logo
US withdraws from WHO pandemic response reforms

US withdraws from WHO pandemic response reforms

Al Jazeera3 days ago
Washington, DC – The United States has withdrawn from reforms introduced by the World Health Organisation (WHO) last year to enhance the global response to pandemics, part of a broader push by Washington against international regulations.
The administration of President Donald Trump formally rejected on Friday the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) that were put in place in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F Kennedy announced the move in a joint statement, saying that it aims to 'prevent international bureaucrats from shaping US domestic policies'.
The legally binding amendments expanded the regulations to enhance the international response to a future pandemic.
They included the adoption of a clear definition of what constitutes a pandemic emergency and how it can be triggered, as well as efforts to improve information-sharing between countries across the world and WHO.
The amendments also called for allowing poorer nations access to medical products to 'equitably address the needs and priorities of developing countries'.
The US officials took issue with several provisions in the reforms.
'Terminology throughout the 2024 amendments is vague and broad, risking WHO-coordinated international responses that focus on political issues like solidarity, rather than rapid and effective actions,' Rubio and Kennedy said in their statements.
Lockdowns and vaccine mandates were a contentious political issue in the US during the pandemic, with right-wing activists close to Trump leading the charge in rejecting the measures.
At the same time, US conservatives have long been suspicious of multilateral institutions, viewing international rules as an infringement on the US's sovereignty.
But advocates of global health regulations argue that pandemics do not stop at borders, and therefore must be confronted with a collaborative, international effort.
Shortly after taking office earlier this year, Trump officially announced that the US would pull out of WHO altogether by January 2026.
On Friday, Kennedy and Rubio said the amendments 'compel countries to adopt digital health documents'.
'Our Agencies have been and will continue to be clear: we will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy, or personal liberties,' the officials said.
'These amendments risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.'
While the reforms require WHO to develop and improve a database for digital health certificates that can be accessed internationally, participants would voluntarily submit information to the documents.
During the pandemic, most countries, including the US during Trump's first term, required travellers to show negative COVID tests.
The US was absent in May when WHO adopted a separate agreement to enhance pandemic preparedness.
COVID, which caused flu-like symptoms and started to spread early in 2020, killed nearly 70 million people across the globe and brought the world to a halt for long stretches of time.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Less than human': Report details Trump immigration detention centre abuses
‘Less than human': Report details Trump immigration detention centre abuses

