"What Is Brigade 313?" Pakistan Senator Sherry Rehman Admits Islamabad's Terror Past On Live TV
Pakistan People's Party (PPP) Vice President Sherry Rehman acknowledged that Islamabad's past is linked to terrorism while she dodged questions on al-Qaeda-linked Brigade 313.
"You keep on talking about the past because it was," she told Sky News journalist Yalda Hakim in response to questions on Pakistan's record on harbouring extremist elements. "We are fighting terrorism. Pakistan is a changed country now."
Ms Hakim, citing inputs from the Terrorism Research and Analysis Consortium (TRAC), said Brigade 313 was a Pakistan-based terror outfit tied to al-Qaeda with members from groups such as the Taliban, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, and Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami. "Brigade 313 is al-Qaeda in Pakistan," she said, referencing TRAC.
"They are the leaders of a massive terrorist organisation that focuses on attacks in Kashmir," Ms Hakim said, adding the group was known to be a "hub for terrorism."
She confronted Ms Hakim about the group, questioning her whether Pakistan should be held responsible for repeated attacks in India, particularly those linked to groups like Brigade 313. "Am I going to war every time there is an attack in India?" Ms Rehman visibly deflected. She added, "There are a hundred insurgencies running in India. Are we responsible for what goes on there?"
The conversation also touched on Pakistan's inclusion on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list until 2022. Ms Hakim questioned whether individuals like Sajid Mir, one of the key plotters of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, played a role in delaying Pakistan's exit.
Ms Rehman responded, "You're citing a long history of engaging with terrorism one way or the other, either fighting it or otherwise."
'Pakistan is fighting very hard to clean its terrorist record'
Vice President of the Pakistan People's Party Senator Sherry Rehman tells @SkyYaldaHakim 'Pakistan is a changed country', even though they were taken off the grey list in 2022 https://t.co/1GOylJEIzn pic.twitter.com/Y7ei3Wbo9h
— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 9, 2025
What Is Brigade 313?
Formed in the early 2000s, Brigade 313 reportedly took its name from the 313 companions who fought alongside Prophet Muhammad at the Battle of Badr. It was led by Ilyas Kashmiri, a former Pakistani army-trained fighter who became one of al-Qaeda's most prominent commanders before his death in a 2011 US drone strike.
The brigade is a hybrid coalition, drawing terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami (HuJI), Jaish-e-Mohammed, and others. It operated under al-Qaeda's umbrella and frequently collaborated with Pakistan's Taliban factions.
Authors describe it as one of al-Qaeda's most "dangerous and effective" formations in South Asia, staging high-profile actions such as assassinations of senior Pakistani officials, bombings across Pakistan, and plots connected to the Kashmir insurgency.
Brigade 313 is often described as part of al-Qaeda's Lashkar al-Zil (the "Shadow Army"), and has been accused of carrying out high-profile terror attacks, including bombings, assassinations, and plots aimed at Kashmir.
Earlier, Pakistan's Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, admitted to the country's complicity in supporting terror groups in the past. He said, "We have been doing this dirty work for the United States for about three decades, and the West, including Britain."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Wang Yi in Delhi: India and China have contrasting approaches to resolving tensions
On August 18, 2025, at the request of Indian National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited India. He was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and had extensive discussions with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and NSA Doval. At the outset, it is appreciable that high-level political dialogue between the two sides is underway after a long pause of four years. And yet, the conclusions from the meeting have brought to light just how structural the differences are in India and China's approaches to resolving their tensions. Specifically, three narrative and policy implications are evident from the statements and readouts of the meeting, as well as post-meeting developments, that shed light on the faultlines. The first, is the distinction between which 'mutuals' each side wishes to focus on. As evident from the press release of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Wang Yi focused on cultivating 'mutual respect and trust' between the two sides. Broadly, from Beijing's view, both the mutuals actually align with its own interest and agenda — mutual respect would translate to respect for its sensitivities, and mutual trust would require that New Delhi wholeheartedly place its trust in China. From the transcript of Jaishankar's opening remarks, it is evident that while India echoed the focus on mutual respect, its other preferred 'mutuals' pertain to sensitivity and interest. New Delhi demands that Beijing be sensitive to India's national interest and strategic autonomy (which often involve closer ties with the US), constraints, and regional power — a parity the latter simply cannot confer upon India. Though Wang did refer to both India and China as major powers, in the past, and at a global scale, Beijing's narrative on India has not reflected these admirable sentiments. Secondly, there seem to be no concessions on what matters to each side. Both sides are holding on to important leverage points even as they demonstrate willingness to negotiate. For starters, there is no mention in the Chinese readout of the meeting, of supporting India in fighting terror groups and cross-border terrorism in general. On the other hand, it is evident from both the transcript of Jaishankar's remarks and India's press release, that the issue of terrorism was raised quite vocally, and that Wang Yi 'concurred' that countering terrorism was a priority. The dissonance goes further. China is cognisant of the fact that for India, the primary challenge vis-à-vis countering terrorism is the Pakistani state. And yet, Wang nonetheless proceeded for a joint strategic dialogue with Pakistan's foreign minister, Ishaq Dar, a mere day after meeting with Jaishankar. It is understandable that the Dar-Wang meeting may have been scheduled in advance. But its announcement on the same day as Wang's India visit concluded, and the agenda itself — strengthening the China-Pakistan 'all-weather' partnership — sends all the wrong messages to New Delhi. Further, there was intense speculation surrounding whether China's export