logo
'Dad strike' as UK's paternity leave worst in Europe

'Dad strike' as UK's paternity leave worst in Europe

Yahoo20-05-2025

As traditional gender roles around parenting shift, the UK's outdated parental leave system is falling behind. British fathers get the worst deal in Europe, with just two weeks off at pay that amounts to less than half the minimum wage.
In a bid to demand change, fathers in the UK will host the world's first-ever 'dad strike' in June. Organised by the campaign group the Dad Shift, fathers and non-birthing parents across the UK will request time off from work to protest outside government buildings in London and Edinburgh, calling for stronger and fairer parental leave policies.
Offering adequate paternity leave isn't just a nice-to-have. Enabling fathers and partners to spend time with their children in the first year of life has been shown to improve the mental and physical health of mothers, narrow the gender gap and improve educational outcomes for children. Paid leave also helps parents share the responsibilities of childcare more equally, leading to lasting benefits for mothers' careers, health and overall wellbeing.
Despite this, new fathers in the UK are entitled to only two weeks' paternity leave at £187.18 a week or 90% of average weekly earnings– whichever is lower. This is less than half of the national living wage for a standard 35-hour working week.
Read more: How inadequate maternity leave harms mothers' wellbeing
Comparatively, Norway gives fathers 15 weeks of parental leave, paid at more than 90% of the average salary, while parents in Sweden are given 480 days of paid parental leave between them at up to 80% of their salary. In Lithuania, fathers are entitled to 30 days of paid paternity leave, paid at 77.58% of their salary.
So why is paternity leave so poor in Britain – and what will it take for the UK to catch up with the rest of Europe?
"This isn't about our values as a country – this is a problem of political inaction,' says Alex Lloyd Hunter, co-founder of the Dad Shift. 'Ninety per cent of fathers agree that 'dads today want to be a bigger part of their kids' lives,' and 82% of people believe it's better when both parents have equal opportunities to be involved in childcare. Our ideas about parenting have evolved like their countries, but our policies haven't.'
In April, it emerged that the promised 'day one' right to paternity leave would not include the right to statutory pay under Labour's flagship employment rights bill. So for dads to be eligible for paternity pay, they will still need to have worked for the same employer for at least six months up to the 'qualifying week' – 15 weeks before the baby is due. Self-employed fathers are locked out of any kind of financial support entirely.
Harriet Morton-Liddle, co-founder of Nugget Savings, a platform that campaigns for parental leave transparency, says Britain's approach to paternity leave reflects a legacy of outdated assumptions about who should care for children.
'Statutory paternity leave wasn't introduced until 2003 and in the 20 years since there have been no meaningful changes beyond minor tweaks to flexibility,' she says.
'Even the language on the government website reveals how fathers are still viewed. It states that you may be eligible for leave 'because your partner's having a baby' not 'because you're becoming a parent'. That one line captures the problem that fathers are seen as supporting actors, not equal parents.'
So far, broad policy efforts to increase paternal leave uptake, like shared parental leave introduced in 2015, have largely fallen short. When economists at the University of Bath and Cardiff University examined data from 40,000 households across the UK last year, they found shared leave hasn't affected the number of fathers taking leave, nor has it allowed fathers to take longer leave.
International evidence shows that if we want fathers to take on more caregiving responsibilities, they need their own dedicated leave – paid at a level that makes it financially feasible.
In 2022, Finland overhauled its parental leave system, giving each parent an equal share: 160 days of paid leave to be used before the child's second birthday. Since then, the number of fathers taking paternity leave has nearly doubled.
Offering similar in the UK could reform how we take – and think about – parental leave, bringing benefits for all parents, children and even employers. Regardless of what couples want, the current system means mothers are forced to become primary caregivers by default.
'One parent told us, 'we woke up one day and found ourselves in the 1950s',' says Hunter. 'This in turn means many women lose out in their careers or face discrimination at work, with the 'motherhood penalty' now accounting for up to 75% of the gender pay gap.'
Currently, fathers aren't given a fair opportunity to bond with their children during their early years. Instead, they're forced to make an impossible choice between keeping their family afloat financially or being present for them. 'Fathers miss out on precious time bonding with their babies and supporting their partners' recovery from childbirth,' says Dr Jeremy Davies, deputy CEO & head of impact and communications at the Fatherhood Institute.
'Children, mothers and fathers themselves also lose out from lost opportunities for fathers to become skilled and equal caregivers throughout the baby's first year – which is when ongoing caring patterns are set, and father-child relationships built,' he adds. 'This has implications for children's emotional and learning outcomes in the longer term.'
And arguments that adequate paternity leave harms employers simply don't stand up. A 2023 qualitative study suggests offering fathers their own protected, paid leave would benefit their mental health, which in turn would likely boost morale, job satisfaction and retention.
Read more:
This is why more employers are introducing their own enhanced paternity leave policies, says Hunter. 'It's good business – the idea that someone can return to work after just two weeks, sleep-deprived and with their life completely turned upside down, and be 100% productive is a complete fantasy,' he explains. 'What happens instead is that fathers struggle in silence, and their mental health often suffers dramatically.'
Read more: How to speak to your boss about a women's health issue
But, with only larger companies financially able to offer enhanced parental leave policies, a two-tier system is emerging. Employees at big firms may benefit from better-paid leave, while those working for smaller employers, or who are self-employed, are left with limited or no support. 'That's why government action is essential to ensure every father gets decent leave, not just those lucky enough to work for progressive employers,' says Hunter.
Whether the structural changes needed to fix the problem are put in place remains to be seen. But right now, paternity leave is treated as an optional extra – not a basic right.
'It is completely out of step with how families live and work today,' says Lucy Kemp, Future of Work and employee experience expert. 'When men are not supported to take time off, it reinforces the idea that childcare is a women's issue. That makes it harder for mothers to return and thrive at work. The best employers are the ones who treat parental leave as a core part of their culture, not a tick-box exercise.'
Read more:
Five questions you shouldn't be asked in a job interview
How to manage 'time blindness' at work if you have ADHD
Can body doubling make us more productive at work?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm 92 and still live independently. I make sure to stay active, and I don't eat a lot of red meat.
I'm 92 and still live independently. I make sure to stay active, and I don't eat a lot of red meat.

