logo
Rift in the margins? Dalit groups condemn Muslim leaders' remarks

Rift in the margins? Dalit groups condemn Muslim leaders' remarks

Hans India05-06-2025
Mangaluru: A press conference by Dalit leaders in coastal Karnataka has brought to light growing discontent within Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe organisations against certain Muslim groups, in the wake of controversial remarks made againstHome Minister Dr. G. Parameshwara, a prominent Dalit leader.
The Karnataka Dalit Horata Samiti, a district-level Dalit rights organisation, on Wednesday condemned a viral audio clip circulating across WhatsApp groups, in which unidentified Muslim individuals were allegedly heard criticising and insulting Dr. Parameshwara and his daughter following the recent communal violence in Mangaluru. The incident, sparked by the killing of Abdul Rahim, a resident of Koltmajalu in Bantwal, had reignited simmering tensions in the communally sensitive region.
'The remarks against a senior Dalit leader and his family have hurt the sentiments of the entire Dalit community,' said Anil Kumar Kankanady, a district leader of the Horata Samiti. 'Dr. Parameshwara is not just a political figure, but a symbol of perseverance for all Dalits who have risen through systemic adversity. Targeting him with such language is not just personal defamation—it is an insult to the community.'
The organisation, which includes several prominent SC/ST activists, demanded the registration of a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against those involved in the derogatory comments. The leaders also pressed for immediate arrests and action against those disseminating the voice recordings.
Among those present at the press conference were district coordinator S.P. Anand, Vishukumar, Siddappa Basavanagar, Dasharath Daddalkad, Prasad Kankanady, and RJ Karkera.
A new political line?
While such condemnations might seem like a routine defence of community pride, analysts suggest this incident signals a potentially deeper shift in Karnataka's subaltern politics. Historically seen as allies in struggles against upper-caste hegemony and right-wing politics, Dalit and Muslim groups in Karnataka have shared political space—both in street mobilisations and electoral strategies, particularly within Congress and smaller social justice-oriented outfits.
However, recent developments, including competitive victimhood, perceived political neglect, and targeted communal violence in coastal areas, have strained this tenuous solidarity. That a Dalit-led press meet would call out Muslim voices so directly—and link it to broader community insult—suggests that identity-based assertiveness is reshaping grassroots narratives.
'This is a moment of divergence,' notes a Mangaluru-based political sociologist. 'Dalit organisations, long accustomed to being marginal players in coastal Karnataka's communal binary, are now asserting a third front—demanding respect not just from dominant castes or state institutions, but also from other marginalised communities.'
Coastal Karnataka's fragile balance
Coastal Karnataka has witnessed a complex mix of caste, religion, and regional assertion. While much of the national discourse has framed the region as a Hindu-Muslim flashpoint, caste-based politics—especially among backwards castes and Dalits—has been gaining traction over the last decade.
In this context, attacks—verbal or otherwise—on a figure like Dr. Parameshwara, who has held key portfolios including that of Home Minister and Deputy Chief Minister, are seen not just as personal affronts but as an attack on Dalit political legitimacy. With state elections on the horizon and national parties recalibrating their caste equations, the growing alienation expressed by Dalit leaders in Mangaluru may well ripple beyond the district.
Whether this episode marks a passing rupture or the beginning of a deeper shift in caste-community alignments will depend on how political parties, civil society, and state mechanisms respond to the grievance, and whether platforms of solidarity can be rebuilt before mistrust calcifies, say political observers on the coast.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia restricts WhatsApp, Telegram over alleged misuse for sabotage and terrorism
Russia restricts WhatsApp, Telegram over alleged misuse for sabotage and terrorism

First Post

time29 minutes ago

  • First Post

Russia restricts WhatsApp, Telegram over alleged misuse for sabotage and terrorism

Russia restricts WhatsApp and Telegram, accusing misuse for sabotage and terrorism. Putin supports a state-run messaging platform. WhatsApp and Telegram defend their encryption. Russia has started restricting certain communications on WhatsApp and Telegram, tightening its grip on the foreign-owned encrypted messaging services as part of its wider bid to exert greater control over the internet. The state's digital regulator alleged the platforms were being misused for 'sabotage and terrorist activities' and accused their owners of refusing to share information with law enforcement, the Interfax news agency reported. Moscow's disputes with international tech companies have simmered for years, particularly over data storage and content regulations. Tensions escalated sharply after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with critics arguing that the Kremlin is moving to consolidate its authority over the country's online space. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Vladimir Putin has backed the creation of a state-run messaging platform that would integrate with government services, part of a push for what officials term 'digital sovereignty', promoting domestic technology while reducing reliance on foreign applications. 'WhatsApp is private, end-to-end encrypted, and defies government attempts to violate people's right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people,' the platform said in a statement. 'We will keep doing all we can to make end-to-end encrypted communication available to people everywhere, including in Russia." Telegram, meanwhile, said its moderators were deploying AI tools to track public channels and remove vast amounts of harmful content daily. 'Telegram actively combats harmful use of its platform including calls for sabotage or violence and fraud,' the company said. With inputs from agencies

How Congress brings Ambedkar and Sardar Patel on the same table
How Congress brings Ambedkar and Sardar Patel on the same table

Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

How Congress brings Ambedkar and Sardar Patel on the same table

In the Congress party's recent national legal conclave on 'Constitutional Challenges — Perspectives and Pathways', photos of Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and B R Ambedkar were prominently displayed. Notably, this is the first time that the pictures of these four — pillars of our freedom struggle and our modern nation-building — were displayed in the Congress office that too in a public meeting. Except for Ambedkar, the rest of them are from the Congress party itself. However, Patel was slowly sidelined after Nehru took over the party. Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru were always considered the guiding lights of the Congress. This was evident in the naming of the institutions — libraries, universities, airports, railway stations, and memorials — during Congress rule. The party made this mistake because it did not want to recognise the caste background of leaders like Ambedkar and Patel, and how their caste identities were shaping the electorate. Soon, the BJP appropriated Sardar Patel, which reached its peak when PM Modi built the tallest statue of Patel in Gujarat. Ambedkar was first revered by Dalits, and he then slowly emerged as a social justice icon. His image is now used to mobilise voters. However, until Rahul Gandhi, Congress didn't realise that Patel and Ambedkar were not given their dues. The BJP helped Congress re-examine its nationalist roots and paved the way for research on these icons who have been relevant across caste and class lines. Rahul Gandhi's realisation during Yatras Gandhi's mass contact during his Bharat Jodo Yatra from Kanyakumari to Kashmir and the Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra from Manipur to Mumbai seems to have changed his understanding about Ambedkar and Patel. Ambedkar emerged as one of the tallest national icons in the post-Mandal era, much to the chagrin of Hindutva intellectuals. Arun Shourie's book Worshipping False Gods was written as a response to his ascent in the mass consciousness during this period. In the recent past, Shashi Tharoor, despite conflicting ideologies, also had to write a book on Ambedkar. Shourie's mindset could also be found in Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who in Parliament contemptuously said that it has become a fashion to say Ambedkar. Immediately after that, Gandhi turned Ambedkar into his party's icon with the slogan: Jai Bapu, Jai Bheem and Jai Samvidhan. He told Shah in no uncertain terms that Ambedkar had already joined Gandhi and Nehru in the nationalist imagination. A new Congress in the making Before 2014, PM Modi gave a call for a 'Congress Mukt Bharat'. He started appropriating Gandhi, Ambedkar, besides Patel. Modi used Patel's image both in Gujarat and outside the state. However, Patel, a Shudra/OBC, was the first rural man to connect the Congress nationalist movement with his Bardoli farmers' agitation that was organised against increased land revenue taxes. It was only after that that Gandhi entered into the farmers' struggles against the British. But Congress forgot to see the link between the farmers' movements and Patel. However, Rahul Gandhi brought Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Ambedkar together and placed them on the party's banner, along with their portraits on the walls of the new party office. His upholding of the caste census as 'societal X-Ray and protection to the Constitution' during the 2024 elections also helped him make Patel and Ambedkar party icons. The erstwhile Congress leaders thought that caste discourse and secularism were contradictory. But that is a misplaced reading of the Indian social system. This shift in the Congress under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi made the BJP fall short of the majority mark in the last Lok Sabha elections. 'Pappu', as Gandhi was scornfully called, has suddenly become a serious contender for the PM post. While Modi turns 75 — the age that his party had set as an ideal retirement age for its leaders — Congress does not disappear from Indian politics. The Congress not only survives, but it appears to embrace a new phase after 140 years. That is a good sign. The writer is a political theorist, social activist and author. His latest book is The Shudra Rebellion

'Kagaz mitao, Adhikaar churao': Rahul Gandhi accuses BJP of 'stealing' Bahujan rights by deleting voters; claims tribal land records missing in Chhattisgarh
'Kagaz mitao, Adhikaar churao': Rahul Gandhi accuses BJP of 'stealing' Bahujan rights by deleting voters; claims tribal land records missing in Chhattisgarh

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Kagaz mitao, Adhikaar churao': Rahul Gandhi accuses BJP of 'stealing' Bahujan rights by deleting voters; claims tribal land records missing in Chhattisgarh

LoP in the Lok Sabha and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi (Image credits: PTI) NEW DELHI: Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Thursday accused the Bharatiya Janata Party ( BJP ) of 'stealing' the rights of Bahujans by removing their names from voter lists and 'disappearing' forest rights titles of Adivasis. In a post on X Thursday, Gandhi alleged, citing a news report, that in Chhattisgarh's Rajnandgaon district, more than half of the forest rights titles have vanished from government records, while in Bastar, 2,788 such titles have 'suddenly' gone missing. 'Kagaz mitao, Adhikaar churao – the BJP has made this a new weapon for the oppression of Bahujans. On one hand, they remove the names of Dalits and backward classes from the voter list, and on the other, they make the forest rights titles of tribals 'disappear,'' he wrote. He said the Congress had enacted the Forest Rights Act to protect the water, forest, and land of tribals, while the BJP is weakening it and 'snatching their primary rights.' Calling tribals the 'first owners' of the country, Gandhi asserted, 'We will protect their rights at all costs.' The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006- also known as the Forest Rights Act- grants legal rights to forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional communities for the ownership and use of forest land and resources, reported ANI. The law was enacted to address historical wrongs from the colonial era, when Adivasis and other forest dwellers were criminalised for using forest resources.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store