China's BYD to nearly triple South Africa dealers' network by next year
BYD's move comes at a time of growing competition in Africa's largest automotive market, where sales of new energy vehicles are rising and other Chinese companies - such as GAC , Chery and GWM - are also making inroads. Launched in 2023, with its BYD battery electric ATTO 3 vehicle, the automaker has about 13 dealerships.
'By the end of the year, we will have about 20 dealerships around the country. The aim is to expand that to about 30, 35 the next year,' Steve Chang, General Manager of BYD Auto South Africa told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday.
BYD currently offers six models in the South African market, with its plug-in hybrid Shark pick-up, hybrid SEALION 6, and pure electric SEALION 7 SUV models launched in April, completing its hybrid and electric dual-powertrain strategy.
The dealership expansion will help BYD become a fairly known brand and capture more buyers across a country that is slowly transitioning to electrified vehicles.
In 2024, sales of new energy vehicles - a term that describes battery-powered fully electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid cars - rose to 15,611 units from 7,782 units in 2023, according to data from automotive industry body NAAMSA.
While the share of NEVs to total car sales is still low, BYD is hoping to capture the market early on, in preparation for a meaningful transition, Chang said.
'We want to educate and cultivate the market of South Africa and make sure that the South African consumers can catch up with the rest of the world,' Chang added.
China's BYD says it is against import of 5-year-old used vehicles
The uptake of electric vehicles and investment in Africa is quite slow relative to emerging market peers due to limited charging infrastructure, unstable power supply and high import duties compared to fossil-fuelled cars.
But BYD sees potential. 'South Africa is actually one of the most important automotive markets in the southern Hemisphere.
It's probably the biggest market in all of Africa, so it's a market that we have to look at and see how we can develop the market,' Chang said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The race to rule AI
In the 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, the world watched as the United States and the Soviet Union competed in the 'space race.' As both hurled rockets, satellites, and spacecraft into the upper atmosphere, each launch showcased more than technological prowess. The race to the moon became a test of geopolitical will, a symbol of which superpower would define the future. When Neil Armstrong planted the American flag on the lunar surface, the 'giant leap' he reflected on was not just for humanity, but a step that cemented the technology-powered hegemony the United States would enjoy for decades. Today, against the backdrop of another great-power rivalry, a similar contest is unfolding. The stage this time is not just the vacuum of space, but the invisible architecture of algorithms and the chips that power them. Artificial intelligence is the new frontier, and once again, two superpowers are vying for dominance. But unlike the space race, this competition is not bound by the heavens. It reaches into every industry, every household, and every corner of human life. The stakes are no longer whose flag hangs on the moon but who controls the digital nervous system of the planet. AI is no longer a distant promise. It is here, transforming economies, redefining power, and reshaping societies. Yet as the technology accelerates, so too does the contest over who sets its rules and who benefits from its capabilities. At the heart of this struggle stand two competing visions — one put forward by the United States, the other by China — that reveal not only differing strategic priorities but also fundamentally divergent philosophies on how the next world order is to be structured. Last month, the White House released America's AI Action Plan, a document that frames AI development as a high-stakes race in which 'whoever has the largest AI ecosystem will set global AI standards and reap broad economic and military benefits.' The language is blunt: the US must 'achieve and maintain unquestioned and unchallenged global technological dominance.' This is not simply about innovation; it is about securing and entrenching American power. To that end, the American plan rests on three pillars: accelerating AI innovation, building American AI infrastructure and leading in international AI diplomacy and security, with the last pillar designed explicitly to 'counter Chinese influence in international governance bodies.' The plan promotes an 'AI alliance' composed of the US and select partners, to which Washington will export its full AI technology stack: hardware, models, software, applications and standards. Crucially, this comes with a defensive edge: stringent export controls to prevent 'foreign adversaries' from accessing advanced computing, enhanced location-verification of chips and coordinated global enforcement to keep high-end AI resources out of the hands of rivals. In other words, Washington's AI diplomacy is about building a gated community, one in which entry is granted on US terms. The US openly links this to national security, implying that AI superiority must be preserved not as a shared global asset but as a strategic advantage for America and its allies. Beijing, by contrast, has spent the past two years articulating a vision for AI governance that is overtly multilateral and inclusive, with an emphasis on participation from the Global South. Premier Li Qiang, speaking at the 2025 World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) held in Shanghai from July 26 to 28, called AI 'an international public good that benefits humanity.' He stressed that 'only by working together can we fully realise the potential of AI while ensuring its safe, reliable, controllable, and equitable development.' Li underscored the urgency of creating a truly global framework for governance, stating, 'there is an urgent need to foster further consensus on how to strike a balance between development and security.' He warned that without broad cooperation, AI risks becoming 'an exclusive game for a few countries and companies.' China's Action Plan on Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence frames AI as a tool for 'serving the people, respecting sovereignty, fairness and inclusiveness, and open cooperation.' The plan advocates reducing technical barriers, promoting technology transfer, and developing open-source communities to foster a diverse and accessible innovation ecosystem. It goes further by explicitly committing to support 'countries, especially those in the Global South' in building their AI capabilities in line with their own national conditions. The most concrete manifestation of