logo
The Labour MPs rebelling against UK Government's welfare reforms

The Labour MPs rebelling against UK Government's welfare reforms

Wales Online5 hours ago

The Labour MPs rebelling against UK Government's welfare reforms
It includes three MPs from Wales
A sizeable number of Labour's MPs have voiced discontent about the proposals
(Image: 2025 WPA Pool/Getty )
More than 100 Labour MPs have publicly backed a bid to halt the UK Government's welfare reforms. Some 108 MPs, including three from Wales, have backed what is called an amendment which could stop the reform plans in their tracks when it is voted on in the Commons on July 1.
The so-called reasoned amendment is a way MPs can formally object to a Bill. If the reasoned amendment is selected by Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle, and the majority of MPs vote in favour of it, the bill will not be allowed to continue its passage through Parliament.

The number who have signed the letter is enough to threaten Sir Keir Starmer's majority and the rebels could sink the plan, if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here

It remains unclear whether the Conservatives would back the rebels. Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel would not state the Conservatives position when asked.
She told Sky News the Tories backed the "fundamental principle of welfare reform, which could lead to structural changes in our country which our economy needs".
It is signed by Henry Tufnell, Labour MP for Mid and South Pembrokeshire, Steve Witherden MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr - who had already indicated he would vote against the Bill, and Ruth Jones, MP for Newport West, who is also chair of the Welsh affairs select committee.
Article continues below
She is one of 10 Labour select committee chairs to sign the letter.
The amendment, published on Tuesday's order paper, notes there is a "need for the reform of the social security system" but it calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill "because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children".
There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said.

They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn.
Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee is one of those who has signed the amendment. The MPs "want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill", she said.
"We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies - investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching - (to) have been able to bed in.

Content cannot be displayed without consent
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading.
Under the proposals in the Bill, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit.

Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. Amid the growing threat of rebellion, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden warned on Tuesday morning it would be a "very serious thing" for Labour MPs to effectively vote down the Bill at its first major outing in the Commons.
He added: "You're right to point out that this phrase reasoned amendment isn't just a small tweak. It would stop the legislative process if it succeeded."
Mr McFadden insisted the growing costs of welfare were unsustainable, as a "city the size of Leicester" was being added to the population on benefits each year.

"I don't think as the party of labour, the party of work, we can sit back and be relaxed about so many people going on to long-term sickness and disability benefits," he added.
Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel, meanwhile, would not say whether the Conservatives would side with the Labour rebels in the Commons.
But she told Sky News the Tories backed the "fundamental principle of welfare reform, which could lead to structural changes in our country which our economy needs".
Article continues below
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall spent Monday night speaking to backbench MPs about the reforms at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK seeks ‘trade and investment relationship' with China despite spying risk
UK seeks ‘trade and investment relationship' with China despite spying risk

Rhyl Journal

time10 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

UK seeks ‘trade and investment relationship' with China despite spying risk

Ministers promised 'greater robustness and consistency' in the way the UK deals with China but acknowledged the desire for a 'trade and investment relationship' with the world's second biggest economy. The 'China audit', which examined the extent of the UK's relationship with Beijing, recommended increasing the Government's ability to engage with the Asian economic superpower while increasing 'resilience' against the risks posed by Xi Jinping's country. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs that in the past decade China has delivered a third of global economic growth, becoming the world's second largest economy and, together with Hong Kong, the UK's third largest trading partner. 'Not engaging with China is therefore no choice at all,' he said. 'China's power is an inescapable fact.' Mr Lammy said the audit painted a 'complex picture' but 'the UK's approach to China will be founded on progressive realism, taking the world as it is, not as we wish it to be'. 'Like our closest allies, we will co-operate where we can and we will challenge where we must,' he said, vowing that meant 'never compromising on our national security'. A summary of the audit's findings – including guidance for colleges and universities which rely on Chinese students and partnerships for vital funding – were laid out in the national security strategy. 'The challenge of competition from China – which ranges from military modernisation to an assertion of state power that encompasses economic, industrial, science and technology policy – has potentially huge consequences for the lives of British citizens,' the strategy said. The audit underlined the need for 'direct and high-level engagement and pragmatic cooperation where it is in our national interest', signalling further high-level talks with Beijing. 'In a more volatile world, we need to reduce the risks of misunderstanding and poor communication that have characterised the relationship in recent years,' the strategy said. 'China's global role makes it increasingly consequential in tackling the biggest global challenges, from climate change to global health to financial stability. 'We will seek a trade and investment relationship that supports secure and resilient growth and boosts the UK economy.' But the strategy acknowledged 'several major areas, such as human rights and cyber security, where there are stark differences and where continued tension is likely'. The report noted: 'Instances of China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years. 'Our national security response will therefore continue to be threat-driven, bolstering our defences and responding with strong counter-measures. 'We will continue to protect the Hong Kong community in the UK and others from transnational repression.' The China audit recommended 'an increase in China capabilities across the national security system'. 'That includes creating the basis for a reciprocal and balanced economic relationship, by providing guidance to those in the private or higher education sectors for which China is an important partner,' the strategy said.

Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice
Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice

Rhyl Journal

time10 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice

The deputy leader of Reform UK will be introducing 'Lucy's Bill', which would allow people to mount mass appeals against punishments they deem to be too severe or lenient. It comes after Mrs Connolly, the wife of Conservative councillor Ray Connolly, was jailed last year for 31 months for inciting racial hatred, a sentence which has been criticised as being too harsh. The Bill will be introduced to the House of Commons on Wednesday and would mean campaigners could get the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to reconsider cases deemed unduly harsh. Speaking outside HMP Peterborough, where he visited Connolly on Tuesday, Mr Tice said she was a 'political prisoner'. He said: 'I genuinely fear that she is actually being treated as a political prisoner for political purposes.' Mrs Connolly posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it,' in the wake of the Southport stabbings. An appeal against her sentence was dismissed at the Court of Appeal last month. Mr Tice claimed Mrs Connolly had bruises on her wrists which he said were from handcuffs but that she was calm and wanted to see through her sentence and rebuild her life. He said he hoped the Bill would enable a 'treble check' on sentences. 'The whole point about justice is it has to have the confidence of the British people,' Mr Tice said. 'We're not calling into dispute the brilliance of our legal system and our judges. 'What we're just saying is, sometimes, however good you are, you might not quite get it right, and it's not unreasonable to have a treble check of the sentence itself.' He said that the number of people required to sign the petition could be up for debate. He added: 'To get 500 signatures on a form is not an easy thing. You've got to explain it to 500 people, and they've got to be convinced. 'You can always say at the margin something might be abused. That doesn't mean you shouldn't talk about it.' When asked why the public should get a say in legal cases, Mr Tice said: 'Never underestimate the common sense of the Great British public and their gut instinct for where something is fair or not fair. We're all human, judges can get things wrong, and sometimes there can be political pressure. 'In this situation, we had a prime minister that effectively ordered the judges to give very strict sentences, and people have very serious concerns about that. 'There's a lot of concern amongst the British public that Lucy Connolly and others were the victims of two-tier justice.' Under the Bill, campaigners would need to get 500 people to sign a petition against a punishment handed down in Crown Court. Those cases would be considered for eight weeks by the CCRC, which may refer them to the Court of Appeal for a decision. Mr Tice said of choosing the CCRC over the Attorney General: 'The Attorney General is a busy person and ultimately a political person, whereas the (CCRC) should not be that. 'It could potentially be extra work but it wouldn't be very many cases a year. It might be an opportunity for the CCRC to say 'We actually need to relook at our competences, how we operate, our procedures. Are we getting it right? Can we improve ourselves?'. He did not say how much the proposal could cost the taxpayer but added: 'I want to have the debate and the discussion and give the British people the ability to have ever more confidence in our justice system. 'If you lose that confidence, if you lose that trust, that's a very bad place to be.'

Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice
Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice

North Wales Chronicle

time10 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Public's ‘gut instinct' should count in reviewing criminal cases, says Tice

The deputy leader of Reform UK will be introducing 'Lucy's Bill', which would allow people to mount mass appeals against punishments they deem to be too severe or lenient. It comes after Mrs Connolly, the wife of Conservative councillor Ray Connolly, was jailed last year for 31 months for inciting racial hatred, a sentence which has been criticised as being too harsh. The Bill will be introduced to the House of Commons on Wednesday and would mean campaigners could get the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to reconsider cases deemed unduly harsh. Speaking outside HMP Peterborough, where he visited Connolly on Tuesday, Mr Tice said she was a 'political prisoner'. He said: 'I genuinely fear that she is actually being treated as a political prisoner for political purposes.' Mrs Connolly posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it,' in the wake of the Southport stabbings. An appeal against her sentence was dismissed at the Court of Appeal last month. Mr Tice claimed Mrs Connolly had bruises on her wrists which he said were from handcuffs but that she was calm and wanted to see through her sentence and rebuild her life. He said he hoped the Bill would enable a 'treble check' on sentences. 'The whole point about justice is it has to have the confidence of the British people,' Mr Tice said. 'We're not calling into dispute the brilliance of our legal system and our judges. 'What we're just saying is, sometimes, however good you are, you might not quite get it right, and it's not unreasonable to have a treble check of the sentence itself.' He said that the number of people required to sign the petition could be up for debate. He added: 'To get 500 signatures on a form is not an easy thing. You've got to explain it to 500 people, and they've got to be convinced. 'You can always say at the margin something might be abused. That doesn't mean you shouldn't talk about it.' When asked why the public should get a say in legal cases, Mr Tice said: 'Never underestimate the common sense of the Great British public and their gut instinct for where something is fair or not fair. We're all human, judges can get things wrong, and sometimes there can be political pressure. 'In this situation, we had a prime minister that effectively ordered the judges to give very strict sentences, and people have very serious concerns about that. 'There's a lot of concern amongst the British public that Lucy Connolly and others were the victims of two-tier justice.' Under the Bill, campaigners would need to get 500 people to sign a petition against a punishment handed down in Crown Court. Those cases would be considered for eight weeks by the CCRC, which may refer them to the Court of Appeal for a decision. Mr Tice said of choosing the CCRC over the Attorney General: 'The Attorney General is a busy person and ultimately a political person, whereas the (CCRC) should not be that. 'It could potentially be extra work but it wouldn't be very many cases a year. It might be an opportunity for the CCRC to say 'We actually need to relook at our competences, how we operate, our procedures. Are we getting it right? Can we improve ourselves?'. He did not say how much the proposal could cost the taxpayer but added: 'I want to have the debate and the discussion and give the British people the ability to have ever more confidence in our justice system. 'If you lose that confidence, if you lose that trust, that's a very bad place to be.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store