Concerns over developers plan to chop 41 trees near Glasgow
Briar homes was due to start construction work in mid-June to build 39 homes adjacent to the Avant Homes Weavers Lea/Littleton Park development in Barrhead, on the former site of Lyoncross Farm.
The developers, however, have submitted a change with council planners to enhance access, parking bays and paths, and to remove even more trees than originally planned.
Residents opposed to the plans say the loss of trees, including a huge sycamore to make way for a "single parking bay", will 'change the local skyline forever".
The trees can be seen in the background of those photo of Barrhead High School (Image: Sourced) A resident, who asked not to be named, said: 'We have identified an abundance of European protected (tree) species at Lyoncross and the current planning application from Briar is wholly inadequate with regards to it not having any information to support European species being there and is more than three years out of date.
'It has many failings to check properly in a nature sensitive area (e.g for bats) and it is also not compliant with the national planning framework that hedgerows and trees that support protected species should not be removed unless there is overwhelming public interest to do so."
The resident also claims that bat detectors have shown an abundance of European protected species including the common pipistrelle and the soprano pipistrelle.
There are also believed to be two nesting herons on the site.
'They (Briar Homes) have started to move heavy machinery onto the site with total disregard for nature and the law,' explained the resident.
'We think there is foul play here. It's really disgusting what is happening.
'We haven't had any response from Briar Homes and their construction people are very disrespectful as they clearly don't understand the law and what nature is there."
Lyoncross Farmhouse (Image: Sourced)
'This tree lined avenue must be saved to protect European species and maintain the listed house setting (of the 18th century Lyoncross farmhouse)," they added.
'This should be saved for the heritage of the people of Barrhead, East Renfrewshire, Glasgow, as part of Dams to Darnley and Scotland nationally and in keeping with East Renfrewshire Council's Barrhead South master town plan.
'The people of East Renfrewshire will never forgive the council if this is done.'
READ NEXT: Plans progress for cycling and skateboarding track
An East Renfrewshire Council spokesperson said: 'We're currently working with the developers to ensure all of the pre-commencement conditions relating to the approved application are addressed.
"This amended application is currently being considered in line with all relevant legislation and will go before the planning applications committee in due course."
A spokesperson from Briar Homes, added: 'Following the purchase of the land in May 2025, and in keeping with demand, our mission is to deliver high-quality, sustainable homes in Barrhead.
"We support the wider regeneration of Barrhead including contributions towards affordable housing and an extensive landscaping and tree provision strategy.
"We have been consulting and collaborating with East Renfrewshire Council on all aspects of development.
"We continue to engage with local residents and our construction approach aims to prioritise the health and safety of both workers and the community while minimising disruption to residents.
"In accordance with an amendment to the existing planning permission, we have agreed with East Renfrewshire Council to appoint an ecological consultant to advise on all construction works on the site, which includes an updated European protected species survey.
"We can confirm that no tree felling will take place until a full bat roost potential and bird nesting survey has taken place."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Orcas left to rot in algae-infested abandoned zoo 'doomed to die' in sad update
France's last remaining orcas, Wikie and Keijo, spend their endless days swimming around a cramped concrete tank after Marineland Antibes closed permanently in January. Now campaigners warn they are doomed to die without urgent action The two last remaining orcas living in captivity in France could be doomed to die because of government inaction on their abandoned marine park, campaigners have warned. Wikie and her son Keijo are the last killer whales living in France and have been forced to swim around their barren, rotting tank after Marineland Antibes closed down permanently in January this year. Since then, the tragic orcas fill their endless days without stimulation, pining for the bonds they made with their now-dead family members. They are the last two surviving members of their original pod of four. Now the park has closed to the public, their environs are crumbling, with the water in their concrete tank getting dirtier by the day and stinking green algae creeping across the site. While a skeleton staff come in to feed them and provide them with minimum human interaction, Wikie and Keijo have been all but forgotten by the people they used to entertain. READ MORE: UK's secret dolphin pool of horrors - breakdowns, blindness and force-feeding animals who longed to die In a much smaller tank nearby, 12 bottlenose dolphins are the only other inhabitants of the rotting park - and time is running out for them, too. Cetacean campaign group TideBreakers have been lobbying the French government to take urgent action and get the animals out of the park before it's too late. But a row between French officials and the marine park's management - who still bear a legal