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

I'm 92 and still live independently. I make sure to stay active, and I don't eat a lot of red meat.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Mira Armstrong, a 92-year-old from Porepunkah, Australia. It has been edited for length and clarity. I built my home with my husband, Bruce, in 1956. Now that I'm 92 years old, I still live independently. I hope I croak it here. I was born in Poland in 1933 during the Depression. My father was a shoemaker and in the army reserve. When World War II broke out, he was taken prisoner and sent to Germany. My mother, siblings, and I followed. I got a rough start to life Life was pretty tough. We lived in a derelict, abandoned farmhouse and weren't allowed to go to school because we weren't German citizens. While German children were at school, we'd scavenge at the dump — once, we even found an old gramophone. Toward the end of the war, I remember hearing American planes overhead. An old German man cycled through our village, sounding a siren as they approached. They never bombed our village, only cities and factories. I remember watching thousands of British airmen being marched past on foot. They stopped and ate grass because they were so hungry. I wish I knew how to speak English back then, but I didn't. We moved to Australia after the war, and things changed After the war, we were moved from one displaced persons camp to another. Europe was in chaos. We spent some time in Italy, then came to Australia aboard the SS Skaugum. My father got a job in the ship's kitchen and was finally able to buy toothpaste. We'd cleaned our teeth with ash during the war. When we arrived in Melbourne on March 28, 1950, I was 17. It felt like heaven. Everything was so strange and unusual. We were finally free. My family eventually settled in Porepunkah, Victoria, and I met my husband, Bruce, at the local swimming hole. One day, he waited in his truck to pick my sister and me up from work, and that was it. We were married in 1954 — I was 21, Bruce was 24. Longevity could be hereditary — my mum lived to 97. She was hardworking and survived many hardships, too. But I have also made a few lifestyle choices that may have helped. Being active has always been a priority When I was younger, I used to cycle 24 kilometers to and from work, even to church in high heels. I did everything fast, whether it was housework or heaving hay bales around our farm. When Bruce and I built our house, we dug the foundation holes and the well by hand. We had five kids, and I was constantly busy. I worked in hospitality and retail, never behind a desk. These days, I still walk a lot, mainly around the house and outside, and I like to garden. I eat a balanced diet, and I don't drink or smoke I eat everything — probably because I remember the starvation during the war. Once, we went for four days without food. For breakfast, I have porridge or Weetabix. I eat soup full of veggies, wholemeal toasties, chicken, fish, and walnuts. There's not a lot of red meat in my diet. My vice is fruit, though I have to be careful because I'm borderline diabetic. I never smoked or drank, and I only recently started drinking coffee. Staying social and volunteering is key Our home was always social — full of friends and family. I enjoy spending time with my eight grandkids and eight great-grandkids. I've also done a lot of volunteer work: 29 years with Meals on Wheels, 14 years with the op shop, and years of church work. I get bored easily, and I enjoy giving back. My faith has given me comfort in tough times Bruce died in 1977 shortly after a trucking accident. He was 47 years old, I was 44. I still had three boys at home and about 70 cows to manage on our farm. It was a horrendous time, and I went through hell. I did three part-time jobs and took care of everything on autopilot. After Bruce died, I started cursing God and stopped going to church. Then, in 1992, my youngest son, Graham, was killed in a road accident. It was very difficult, and that's when I returned to church. My faith has brought me comfort ever since. I make sure to keep my mind active I keep my mind active with puzzles and reading. I enjoy thrillers, and hot romances, too. After Bruce died, I'd read romance novels through the night. In the morning, I didn't even remember what they were about. These days, I enjoy feeding the birds and gardening. For what it's worth, these habits may have led to my longevity, and they've surely contributed to my enjoyment of life. But my No. 1 tip for a long life? Don't die!

