts, and, yup, it's always a good time to throw in the towel. (When it comes to family, interestingly, the opposite is true.) It does sound as if you are the common denominator, carting your high standards and your limited tolerance for banality and ineptitude from office to office. Then again, aren't we all the common denominators in our own lives? It's always us, in the middle of some situation, doing what we always seem to do, arriving at more or less the same outcomes, which for some reason bewilder us completely. Not you, though: You're un-bewildered. You know what you're doing. I've had only a couple of office jobs in my life. I'm a lucky bastard: I sit in coffee shops and type and fiddle around with my playlists on Apple Music. But I do know that watercooler niceties (to take a phrase from your letter) will kill you in the end, and that team-wide inadequacies (to take another one) are a condition of office life. And if you've had enough, you've had enough. Continually firing myself, Dear James, After more than 40 years of cognitive behavioral therapy, I thought I'd overcome my childhood demons. But, like my parents before me, I still became an alcoholic. Now I'm 66, and I'm torn: Should I give up on the world? (The state of affairs is grim.) Or should I strive to live without alcohol? Dear Reader, I deeply appreciate this letter. So many of us right now are contemplating, approaching, or have already passed the moment of abdication you present so clearly. The moment of: You know what? Fuck it. I hope you won't think I'm being flippant if I respond to your question with a couple of staves of soul doggerel. Here they are: TO A READER ON THE VERGE When the demons are upon you and the world is on its ass, why not sink in resignation to the bottom of a glass? I'll tell you why: You're here to try, and while you have volition, to quote my friend Jay Babcock: Don't be bummed into submission. Heroically, James By submitting a letter, you are agreeing to let The Atlantic use it in part or in full, and we may edit it for length and/or clarity.


Atlantic
05-08-2025
- Atlantic
Dear James: I'm a Textbook People Pleaser
Editor's Note: Is anything ailing, torturing, or nagging at you? Are you beset by existential worries? Every Tuesday, James Parker tackles readers' questions. Tell him about your lifelong or in-the-moment problems at [email protected]. Don't want to miss a single column? Sign up to get 'Dear James' in your inbox. Dear James, I have spent so much of my life thinking about other people and viewing my own worth in relation to them. Growing up, I was the 'golden kid' in my family, focused on making the adults happy. Years later, I still often try to say what people want to hear. Ironically, I believe my intense fear of being disliked makes me unlikable: clingy, distant, cold, and needy. I've never had long-lasting friendships or relationships because of it. How do I escape this self-fulfilling prophecy? Dear James, A confluence of life events—processing the imminent loss of a family member to cancer, dealing with some new-to-me mental illness, and leaving the high-demand religion of my youth—has prompted me to realize that I've lived most of my life on autopilot, trying to meet other people's expectations. Now I'm left wondering who I really am and what is actually important to me. Do you have any sage advice for finding myself? Dear Readers, Pleasing people: That's a bad thing, right? Do it, and you invite the scorn of the jargon-mongers. To be a people pleaser —yuck. But speaking as a person, I like to be pleased. I like to have my feelings tenderly considered. Sure, it's good to be confronted now and again, or given a little jolt, but fundamentally, I have to say, I prefer to be at ease. My great-grandfather used to say that if he had to be trapped on a desert island with another person, and could choose between someone interesting and someone with good manners, he would without hesitation choose the latter. One can be too accommodating, of course. As a well-trained English person, I have in my life apologized to chairs, lampposts, and low branches for bumping into them. (That's over, by the way. In middle age, my relationship with inanimate objects has grown vicious and profane: At every turn, they obstruct me and confound me, and I curse them.) There's a quality of self-abnegation in excessive politeness. I think of Charles Dickens's Mr. Toots in Dombey and Son, rendered almost brainless by gentility: He sits there blushing and chuckling and saying, 'It's of no consequence at all.' And yes, you can try too hard to please people—so hard that it becomes a strange form of aggression. Thinking of others: It's complicated. Then again, what's the alternative? If you stomp around speaking your mind and having it your way, are you a reality dispenser, a model of authenticity? Or are you just an asshole? But I'm rambling, and I may be evading the question behind both of your letters. Which is (as I hear it) this: How do I separate myself from the needs and opinions of others? Strip it down, is my answer. Back to basics. Go into the sensorium, into your body, into your own God-given perceptual equipment: what you see, what you smell, the thoughts that flash across your viewfinder. This is you, nothing and no one but you, in your essential nonstop dialogue with the universe. Attend to this dialogue. Refine it. Trust the information it's giving you. In this place, at this depth (which is really the glittering surface), no one else can tell you who you are. Wondering what's for lunch,


CBS News
28-07-2025
- CBS News
Monterey County plane crash victims recovered; 3 found dead
The United States Coast Guard said three people were recovered and found unresponsive after a plane crash in Monterey County on Saturday. Search and rescue crews recovered the three unresponsive passengers on Sunday, the Coast Guard said. Just before 11 p.m., the Coast Guard Station in Monterey was alerted to a twin-engine Beechcraft that had crashed between 200-300 yards off Point Pinos. The Coast Guard said three people were on board. A boat and helicopter crew responded to the scene and located the Beechcraft. One person was found unresponsive around 3 a.m., the Coast Guard said. The other two were found unresponsive inside the aircraft later Sunday morning, officials said. According to the Coast Guard, the plane took off from the San Carlos airport. Pacific Grove Police said they received calls about the plane crash after 10 p.m. and were told it crashed near the coastline of Asilomar State Beach. One Pacific Grove resident said he heard a plane circling his neighborhood and then a loud thump about 30 seconds later. The Monterey County Sheriff's Office identified the three victims as 60-year-old Steve Eugene Clatterbuck of Salinas, 36-year-old James Vincent of Monterey and 44-year-old Jamie Lee Tabscott of Monterey. The office said in a statement that, "The family and friends of the deceased have expressed that they wish to extend their gratitude for the outpouring of support from the community. They ask for privacy during this difficult time." Pacific Grove Police, the Monterey Fire Department, Monterey County Sheriff's Office and San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, Cal Fire and the Coast Guard were all at the scene. The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the crash.