duty for the welfare of the cetaceans - could drag on until all of the animals have succombed to their tragic fate. Legislation that came in in 2021 banned entertainment shows featuring whales, dolphins and porpoises, and set a hard deadline of December 2026 for Marineland to move their animals to safety. But government ministers have since blocked two proposals to rehome the orcas: one to a marine zoo in Japan, and another to a whale sanctuary in Canada - which is not yet built. The Japanese offer was rejected on the grounds of animal welfare concerns, while the Canadian Whale Sanctuary Project's offer was binned in favour of a potential European sanctuary, because of the strenuous travel involved to get the orcas to North America. A third option, to move the dolphins and two orcas to Loro Parque in Tenerife, was dismissed by an expert panel, who said the proposed tank "would not meet the minimum requirements in terms of surface area, volume and depth necessary to house the specimens in optimal conditions". Loro Parque already boasts four captive orcas of its own, including a calf born in March 2025. The French Ministry of Ecology said the government are still hunting for alternatives - while campaigners say there is no time to be dragging their feet. Theme park left abandoned and 'frozen in time' where Orca whales still alive left to rot "To date, with the exception of orcas and dolphins, all the animals have found a new habitat suited to their needs," said a government spokesperson. "With regard to the orcas and dolphins, an assessment by the Spanish Scientific Authority led the latter to oppose the transfer of the orcas and dolphins to Loro Parque (Tenerife) and the transfer of ten dolphins to the Madrid aquarium: the Authority concluded that the facilities did not meet the requirements in terms of surface area, volume and depth to house the specimens in optimum conditions. "This unfavourable opinion means that authorisation cannot be granted to transfer these animals to Spain." They added: "Pending their transfer, the Minister for Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forestry, Sea and Fisheries is asking Parques Reunidos, Marineland's owner, to ensure that the animals continue to be cared for pending a future solution. "At the same time, discussions have been held with the Italian, Greek and Spanish ministers to find a satisfactory solution that will ensure the animals' welfare. "Although no solution has yet been found, discussions with the Italian minister have shown that the Taranto sanctuary project has the support of the authorities and could be ready within a year." But TideBreakers say Wikie and Keijo might not have a year left if they stay in their unsafe and unsanitary tanks. Wikie turned 24 on June 2, marking nearly a quarter of a century living in captivity. She has already witnessed the death of her son Moana, who died in October 2023, and her brother Inouk who died last March after ingesting a piece of metal that had fallen loose into his tank. "Wikie has spent her entire life in the concrete tanks at Marineland Antibes," said TideBreakers. "Our wish for Wikie is to see her thrive in a clean, safe environment as soon as possible, where she can live a long life alongside her son, Keijo."
North Wales Chronicle
11 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Bangor is most prepared city in Wales for zombie apocalypse
The city has topped the list as the UK's most survival-ready city, with more people searching for emergency supplies than anywhere else in the country. The research is especially fitting as director Danny Boyle, who graduated from Bangor University in 1978 with a degree in English and drama, is set to release 28 Years Later, the latest instalment in the iconic zombie film series. The study, carried out by LSS, found that in the year to April 2025, there were 553 searches per 10,000 people in Bangor for terms such as survival kit, bug out bag, and emergency kit – the highest rate in the UK. Gary Noble, from LSS, said: "A zombie apocalypse, while great on screen, in books, and in video games, would be a disaster for humanity, and thankfully, will never happen. "While the results are a bit tongue in cheek, it's great to see people taking serious steps to protect themselves though, should an emergency happen." Wrexham came second with 207 searches per 10,000 people, while Newport placed third with 165. In terms of total search volume, Cardiff led the way with an average of 4,350 searches per month, followed by Swansea with 3,860 and Wrexham with 2,800. Mr Noble said: "Having a survival kit, food supplies, medical supplies, and even a bug out bag in case you need to dash quickly, are all smart things to have on hand. "While you might not need them to escape a zombie horde, they're great to have in case of an injury, a power cut, or an emergency last minute trip to support a loved one." LSS also submitted Freedom of Information requests to councils across the UK to see if any had official plans for a zombie outbreak – none did. READ MORE: European surgeons visit Ysbyty Gwynedd to learn robotic knee surgery techniques Dorset Council responded: "The concept of a zombie apocalypse was referenced tongue in cheek in an article explaining what the emergency planning team do, which commenced 'Have you ever wondered what the emergency planning team do? "The rumours of them hiding away in a darkened bunker drawing up plans of how to respond to the end of the world or a zombie apocalypse are (largely) untrue. "Although we do have a bunker!'" Nationally, searches for survival kit have increased by 236 per cent over the past year.
