logo
Ballard Reports Q1 2025 Results

Ballard Reports Q1 2025 Results

Globe and Mail06-05-2025

VANCOUVER, BC , May 6, 2025 /CNW/ - Ballard Power Systems (NASDAQ: BLDP) (TSX: BLDP) today announced consolidated financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025 . All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Highlights (comparisons are to Q1 2024):
Revenue of $15.4 million , up 6% YoY, primarily driven by bus market strength; engine shipments up 31%
14 point improvement in gross margins, primarily driven by increased revenue and lower manufacturing overhead costs
22% and 31% reductions in Cash Operating Costs 1 and Total Operating Expenses 2 respectively, primarily driven by restructuring actions initiated in September 2024
Q1 ended with $576.7 million in cash and cash equivalents
"Amidst an uncertain macroeconomic, geopolitical and industry context, we continue to focus on our controllables," stated Randy MacEwen, President and CEO. "Compared to prior year, 2025 Q1 revenue increased 6%, engine shipments were up 31%, gross margin improved by 14 points, and Total Operating Expenses 2 were down 31%."
Mr. MacEwen added, "We are encouraged with the continued growth in the Bus market, which contributed 81% of Q1 revenue, up 41% year-over-year. After securing new order intake of $75.4 million in Q4, we saw soft order intake in Q1. While certain sales opportunities were delayed as the hydrogen and fuel cell industry continues to undergo rationalization and compounded by tariff uncertainties, we expect significant orders over the coming quarters. We ended Q1 with an Order Backlog of $158 million , including a 12-month Orderbook of $92.4 million ."
Mr. MacEwen concluded, "As we look to the remainder of 2025, we will continue to navigate uncertainties related to hydrogen policies and trade tariffs. We will continue to focus on our customers, new order intake, on-time delivery of quality products, gross margin expansion initiatives, and prioritized product development and cost reduction programs. As our Q1 results reflect, we are starting to see the positive financial impact of the corporate restructuring we initiated last year. We continue to assess opportunities for further cost rationalization in 2025. Importantly, we ended Q1 with $576.7 million in cash, and no requirements for near- or mid-term financing. We will maintain disciplined spending and balance sheet strength for long-term sustainability."
Q1 2025 Financial Highlights
(all comparisons are to Q1 2024 unless otherwise noted)
Total revenue was $15.4 million in the quarter, up 6% year-over-year.
Heavy Duty Mobility revenue of $12.9 million , 22% higher year-over-year, driven by bus revenues which grew 41% but were offset with lower revenue from truck, rail, and marine verticals.
Stationary revenue was $0.6 million , (84%) year-over-year, and Emerging and Other Markets revenue was $1.9 million or 757% higher compared to Q1 2024.
Gross margin was (23%) in the quarter, an improvement of 14-points. Negative gross margin has continued to be impacted by relatively low revenue and manufacturing cost absorption. Improvement in gross margin over the prior year was primarily due to lower manufacturing overhead costs from restructuring actions taken in Q3 2024.
Total Operating Expenses 2 were $25.5 million, a decrease of 31%, a result of our reduced global operating cost structure from our 2024 restructuring activities, including reductions of 28%, 32% and 23% in research and product development, general and administrative, and sales and marketing expenses, respectively. Cash Operating Costs 1 were $23 .2 million, a decrease of 22%, also driven by our 2024 restructuring.
Total Cash Used by Operating Activities was $24.4 million , compared to $20.0 million in the prior year. Cash and cash equivalents were $576.7 million at the end of Q1 2025, compared to $720.7 million in the prior year.
Adjusted EBITDA 1 was ($27.5) million , compared to ($36.6) million in Q1 2024. The improvement in Adjusted EBITDA was driven primarily by margin and operating cost improvements, as well as certain changes in mark to market gains on financial assets.
Order Backlog at the end of Q1 2025 was $158.0 million , a decrease of 9% compared to the end of Q4 2024 as a result of delivering more revenue in Q1 than new orders received in Q1.
The 12-month Orderbook was $92.4 million at end-Q1, a decrease of $6.6 million or 7% from the end of Q4 2024.
2025 Outlook
