'Dad strike' as UK's paternity leave worst in Europe
In a bid to demand change, fathers in the UK will host the world's first-ever 'dad strike' in June. Organised by the campaign group the Dad Shift, fathers and non-birthing parents across the UK will request time off from work to protest outside government buildings in London and Edinburgh, calling for stronger and fairer parental leave policies.
Offering adequate paternity leave isn't just a nice-to-have. Enabling fathers and partners to spend time with their children in the first year of life has been shown to improve the mental and physical health of mothers, narrow the gender gap and improve educational outcomes for children. Paid leave also helps parents share the responsibilities of childcare more equally, leading to lasting benefits for mothers' careers, health and overall wellbeing.
Despite this, new fathers in the UK are entitled to only two weeks' paternity leave at £187.18 a week or 90% of average weekly earnings– whichever is lower. This is less than half of the national living wage for a standard 35-hour working week.
Read more: How inadequate maternity leave harms mothers' wellbeing
Comparatively, Norway gives fathers 15 weeks of parental leave, paid at more than 90% of the average salary, while parents in Sweden are given 480 days of paid parental leave between them at up to 80% of their salary. In Lithuania, fathers are entitled to 30 days of paid paternity leave, paid at 77.58% of their salary.
So why is paternity leave so poor in Britain – and what will it take for the UK to catch up with the rest of Europe?
"This isn't about our values as a country – this is a problem of political inaction,' says Alex Lloyd Hunter, co-founder of the Dad Shift. 'Ninety per cent of fathers agree that 'dads today want to be a bigger part of their kids' lives,' and 82% of people believe it's better when both parents have equal opportunities to be involved in childcare. Our ideas about parenting have evolved like their countries, but our policies haven't.'
In April, it emerged that the promised 'day one' right to paternity leave would not include the right to statutory pay under Labour's flagship employment rights bill. So for dads to be eligible for paternity pay, they will still need to have worked for the same employer for at least six months up to the 'qualifying week' – 15 weeks before the baby is due. Self-employed fathers are locked out of any kind of financial support entirely.
Harriet Morton-Liddle, co-founder of Nugget Savings, a platform that campaigns for parental leave transparency, says Britain's approach to paternity leave reflects a legacy of outdated assumptions about who should care for children.
'Statutory paternity leave wasn't introduced until 2003 and in the 20 years since there have been no meaningful changes beyond minor tweaks to flexibility,' she says.
'Even the language on the government website reveals how fathers are still viewed. It states that you may be eligible for leave 'because your partner's having a baby' not 'because you're becoming a parent'. That one line captures the problem that fathers are seen as supporting actors, not equal parents.'
So far, broad policy efforts to increase paternal leave uptake, like shared parental leave introduced in 2015, have largely fallen short. When economists at the University of Bath and Cardiff University examined data from 40,000 households across the UK last year, they found shared leave hasn't affected the number of fathers taking leave, nor has it allowed fathers to take longer leave.
International evidence shows that if we want fathers to take on more caregiving responsibilities, they need their own dedicated leave – paid at a level that makes it financially feasible.
In 2022, Finland overhauled its parental leave system, giving each parent an equal share: 160 days of paid leave to be used before the child's second birthday. Since then, the number of fathers taking paternity leave has nearly doubled.
Offering similar in the UK could reform how we take – and think about – parental leave, bringing benefits for all parents, children and even employers. Regardless of what couples want, the current system means mothers are forced to become primary caregivers by default.
'One parent told us, 'we woke up one day and found ourselves in the 1950s',' says Hunter. 'This in turn means many women lose out in their careers or face discrimination at work, with the 'motherhood penalty' now accounting for up to 75% of the gender pay gap.'
Currently, fathers aren't given a fair opportunity to bond with their children during their early years. Instead, they're forced to make an impossible choice between keeping their family afloat financially or being present for them. 'Fathers miss out on precious time bonding with their babies and supporting their partners' recovery from childbirth,' says Dr Jeremy Davies, deputy CEO & head of impact and communications at the Fatherhood Institute.
'Children, mothers and fathers themselves also lose out from lost opportunities for fathers to become skilled and equal caregivers throughout the baby's first year – which is when ongoing caring patterns are set, and father-child relationships built,' he adds. 'This has implications for children's emotional and learning outcomes in the longer term.'
And arguments that adequate paternity leave harms employers simply don't stand up. A 2023 qualitative study suggests offering fathers their own protected, paid leave would benefit their mental health, which in turn would likely boost morale, job satisfaction and retention.
