‘Big Fish' has heart and warmth
It has heart, warmth and clever music that leads you to uncharted places — so, it beats me why it was such an unmitigated disaster on Broadway in 2013.
The fact is, there's no disputing that its 21 bad reviews and audience apathy killed it dead.
Certainly, its original New York director, Susan Stroman, did everything but land a spaceship on the Neil Simon theatre stage to keep audiences entertained.
Marching bands, rah-rah America dance numbers and twirling baton girls were all trekked out to keep things chugging along.
No matter. The book by John August was called clumsy and the score by Andrew Lippa was labelled wannabe Sondheim.
Roughly savaged, 'Big Fish' joined the parade of other Lippa flops, from 'The Addams Family' to 'The Wild Party.'
All this is by way of trying to make sense of why the show has had no less than two amateur productions here in Hamilton.
Hammer Theatre gave it a game go in 2016, even though audiences didn't rush to buy seats.
Undaunted, Hamilton Theatre Inc. has just opened a somewhat messy, but very entertaining, production of the show that rides over some seriously troubled singing and annoying technical problems to find the show's haunting core.
A teller of tall tales, Edward Bloom lives a charmed life, somewhere in rural Alabama. He's adored by his wife, Sandra, and befriended by some unusual supportive friends.
Yet, there's a wall of resistance that separates Edward from his son. Will wants to be close to his father but can't find a way of separating his dad's truth from fantasy. The stories Edward tells always get in the way.
So, Will embarks on a journey of discovery, trying to find the man not the myth.
'Big Fish' ultimately turns on the moving discoveries Will Bloom makes, trying to get closer to the father whose remarkable tales are populated with giants, witches, and of course big fish.
There's a tenderness here, a sweet sense of love and inevitable loss that gives this show incredible warmth. Thankfully, that tenderness is played out beautifully in Lippa's underrated pastiche of a score, particularly in its gorgeous ballads, 'Time Stops' and 'Fight the Dragons,' given suitable accompaniment by Jennifer Ferreira's large upstage orchestra.
There are hoedown numbers and raucous tunes too and, while they're all fun, they deserve more fully-fleshed choreography than they sometimes get here from an inventive Katlyn Alcock.
Technically, the show is mauled by troublesome sound. Some lines are impossible to hear, and vocal projection is often too low and lacking in energy.
Then there's patchy lighting, which is an ongoing issue at HTI's theatre space. Frequently dim, it gives this show an uncalled for, dreary look. Clearly, there are not enough lamps to properly light HTI's stage, and using a dim follow spot to light scenes doesn't work.
Matt Moore's direction finds the show's innate warmth and humour and works best when it's focusing on the show's relationships. It's less felicitous, however, dealing with movement and the way actors use space on the show's wide-open set.
Sometimes visually impressive, costumes by The Muses add important colour against vast walls of daffodil yellow paint. Standouts for The Witch, Giant and Ringmaster are excellent, but others don't always work for the characters wearing them.
John Connolly is believable as the worried son Will, singing with passion and conveying a likable stage presence. Unfortunately, pitch problems mar things when Connolly forces and pushes too hard.
Glen McCann finds the soul of Edward Bloom, a charismatic father and teller of tales. Vocally, he has problems too — when he turns his head toward the theatre's side walls, he's impossible to hear.
Fiona Roossien is excellent as Sandra, Edward's loving wife, finding necessary balance between backbone and gentleness.
And Aramenta Sobchak and Noun Holloway give good accounts of 'Big Fish's' resident Witch and Giant, finding necessary reality in these larger-than-life creations.
Best of all, though, is Meagan Collett's Jenny Hill, bringing truth and grace to the woman who never stopped loving Edward Bloom from a distance.
'Big Fish,' produced by Teryn Lawson, is a musical that fills the stage with fantasy and truth. HTI's production isn't perfect, but it has wonderful warmth and heart.
