Broadband Program Changes Stir Uncertainty for Rural Black Communities
A promise made by former President Joe Biden to connect millions of Americans to reliable and affordable high-speed internet service may become another casualty of President Donald Trump's campaign to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives across the nation.
A top outgoing official at the U.S. Department of Commerce warned that funds for the Broadband, Equity, Access and Deployment Program, also known as BEAD, may be diverted to Trump adviser Elon Musk's satellite internet company, Starlink. The BEAD program provides $42.5 billion to states and territories to build and deploy high-speed internet to underserved areas.
Evan Feinman, who until March 16 directed the program at the Commerce Department, wrote in an email last week that the broadband initiative — one of the centerpieces of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act — was in jeopardy. Just days later, on March 18, Federal Communications Commissioner Geoffrey Starks resigned from his position, cutting short his term that was set to expire in 2027. Starks was one of two Democrats and only Black commissioner for the FCC.
Feinman argued that Starlink's connections, which rely on Musk's satellites, are inferior to using fiber optic cables, which is prioritized in the BEAD program.
'Stranding all or part of rural America with worse internet so that we can make the world's richest man even richer is yet another in a long line of betrayals by Washington,' Feinman wrote in the email.
Politico first reported on Feinman's email.
Expanding access to high-speed internet service, particularly in rural communities, is seen as a crucial step in alleviating the digital divide — the gap between those who can easily use, access, and afford technology, and those who cannot. Such disparities amplify the deep racial and economic inequalities in education, jobs, and health care for rural Black households in the South, where the greatest divide exists.
The BEAD program is also seen as a key element of promoting equity and leveling the technological playing field for communities of color.
However, there has been a lag in broadband deployment because of red tape, administrative delays, and the program's affordability requirements. Digital equity advocates say that such delays were to be expected because the program's initial timeline indicated it would take until 2026 to implement.
Technology experts like Mignon Clyburn, a former FCC commissioner and the first woman to serve as acting chair, also expressed worry that significantly altering the program could result in some marginalized populations being left behind — including veterans, seniors, and households with low incomes.
'My communities have been ignored for too long. I want sustainable, affordable, robust technologies. Those people don't deserve to be cheapened. They deserve to have the best that our resources have to offer,' Clyburn said in an interview, emphasizing that the federal government needs to ensure 'that the people currently on the wrong side of the technology divide do not stay there throughout several more lifetimes.'
Newly appointed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called for a 'rigorous review' of the BEAD program. He criticized Biden's regulations for the program and emphasized the need to overhaul it with a 'tech neutral approach' so that satellite services like Starlink could have a greater chance to participate in it.
In recent years, Republican lawmakers have condemned the program because of its DEI labor requirements and other factors. But some of their Republican colleagues have pushed back against their efforts while advocating for their states to continue the work.
In a statement, Lutnick said that he is adamant about 'ripping out the Biden Administration's pointless requirements.'
'The Department is exploring ways to cut government red tape that slows down infrastructure construction,' the statement read. 'We will work with states and territories to quickly get rid of the delays and the waste.'
While Trump administration officials appear to prefer satellite over fiber internet, multiple experts said satellite doesn't fix the problem because it's not affordable, nor does it work in all regions.
Starlink, which services 4 million people, uses satellites to connect internet service to dishes then to devices. Two years ago, the FCC denied Starlink's application for $900 million in subsidies for rural broadband because the company did not meet the service requirements, according to The New York Times.
For residential service at homes, the price starts at $80 a month, according to its website. To assist those in need, the federal government created the Affordable Connectivity Program, which provided a discount of up to $30 per month ($75 for tribal households) toward internet service and mobile services, and a one-time discount up to $100 toward a laptop, desktop computer, or tablet for eligible low-income households. More than 23 million Americans were enrolled.
However, Congress did not reauthorize the program. Since the program ended, 40% of Americans cut spending on food to afford internet service, whereas 36% discontinued telehealth services, a recent survey by the National Lifeline Association found. At least 80% of those who were enrolled live at or below the poverty line. The only other program available is the FCC's Lifeline Program, but recipients only receive a $9.25 monthly discount, which critics say isn't enough.
Read More: Disconnected Rural Black America and the Digital Divide
If consumers can't afford internet service, it undermines efforts to promote equity, said Brandon Forester, senior campaign lead at Media Justice.
'Having a low-cost option makes it more viable for an internet service provider to build out. That's also true about having digital equity practitioners. If they have people in the community that are helping people sign up for their services and are helping people use their services, that's a benefit,' Forester said. 'If we're getting rid of digital equity, that's another loss. When the lights go on on these networks, is there going to be anybody there to connect to them? Maybe, maybe not.'
With the current program, installing fiber creates jobs and workforce development, which could be dismantled, said Alisa Valentin, broadband policy director at Public Knowledge. She also points to the hard work of state broadband offices and federal workers, and doesn't want it to be in vain.