Consistent with our past practice, and in view of the early stage of hydrogen fuel cell market development, specific revenue and net income (loss) guidance for 2025 is not provided. We expect revenue in 2025 will be back-half weighted. Total Operating Expense 2 and Capital Expenditure 3 guidance ranges for 2025 are as noted below. We continue to review and consider various options to reduce our operating cost structure and capital spend, which may result in revisions to our guidance ranges at a future date.
2025
Guidance
Total Operating Expense 2
$100 - $120 million
Capital Expenditure 3
$15 - $25 million
Q1 2025 Financial Summary
(Millions of U.S. dollars)
Three months ended March 31
2025
2024
% Change
REVENUE
Fuel Cell Products & Services: 4
Heavy-Duty Mobility
$12.9
$10.6
22 %
Bus
$12.5
$8.9
41 %
Truck
$0.3
$1.2
(73 %)
Rail
$0.1
$0.3
(68 %)
Marine
-
$0.2
(99 %)
Stationary
$0.6
$3.7
(84 %)
Emerging and Other Markets
$1.9
$0.2
(757 %)
Total Fuel Cell Products & Services Revenue
$15.4
$14.5
6 %
PROFITABILITY
Gross Margin $
($3.6)
($5.4)
(33 %)
Gross Margin %
(23 %)
(37 %)
14pts
Total Operating Expenses 2
$25.5
$37.1
(31 %)
Cash Operating Costs1
$23.2
$29.8
(22 %)
Equity loss in JV & Associates
($0.8)
($0.8)
0 %
Adjusted EBITDA1
($27.5)
($36.6)
25 %
Net Loss from Continuing Operations 4
($21.0)
($41.1)
49 %
Loss Per Share from Continuing Operations 4
($0.07)
($0.14)
49 %
CASH
Cash provided by (used in) Operating Activities:
Cash Operating Loss
($21.7)
($24.4)
11 %
Working Capital Changes
($2.7)
$4.4
(161 %)
Cash used by Operating Activities
($24.4)
($20.0)
(22 %)
Cash and cash equivalents
$576.7
$720.7
(20 %)
For a more detailed discussion of Ballard Power Systems' first quarter 2025 results, please see the company's financial statements and management's discussion & analysis, which are available at www.ballard.com/investors, www.sedarplus.ca and www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.
Conference Call
Ballard will hold a conference call on Tuesday May 6, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time ( 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time ) to review first quarter 2025 operating results. The live call can be accessed by dialing +1-844-763-8274 ( Canada /US toll free). Alternatively, a live audio and webcast can be accessed through a link on Ballard's homepage ( www.ballard.com). Following the call, the audio webcast and presentation materials will be archived in the 'Earnings, Interviews & Presentations' area of the 'Investors' section of Ballard's website ( www.ballard.com/investors).
About Ballard Power Systems
Ballard Power Systems' (NASDAQ: BLDP; TSX: BLDP) vision is to deliver fuel cell power for a sustainable planet. Ballard zero- emission PEM fuel cells are enabling electrification of mobility, including buses, commercial trucks, trains, marine vessels, and stationary power. To learn more about Ballard, please visit www.ballard.com.
Important Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this release are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws, such as statements concerning the markets for our products, Order Backlog, expected revenues, gross margins, operating expenses, capital expenditures, corporate development activities, and impacts of investments in manufacturing and R&D capabilities and cost reduction initiatives. These forward-looking statements reflect Ballard's current expectations as contemplated under section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Since forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact and address future events, conditions and expectations, forward-looking statements by their nature inherently involve unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors well beyond Ballard's ability to control or predict. Actual events, results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Any such statements are based on Ballard's assumptions relating to its financial forecasts and expectations regarding its product development efforts, manufacturing capacity, market demand and financing needs. For a detailed discussion of the factors and assumptions that these statements are based upon, and factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially, please refer to Ballard's most recent management discussion & analysis. Other risks and uncertainties that may cause Ballard's actual results to be materially different include general economic and regulatory changes, detrimental reliance on third parties, level of achievement of our business plans, achieving and sustaining profitability, changes that affect how long our cash reserves will last and the timing of, and ability to obtain, required regulatory approvals. For a detailed discussion of these and other risk factors that could affect Ballard's future performance, please refer to Ballard's most recent Annual Information Form. These forward-looking statements represent Ballard's views as of the date of this release. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual events and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. These forward-looking statements are provided to enable external stakeholders to understand Ballard's expectations as at the date of this release and may not be appropriate for other purposes. Readers should not place undue reliance on these statements and Ballard assumes no obligation to update or release any revisions to them, other than as required under applicable legislation.
Further Information
Sumit Kundu – Manager, Investor Relations & Finance +1.604.453.3517 or investors@ballard.com
Endnotes
1 Note that Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Ballard believes that Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA assist investors in assessing Ballard's operating performance. These measures should be used in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income (loss), cash flows and other measures of financial performance and liquidity reported in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA to the Consolidated Financial Statements, please refer to the tables below.
Cash Operating Costs measures total operating expenses excluding stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment losses or recoveries on trade receivables, restructuring charges, acquisition related costs, the impact of unrealized gains or losses on foreign exchange contracts, and financing charges. EBITDA measures net loss excluding finance expense, income taxes, depreciation of property, plant and equipment, and amortization of intangible assets. Adjusted EBITDA adjusts EBITDA for stock-based compensation expense, transactional gains and losses, acquisition related costs, finance and other income, recovery on settlement of contingent consideration, asset impairment charges, and the impact of unrealized gains or losses on foreign exchange contracts.
2 Total Operating Expenses refer to the measure reported in accordance with IFRS.
3 Capital Expenditure is defined as Additions to property, plant and equipment and Investment in other intangible assets as disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
4 We report our results in the single operating segment of Fuel Cell Products and Services. Our Fuel Cell Products and Services segment consists of the sale of PEM fuel cell products and services for a variety of applications including Heavy-Duty Mobility (consisting of bus, truck, rail, and marine applications), Stationary Power, and Emerging and Other Markets (consisting of material handling, off-road, and other applications). Revenues from the delivery of Services, including technology solutions, after sales services and training, are included in each of the respective markets.
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Three months ended March 31,2025
Cash Operating Costs
2025
2024
$ Change
Total Operating Expenses
$ 25,452
$ 37,060
$ (11,608)
Stock-based compensation expense
(1,866)
(2,800)
934
Impairment recovery (losses) on trade receivables
1
(1,670)
1,671
Restructuring and related (costs) recovery
(228)
(30)
(198)
Impact of unrealized gains (losses) on foreign exchange contracts
437
(485)
922
Depreciation and amortization
(583)
(2,236)
1,653
Cash Operating Costs
$ 23,213
$ 29,839
$ (6,626)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Three months ended March 31,
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
2025
2024
$ Change
Net loss from continuing operations
$ (21,036)
$ (41,066)
$ 20,030
Depreciation and amortization
916
3,382
(2,466)
Finance expense
506
431
75
Income taxes (recovery)
-
35
(35)
EBITDA
$ (19,614)
$ (37,218)
$ 17,604
Stock-based compensation expense
1,866
2,800
(934)
Acquisition related costs
-
-
-
Finance and other (income) loss
(11,501)
(2,709)
(8,792)
Impairment charge on property, plant and equipment
2,223
-
2,223
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment
(70)
-
(70)
Impact of unrealized (gains) losses on foreign exchange contracts
(437)
$ 485
(922)
Adjusted EBITDA
$ (27,533)
$ (36,642)
$ 9,109