John D.H. Harris John D.H. Harris passed away May 4, 2025 at
John D.H. Harris John D.H. Harris passed away May 4, 2025 at

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

John D.H. Harris John D.H. Harris passed away May 4, 2025 at

Jun. 6—John D.H. Harris John D.H. Harris passed away May 4, 2025 at a local hospital. He was in poor health for some months prior. Survivors are wife of 41 years, Mary Harris, son David Minall (Tracey), daughter Pam Gilsenan, grandchildren Leanne Minall (Tom), Ross Minall, Liam Gilsenan, Kerry Gilsenan. Katharine Ofcarzik (Rick). John was born April 1933 in Surrey, England. He received a Technical degree in England and rose to chief engineer at Decca Radar in London with a specialty in telecommunications. He emigrated to the U.S. in 1968 and began working in various technical fields, leading to a long career in General Instrument. He was remarkable for his contributions to many branches of creative engineering: if you ever used high definition television, a satellite dish, an IBM machine, a programmable thermostat, or driven a GM or Ford card with computerized dashboard, you have met John Harris. After retiring from GI, he worked for a local firm producing medical research equipment, including Laser Tweezers. In his own LLC company, he completed diverse projects for Los Alamos, Sandia, as well as for private individuals and companies. He was coding on his computer well up until poor health overtook him. At home, he also crafted model airplanes and grew tomatoes. Friends and acquaintances recall John as a warm and generous man, with a British wit and sense of humor that never quit. He was dedicated to high technology that has improved daily life for mankind. And no job was too small for him to lend a hand. John loved the East Mountains. It reminded him of England and Wales. He will remain with us in the East Mountains where he wished to stay. A Celebration of Life service is planned and will be announced in the near future.

King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert
King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert

