We should consider introducing same prison sentence as France on hiring illegal workers here… and bring back Rwanda
They are willing to risk their lives to cross the Channel from safe countries like France, thanks to Keir Starmer's weak approach to fighting illegal migration.
3
3
3
I saw this with my own eyes a couple of weeks ago. I went to an asylum hotel in central London, populated by illegal immigrants who had mainly come here on small boats.
In a small compound next to the hotel I found dozens of bikes, many of which had Deliveroo, Just Eat or Uber Eats containers.
A shopkeeper over the road confirmed that the residents of the hotel routinely worked on these bikes — despite having no right to work here.
The Sun has done great work to expose this illegal working as well.
People-smugglers now openly advertise the fact it's easy to work illegally in the UK.
This illegal working is also putting women and girls at risk if a late-night delivery is made by an undocumented and unknown illegal immigrant.
Afghan males, for example, are 22 times more likely to be sex offenders than average. This is exactly what happened to a 32-year-old pregnant woman in Glasgow.
Her attacker, Muhammad Faizan Khan, brutally sexually assaulted her in her own home, causing her pregnancy to be lost.
Khan was using someone else's Deliveroo account that he had paid to use.
By allowing accounts to be rented without proper checks, companies such as Deliveroo are making the UK a magnet for illegal immigrants and putting women and girls at risk.
This madness has to stop.
First, the Home Office must urgently end illegal working based at the hotels they run which taxpayers are funding.
Action by Immigration Enforcement and the police against illegal working must also be ramped up.
The likes of Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just East must face massive fines for what they are enabling.
Allowing illegal immigrants to work on their platforms has become part of the business model. They are complicit.
Log-ins to work on the platforms are openly bought and sold — a practice called 'substitution', where one person can work in place of another.
Deliveroo and others claim driver substitution is fine but it is allowing illegal immigrants and unverified people to make deliveries without proper checks.
Those running companies which enable illegal immigrants to work on their platforms, or do not have systems to identify substitutes and verify they are in the UK legally, would be deterred by facing prison.
In France, employers can get up to five years in jail for hiring an illegal worker.
We should now consider introducing that same prison sentence here.
The Government must also stop illegal arrivals in the first place.
Keir Starmer claimed last year that he would 'smash the gangs'. This has laughably failed.
Illegal channel crossings have surged by over 40 per cent since Starmer was elected, and this year so far has been the worst for it in history.
Sir Keir's recent deal with France — if it ever starts — will only see six per cent of illegal immigrants crossing the Channel removed.
What we need is a removals deterrent where every illegal arrival is removed without interference by judges. An approach like this worked in Australia about 12 years ago.
And this is exactly what the last Government's Rwanda plan would have done.
It was ready to go last July and was handed to Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper on a plate.
And what did they do? They cancelled it days before it was due to start.
We need to end illegal working and we need to bring back Rwanda.
Then illegal immigrants will know there is no point in trying to come here in the first place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
UK politicians are in the pockets of the rich. Is that democracy?
At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, Keir Starmer responded to a question from Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay about growing calls to introduce a tax on wealth for the super-rich – those with assets above £10 million – by saying he wouldn't 'take advice' from the Greens, and insisting that 'we can't just tax our way to growth'. We can, it seems, cut our way to growth though, as long as it's those already at the greatest risk of poverty who'll bear the brunt. On Wednesday evening, 333 Labour MPs voted to cut disability benefits by £2 billion per year, halving the health element of universal credit for new claimants, and cutting it altogether for new claimants aged under 22. At a certain point, when the faces and the colour of the rosettes change but the glaring injustices remain the same, we have to ask ourselves why. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Image: Yui Mok) A common refrain among politicians is that right-wing policies that make life harder for social security claimants – or immigrants, or any other marginalised group – are popular. So popular that they have no choice but to implement them with gusto, because that's the will of the people, I guess. Meanwhile, I suppose we are to imagine that the average British voter is kept up at night worrying about the prospect of millionaires and billionaires being asked to pay more into our public services. As Tory leader Kemi Badenoch put it at PMQs, a wealth tax would be 'a tax on all of our constituents' savings, their houses, their pensions'. Who among us doesn't know and love someone with more than £10m in assets lying around? And surely we can all agree that they're the real victims? Back in the real world, a YouGov poll last week found that 75% of people in the UK would support