'We want to ensure that broadband is deployed where it is needed the most to avoid wasting time and resources. We want to get this right. This is a historic amount of funds that I'm so proud that we were able to come together across government, across public interest organizations, across industries to make sure that this happens,' she said. 'We got to make sure we finish the job.'
Beyond BEAD, advocates and experts say there are threats looming for other programs and legislation, including the Digital Equity Act, which provides $2.75 billion to establish three grant programs that 'promote digital equity and inclusion.'
The Digital Equity Act increases access to digital technology, education, and economic opportunities. The uncertainty is forcing states to cease work, questioning the future of their programming. For example, in Texas, the broadband office paused grants and contracts because of the Trump administration's shift of federal priorities.
There are some states moving forward despite the uncertainties. Clyburn said she doesn't foresee states rolling back the work they've done because they simply want to get to the finish line to connect communities, expand the workforce, build partnerships and 'level the playing field,' and they shouldn't be penalized over political bias.
This is the time for advocates to keep fighting and doing the work, said Kristenn Fortson, communications director for the National Digital Inclusion Alliance. The organization brings organizers to Washington to speak directly to lawmakers about their experiences and importance of these programs.
'It's the grandfather who can now join his church virtually or FaceTime his grandchildren after being home bound for months. It's incarcerated women who are being taught digital skills so they can build a resume and successfully reenter society,' Fortson said.
She added: 'We know from the history of any movement centered on equity and equality that nobody can really guarantee that for us; we have to fight for it. We keep on pushing for it like anybody else who's come before us, trying to make their communities a better place to live, a better place to thrive.'
The post Broadband Program Changes Stir Uncertainty for Rural Black Communities appeared first on Capital B News.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
39 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Supreme Court allows DOGE team to access Social Security systems with data on millions of Americans
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two victories Friday in cases involving the Department of Government Efficiency, including giving it access to Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans. The justices also separately reined in orders seeking transparency at DOGE, the team once led by billionaire Elon Musk. The court's conservative majority sided with the Trump administration in the first Supreme Court appeals involving DOGE. The three liberal justices dissented in both cases. The DOGE victories come amid a messy breakup between the president and the world's richest man that started shortly after Musk's departure from the White House and has included threats to cut government contracts and a call for the president to be impeached. The future of DOGE's work isn't clear without Musk at the helm, but both men have previously said that it will continue its efforts. In one case, the high court halted an order from a judge in Maryland that has restricted the team's access to the Social Security Administration under federal privacy laws. 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in an unsigned order. Conservative lower-court judges have said there's no evidence at this point of DOGE mishandling personal information. The agency holds sensitive data on nearly everyone in the country, including school records, salary details and medical information. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the court's action creates 'grave privacy risks' for millions of Americans by giving 'unfettered data access to DOGE regardless — despite its failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards, and all before we know for sure whether federal law countenances such access.' Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined Jackson's opinion and Justice Elena Kagan said she also would have ruled against the administration. The Trump administration says DOGE needs the access to carry out its mission of targeting waste in the federal government. Musk had been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud. The entrepreneur has described it as a ' Ponzi scheme ' and insisted that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending. But U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland found that DOGE's efforts at Social Security amounted to a 'fishing expedition' based on 'little more than suspicion' of fraud, and allowing unfettered access puts Americans' private information at risk. Her ruling did allow access to anonymous data for staffers who have undergone training and background checks, or wider access for those who have detailed a specific need. The Trump administration has said DOGE can't work effectively with those restrictions. Solicitor General D. John Sauer also argued that the ruling is an example of federal judges overstepping their authority and trying to micromanage executive branch agencies. The plaintiffs say it's a narrow order that's urgently needed to protect personal information. An appeals court previously refused to immediately to lift the block on DOGE access, though it split along ideological lines. Conservative judges in the minority said there's no evidence that the team has done any 'targeted snooping' or exposed personal information. The lawsuit was originally filed by a group of labor unions and retirees represented by the group Democracy Forward. It's one of more than two dozen lawsuits filed over DOGE's work, which has included deep cuts at federal agencies and large-scale layoffs. The nation's court system has been ground zero for pushback to President Donald Trump's sweeping conservative agenda, with about 200 lawsuits filed challenging policies on everything from immigration to education to mass layoffs of federal workers. In the other DOGE order handed down Friday, the justices extended a pause on orders that would require the team to publicly disclose information about its operations, as part of a lawsuit filed by a government watchdog group. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington argues that DOGE, which has been central to Trump's push to remake the government, is a federal agency and must be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. But the Trump administration says DOGE is just a presidential advisory body aimed at government cost-cutting, which would make it exempt from requests for documents under FOIA. The justices did not decide that issue Friday, but the conservative majority held that U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled too broadly in ordering documents be turned over to CREW.

