Alpine to sell Formula 1 tickets to fans through Viagogo partnership
Alpine will use the ticketing platform to offer thousands of places at Grands Prix this season directly to motorsport fans, who normally have to buy from F1 itself or race venues such as Silverstone.
'The partnership with Viagogo is an exciting step to bring BWT Alpine closer to fans worldwide,' said team principal Oliver Oakes.
'By making tickets more accessible through a safe and trusted platform, we're ensuring more supporters can experience the thrill of race day firsthand.
'We're committed to enhancing the fan experience and strengthening global presence – this collaboration is a testament to that.'
Alpine is selling the tickets out of the allocation that all teams receive for Formula 1 races. The terms of the agreement are confidential but it is understood to amount to hundreds of tickets for fans at each of the 24 Grands Prix this season, which starts this week in Australia.
The partnership will also see Viagogo receive branding in Alpine's garage, hospitality areas and digital platforms, while the team will benefit from data insights it can use to reach new audiences and unlock marketing opportunities.
Alpine's driver line-up for 2025 features Frenchman Pierre Gasly, in his third season at the team, and Australian newcomer Jack Doohan, who has replaced Haas-bound Esteban Ocon.
'We're excited to partner with BWT Alpine to make attending Formula 1 races easier than ever for fans around the world,' said Viagogo's international business development lead Matt Drew.
'In 2024, fans from 160 countries bought tickets on viagogo to see F1 live, and through this partnership, we will connect even more fans to their favourite races.
'Our goal is to bring supporters closer to world-class events with a seamless experience, while helping our partner expand their global reach and grow revenues.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Driver faces up to $110,000 in fines for speeding
GENEVA -- The driver was clocked going 27 kilometers per hour (17 mph) over the speed limit on a street in the Swiss city of Lausanne, and now he's facing up to 90,000 Swiss francs (over $110,000) in fines as a result. But he can afford it. Why the eye-popping penalty? Because the speedster, a repeat offender, is one of Switzerland's wealthiest people, and the Vaud canton, or region, serves up fines based on factors like income, fortune or general family financial situation. The Swiss are not alone. Germany, France, Austria and the Nordic countries all issue punishments based on a person's wealth. The recent fine isn't even a record in Switzerland. In 2010, a millionaire Ferrari driver got a ticket equal to about $290,000 for speeding in the eastern canton of St. Gallen. Back then, the Swiss safety group Road Cross said rich drivers had been lightly punished until voters approved penal law overhaul three years earlier that let judges hand down fines based on personal income and wealth for misdemeanors like speeding and drunk driving. Under today's rules, an indigent person might spend a night in jail instead of a fine, while the wealthiest in the rich Alpine country could be on the hook for tens of thousands. A court in the Swiss canton of Vaud recently ruled that the tycoon must pay 10,000 Swiss francs ($12,300) up front and could be forced to pay the rest — 80,000 more — if he's caught for a similar roadway infraction over the next three years. Switzerland's '24 Heures' newspaper first reported the case and said the man, who was not identified, was a French citizen listed by Swiss economic weekly Bilan among the 300 richest people in Switzerland — with a fortune in the hundreds of millions of dollars. The daily reported that an automated police radar photographed the offender driving at 77 kilometers per hour (48 mph) in a 50 kph (31 mph) zone on a Lausanne street. A quick-calculating prosecutor tallied the maximum fine the driver faced under the law, the report said. Vincent Derouand, a spokesperson for the Vaud public prosecutors office, said the defendant didn't contest the decision, which was handed down in June for the infraction nearly a year ago — in August 2024. The Vaud criminal code sets a maximum financial penalty based on the "personal and economic situation of the offender at the time of the ruling' — notably taking into account issues like income, fortune, lifestyle and family financial needs. The newspaper reported that he had already been caught for a similar speeding infraction eight years ago, and also paid 10,000 Swiss francs in penalty and faced another 60,000 if another infraction had taken place within the following two years. In Switzerland, penalties for speeding can even catch up with the cops: One officer was fined for racing at nearly twice the speed limit through Geneva streets back in 2016 while chasing thieves who had blown up a bank teller machine.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Google, Apple lose 'Fortnite' anticompetition lawsuit in Australia
