Massive Edinburgh infrastructure plan approved despite concerns
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
A new scheme to prioritise Edinburgh infrastructure projects has been approved by councillors, despite some of them holding concerns over several issues.
The new City Mobility Plan aims to determine which projects the city will prioritise working on in the next decade.
Officers recommended that councillors accept a priority list which saw 73 projects approved to go ahead, and 61 others paused – with most either not having been started yet or having already been paused before the plan's release.
Labour councillor Stephen Jenkinson, who convenes the Transport and Environment Committee, heralded the plan, saying the time to take action was now, and that it is a 'a necessary piece of work.'
But some councillors raised concerns over the priority list, questioning the system used to select projects to carry out or pause and the geographic distribution of projects.
Infrastructure projects were scored on a matrix which judged elements of each, such as cost effectiveness and benefit for public transport – but some projects with higher scores were paused, while others with lower scores were approved.
Liberal Democrat councillor Kevin Lang said: 'Coming into this committee meeting, I feel like I had two fundamental issues with this report. Now I feel like I'll leave with three.
'The first is around what has been quite a complex scoring matrix. I don't think it's an unreasonable question to ask, [why do] you get a project scoring 20 paused when a project with 10 is proceeding?
'My second worry is around deliverability. I completely admire and respect the optimism that exists. Let's be frank, this is a council that can take three years to change a speed limit and six years to put in a speedbump.'
Lang's third concern was about developers' compliance with section 75 orders, which involve developer contributions to infrastructure projects.
Earlier in the meeting, a council officer said that most projects were continued or paused based on their score, but that some broke from this pattern due to extenuating circumstances, such as projects being eligible for certain bespoke funding.
The Liberal Democrat group had lodged an amendment calling on the report to be paused, giving councillors and officers more time to look at it.
Meanwhile, the Conservative group put forward their own list of projects to be continued and paused, using different scoring criteria.
Conservative councillor Neil Cuthbert, representing Colinton/Fairmilehead, asked officers: 'It does feel like a report for lovers of spreadsheets. Just looking at the different projects, I don't think it's any surprise that the ward with the most projects is the city centre.
'The wards with the second and third most projects are Forth and Almond. I don't want to go through the list, but Colinton/Fairmile is at the bottom of the list. There's two [projects].
'I wondered if there's any comments about why there does appear to be quite a disparity in a lot of different areas?'
Council officer Sheila Paton said: 'This is a long legacy and history of projects that have come forward over the years. We haven't deliberately tried to exclude any geographical areas, as I'm sure you can imagine.
'In terms of the focus on the city centre, we have a sense of how much of the proposed ten year programme would potentially be dedicated to the city centre.
'And we feel like it's in proportion with how complicated the city centre is, how important it is.'
Interim Executive Director of Place Gareth Barwell added: 'This list here hasn't added new schemes. This is officers broadly trawling through the commitments of this committee.
'A lot of these are actions we've inherited due to growth and development.'
The SNP group put forward an amendment adding three projects to the 'proceed' list, while the Green group wanted to see council officers begin looking at a congestion charge in the capital as a possible infrastructure funding source.
At a vote, seven councillors supported a joint Labour, SNP and Green position, while two supported the Conservative position and two supported the Liberal Democrat position.
Cllr Jenkinson said: "I'm really pleased that we've agreed this bold programme for our city. Prioritisation allows us to work smarter with the resources we have available - making sure we have a clear and achievable path to achieving our objectives.
"This programme follows the successes of major infrastructure projects such as Trams to Newhaven and active travel projects including the City Centre West to East Link (CCWEL), Roseburn to Union Canal and Leith Connections.
"This is an extensive piece of work which allows the City Mobility Plan to be agile, and able to adapt in the future as necessary."
Three projects were added to the list after amendments by political groups, and a fourth was added pending further work on how to fund it.
Among these was the Causey project, which seeks to turn the traffic island at the junction of West Crosscauseway and Buccleuch Street into a public events space.
The project, which campaigners have spent over a decade seeking funding for, was added to the priority list as a result of an SNP amendment.