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Jobs report shifts Fed interest rate forecasts
Will they or won't they? With the relatively bland U.S. labor numbers for May bumping against randy trade deals and thirsty tariff tiffs, there's leverage for Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell to re-examine the expected three 25-basis point rate cuts later this year. The Department of Labor reported June 6 that hiring remained stable in May with employers adding 139,000 jobs, gains that were slightly higher than expected but down from April. The unemployment rate stayed the same at 4.2%, as expected by most economists. Leisure and hospitality plus healthcare sectors reported the highest numbers of jobs with the DOGE-ed federal workforce among the lowest. But the manufacturing and retail sectors also shed jobs, which coupled with the federal losses, display an irrefutable shock from the Trump administration's trade wars churning the global economy. Bloomberg/Getty Images President Trump, just days before the jobs report, blasted the central bank chairman as "unbelievable" and a "disaster" on Truth Social for Powell's delay in lowering interest rates, a move Trump maintains is choking economic growth. Trump's latest angry tirade against Powell was sparked after the payroll firm ADP reported private-sector firms added just 37,000 jobs in May, the lowest total in more than two years. An irked Trump demanded 'Too Late' "Powell must now LOWER THE RATE." Related: Bank of America predicts major housing market changes are coming soon Minutes from a meeting of the Federal Reserve Bank leaders, which was held in early May and released on May 29 show the central bank voted to undertake open market operations "as necessary" to maintain the federal funds rate in a target range of 4.2% to 4.50%. In a related action, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System voted unanimously in early May to approve the establishment of the primary credit rate at the existing level of 4.5 percent – which means interest rates for lenders, consumers and the rest of Americans won't be budging in the near term. This added fuel to Trump's increasing vitriolic displays against Powell (a mere harbinger of what the president started throwing down against former First Buddy and Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk on June 5.) Market participants remain downbeat about interest rate cut chances despite President Trump's demands. The CME's highly-watched FedWatch tool showed a decline in odds of an interest rate cut this summer. Related: Fannie Mae predicts major mortgage rate changes are coming soon The chances the Fed Funds Rate will be in a 4% to 4.25% range in July fell to 16.5% on Friday, June 6, from 30.4% on Thursday, June 5. The odds were nearly 57% one month ago. The Street's Chris Versace reports the market will need to reconsider the three 25-basis point rate cuts it expects per the CME Fed Watch Tool. "With Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic signaling ahead of this data that he sees room for just one rate cut, the growing likelihood is more Fed heads will fall into that camp based on the aggregate data published this week." Verace says. " We also have to wonder if Bostic's comment helps lay the groundwork for the Fed's upcoming set of economic projections that it will publish alongside its next policy decision on June 18.'' Thus, the odds of the Fed indicating just one rate cut in the second half of 2025 will increase if next week's May CPI and PPI data support the "May inflation data we've seen thus far and there is no meaningful progress on trade deals,'' Verace says. Related: Veteran fund manager who predicted April rally updates S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In win for Trump, Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data
WASHINGTON – A divided Supreme Court on June 6 said Department of Government Efficiency can have complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. The court paused a judge's order blocking DOGE from immediately getting broad access to the data which includes Social Security numbers, medical and mental health information, tax return information and citizenship records. The court's three liberal justices − Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson − disagreed with that decision. "The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now —before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful," Jackson wrote in a dissent joined by Sotomayor. "In essence, the `urgency' underlying the Government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes." Jackson said the court has "truly lost its moorings" when deciding what's worthy of emergency intervention and may be showing preferential treatment for the administration. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." In a brief and unsigned decision, the majority said access is warranted now because the courts are likely to ultimately decide that DOGE can have the information. A delay would harm the administration's reorganization efforts and not be in the public's interest, the majority wrote. In March, U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland said DOGE was intruding on "the personal affairs of millions of Americans" in a fishing expedition that's based on little more than suspicion.' Hollander limited DOGE's access to the information while the courts assess the legality of the Trump administration's actions. The administration argued the judge overstepped, viewing DOGE staffers as the equivalent of intruders breaking into hotel rooms rather than as employees trying to modernize the agency's technology and root out waste – as DOGE officials said they intended to do. 'District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government's 'needs' for that of the President and agency heads,' Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court in an emergency appeal. DOGE has sought access to multiple agencies as part of its mission to hunt for wasteful spending and dramatically overhaul the federal government. Musk has falsely claimed that millions of Americans who are deceased are still receiving Social Security checks. Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued the SSA after DOGE began digging into personal data. They told the Supreme Court justices they shouldn't intervene because the administration hadn't shown an emergency need to access data beyond what the district judge allowed. In addition to overseeing Social Security benefits for retirees and disabled people, the Social Security Administration helps administer programs run by other agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. A divided federal appeals court on April 30 rejected the Trump administration's request to block the district judge's order. U.S. Circuit Judge Robert King of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, said the government hadn't shown a need for unfettered access to the highly sensitive personal information that the American people had every reason to believe would be 'fiercely protected.' DOGE's mission can be largely accomplished through anonymized and redacted data, which is the usual way the agency has handled technology upgrades and fraud detection, he wrote. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data for now