this philosophy is China's proposal for a global AI cooperation organisation. The body would aim to align governance rules, technical standards, and development strategies, while respecting policy differences between nations. Beijing presents this not as an ideological bloc but as a pragmatic platform: a means for countries to undertake joint technical research, share open-source technologies, and strengthen their own AI innovation ecosystems. As Li explained, 'China is willing to share its AI development experience and technological products to help countries around the world — especially those in the Global South — to strengthen their capacity building.' He further proposed 'greater cooperation on innovation to achieve more groundbreaking results,' pledging that China 'will be more open in sharing open-source technology and products.' The Global South is central to this vision. Chinese officials position the cooperation body as a way to bridge the 'digital and intelligence divide,' ensuring developing nations benefit equally from AI's economic and social potential. For countries outside the US orbit, many already drawn into China's Belt and Road networks, this is an attractive proposition: access to AI technologies, capacity-building support and a seat at the governance table without having to choose sides in a zero-sum competition. This is not to say China's approach is entirely altruistic. Extending AI cooperation deepens Beijing's global influence, especially in regions where Western technology and capital have been limited or conditional. By positioning itself as the champion of multilateralism, China counters the US narrative that it should be isolated from key technological flows. In effect, China's inclusive rhetoric also functions as strategic outreach to counter Washington's exclusionary alliance-building. Still, the differences in tone and substance between the two plans are striking. The US blueprint treats AI as a high ground to be seized and defended. The Chinese plan treats it as a commons to be cultivated. These divergent philosophies carry profound implications for the structure of the emerging AI order. If Washington's approach prevails, the world could see the consolidation of closed technology blocs: one led by the US and populated by its security partners, another orbiting around China and those willing to defy American export controls. Innovation might accelerate within each bloc, but the gaps between them — in capabilities, standards, and access — would widen. The very idea of global governance would fragment into parallel systems, mirroring Cold War-era divides. If Beijing's approach gains traction, there could be greater cross-border sharing of AI resources, especially between advanced economies and the developing world. This could help narrow the AI divide and create more interoperable global standards, though it would also require trust in China's commitment to openness and in its own governance norms. Given that China's domestic AI environment is subject to extensive state oversight and censorship, some countries may remain cautious about whether its version of 'openness' aligns with their values. For the Global South, the stakes are especially high. Under the US plan, access to cutting-edge AI may be contingent on political alignment, limiting the ability of non-aligned nations to leverage AI for their own development. Under the Chinese plan, access might be easier, but the terms could be shaped by Beijing's strategic priorities and its own vision for digital sovereignty. The choice facing much of the world, then, is not simply between 'free' and 'restricted' AI, but between different models of technological interdependence: one based on selective exclusivity, the other on conditional inclusivity. Both are political, both are strategic and both will shape how AI transforms the global economy.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Yuyuan Tantian flags security, tech and environmental concerns in Nvidia H20 chip
Listen to article A social media account affiliated with state broadcaster CCTV said on Sunday that Nvidia's H20 artificial intelligence chips pose security concerns for China, after Beijing raised questions over possible backdoor access. The account, Yuyuan Tantian, published an article on WeChat saying the H20 chips were neither technologically advanced nor environmentally friendly. 'When a type of chip is neither environmentally friendly, nor advanced, nor safe, as consumers, we certainly have the option not to buy it,' the article concluded. Read: US licenses Nvidia to export chips to China Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The H20 chips were developed by Nvidia for the Chinese market after the US imposed export restrictions on advanced AI chips in late 2023. The administration of US President Donald Trump banned their sales in April amid escalating trade tensions with China, but reversed the ban in July. China's cyberspace watchdog said on July 31 that it had summoned Nvidia to a meeting to ask whether the H20 chips contained any backdoor security risks — a hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls. Nvidia later said its products had no 'backdoors' that would allow remote access or control. In its article, Yuyuan Tantian claimed Nvidia chips could perform functions including 'remote shutdown' through a hardware 'backdoor'. The account's comments followed criticism of Nvidia by People's Daily, which in a commentary this month said Nvidia must produce 'convincing security proofs' to ease Chinese users' concerns and regain market trust.
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
China wants US to relax AI chip-export controls for trade deal, FT reports
China wants the United States to ease export controls on chips critical for artificial intelligence as part of a trade deal before a possible summit between Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. Chinese officials have told experts in Washington that Beijing wants the Trump administration to relax export restrictions on high-bandwidth memory chips, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter. The White House, State Department and China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the report. HBM chips, which help perform data-intensive AI tasks quickly, are closely watched by investors due to their use alongside AI graphic processors, particularly Nvidia's. The FT said China is concerned because the U.S. HBM controls hamper the ability of Chinese companies such as Huawei to develop their own AI chips. Successive U.S. administrations have curbed exports of advanced chips to China, looking to stymie Beijing's AI and defence development. While this has impacted US firms' ability to fully address booming demand from China, one of the world's largest semiconductor markets, it still remains an important revenue driver for American chipmakers.