Aug. 12 (UPI) -- Epic Games said its popular Fortnite video game will return to iOS platforms in Australia after its high court ruled on Tuesday that Google and Apple's dominance over the digital marketplace was anticompetitive. Australian federal Judge Jonathan Beach ruled that both Google and Apple had misused their positions as the dominant players over in-app purchase commissions that included fees of up to 30% to cut back on competition. On Tuesday, CEO Tim Sweeney said Fortnite will return to iPhones along with its Epic Games Store "at a date to be determined." In a social media post, Sweeney called the ruling a "victory" in Australian antitrust proceedings via its nearly five-year-long legal battle against the tech giants. Apple, the judge said, engaged in conduct that had the purpose or was "likely to have or had the effect of substantially lessening competition in such markets." He added that Google's conduct "had or is likely to have had the effect of substantially lessening competition in such markets." Beach pointed to Apple's specific conduct that "prevents prohibits the direct downloading or sideloading of native apps and conduct that prevents or prohibits developers and users from using alternative payment methods." But he rejected the accusations by Epic that the two companies had otherwise violated consumer laws and exhibited "unconscionable conduct." Epic added that officials still need to sift through the nearly 2,000 pages of legal documents stemming from Tuesday's ruling. Both Google and Apple officials "welcomed" Beach's rejection of certain parts of the ruling, but disagreed with the other aspects of Epic's characterizations and court victory. Google spokesperson Dan Jackson said it disagreed with the "court's characterization of our billing policies and practices." He added it included "findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape on behalf of users and developers," he told The Verge. "We will review the full decision when we receive it and assess our next steps," Jackson said. The legal battle began in 2020 when Apple and Google kicked Fortnite off its app stores for bypassing their payment systems with its own. Legal action against Apple that year was followed by a 2021 lawsuit against Google Australia. Epic has filed lawsuits against both Apple and Google around the world in courts in Britain over in Europe and the United States. The California-based U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in July upheld a 2023 jury verdict against Google, saying it violated state and federal antitrust law by holding an illegal monopoly in Android app distribution and billing, and that Google unlawfully tied its billing system to Play Store. On Tuesday, Apple officials stated the global tech giant faced "fierce competition in every market" where it operates. "We continuously invest and innovate to make the App Store the safest place for users to get apps and a great business opportunity for developers in Australia and around the world," Apple told ABC in Australia. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Google, Apple lose 'Fortnite' anticompetition lawsuit in Australia
On Tuesday, an Australian judge ruled that Google and Apple's dominance over the in-store app marketplace was anticompetitive. Epic Games called it a "win" for Australian developers and consumers as the popular games Fortnite is set to return to iOS platforms in Australia. Photo by Keizo Mori/UPI | License Photo Aug. 12 (UPI) -- Epic Games said its popular Fortnite video game will return to iOS platforms in Australia after its high court ruled on Tuesday that Google and Apple's dominance over the digital marketplace was anticompetitive. Australian federal Judge Jonathan Beach ruled that both Google and Apple had misused their positions as the dominant players over in-app purchase commissions that included fees of up to 30% to cut back on competition. On Tuesday, CEO Tim Sweeney said Fortnite will return to iPhones along with its Epic Games Store "at a date to be determined." In a social media post, Sweeney called the ruling a "victory" in Australian antitrust proceedings via its nearly five-year-long legal battle against the tech giants. Apple, the judge said, engaged in conduct that had the purpose or was "likely to have or had the effect of substantially lessening competition in such markets." He added that Google's conduct "had or is likely to have had the effect of substantially lessening competition in such markets." Beach pointed to Apple's specific conduct that "prevents prohibits the direct downloading or sideloading of native apps and conduct that prevents or prohibits developers and users from using alternative payment methods." But he rejected the accusations by Epic that the two companies had otherwise violated consumer laws and exhibited "unconscionable conduct." Epic added that officials still need to sift through the nearly 2,000 pages of legal documents stemming from Tuesday's ruling. Both Google and Apple officials "welcomed" Beach's rejection of certain parts of the ruling, but disagreed with the other aspects of Epic's characterizations and court victory. Google spokesperson Dan Jackson said it disagreed with the "court's characterization of our billing policies and practices." He added it included "findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape on behalf of users and developers," he told The Verge. "We will review the full decision when we receive it and assess our next steps," Jackson said. The legal battle began in 2020 when Apple and Google kicked Fortnite off its app stores for bypassing their payment systems with its own. Legal action against Apple that year was followed by a 2021 lawsuit against Google Australia. Epic has filed lawsuits against both Apple and Google around the world in courts in Britain over in Europe and the United States. The California-based U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in July upheld a 2023 jury verdict against Google, saying it violated state and federal antitrust law by holding an illegal monopoly in Android app distribution and billing, and that Google unlawfully tied its billing system to Play Store. On Tuesday, Apple officials stated the global tech giant faced "fierce competition in every market" where it operates. "We continuously invest and innovate to make the App Store the safest place for users to get apps and a great business opportunity for developers in Australia and around the world," Apple told ABC in Australia.