restrictions on rare earth magnets came up at the meeting, even though neither side's press releases focused on anything further than 'trade issues.' But when Indian media began citing sources confirming that there are concessions made on fertilisers, rare earths, and tunnel boring machines, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning took to the mic and clarified that she is not aware of such reports, and only confirmed that 'dialogue on export restrictions' is underway. India undertook a similar manoeuvre with the Taiwan issue. The Chinese press release stated in firm terms that Jaishankar said, 'Taiwan is a part of China.' Because the Indian press statement was not out at the time of the release by Beijing, the rumour mill was already churned, even though there was no mention of Taiwan in Jaishankar's remarks. To assuage the speculation, the Indian press release later clarified that India's statement was not that, but rather a more nuanced one in response to Wang bringing up the issue of Taiwan. New Delhi argued that its policy on Taiwan is unchanged, and that it will continue to maintain economic, cultural, and technological ties with Taiwan like the rest of the world. There was no mention of India's 'One China policy', which is a continued irritant for the Chinese since it stopped being mentioned in official communication from New Delhi in 2008. Third, and finally, there is a faultline in the trajectory both sides envision for normalisation. The Indian side specified that it looked forward to de-escalation and delimitation of the boundary, while the Chinese side's emphasis was on maintaining the 'peace and tranquility' that exists in their imagination. They also did not mention the progress of the Special Representative talks, which is vital from New Delhi's perspective to settle the boundary question. Clearly, Beijing sees merit in keeping the pressure on, and the way for it to do that is to maintain some instability on the border issue. For India, stability on that front remains non-negotiable. Another non-negotiable is India's relationship with the US. The lack of mutual trust with China, the hindrances in enhanced ties with Russia, and the mutual benefit in ties with the US all mean that New Delhi will want a way out of the current tensions with Washington. For China, this endeavour amounts to 'interference' in regional affairs, something Wang asked Jaishankar to 'eliminate,' as per China's press release. China's view of the world continues to be tinted with the hues of its competition with the US, and India comes across to Beijing as a pawn in the West's games. The quandary for India to deal with going forward, would be to manage its ties with China and the US if the two enter a state of managed competition (not a 'G-2' but at least, stable ties). In that regard, attempting to thaw relations with both sides is a must. Still, the power imbalance must further be offset through enhanced partnerships with middle economies, and through domestic investment and reform. The writer is Staff Research Analyst, Indo-Pacific Studies Programme, the Takshashila Institution, Bengaluru
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
BLA fighters kill four Pakistani soldiers in Panjgur raid
Balochistan [Pakistan] August 21 (ANI): The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for an attack in Panjgur that left four Pakistani army personnel dead. According to BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch, fighters launched a raid in the Surdu area of Panjgur on Tuesday night, eliminating a key operative of the Pakistan statement revealed that Ghulam Sarwar had earlier established and commanded a so-called death squad under the protection of the Pakistani military. This squad, which had been active for years in Gichek and other parts of Panjgur, was later led by his son, Islam Sarwar. The group allegedly supported the army's operations, carrying out targeted killings, enforced disappearances, and other violent acts. In return, the army reportedly allowed them to freely engage in drug trafficking, kidnappings for ransom, and extortion through road the operation, BLA fighters seized three Kalashnikov rifles, an M-4, additional weapons, two vehicles, and three motorcycles from Islam Sarwar's hideout. The site, according to the BLA, also served as a torture chamber, where electric shock devices and other tools of abuse were found. Islam Sarwar was accused of abducting and killing a young man in Panjgur just two months earlier. Jeeyand Baloch warned that the Pakistani army and its allies would be held accountable for crimes against the Baloch BLA's latest offensive is part of the ongoing insurgency in Balochistan, where separatist groups are demanding greater autonomy and recognition of Baloch rights. In recent years, attacks on military and paramilitary forces, along with government facilities, have factions argue that the Baloch people face systemic marginalisation and exploitation, despite the province's wealth in natural resources. In response, Pakistan's military has pursued counterinsurgency campaigns to suppress the rebellion. However, human rights groups have repeatedly raised concerns over reports of forced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and excessive force during these accounts point to the widespread issue of disappearances, with civilians and activists allegedly detained without due legal process. Rights organisations argue that such tactics fuel fear and deepen mistrust, further straining relations between the Pakistani state and the Baloch population. (ANI)
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
15,631 constable positions to be filled in Maharashtra police and prisons
The Maharashtra government has cleared the recruitment of 15,631 constables across the state's police and prison departments. The decision was formalised through a Government Resolution (GR) issued on a one-time relaxation, candidates who have crossed the upper age limit in 2022 and 2023 will also be eligible to apply. The government has also waived the earlier rule that allowed only 50 percent of posts to be filled through direct recruitment, citing the urgent need for additional recruitment drive will be conducted division-wise, and applicants will be required to appear for an OMR-based written examination. The exam fee has been fixed at ?450 for open category candidates and ?350 for those from reserved categories. The vacancies include both posts that remained unfilled in 2024 and those that will open up in 2025. Out of the total, there are 12,399 police constable posts, 234 police constable driver positions, 25 bandsmen, 2,393 armed police constable posts, and 580 prison constable vacancies.(With PTI inputs)- EndsMust Watch
