US defence secretary praises ‘indispensable partner' Japan
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth has called Japan an 'indispensable partner' in deterring growing Chinese assertiveness in the region.
Mr Hegseth announced upgrading the US military command in Japan to a new 'war-fighting headquarters'.
On his first Asia trip with Japan as his second stop, Mr Hegseth also stressed the need for both countries to do more to accelerate the strengthening of their military capability as the region faces China's assertive military actions and a possible Taiwan emergency.
'Japan is our indispensable partner in deterring communist Chinese military aggression,' Mr Hegseth said at the beginning of his talks with Japan's defence minister Gen Nakatani in Tokyo.
'The US is moving fast, as you know, to re-establish deterrence in this region and around the world.'
His comments come as an assurance at a time when Japan has been worried about how US engagement in the region may change under President Donald Trump's 'America First' policy, Japanese defence officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Mr Trump has also threatened to impose trade tariffs on Japan, a key US ally, sparking more concern.
The two sides agreed to accelerate plans to jointly develop and produce missiles such as advanced medium-range air to air missiles (MRAAM) and consider producing SM-6 surface-to-air missiles, to help ease a shortage of munitions, Mr Nakatani said.
The ministers also agreed to speed up the process involving the maintenance of US warships and warplanes in Japan to strengthen and complement Japanese and US defence industries.
Japan and the US decided in July to upgrade the command and control of the Japanese military as well as US forces in the east Asian country, under the Biden administration, a major structural change aimed at bolstering joint operational and response capabilities. Japan is home to more than 50,000 US troops.
Tokyo last week launched the Japan joint operations command (JJOC), whose mission is to co-ordinate Japanese ground, maritime and air self-defence forces, in a significant action to further strengthen capabilities to respond to contingencies and better co-operate with the US.
Mr Hegseth announced on Sunday the upgrading of its current command, US Forces Japan, by placing a unified operational commander to function as a joint force headquarters to liaise with its Japanese counterpart to serve as 'war-fighting headquarters' to bolster speed and capability of their troops' joint operations.
The Pentagon chief said the reorganisation of US troops is a step to better prepare for a possible conflict. America and Japan both work for peace, but 'we must be prepared,' he said.
Japanese defence officials say they are not expecting a significant change in their responsibilities or an increase in US troops in Japan.
Mr Hegseth and Mr Nakatani told a joint news conference they have also agreed on the need to beef up Japan's defence posture on the Southwestern islands, which are in critical locations along the disputed areas in the East China Sea and near Taiwan to further step up deterrence against China.
He stressed the need to have 'sustaining, robust, ready and credible deterrence' in the Indo-Pacific, including across the Taiwan Strait, as 'Japan would be on the front lines of any contingency we might face in the western Pacific'.
China claims Taiwan as its own territory.
The US is obligated under a 1979 law to provide Taiwan with sufficient military hardware and technology to deter invasion, and its arm sales to Taiwan have always drawn strong opposition from Beijing.
On Saturday, he joined the US-Japan joint memorial to honour the war dead in the Battle of Iwo Jima as they marked the 80th anniversary of the end of one of the fiercest battles of the Second World War, praising the strong alliance between the former enemies.
Before landing in Japan, Mr Hegseth stopped in the Philippines, where he also ensured Mr Trump's commitment to step up ties with the south-east Asian country that faces maritime disputes with Beijing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S., China reach "framework" to activate Geneva trade deal
The U.S. and China have agreed on a "framework" to implement a trade deal struck last month, pending approval from both countries' leaders, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday. Why it matters: Progress on trade peace with China, particularly if it resolves the issue of crucial Chinese rare earth minerals exports, would be a boon to an economy and markets that have struggled for months with the impact of President Trump's tariff program. Catch up quick: After a series of tit-for-tat retaliations in April, the world's two largest economies effectively had a trade embargo in place, with 145% U.S. tariffs crushing imports from China. The sides announced a trade deal that included a 90-day pause on most of those tariffs on May 12 after a weekend of high-level talks in Geneva. Only days later, the U.S. issued global restrictions on the use of certain Chinese chips from Huawei Ascend, saying they were developed in violation of U.S. export controls. The Chinese reacted furiously, and soon there were reports the government was restricting exports of the rare earth materials needed for hundreds of the world's most important high-tech products. The U.S. subsequently retaliated with a move to restrict and withdraw visas for Chinese students. Where it stands: Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke for 90 minutes last Thursday about trade issues, and agreed to high-level talks immediately. That led to this week's meeting in London. "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus," Lutnick told reporters in London Tuesday night after marathon trade talks, Bloomberg reported. The Wall Street Journal reported that Tuesday's deal would essentially get the May 12 deal back on track, including the lowered tariffs and the loosened Chinese restrictions on rare earths. Between the lines: The trade war is squeezing both economies.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump warns that LA military deployment could be first 'of many'