introducing a wealth tax of 2% on wealth above £10m. Earlier this year, YouGov conducted another poll on behalf of Oxfam which found that 79% of over 16s in Scotland would rather the government tax the richest than make cuts to public spending. (Image: YouGov) And while it's true that some voters do believe that the welfare system is too generous, and the immigrants are draining the country of resources, it's important to remember that large sections of the British media, with their own vested interests, have spent not years but decades pushing precisely this narrative. It's disingenuous at best to persuade someone of something and then behave as though it was their idea all along. Alongside campaign groups Tax Justice UK and Patriotic Millionaires UK, Oxfam identified that the government could raise up to £24bn per year through a wealth tax which would apply to only 0.04% of the population. At the same time, charities and experts from across the UK and beyond – extending to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – have highlighted the damage that cuts to social security could cause to people's ability to make ends meet or simply live with dignity. So, if it's not the electorate telling politicians which policies to pursue, and it's not the data or the impassioned pleas of experts that persuade them, then what is it that drives them to make these decisions? READ MORE: Mark Brown: Why I plan to join Scotland's new radical left party Surely the answer is obvious by now. Time and again, right-wing and supposedly centrist politicians prove that nothing matters to them than the feelings of their rich donors and supporters – and nothing matters more to those wealthy individuals and large corporations than money. Successive governments' inaction on a range of urgent issues – from climate change, to energy prices, to raising taxes to fund crumbling public services – becomes far easier to understand once you realise that standing up to behemoth corporations and their numerous beneficiaries could cost these politicians dearly. If power for power's sake is the goal, if fuelling the party machine with big donations is a worthwhile end in and of itself, and if securing oneself a cushy position after – or perhaps during – your time in office is the ultimate prize, then making an enemy out of the 1% is a senseless endeavour. The dramatic decline in political party membership numbers over the past several decades mean that parties have become more and more reliant on a small pool of wealthy donors. Analysis by the Electoral Reform Society found that, during the 2024 election campaign, Labour received £6.7m from 'mega-donors', which made up 68.5% of their total donations up to polling day. This equates to 42 times the amount they took from the same type of donors during the 2019 election campaign. David Lammy secured a personal donor a job at the Foreign Office (Image: PA) When we ask ourselves how it is that the Labour Party have sold out on so many principles in such a short period of time, the answer is in the question. What chance does the average person – or community – stand to have their voice heard and acted upon by those in power while principles and policies are being sold to the highest bidder? Just last week, it was revealed by the Democracy for Sale substack that Foreign Secretary David Lammy gave a taxpayer-funded job in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office to the former UK president of multinational PR company WPP after she donated £5000 to his office ahead of the election. This is only the latest in a series of jobs for donors that Labour have been scrutinised over. Under the ideal of democracy which we are encouraged to believe the UK represents, every eligible voter should have an equal say in elections and, by extension, an equal opportunity to have a say in the decisions the elected parliament makes. How far must our political leaders stray from this principle before we recognise that we are no longer ruled by democracy but plutocracy: a society controlled by people with great wealth or income? Consider that the UK's 50 richest families hold more wealth than 50% of the population, according to analysis from the Equality Trust. And while the top 20% hold 63% of the UK's wealth, the bottom fifth have only 0.5% of the wealth. READ MORE: The best way to defeat Reform UK? Expose the gaping holes in their politics Polls might show that the vast majority of the British public want to see the wealthy taxed more, but to imagine that this information would seize the Prime Minister with an urgency to act would be to believe that all views, experiences, voices or lives are equal. You only need to look at how this government – the progressive alternative to the old government – treats the most vulnerable to know that isn't true, not under this system. As long as money talks and those without are silenced, most of us will be out here screaming into the void. In case that seems too bleak a note to end on, a reminder: it doesn't have to be this way. Just look at the growing fervency with which the Tories and now Labour have sought to quash dissent through the criminalisation of peaceful protest, and the proscription of activist groups they don't like as terrorists. Even the frantic efforts of the Government to censor a rap group, Kneecap, over political statements is revealing. These are the actions of power under threat. They are terrified of ordinary people speaking their minds and telling them in no uncertain terms that enough is enough. That, alone, should act as motivation to keep doing just that.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Arms firms are buying exclusive access to MPs for as little as £1499