Read more:
This is why more employers are introducing their own enhanced paternity leave policies, says Hunter. 'It's good business – the idea that someone can return to work after just two weeks, sleep-deprived and with their life completely turned upside down, and be 100% productive is a complete fantasy,' he explains. 'What happens instead is that fathers struggle in silence, and their mental health often suffers dramatically.'
Read more: How to speak to your boss about a women's health issue
But, with only larger companies financially able to offer enhanced parental leave policies, a two-tier system is emerging. Employees at big firms may benefit from better-paid leave, while those working for smaller employers, or who are self-employed, are left with limited or no support. 'That's why government action is essential to ensure every father gets decent leave, not just those lucky enough to work for progressive employers,' says Hunter.
Whether the structural changes needed to fix the problem are put in place remains to be seen. But right now, paternity leave is treated as an optional extra – not a basic right.
'It is completely out of step with how families live and work today,' says Lucy Kemp, Future of Work and employee experience expert. 'When men are not supported to take time off, it reinforces the idea that childcare is a women's issue. That makes it harder for mothers to return and thrive at work. The best employers are the ones who treat parental leave as a core part of their culture, not a tick-box exercise.'
Read more:
Five questions you shouldn't be asked in a job interview
How to manage 'time blindness' at work if you have ADHD
Can body doubling make us more productive at work?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
3 days ago
- Fox News
Prince William and Kate Middleton's big move forces two families out of their homes
Prince William and Kate Middleton's upcoming move has forced two families living nearby to vacate their homes. The Prince and Princess of Wales, along with their three children, are gearing up to relocate to Forest Lodge, nestled in Windsor Great Park. Two families living near the eight-bedroom property were asked to vacate ahead of the royal family's move, Fox News Digital has learned. Fox News Digital reached out to Kensington Palace for comment. "Close neighbors have been surprised to be ordered to leave their properties so that no prying eyes can see the Prince and Princess with their children," royal expert Ian Pelham Turner claimed to Fox News Digital. It's understood that there have been no eviction notices, and the tenants have since moved to similar or better housing within the 4,800-acre Great Park. Everyone remains in Crown Estate properties. A "well-connected source" told the U.K.'s Daily Mail that the families "were not expecting it." "They were told to move out," the insider claimed to the outlet. "I guess they were given somewhere else, but they were told they had to move. They were not expecting it." "Those houses are very close to the Lodge, so they're not going to want any Tom, Dick, or Harry living in those houses if there are going to be royals there." Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital that the families were asked to relocate due to "security reasons." He stressed that the residents are still allowed to stay on "Crown Estate Land." "They were reportedly in close proximity to the Lodge," Fitzwilliams explained. "The Prince and Princess of Wales need shelter from the enormous pressures of royal life with a media circus watching everything they do." The tenants lived in cottages that were previously converted from stables on the property and rented out by the Crown Estate. The Daily Mail reported that new shrubs have recently been planted and a metal fence with black mesh privacy screens has also been placed around the front of the home in anticipation of the royal family's arrival. A Kensington Palace spokesperson previously confirmed to People magazine that the Wales family will move in later this year. It is understood that William and Kate are paying for the renovations themselves. William, who is heir to the British throne, receives around $30 million a year from the Duchy of Cornwall Estate. "Some royal skeptics are saying that it is not grand enough for a future king," said Turner. "William and Kate may already be setting the precedent for the future monarch living a much humbler existence." WATCH: KATE MIDDLETON, PRINCE WILLIAM 'PLANNING THEIR LEGACY' AMID 'ENDGAME' The royal family previously moved to Adelaide Cottage in 2022. At the time, the couple's three children – Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis – started attending the nearby co-ed prep school Lambrook. Forest Lodge is not far from their current four-bedroom home. Royal insiders told the Daily Mail that William and Kate are hoping for a "fresh start" at the new property. In January of this year, Kate, 43, announced that her cancer was in remission. William's father, King Charles III, was diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer in February 2024. "For Kate, there is a tennis court for the game she loves," said Turner. "She can also have relaxing walks in nearby woodlands, which she has stated helps her on her journey after cancer treatment." It is believed that the Wales family will likely remain in their new home even after William ascends to the throne.