The group also got the Portobello Town Centre project, which seeks to widen footways and reduce road traffic in the area, and a new cycle link over the bypass near Heriot Watt, over the line.
An amendment by the city's Labour administration, meanwhile, got approval for the funding of more toilets for bus drivers at the ends of routes, pending finding a funding source.
Cllr Jenkinson said: 'The project which I've identified as part of my amendment is a very particular project. It is currently marked for pause, but just for this financial year.
'The topic itself of provision of bus driver toilets at key locations, which are predominantly the terminuses for buses, is a very important one.
'Personally, and I hope the committee will agree, that it's a project that, once the uncertainty around funding is clarified, is unpaused.'
Graeme Smith, an industrial officer for Unite, which covers Lothian Buses, said: 'Access to a toilet at work is a basic right so it is important that the Council gets this right for our members in passenger transport.
'This is a matter of health and safety. It is also an equalities issue, more acutely impacting workers who are older, pregnant or have a health condition.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Startling sum North missed out on for transport in 'decade of deceit'
Analysis by think-tank the IPPR found the North of England would have had an extra £140billion in transport cash if it was treated the same as London under the Tories The North of England would have had an extra £140billion of transport cash if it was treated the same as London under the Tories, damning figures show. New analysis reveals the Government spent £1,183 per person in the capital between 2010 and 2023 - compared to just £486 in the north. And it was even worse in the Midlands, where the figure was £455. Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at think-tank IPPR North - which crunched the numbers - said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit. "We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign – yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her reign – while our transport chasm widens. This isn't London bashing - Londoners absolutely deserve investment. "But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right." The data shows £83billion of Government cash was spent on transport projects in the north since 1999/2000. The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person. Last week Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands. This cash is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands. There will also be a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire. Labour's Local Transport Minister Simon Lightwood said: 'This report lays bare the way in which successive Conservative governments have short-changed areas outside of London and the south east, denying millions of people access to jobs, education and opportunity. ' Labour promised we would bring growth to every part of the country and we've put our money where our mouth is. As part of our Plan for Change we've announced more than £15 billion for local transport in England's city regions, delivering the biggest ever investment in buses, trams and local rail."
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Disability cut impact could be even worse than expected warns food bank charity
Research commissioned by food bank charity Trussell found that 340,000 people in disabled households will be pushed into severe hardship by benefit changes being brought in by the Government Tens of thousands more people will be pushed into poverty by the Government's welfare cuts than previously feared, a major foodbank charity has warned. Trussell has claimed that 340,000 people in disabled households will be forced into severe hardship by the end of the decade. Keir Starmer faces a rebellion from his own party over a string of measures, including cutting access to the personal independence payment (PIP) and sickness-related elements of Universal Credit. The Government's assessment found 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, will fall into relative poverty in England, Scotland and Wales after housing costs are taken into account. But Trussell's analysis said the true picture is even worse, with 440,000 likely to need a food bank - although an increase in the basic rate of Universal Credit will move around 95,000 people out of severe hardship. Helen Barnard, director of policy at Trussell, said: 'This UK government was elected on a promise of change, and with a commitment to end the need for food banks. If the government goes ahead with these ill-considered and cruel cuts to social security, this promise will not be kept – and instead, they will risk leaving behind a legacy of rising poverty and hunger. "Tackling fiscal challenges should not be done at the expense of people already facing hunger and hardship. These cuts will force 440,000 people in disabled households into severe hardship and leave them at risk of needing a food bank. "We urge the government not to continue down this damaging path." The PM faces fierce opposition from Labour backbenchers, dozens of who say the proposals - expected to save £5billion a year - are "impossible to support". Charity the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has backed Trussell's calls for the Government to rethink the disability benefit cuts. It said: "This analysis shows they are likely to create more deep poverty and hardship than even the bleak forecast from the Government's own limited assessments." Trussell has also demanded the Government brings forward the planned increase to the basic rate of Universal Credit to April 2026, instead of waiting until April 2029. A Government spokesperson said: "This Government is determined to change people's lives for the better, helping them out of poverty and tackling the unacceptable rise in food bank dependence in recent years. "We will never compromise on protecting people who need our support, and our reforms will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work, and that their income is protected."