I think its Broadway failure in 2013 was because it was simply a show ahead of its time. Well, it's right on time here in Hamilton in 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Robert Mulligan: The Last Poetic Filmmaker
Some filmmakers are naturally in tune with their times. Their films address pressing political matters or urgent social themes. In the case of the great American director Robert Mulligan, whose centenary falls this month, the inverse was true. From 'To Kill a Mockingbird' (1962) to 'Summer of '42' (1971) to 'The Man in the Moon' (1991), Mulligan attended to the universal states of childhood and adolescence, and the timeless condition of love at any age, but particularly in youth. When he strayed from these themes for a picture or two, he found his way back to them. He developed a cinematic style that was in keeping with his poetic rather than didactic sensibility: expressive, lyrical, aligned with the internal dramas of his characters. At the time of his death in 2008 at age 83, Mulligan was Hollywood's last poet standing.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
CHRISTOPHER RUFO: I exposed fake news about Sydney Sweeney. Then they deleted the proof
It seems that all of the conventional opinion of America's chattering class is condensed and printed once a week in the pages of the New Yorker. In normal times, this process yields some good writing and reporting. In certain periods, the magazine has produced some magnificent work. But we have not lived in normal times for the past decade. The conventional opinions of the chattering classes have ranged from delusional idealism to racialist fever dreams, and worse. The most recent illustration of this trend is an essay by New Yorker staff writer Doreen St. Felix, who penned a screed about the blonde starlet Sydney Sweeney. Sweeney, St. Felix mused, represents a fantasy "Aryan princess" to some of her fans, with her much-discussed breasts placed in dark contrast with "the Black man's hunger for ass." This is not the New Yorker of the past; it is something different. What is it, exactly? Beginning a decade ago, the New Yorker, like many of its peers, jumped on the "diversity and inclusion" bandwagon and declared itself an "anti-racist" institution. The magazine, owned by Condé Nast, set explicit racial quotas in hiring and pledged to "talk about racism" at every opportunity. The magazine was capitulating to critical race ideologies. It snapped up writers, like St. Felix, who is Black, to provide "representation" not only of favored demographic groups but also of a certain flavor of opinion. After St. Felix's Sweeney essay, a colleague sent me a link to one of her posts on X. "I hate white men," the post read in part. Out of curiosity, I searched her history for the phrases "white men" and "white people," and discovered a cesspool of bigotry: "Whiteness fills me with a lot of hate"; "Whiteness must be abolished"; "We lived in perfect harmony w/ the earth pre whiteness"; "White terrorism is a redundant phrase"; "White people['s] . . . lack of hygiene literally started the bubonic plague, lice, syphilis"; "It's tricknological, when white people invoke the holocaust"; "White people bring up the holocaust or 9/11 to affect a fake racial psychic burden." And so on. Most of these posts were written a decade ago, after St. Felix had graduated from Brown University and a few years before the New Yorker hired her as a writer. They are indicative of a fashionable ideology that, for the entire Black Lives Matter era, was seen as a credential for ascension into the cultural elite. For St. Felix, the credential seemingly worked. I published screenshots of St. Felix's stream-of-hatred writing, sparking a media firestorm, with headlines in the Daily Mail, New York Post, and other international outlets. Within hours, St. Felix had deleted her X account and the New Yorker had blocked me from engaging with its posts on the same platform—a rare move from a national publication. The St. Felix affair raises an important question, summarized with characteristic acuity by the social critic Wesley Yang: "Should there be a single standard of civility, decency, and honesty that excludes this kind of poisonous racial vitriol and defamation from public life or will we continue to give license to it so long as it is directed at white people?" Indeed. Publications like the New Yorker have long worn the halo of "antiracism." But "antiracism" has always had an exception, which can no longer be denied, for Whites and Jews—the "tricknological" oppressors who, in the minds of people like St. Felix, apparently deserve a steady stream of racialist vituperation. After all, the very term "tricknological" was coined by the Nation of Islam, whose leader, Louis Farrakhan, never concealed his hatreds in euphemism or intellectualization. Some writers have called for St. Felix to make a public apology, or even for the New Yorker to fire their "star writer." My preferred outcome to the Doreen St. Felix affair would be silence. Rather than engage in Kabuki theater, we should simply accept the fact that the entire premise of the BLM era was never about "antiracism." It was always a fraud, from top to bottom. If the New Yorker simply moves on without comment, none of us will have to pretend anymore, or delegate our moral conscience to magazines, DEI manifestos, and the rest of the rotten edifice. It is better to accept reality than to continue to live in the delusion. The "racial reckoning" that produced writers such as St. Felix was not about helping minorities. It was about punishing the majority. All of the preening over the past decade was empty. It helped no one except grifters and hustlers who used it to vent their spleens and line their pockets. For making this reality so plain, Doreen St. Felix deserves not our condemnation, but our gratitude. She revealed the truth for all of us to see. This column first appeared in City Journal and also on the author's Substack.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
How Bravo backlash pushed this reality star towards conservatism
After Bravo controversy, Annemarie Wiley spoke with Fox News Digital about why she's unapologetically embracing conservatism.