Scotsman
16 hours ago
- Scotsman
100 years of refrigeration - why are animals still transported live?
PA History repeats itself at animals' expense Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Sometimes, it feels like we'll never learn. That our mistakes of the past are just waiting to resurface, to be repeated all over again. That our promises to do better are just window-dressing for a harsher reality. It seems particularly pertinent when anniversaries come round to remind us that something as wrong as exporting live animals over long distances, simply to be slaughtered at the other end, just aren't necessary. And haven't been for a long time. And so, it was with a big sigh of disbelief that we heard the news earlier this year that Brittany Ferries was resuming live animal exports from Ireland to France. Dame Joanna Lumley and Pauline McLynn joined forces with over 120 high-profile individuals, experts and civil society organisations to condemn the decision. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Out of kilter It seemed to particularly go against the grain as Britain had just banned live exports from Scotland, England and Wales to the continent only a year before. The ban from Britain in May 2024 finally enshrined in law the will of the people, many of whom had come out to protests around ports and docklands around the country for decades. Finally, the voice of reason had been heard. Action had been taken to condemn a redundant and cruel trade to the history books where it belongs. Scientific evidence shows that when live animals are exported or transported long distances, they often suffer extremes of temperature and are deprived of rest, food or water. It doesn't take a scientist to know that putting sentient beings into lorries and taking them on journeys that can last days, causes them fear and distress. Must do better While Great Britain introduced a ban on the live export of farmed animals last year, and Australia has announced the end of the live export of sheep by sea from 2028, the trade continues in the EU. It is a matter of shame that the EU's current revision of its animal transport rules is appallingly weak. Journeys can last several days or even weeks, exposing animals to exhaustion, dehydration, injury, disease, and even death. Some 44 million farm animals annually have been found to be transported between EU member states and exported internationally, many of them on long distance journeys lasting eight hours or more. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The trade is flourishing owing to the rising demand for meat in some parts of the world: European companies are cashing in on the need to stock farms in countries such as Libya and Vietnam with breeding and fattening animals. For some countries – including Spain, Denmark, Ireland and Romania – livestock export is still seen as a key part of the farming economy. Yet it is not only cruel, but also totally unnecessary. Redundant for a Century This year is the 100th anniversary of the invention of the first refrigerated truck. Made for the ice cream industry in 1925 by American inventor, Frederick McKinley Jones, it meant that chilled desserts, or carcases for that matter, could be transported over long distances and arrive in great condition. From that day on, loading cattle, sheep and pigs into lorries to ship them abroad for slaughter was no longer needed. Instead, they could be slaughtered at a local abattoir and the carcases transported to wherever they are required. Refrigerated sea transport has an even longer history. In 1877, the French steamer Paraguay completed the first successful travel with its shipment of 5,500 frozen sheep carcases from Argentina arriving to France in reportedly excellent condition despite a collision that delayed the delivery for several months, thus proving the concept of refrigerated ships. From that day on, we've never needed to subject live animals, often young animals just weeks old, to long distance sea journeys for slaughter or fattening again. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Blind persistence Yet, we carry on despite clear evidence that doing so causes profound harm. Recommendations published recently by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), identified multiple welfare concerns in the transportation of live animals including 'group stress, handling stress, heat stress, injuries, motion stress, prolonged hunger, prolonged thirst, respiratory disorders, restriction of movement, resting problems and sensory overstimulation'. The EU is believed to be the world's biggest live animal exporter. What fuels this outdated trade? Not need. Not compassion. Just cold, hard cash. A backward pursuit of an outdated economic model whereby animals are treated as inanimate objects and where farm specialisation has fuelled a trend towards fewer, but larger farms and slaughterhouses. Against this backdrop, meat producers aim to minimise production and slaughter costs, maximise revenues and optimise economies of scale by exploiting cost differences between member states. And who pays the price? The animals. The voiceless creatures whose purity of spirit, innocence and blamelessness renders them defenceless in the face of unyielding, uncaring and backward-looking practices. To throw another pertinent anniversary into the mix, this June sees the tenth International Ban Live Exports Day raising awareness of the scale and impact of these cruel journeys by land and by sea and sending a clear message to the companies that profit from this misery that it is totally unacceptable. Brittany Ferries, are you listening? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