It comes as the new UK Labour Government has ushered in the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War. Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced in February that the UK would increase spending on defence up to 2.5% of GDP by April 2027, raiding the international development budget. The 144-page-long Strategic Defence Review released last month details how the UK is moving to a position of 'war-fighting' readiness, including committing to procuring up to 7000 domestically built long-range weapons. Look no further than the newly created All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for Defence Technology. READ MORE: Scotland's NHS ready to treat injured Gaza children, First Minister says This informal cross-party group at Westminster was only created in January 2025 but has hit the ground running with a swish website where it says it is looking to 'partner' with defence firms who can then buy exclusive access to Westminster MPs and policy makers. Demand has certainly been high. At least 37 arms firms – including industry titans Leonardo and Lockheed Martin – have already sponsored the group according to its website. Leonardo, which has a factory in Edinburgh, is known to have produced targeting systems for Israel's F-35 fighter jets, which have been used to bombard Gaza. Lockheed Martin – the world's largest arms company – also contributes parts to F-35 fighter jets. Membership comes with its perks. So-called 'Tier 1 Partners' – which the APPG recommends to start-ups – can get access to 'all organised meetings' and 'opportunities to network with MPs and policymakers' for just £1499 (below). (Image: Defence Technology APPG) At the higher price point of £5000, meanwhile, 'Tier 2 Partners' can also get 'enhanced access to exclusive APPG meetings and key discussions' as well as 'priority invitations to high-profile parliamentary engagements' (below). (Image: Defence Technology APPG) The APPG register claims the group has already received between £60,001-£61,500 for a group 'secretary' from these firms. Declassified UK reported earlier this month that RUK Advanced Systems Ltd, a weapons firm which is owned by the Israeli government, also donated at least £1499 to the group. Of the 30 MPs involved in the APPG, five are from Scottish Labour, including Gordon McKee (Glasgow South), Graeme Downie (Dunfermline and Dollar), Lillian Jones (Kilmarnock and Loudon), Kenneth Stevenson (Airdrie and Shotts) and Chris Kane (Stirling and Strathallan). Other MPs on the group include Neil Shastri-Hurst (co-chair), Fred Thomas (co-chair), Sarah Bool (officer), Anna Gelderd (officer), Luke Akehurst and Iain Duncan Smith. READ MORE: Scotland's NHS ready to treat injured Gaza children, First Minister says Meanwhile, another new Westminster group this year – the Defence and Security Sectors Supporting Local Communities APPG – is also funded by the arms industry, with the ADS group – the industry body for the arms industry – funding its secretary to the tune of £16,501- 18,000, according to the register. The ADS group also contributes funding to the APPG for Aviation, Travel and Aerospace. (Image: Danny Lawson) Meanwhile, arms firms BAE Systems and Babcock International – alongside other organisations – pay for the secretary for the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Apprenticeships to the tune of £54,001-£55,500. This type of lobbying and private firms sponsoring Westminster APPGs isn't new. For years, concerns have been raised that they can operate as a 'back door' for lobbyists. In 2021, the parliament's standards watchdog warned that a new Westminster lobbying scandal could be sparked by the actions of MPs sitting on these informal committees. Labour's Chris Bryant – who chaired the committee at the time and is now a minister in Starmer's government – said he feared some APPGs were being used as a "backdoor" for commercial interests. Anti-corruption campaign group Transparency International has also expressed concerns. Rose Whiffen, a senior research officer at Transparency International UK, told the Sunday National: "All-Party Parliamentary Groups serve an important function in bringing expertise to Parliament, and encouraging cross-party work. When defence companies can buy access to MPs and policymakers, it raises serious questions about whether APPGS are being exploited by private interests seeking to influence decision-makers. "To avoid the next major lobbying scandal, we need much greater openness and accountability in how APPGs operate, with clear rules preventing them from being used as backdoors for commercial influence." Meanwhile, Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman said: 'That Westminster has allowed an official group to form where multinational arms dealers and foreign governments like Israel are paying to access a large group of MPs and peers through the backdoor is frankly astonishing. 'If this represents the level of lobbying and ethics regulation in London, then it's no surprise the UK consistently ends up supplying weapons to tyrants and war criminals around the world. It shames Scotland to be associated with it.' The APPG for Defence Technology didn't respond to a request for comment.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Met Police Chief, Mark Rowley, says race disparities in crime and justice are 'shameful' for London
Speaking to Sky's Trevor Phillips, Sir Mark Rowley explains the Met's relationship with minority communities. Sunday 13 July 2025 04:16, UK