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Toronto housing among least affordable on this global index. Here's what experts say needs to change
Toronto housing among least affordable on this global index. Here's what experts say needs to change

CTV News

time13 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Toronto housing among least affordable on this global index. Here's what experts say needs to change

A new global index suggests Toronto is among the world's worst cities when it comes to housing affordability — as experts blame decades of policy missteps, development delays, and overwhelming population demand for the problem. The 2025 Global Cities Index from Oxford Economics finds that as a result of Toronto's expensive real estate market, residents 'spend more of their income on housing than residents of nearly every other city in the world.' While the federal government recently promised to eliminate the GST on first-time home purchases under $1 million, critics argue that restrictive housing policies, costly development charges and sluggish approvals have created a market that's out of reach for most buyers. The average price of a home in the Toronto area did decline four per cent year-over-year in May but still stood at more than $1.1 million, according to the latest data from the Toronto Region Real Estate Board. 'Over the past 20 years Toronto's population has grown by 35 per cent but affordable housing hasn't kept up. The result? Life is getting too expensive for families,' Mayor Olivia Chow said during a press conference on Friday. 'Young people are giving up on the dream of home ownership.' The City of Toronto has a program where it will defer development fees for some projects so long as at least 20 per cent of its units are affordable. However, demand for the program has far exceeded the city's ability to fund it and as a result Chow says that there are projects totalling 300,000 new units from about 70 different developers that are 'shovel ready' and just 'sitting there in the pipeline' waiting for funding from other levels of government. In Toronto alone, development fees can add more than $100,000 to the cost of a new home and in some areas in the GTA development fees can easily double that, says Frank Clayton, Senior Research Fellow at Toronto Metropolitan University. Prime Minister Mark Carney has previously promised to help municipalities reduce those fees by 50 per cent through additional payments that could be distributed by the provinces though he has not provided a timeline for those investments. 'If a municipality takes $200,000 up front, developers got to increase their prices such that $200,000 is reflected ultimately in the price of the house,' Clayton said. 'Builders won't build, unless they can cover their costs.' Toronto housing A real estate sign is displayed on the front lawn of a house in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on Thursday, May 11, 2017. Clayton identifies three key culprits behind Toronto's crisis: high fees, restrictive planning rules, and relentless demand — the latter driven in part by immigration. Last year alone, nearly 300,000 newcomers arrived in the region, fuelling further housing pressure. 'You need sites. You need sites that are zoned, and you need sites that are serviced,' Clayton said. 'The planning system is very unresponsive to changes in demand.' 'We have to act now' New home sales in the GTA hit a seventh consecutive month of record all-time lows in April, owing in part to a significant reduction in housing starts. Dave Wilkes, president and CEO of the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD), says time is running out to fix the system. 'We are seeing real market consequences. 80,000 people leave the GTA,' Wilkes said. 'The longer we wait, the longer that it's going to take to balance supply and demand.' Wilkes is calling for urgent action on housing taxes — especially the harmonized sales tax (HST) formula, which hasn't been revised since 1991. 'Making that change on HST today is the most immediate thing we could do,' Wilkes said. 'It would bring costs down by a dramatic 13 per cent for the first million dollars of a purchase.' He also warned that the federal government's plan to remove GST only for homes under $1 million misses the mark in high-cost cities like Toronto, where the average sale price sits well above that. 'Under a million is just not a product type that is available in the GTA,' he emphasized. Row of houses in Toronto Children ride bikes by a row of houses in Toronto on Tuesday July 12, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston What is the market is lacking? Jason Mercer, Chief Information Officer for the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board, says affordability has technically improved — but warns that too little new construction could reverse that trend. 'Two years ago, a lot of households simply wouldn't have qualified,' Mercer said. 'Today, I would argue that a lot of those households could qualify, because prices have edged lower and interest rates have come down.' Still, Mercer says demand will eventually rebound, and if the city can't match it with supply, prices will climb again. 'We haven't done a good job keeping up with housing supply to meet that population growth,' he said. 'From a public policy perspective, we want to look at ways that we see sort of a sustained pipeline of new housing coming online.' A turning point with urgency Clayton says the roots of the crisis stretch back to the early-2000s when Ontario shifted its land-use focus towards environmental protection, including the establishment of the Greenbelt. He argues the policy limited where housing could be built, and gave too much power to growth management plans that discouraged the types of homes most people want — townhouses and detached units. 'We have to have a competitive supply of land,' Clayton said. 'Because if there's competition, then prices don't go up very much.' Despite efforts from all levels of government to address the issue — including a recent Ontario bill aimed at speeding up construction — most experts agree that housing affordability won't be meaningfully restored unless there's a broad and urgent shift in policy, from zoning and fees to taxes and timelines. 'The time for discussion has concluded. We really need the time for action,' Wilkes said.