Newsweek
5 days ago
- Newsweek
Dog Who Endured Trauma and Tragedy Faces Biggest Test Yet: 'Never Give Up'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Dog lovers are rallying around a brave rescue Dachshund after her owner shared her heartbreaking story on social media. In a post shared on Reddit, u/frasnet introduced the online pet community to his senior rescue dog, Slinky, alongside three simple words: "never give up." It's an apt statement to include, given everything Slinky has been through. Frasnet, a British national living abroad who requested his real name be omitted from this story, told Newsweek he adopted Slinky in 2022. Their vet estimates Slinky to be around 7 years old when they brought her home. From the moment he laid eyes on her, it was clear Slinky had endured a difficult life. Even so, Frasnet was shocked and saddened at just how difficult it had been. "She was surrendered from illegal breeders with severe gum disease and gave birth to a stillborn puppy," he said. "She had all but 5 teeth removed and suffered nerve damage that affected her tongue and possibly her vocal cords as she doesn't bark normally." Slinky had to undergo reconstructive surgery to plug a hole in her gums that had left her nasal cavity exposed and uncomfortable. Frasnet and his wife already had two dogs, Belle and Zeina, but there was something about Slinky, when they first came across her online adoption profile, that made them determined to adopt. "We both just knew we could help her," he said. "Nobody wanted her. We saw her, listened to her backstory and immediately made arrangements to adopt her." Slinky the rescue dachshund lying on the grass. Slinky the rescue dachshund lying on the grass. Reddit/u/Frasnet Slinky could so easily have fallen between the cracks and ended up being consigned to a future stuck waiting in the shelter for a family that never comes. A 2021 study published in the journal Animals saw researchers attempt to narrow the most commonly seen characteristics of a long-term, shelter dog—a dog living in a shelter for 12 months or more. The results concluded that long-term shelter dogs were more often older in age, male, of large size, and considered a "dangerous breed." Slinky may not have fit all of those criteria, but her age undoubtedly counted against her. Frasnet and his wife preferred to focus their mental energies on making this dog, who had suffered so much, smile again. "It took about 18 months of nurturing to bring her out of her shell; she looked defeated," Frasnet said. "My wife cuddled her constantly, we started to take her on walks and she really started to get a personality." It seemed like Slinky was getting the happy ending she so richly deserved. But everything changed. "In January 2025 she started stumbling and we took her immediately for a checkup," Frasnet said. "Nothing showed on her blood tests or X-ray." It seemed like Slinky was on the mend from whatever illness she had been struck down by, but then a month ago, they noticed she was rapidly losing weight. Further X-rays, blood tests and two biopsies followed before it was confirmed she had cancer. Frasnet didn't waste any time getting Slinky the treatment she needed. "We decided she was losing weight so quickly we didn't have time to investigate and booked her in for surgery," he said. Slinky has had her tumor removed. Slinky has had her tumor removed. Reddit/u/Frasnet Though the operation was essential, Frasnet feared Slinky might not make it. "I made casts of her paws because she was so thin I didn't think she could handle the surgery," he said. But Slinky had already overcome so much and appeared determined to do that again. "She would have died in days without it, but [it] looks like she is pulling through," Frasnet said of the surgery. "She really is a fighter and is not ready to give up." Those words, "never give up," appeared as part of the Reddit post about Slinky's situation. The post has gotten a huge response with over 2,500 upvotes and a slew of comments offering support and encouragement during her cancer journey. "I'm cheering for you, Slinky. You go girl, stay strong," one user wrote. "Sending much love and wishes for healing," a second Redditor said. "May the feisty Doxie spirit carry you through recovery," a third person commented. Though Slinky is recovering well from the surgery, Frasnet is taking things one day at a time. "The mass has been sent for analysis to see what future treatment plan she needs. A lot is unknown right now with the key factor on her immediate healing, which is happening," he said. Right now, the outpouring of support has been much appreciated. Frasnet hopes Slinky's story serves as an important reminder about certain kinds of rescue dogs. "Old, disabled, ill-health animals need love too, especially when humans did this to her, breeding the next insta-pup, the mums just discarded," he said. "It really breaks our hearts how humans can be so horrible to animals that show such love."

Epoch Times
6 days ago
- Epoch Times
The British Pacific Fleet of WWII Finally Gets Its Story Told
The raids on Sumatra by the British Pacific Fleet is a little known piece of World War II history. In fact, according to Angus Konstam's new work, 'this is the first history of the Sumatra raids.' Konstam, one of the most prolific maritime historians living, has recently written a concise work on this brief piece of British naval history, entitled 'Sumatra 1944-45: The British Pacific Fleet's Oil Campaign in the Dutch East Indies.' The author, who hails from the UK, is not shy about why the history of these raids is so obscure. They were conducted in the shadow of the behemoth that had become the United States Navy. Catching Up Konstam discusses how the U.S. Navy had controlled the Pacific War and ultimately won it pretty much single-handedly. For their British counterparts, they were significantly behind in the advanced world of naval warfare. The British had long ruled the seas. But after World War I, the Royal Navy could no longer compete, specifically on an economic level, in building its naval fleet. Naval warfare had graduated from the battleship era to the carrier era, primarily because of the advances in aviation.