President Donald Trump and his administration officials warned that the use of the military in response to protests against his immigration crackdown may not be limited to just Los Angeles, saying it could be the first "of many" -- and that protesters could be met with "equal or greater force." Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday that his administration was going to enforce its deportation policy strictly and that it would not tolerate violent protests against ICE officers. "This is the first, perhaps, of many," Trump said of the deployment of 4,000 National Guardsmen and 700 Marines to Los Angeles as demonstrators clash with law enforcement amid the protests. MORE: Trump warns 'any' protesters at military parade will be 'met with heavy force' Demonstrators have clashed with law enforcement sporadically for days, and Trump called in the National Guard, against Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes, in an attempt to quell the violence and allow immigration enforcement to continue. "You know, if we didn't attack this one very strongly, you'd have them all over the country, but I can inform the rest of the country, that when they do it, if they do it, they're going to be met with equal or greater force," Trump continued. The president's threats come as California's leaders and 22 Democratic governors decry Trump's show of force as a breach of the state's sovereignty and a provocative escalation. Trump's words were echoed in testimony given by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a congressional hearing on Capitol Hill earlier in the day. "So in Los Angeles, we believe that ICE, which is a federal law enforcement agency, has the right to safely conduct operations in any state, in any jurisdiction in the country," Hegseth said. "ICE agents should be allowed to be safe and doing their operations, and we have deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them in the execution of their duties, because we ought to be able to enforce ... immigration law in this country." The president suggested he is open to invoking the Insurrection Act in response to the protests. The act authorizes the president to deploy military forces inside the United States to suppress rebellion or violence. The National Guard and Marines, under Trump's current authorization, are not allowed to act in a law enforcement capacity because of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. "There were areas of Los Angeles last night where you could call it an insurrection," Trump said. MORE: Hegseth asserts Trump can send troops anywhere to protect ICE agents conducting raids Trump repeated claims, without evidence, that the protesters are "paid insurrectionists." He decried some protesters who were damaging streets and targeting members of the National Guard. Despite claims from Trump that there were fires and "bad scenes" on Monday night, there wasn't anything all that violent. ABC News observed police moved protesters using skirmish lines and less lethal rounds around the city for a few hours, but there was no widespread violence compared to the weekend. And although Trump claimed that Los Angeles was "under siege," the incidents had been confined on Sunday and Monday to a relatively small area of downtown Los Angeles -- about a 10-block area. So far, the National Guard's presence and role in handling the protests appears to have been minimal. ABC News observed National Guard troops standing outside of a federal building and the Los Angeles Police Department and other local agencies clearing the streets and interacting with protesters. The administration has not immediately provided details about the guardsman's actions from Monday. Congressional Republicans -- including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune -- backed the president's use of the military in the situation. "Clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task of getting the job done there," Thune told reporters Tuesday. Although Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said "violence in the riots is outrageous," he called Trump's order to send in troops "provocative" and "dangerous." "It really threatens the bedrock of our democracy," the New York Democrat said. MORE: LA protest live updates Trump said the National Guard will be in the Los Angeles area "until there's no danger," declining to put a timetable on ending the deployment. "It's easy. Look, it's common sense. … When there's no danger, they'll leave," he said. ABC News' Alex Stone, Lalee Ibssa, Isabella Murray and Kelsey Walsh and contributed to this report.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Defense Secretary Hegseth defends LA deployments at Capitol Hill hearing
June 10 (UPI) -- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparred with Democrats on Capitol Hill on Tuesday over the decision to send 5,000 Marines and National Guard troops into Los Angeles as some protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids turned violent. Hegseth, a former National Guardsman, testified before the House Appropriations subcommittee, where he defended the decision to deploy troops and the role of ICE. "We ought to be able to enforce immigration law in this country," Hegseth testified. "I think we're entering another phase, especially under President Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland." "In Los Angeles, we believed ICE had the right to safely conduct operations," Hegseth added. "We deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them." Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., asked Hegseth why he was sending "war fighters to cities to interact with civilians?" "ICE agents need to be able to do their job," Hegseth responded. "They are being attacked for doing their job, which is deporting illegal criminals. The governor of California has failed to protect his people, along with the mayor of Los Angeles. And so President Trump has said he will protect our agents and our Guard and Marines." Aguilar fired back against Hegseth's answer and said, "The law also says Mr. Secretary that the orders for these purposes shall be issued through governors of the states." Democratic Rep. Betty McCollum of Minnesota also sparred with Hegseth about the cost of deploying the National Guard and Marines, and whether their absence would impact trainings in other parts of the country. The two talked over each other repeatedly as Hegseth referenced the George Floyd murder protests and accused Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz of "abandoning a police precinct" in 2020. "We're both from Minnesota. I was in the Twin Cities during the riots that followed the murder of George Floyd. Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets for days," said McCollum. "At no point did we need Marines to be deployed. This is a deeply unfair position to put our Marines in. Their service should be honored. It should not be exploited." "You are right," Hegseth testified. "We are both originally from Minnesota. Which is why I recall 2020 quite well, when Gov. Walz abandoned a police precinct and allowed it to be burned to the ground -- and also allowed five days of chaos to occur inside the streets of Minneapolis." "We believe that ICE has the right to safely conduct operations in any state and any jurisdiction in the country," Hegseth continued. "Especially after 21 million illegals have crossed our border under the previous administration. ICE should be able to do their job." "Chairman, I have limited time," McCollum declared. "I asked a budget question." After repeated questioning about the budget by several committee members, Hegseth finally gave an answer. "We have a 13% increase in our defense budget and we will have the capability to cover contingencies, which is something the National Guard and the Marines plan for. So we have the funding to cover contingencies, especially ones as important as maintaining law and order in a major American city," Hegseth testified. During the hearing, Hegseth was also questioned about spending cuts to foreign aid programs, including USAID, and staffing cuts at the Defense Department, to which he argued the administration is reducing any program considered "wasteful and duplicitous."
