Why our Stone Age brains aren't designed for sustained attention

RTÉ News​

24-07-2025

Analysis: Our modern world demands sustained vigilance, but we're using brains that weren't designed for this kind of focus
We've all been there. You're trying to focus on an important task, but your mind starts wandering. Maybe you're a student struggling to pay attention during a long class or lecture, or you're at work trying to concentrate on a detailed report. You might think the solution is simple: just try harder, practice more, or maybe find the right productivity hack.
But what if we told you that perfect, unwavering attention isn't just difficult but actually impossible to achieve? Recent research from cognitive scientists reveals something that might surprise you: the human brain simply isn't designed for perfect sustained attention. This isn't a personal failing or something you can overcome with enough willpower. It's a fundamental feature of how our minds work.
From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, why is our attention more vulnerable than ever and what can we do about it?
Think of your attention like a flashlight with a flickering battery. No matter how much you want that beam to stay perfectly steady, it's going to flicker. Scientists have discovered that our brains operate through rhythmic pulses, with attention naturally cycling several times per second.
It's not something you can control or train away. The brain networks responsible for attention, particularly areas in the front and sides of your head, show constant fluctuations in activity. Even when you think you're paying perfect attention, brain scans reveal that your neural activity is constantly shifting. It's like trying to hold water in your cupped hands.
During World War II, researchers noticed something troubling: radar operators whose job was to spot enemy aircraft on screens would inevitably miss targets after just a short time on duty. This wasn't because they weren't trying hard enough or lacked training. Even the most skilled, motivated operators showed the same pattern.
From RTÉ Radio 1's Drivetime, Dr. Philipp Hövel from UCC on what's competing for our shrinking attention spans
Scientists called this the "vigilance decrement", which is the inevitable decline in attention over time. This finding has been replicated thousands of times across different jobs and situations. Air traffic controllers, security guards watching CCTV screens, and even lifeguards at busy beaches all show the same pattern. It doesn't matter how important the job is or how much training someone has received: performance starts to drop within minutes of starting a vigilance task.
You might wonder why evolution would give us such a seemingly flawed attention system. The answer seems to lie in survival. Having attention that automatically shifts and scans the environment was actually a survival advantage for spotting danger in the wild. Our "distractible" attention system kept our ancestors alive.
Even experienced meditators, who spend years training their attention, don't achieve perfect sustained focus. Brain scan studies of Buddhist monks with decades of meditation experience show they still have, and can't eliminate, natural fluctuations in attention. What meditation does teach is awareness of these fluctuations and the ability to gently redirect attention when it wanders.
From RTÉ 2fm's Morning with Laura Fox, tech journalist Elaine Burke on how the entertainment industry is adapting to shorter attention spans
Our attention limitations create real problems in today's world. Medical errors in hospitals, aviation accidents and industrial disasters often involve attention failures. We've built a modern world that demands sustained vigilance, but we're using Stone Age brains that weren't designed for this kind of focus. The traditional response has been to try harder: more training, more motivation, more discipline.
But this approach is like trying to make water flow uphill. It fights against the fundamental nature of human attention rather than working with it. Instead of fighting our attention limitations, we need to design systems that work with them. This means creating technology that can handle the boring, repetitive vigilance tasks while humans focus on what we do best: creative problem-solving, understanding context (including emotions aroused), and making complex decisions.
Some industries are already moving in this direction. Modern aircraft use automation to handle routine monitoring while pilots focus on higher-level decision-making. Medical devices can continuously monitor patients while nurses provide care and interpret complex situations. The key is finding the right balance. Complete automation isn't the answer either. Humans need to stay engaged and maintain skills. But neither is expecting perfect human attention in situations where technology could provide better, more reliable monitoring.
Accepting that perfect attention is impossible might actually be liberating. Instead of feeling guilty when your mind wanders during a long meeting or beating yourself up for losing focus while studying, you can recognise this as normal human behaviour. The goal isn't to eliminate attention fluctuations but to work with them. Take regular breaks, change tasks periodically, and design your environment to support rather than fight your natural attention rhythms. Perfect attention isn't just difficult to achieve but theoretically impossible - and that's OK.