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Farage's 10 most public spats as he faces 'serious lack of leadership' jibe
There are fresh questions over Nigel Farage's leadership skills following the Zia Yusuf saga, with the Reform leader having got in a number of public spats over the years The latest Reform UK drama shows it's "Nigel's way or the highway" amid growing questions about Nigel Farage's leadership ability, Labour says. Last week the party was rocked when chairman Zia Yusuf stood down hours after accusing Reform's newest MP of asking a "dumb" question at PMQs. But in a round of 'humiliating hokey-cokey' he later announced his return, despite saying getting Mr Farage into No10 was no longer a "good use of my time". The debacle was seized on by Mr Farage's ally-turned-nemesis Rupert Lowe, who said it showed the Reform leader "must never be Prime Minister". The former Reform MP, who now sits as an independent, has previously accused his old boss of running Reform like a "cult". Labour has said Mr Yusuf's brief exit highlights Mr Farage's "inability to maintain good relations with any of his colleagues". Here we look at some of the best-known cases that raise questions about his leadership skills as he tries to convince the country he can run the country. Zia Yusuf: the Reform chairman initially resigned after suggesting Reform's newest MP, Sarah Pochin, had asked a 'dumb' question at Prime Minister's Questions. Mr Farage's response suggested Mr Yusuf didn't have the mettle for the 'highly pressured and difficult' political world. Humiliated Yusuf now says he 'made an error. It was a function of exhaustion' Rupert Lowe: Reform's fifth MP was expelled and reported to the police by the party. The explosive row that followed saw Mr Lowe accuse Mr Farage of running a 'cult', said he was 'messianic' and 'must never be PM', and said the Reform leadership had 'zero integrity'. Mr Farage, in return, suggested he'd 'rather eat razor blades' than allow Mr Lowe back to Reform Elon Musk: Mr Farage fell out with Elon Musk after criticising his support for Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. In response, Musk suggested he 'doesn't have what it takes' to lead Reform Gawain Towler: Mr Towler was sacked by Mr Farage after two decades with various Eurosceptic outfits. He suggested Reform infighting was 'sub-optimal' Ben Habib: Mr Farage called Mr Habib 'bitter' and 'twisted' after he was passed over for Deputy Leader. Mr Farage suggested Mr Habib leaving the party was 'a huge relief'. In return, Mr Habib called the Reform leader a 'coward', accused him of 'childish behaviour' said Reform was a 'cult' and 'unfit to govern' Douglas Carswell: Mr Farage accused former UKIP MP Douglas Carswell of blocking efforts to give him a peerage and called him a 'Tory party posh boy' who should be expelled from UKIP. Mr Carswell resigned UKIP and blamed Mr Farage for the party's decline saying that 'Far from having a strategy, we seemed to be driven by whatever came out of Nigel's mouth" Dominic Cummings and Vote Leave: Mr Farage said Vote Leave top brass were ' cretins' just a month before the referendum. Suzanne Evans: Former UKIP Deputy Chairman Suzanne Evans said Mr Farage was 'very divisive' and suggested 'somebody else' should front the Brexit campaign. She was dropped as a party spokesperson Patrick O'Flynn: Mr O'Flynn called Farage 'snarling, thin-skinned, and aggressive' and stood down as UKIP's economics spokesperson Alan Sked: The founder of UKIP called Mr Farage a 'silly bugger' for focusing on immigration Ellie Reeves, Labour Party Chair, said: 'Zia Yusuf's humiliating hokey-cokey in recent days might be laughable but it just goes to show that the party revolves around just one person who clearly has a problem with working relationships. For Farage to fall out with one colleague might be an accident but to feud with everyone you've ever worked with suggests a serious lack of leadership. Nigel Farage is only happy when he's in total control. 'It's Nigel's way or the highway. How on earth would he run a country if he can't manage a handful of politicians without sparking chaos every few weeks? Reform are just not serious. They've pledged £80 billion in unfunded spending, would put up every single mortgage in the country and hammer family finances, while forcing them to buy private healthcare. Working people simply can't afford the risk of Reform UK.'