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

‘Less than human': Report details Trump immigration detention centre abuses

Detainees at three United States immigration detention centres have reported degrading conditions, including a delay in medical treatment that may be tied to two deaths, according to a human rights report. The investigation published on Monday detailed women held in male facilities, rampant overcrowding and potentially deadly indifference to medical needs at the three facilities in or near Miami, Florida: Krome North Service Processing Center, Broward Transitional Center and the Federal Detention Center. Its authors said the abuses underscore another aspect of the human toll of President Donald Trump's deportation campaign, which has forced many facilities to operate beyond their capacity. In turn, the administration has sought a mad-dash scale-up in deportation infrastructure with new facilities, including the Florida state-erected 'Alligator Alcatraz', spiking their own concerns and condemnation. In a statement accompanying the 92-page report's release, Belkis Wille, the associate crisis and conflict director at Human Rights Watch, which authored the report with Americans for Immigrant Justice and Sanctuary of the South, warned that 'people in immigration detention are being treated as less than human.' 'These are not isolated incidents, but rather the result of a fundamentally broken detention system that is rife with serious abuses,' Wille said. Denial of medical care The report, which relied on current and former inmate testimony, information from family members, lawyers and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency data, detailed a lax approach to medical care at the three facilities, which included denial of treatment and medication. One detainee recounted guards in late April ignoring cries for help as 44-year-old Marie Ange Blaise, a Haitian national, suffered what would prove to be a deadly medical emergency at the Broward Transitional Center. 'We started yelling for help, but the guards ignored us,' the detainee recounted, according to the report. By the time a rescue team came more than half an hour later, 'she was not moving.' The detainee who detailed the death said she was also punished for seeking mental health treatment, adding people were regularly put in solitary confinement for requesting such help. In another instance, the wife of Maksym Chernyak, a 44-year-old Ukrainian man, said her husband's requests in February to see a doctor were repeatedly delayed as he experienced fever, chest pain and other symptoms while in detention at Krome. When he did see a doctor, he was diagnosed with elevated blood pressure, which was not directly treated, according to his wife. When Chernyak later started vomiting, drooling and defecating on himself, a cellmate recounted that guards took 15 to 20 minutes to respond. When they did, they accused Chernyak of taking illicit synthetic drugs, a claim the cellmate, identified only as Carlos, denied. Chernyak was removed on a stretcher, declared brain dead and pronounced dead two days later. Overcrowding and degrading behaviour Across the three facilities, the report detailed rampant overcrowding with detainees at Krome saying they were held in cells that at times exceeded twice their capacity. The crowding led to shortages in bedding, soap and other sanitation products, and some detainees were forced to sleep on the floor. Women were also processed at Krome despite it being a male-only facility. Women held at the centre told the investigators that they were denied showers and forced to use open toilets potentially visible to the male population. 'If the men stood on a chair, they could see right into our room and the toilet,' recounted a woman from Argentina. 'We begged to be allowed to shower, but they said it wasn't possible because it was a male-only facility.' Other alleged abuses include excessive use of force, inadequate access to food, prolonged shackling and exposure to extreme heat and cold. Detainees reported 30 to 40 people crowded into a room meant for six and being forced to use a bucket as a toilet. Harpinder Chauhan, a British entrepreneur who spent months bouncing between facilities after being detained by ICE at a regular immigration appointment in February, recounted one response from detention centre authorities. 'They told us if we kept asking for a toilet that flushed, they would create a problem we wouldn't like,' he said. Violations of international, domestic law All told, the report's authors said the allegations amount to violations of both international law and federal US policies on immigration detention. They said the conditions showed the fallout of Trump's effort to enact mass deportations – a drive itself predicated on the evidenceless claim that immigrant criminality is rampant in the US – despite lacking the proper resources. The number of people held in immigration detention, who are typically undergoing their right to challenge their deportations, has risen steadily since Trump took office on January 20, jumping from 39,238 on January 26 to 56,816 on July 13, according to data compiled by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. On Saturday, The Wall Street Journal reported the Trump administration is seeking to quickly scale up its detention capacity from 40,000 to 100,000 beds by year end, largely by prioritising quick-build tent facilities on military bases and ICE properties. The construction drive comes after Trump signed a tax and spending bill that surges an unprecedented $45bn to new detention centres. Last week, US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the administration would also seek to boost cooperation with states like Florida to open more detention facilities like 'Alligator Alcatraz', whose construction is initially funded not by the federal government but by state taxpayers.

Video: Protests against World Cup property speculation in Mexico City
Video: Protests against World Cup property speculation in Mexico City

Al Jazeera

time10 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Video: Protests against World Cup property speculation in Mexico City

Protests against World Cup property speculation in Mexico City NewsFeed Protesters have taken to the streets again in Mexico City to demonstrate against real estate price speculation ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46 Video Duration 01 minutes 18 seconds 01:18 Video Duration 01 minutes 52 seconds 01:52 Video Duration 02 minutes 10 seconds 02:10 Video Duration 00 minutes 57 seconds 00:57 Video Duration 02 minutes 48 seconds 02:48 Video Duration 01 minutes 03 seconds 01:03

In South Korea, Trump's tariff threats place US love affair under strain
In South Korea, Trump's tariff threats place US love affair under strain