As King Charles prepares to put on a united front with his family at this year's Trooping the Colour, the monarch and estranged son Prince Harry are nowhere near ending their rift. "There is no turning back," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital. "King Charles remains tender towards his son but can't risk communication," she shared. "Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences. Those close to the king say he [shouldn't] make peace with Harry in a way that would burden Prince William's future reign. The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry. Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes." King Charles, Prince Harry's Painful Feud 'Damaging' Monarch's Reign As Gutted Son Remains Furious: Expert "Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it," Fordwich added. Fordwich's comments came shortly after insiders told People magazine that the monarch, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, is hesitant to reconnect with his son. Many royal observers believe it's the monarch who should take the first step in igniting a royal reconciliation. Read On The Fox News App "The underlying issue is trust," royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith told the outlet. "The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders told the outlet that the king, 76, isn't surrounded by palace aides urging him to reconcile with his son. Meanwhile, William is said to have "no interest" in extending an olive branch. "There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,'" royal author Valentine Low told the outlet. Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment. WATCH: PRINCE HARRY LOOKING TO RECONCILE WITH KING CHARLES, ROYAL FAMILY Fordwich claimed that Harry has crossed such a deep line in Charles's eyes that it's been difficult for the king to forgive his son. Sources close to Harry previously claimed to People magazine that Charles won't respond to his letters or phone calls. "It's Harry's criticisms of Queen Camilla [in his memoir, 'Spare'], as well as his broader attacks on the family and institution, which have seriously crossed a line for the king and those closest to him," Fordwich claimed. "The king is now so puzzled by Harry's constant revelations. It's now beyond sensitive to discuss, so he avoids all interaction regarding the subject. He is so kind but overwhelmed and has quite enough on his plate to deal with, without all this from his son." Harry's troubled relationship with his family and the U.K. establishment has played out in public for years – in books, interviews, TV programs and the courts. Harry and his wife, Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, stepped back as senior royals in 2020, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace. That same year, they moved to California. Since the couple's royal exit, they have aired their grievances and made blistering allegations against the royal family. Harry's explosive 2023 memoir, "Spare," was stuffed with private details and embarrassing revelations. Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter Harry's rift with his family burst into the open once more with a raw interview he gave to the BBC in May after losing a court case over his security. In a long and at times emotional conversation, Harry said he wanted reconciliation. He admitted that his father, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, won't speak to him. "Harry's ill-timed recent interview on the BBC highlighted the lack of trust between them publicly," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. "He seemed to believe his father could and should solve the issue of security, which he insists he and his family should have." "The rift, sadly, seems likely to remain toxic as there is no mutual trust between them," said Fitzwilliams. "Hopefully, it will not worsen as the Sussexes could give further interviews or possibly write more about the feud, something that is invariably remunerative for them." Low told People magazine that despite Harry's call for peace on the BBC, his comments were seen as another blow to the royals. During the interview, Harry, who has met his father only once, briefly, since his diagnosis early last year, said, "I don't know how much longer my father has." "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," said Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that the royals take great pride in protecting their public image. They've maintained the late Queen Elizabeth II's motto of keep calm and carry on. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News "The royals play a positive role to the cameras," he explained. "[But] behind the scenes, they allegedly are constantly bickering with each other… King Charles has a past reputation for not making advances on difficult decisions." A source recently claimed to Us Weekly that William was "absolutely appalled" by Harry's comments to the BBC about their father's health. The insider claimed that the 42-year-old feels like Harry stooped "so low." Royal experts previously told Fox News Digital that William is fiercely protective of Charles. The source also told the outlet that it's unlikely that the feuding brothers will reunite while their father is still alive. "The funeral of Charles would be the first time that courtiers would imagine [them reuniting]," said the insider. "I can't imagine William would invite Harry to his coronation." Despite infrequent updates from the palace about his health, Charles has returned to a full slate of public duties. During his sit-down with the BBC, Harry held out little hope of another meeting with his father. "The only time I come back to the U.K. is, sadly, for funerals or court cases," he said. Fitzwilliams said that Charles must address his ongoing rift with Harry, 40, as it remains a dark cloud over his reign. "We are now less than a fortnight away from Trooping the Colour, which celebrates the monarch's birthday," he said. "King Charles can surely congratulate himself on negotiating a year where he has worked so hard and achieved a great deal despite battling cancer." "The one area that remains problematic is the rift with the Sussexes. He has only seen Prince Harry once after his diagnosis and then fleetingly." Back in 2024, Christopher Andersen, author of "The King," claimed to Fox News Digital that the king is still unable to forgive his son for casting Camilla as the villain in "Spare." "I think people have to realize that the one thing that Charles finds unforgivable is criticism of Camilla," said Andersen at the time. "There's no criticism of Camilla," Andersen claimed. "And unfortunately for Harry… Harry said some pretty devastating things about her. He made it clear that he felt she was… the villain in the piece. I think that still bothers the king, and I don't know that it will be easy for him to [forgive]. I don't think they'll ever forgive Harry for that." WATCH: PRINCE HARRY'S JABS AT QUEEN CAMILLA UNFORGIVABLE FOR KING CHARLES: EXPERT "[He's] on his own," Andersen added, referring to the Duke of Sussex. In televised interviews to promote the book, Harry accused his stepmother, 77, of leaking private conversations to the media to burnish her own reputation. He accused members of the royal family of getting "into bed with the devil" to gain favorable tabloid coverage, singling out Camilla's efforts to rehabilitate her image with the public after her longtime affair with his father. "That made her dangerous because of the connections that she was forging within the British press," Harry told CBS ahead of his book launch. "There was open willingness on both sides to trade information. And with a family built on hierarchy, and with her on the way to being queen consort, there was going to be people or bodies left in the street." The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reside in the wealthy coastal city of Montecito with their two young article source: King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store