Nearly 2 in 3 say Canada should not join Trump's Golden Dome defence system: Nanos
Nearly 2 in 3 say Canada should not join Trump's Golden Dome defence system: Nanos

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Nearly 2 in 3 say Canada should not join Trump's Golden Dome defence system: Nanos

U.S. President Donald Trump attends the UFC-316 mixed martial arts event, at the Prudential Center, Saturday, June 7, 2025, in Newark, N.J., with UFC's Dana White, left. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II) A majority of surveyed Canadians are against joining U.S. President Donald Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defence system, new polling from Nanos Research shows. Conducted earlier this month for CTV News, the randomized survey of 1,120 Canadian adults found that 63 per cent of respondents said Canada 'should not be part of the American Golden Dome,' and should instead prioritize spending 'on the capability of Canadian Armed Forces.' Roughly 17 per cent of respondents supported paying the required costs to join the Golden Dome, with 20 per cent telling pollsters they were unsure. Respondents aged 35-54 were marginally more likely to show support for joining the defence pact (19.8 per cent) compared to other age groups, and men were roughly twice as likely as women to do so (22.6 and 11.6 per cent, respectively). Regionally, Golden Dome support was more common in the Prairies (20.3 per cent), British Columbia (19.9 per cent) and Quebec (19.6 per cent), and least common in Atlantic Canada (12 per cent) and Ontario (13.6 per cent). Golden Dome, golden price tag Last month, Trump unveiled his plan to construct the Golden Dome, a sprawling, multilayered defence grid he said would be capable of intercepting missiles launched from around the globe, and even from space. Said to cost US$175 billion, the president later announced on social media that the grid could include protections for Canada from outside threats, but with a substantial price tag. 'I told Canada, which very much wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation, but will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our cherished 51st State,' he wrote in a post to Truth Social on May 27. Trump Truth Social Golden Dome Canada (Image credit: Truth Social) Prime Minister Mark Carney's office told CTV News in a statement that 'the prime minister has been clear at every opportunity, including in his conversations with President Trump, that Canada is an independent, sovereign nation, and it will remain one.' Carney has separately acknowledged the Dome, saying it 'has been discussed at a high level,' but that he was 'not sure one negotiates' on defence matters like this. 'These are military decisions that have been taken in that context, and we will evaluate it accordingly,' he said in a May press conference. Methodology The survey involved a randomized sample of 1,120 Canadians aged 18 years or older, and was conducted between June 1 and 3, 2025, online and over the phone. Results were 'statistically checked and weighted by age and gender,' in keeping with the latest federal census data, as well as geographically to provide a representative sample of Canada. The survey carries a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. With files from CTV News' Lynn Chaya and Mike Le Couteur

Nova Scotia's ambitious ‘Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions
Nova Scotia's ambitious ‘Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

Nova Scotia's ambitious ‘Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions

Turbines operate at the Block Island Wind Farm, Dec. 7, 2023, off the coast of Block Island, R.I. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP-Julia Nikhinson HALIFAX — Two leading environmental groups are giving a thumbs up to Nova Scotia's ambitious plan to dramatically expand its fledgling offshore wind energy industry. But both groups were quick to add caveats. On Monday, Premier Tim Houston said the province's plan to license enough offshore wind farms to produce five megawatts of electricity would be increased eightfold to 40 megawatts, well beyond the 2.4 megawatts Nova Scotia needs. He called on Ottawa to help cover the costs of his new Wind West project, saying the excess electricity could be used to supply 27 per cent of Canada's total demand. 'Nova Scotia is on the edge of a clean energy breakthrough,' the Progressive Conservative premier said in an online video, adding the province is poised to become an 'energy superpower.' Gretchen Fitzgerald, executive director of Sierra Club Canada, said the premier's bold plan, which includes building transmission lines across the country, represents an exciting opportunity for the province. 'It could be a game-changer for the region and for Canada,' she said in an interview from Ottawa. 'But it needs to be done correctly and with consultations.' Fitzgerald said the Nova Scotia and Canadian governments must focus on securing long-term benefits from the nascent offshore wind industry because they did a poor job on that front when dealing with the offshore oil and gas sector. 'We have to make sure that we are not selling out what is a massive resource for less benefit than communities should have,' Fitzgerald said, adding that Nova Scotia continues to suffer from a high rate of energy poverty. In May of this year, utility affordability expert Roger Colton produced a report showing that 43 per cent of Nova Scotians were struggling to pay their energy bills — the highest proportion in Canada. While Fitzgerald applauded Houston's clean energy plan, she criticized what she described as the premier's populist penchant for taking decisive action before consulting with experts and the public. 'Moving from a couple hundred turbines to thousands in the next decade needs to be done in a staged way so we learn how to do this right,' she said, adding Houston appears to have adopted a ''move-fast-and-break-things mentality.' '(That) can lead to unacceptable harm to sensitive ocean life,' she said. 'From a community benefits and acceptance point of view, breaking trust can be the biggest barrier to getting to good climate solutions.' In October 2023, the Public Policy Forum released a study saying Sable Island Bank, an ocean area about 180 kilometres south of Nova Scotia, is among the world's best locations for wind energy generation. 'It and several other similarly endowed areas off the coast of Atlantic Canada hold the potential to place the region among the leading global hubs of offshore wind-powered energy development,' says the report from the independent non-profit think tank. It goes on to say that as the world shifts from a dependence on fossil fuels to forms of energy that do not emit climate-changing greenhouse gases, Atlantic Canada is facing 'a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ... to recover an economic vitality comparable to the Age of Sail — fittingly built again on the power of wind at sea.' The report says the installation of 15 gigawatts of offshore wind generation would create about 30,000 direct jobs annually. Despite the hype, the industry must also earn acceptance from Nova Scotia's fishing industry, which in 2023 contributed $2.5 billion to the province's economy and employed 19,000 people. In Halifax, a spokesman for the Ecology Action Centre called on the provincial government to build public trust, especially with coastal communities. 'There really needs to be a priority on stakeholder engagement for all ocean users,' said senior energy co-ordinator Thomas Arnason McNeil. 'We're going to need to prioritize ecological safeguards and preserve the existing livelihoods that we have. That includes the fishing industry. That's half the economy in Nova Scotia.' Still, he said the province's big push for clean energy is on the right track, especially when it comes to building out its electricity grid to better connect with the rest of the country. If done right, the payoff would be enormous, Arnason McNeil said. 'We're talking serious job creation here and a lot of revenue potentially,' he said. 'The bottom line is that you have to do this right. (But) the prize at the end of the road is monumental in terms of the benefits.' A call for bids to build enough offshore turbines to generate five gigawatts of electricity is expected as early as this year. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Michael MacDonald, The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store