Al Jazeera

time12 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

In South Korea, Trump's tariff threats place US love affair under strain

Seoul, South Korea – When Sideny Sim had a chance to visit the United States on business several years ago, it was the fulfilment of a lifelong dream. Like many South Koreans, Sim had long admired the US as a cultural juggernaut and positive force in the world. These days, Sim, a 38-year-old engineer living near Seoul, feels no such love towards the country. As US President Donald Trump threatens to impose a 25 percent tariff on South Korea from August 1, Sim cannot help but feel betrayed. 'If they used to be a country that was known to be a leader in culture, the economy and the perception of being 'good,' I feel like the US is now a threat to geopolitical balance,' Sim told Al Jazeera. South Korea and the US share deep and enduring ties. South Korea is one of Washington's closest allies in Asia, hosting about 28,000 US troops as a bulwark against North Korea. The US is home to a larger South Korean diaspora than any other country. But with the return of Trump's 'America First' agenda to Washington, DC, those ties are coming under strain. In a Pew Research Center survey released earlier this month, 61 percent of South Koreans expressed a favourable view of the US, down from 77 percent in 2024. Like dozens of other US trading partners, South Korea is facing severe economic disruption if it cannot reach a trade deal with the Trump administration by the August deadline. The Asian country, which is a major producer of electronics, ships and cars, generates more than 40 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) from exports. In addition to sending a letter to South Korean President Lee Jae-Myung outlining his tariff threats, Trump earlier this month also claimed that Seoul pays 'very little' to support the presence of US Forces Korea (USFK). Trump's comments reinforced speculation that he could demand that the South Korean government increase its national defence spending or contributions to the costs of the USFK. After Trump last week told reporters that South Korea 'wants to make a deal right now,' Seoul's top trade envoy said that an 'in-principle' agreement was possible by the deadline. With the clock ticking on a deal, the uncertainty created by Trump's trade policies has stirred resentment among many South Koreans. Kim Hyunju, a customer service agent working in Seoul, said that although her company would not be directly affected by the tariffs, Trump's trade salvoes did not seem fair. 'It would only be fair if they are OK with us raising our tariffs to the same level as well,' Kim told Al Jazeera, adding that the Trump administration's actions had caused her to feel animosity towards the US. 'I can't help but see the US as a powerful nation which fulfils its interests with money and sheer power plays,' Kim said. 'I've always thought of the US as a friendly ally that is special to us, especially in terms of national defence. I know it is good for us to maintain this friendly status, but I sort of lost faith when Trump also demanded a larger amount of money for the US military presence in our country.' Kim Chang-chul, an investment strategist in Seoul, expressed a more sanguine view of Trump's trade policies, even while acknowledging the harm they could do to South Korean businesses. 'The US tariff policy is a burden for our government and businesses, but the move really shows the depth of US decision-making and strategy,' Kim told Al Jazeera. 'Trump wants South Korea to be more involved in the US's energy ambitions in Alaska. It's part of the US pushing for geopolitical realignment and economic rebalancing.' Earlier this year, the US held talks with South Korean officials about boosting US exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to South Korea, a major LNG importer. Keum Hye-yoon, a researcher at the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), said it has been difficult for a US ally like South Korea to make sense of Trump's comments and actions. 'When Trump cites 'fairness' in his tariff policy, it's based on unilateral expectations of improving the US trade balance or restoring economic strength to certain industries,' Keum told Al Jazeera. 'As allies like South Korea share supply chains with the US and work closely with its companies, disregarding these structures and imposing high taxes will likely create burdens on US businesses and consumers as well.' While Trump's most severe tariffs have yet to come into effect, South Korean manufacturers have already reported some disruption. South Korea's exports dropped 2.2 percent in the first 20 days of July compared with a year earlier, according to preliminary data released by Korea Customs Service on Monday. Kim Sung-hyeok, the head of research at the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) Labour Institute, said exporters in the auto, steel, semiconductor and pharmaceutical sectors had been especially affected. 'As exports in these fields decreased considerably since the tariff announcements, production orders in domestic factories have declined,' Kim told Al Jazeera. 'Some automotive and steel production lines have closed temporarily, while other manufacturing sites have closed altogether. Voluntary resignations and redeployments have become rampant in some of these workplaces.' Kim said small companies may face the brunt of the tariffs as they are not capable of 'moving their manufacturing plants to the US', or 'diversifying their trade avenues outside of the US'. 'And as major companies face a general decline in exports, these small companies will consequently face a shortage in product delivery volume that will cause employment disputes,' he said. The Korea Development Institute estimated in May that the number of employed South Koreans would increase by just 90,000 this year, in part due to the economic uncertainties, compared with a rise of 160,000 last year. Even before Trump's arrival on the political scene, US-South Korea relations had gone through difficult periods in the past. In 2002, two South Korean middle-school girls were killed when they were struck by a US Army armoured vehicle. After the American soldiers involved in the incident were found not guilty of negligent homicide by a US military court, the country saw an explosion in anti-US sentiment and nationwide protests. In 2008, nationwide protests took place after the South Korean government decided to continue importing US beef despite concerns about the risk of Mad Cow Disease. More recently, President Lee, who was elected in June, has emphasised the importance of maintaining positive relations with China, Washington's biggest strategic rival and competitor. The KIEP's Keum said the US-South Korea relationship has evolved into a partnership where the US has become a 'conditional ally', where 'economic interests take precedence over traditional alliance'. 'The US is increasingly demanding South Korea to cooperate in its containment strategy of China among its other socioeconomic policies,' she said. Keum said that South Korea will need to seek out alternative markets and diversify its exports to mitigate the fallout of Trump's agenda. 'South Korea also doesn't need to act alone. The country can seek joint action with countries such as EU members, Japan and Canada to come up with joint responses to the current predicament,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store