'No THAAD...': Saudi Rejects 'Trump Pressure' To Defend Israel; US' Arab Ally Sides With Iran!?
The Supreme Court on Saturday heard serious allegations against the Election Commission's special intensive revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls. Petitioners, including the Association for Democratic Reforms and the RJD, claimed the process was marred by irregularities — with BLOs allegedly forging voter signatures, dead individuals shown as having submitted forms, and genuine voters excluded without notice. The petitioners argued that the EC's numbers were unreliable as forms were collected without proper documentation, putting lakhs at risk of disenfranchisement just ahead of the state elections. They also questioned why the EC rejected Aadhaar and ration cards as valid proof.#supremecourt #electioncommission #biharelections #voterfraud #electoralrolls #rjd #adr #voterlist #disenfranchisement #biharnews #manojjha #ashoklavasa #form6 #voteridentity #bloirregularities
152 views | 1 hour ago
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
20 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Supreme Court refuses to stay publishing of draft electoral roll, asks EC to accept Aadhaar & voter ID
The apex court asked the poll panel to continue accepting Aadhaar and voter ID for the SIR exercise in Bihar in compliance with its order saying both documents had a "presumption of genuineness".
Scroll.in
20 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC order blocking new OBC list in West Bengal
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed a Calcutta High Court order blocking the implementation of a West Bengal government notification classifying 140 communities as Other Backward Classes, verbally observing that it seemed to be 'prima facie erroneous', Live Law reported. A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria expressed surprise at the High Court's reasoning that only the legislature could approve the OBC list, and not the executive. 'How can the High Court stay like this?' Live Law quoted the Supreme Court as saying. 'Reservation is part of the executive functions. This is the settled law... Executive instructions are enough for providing reservations and legislation is not necessary.' The matter pertains to a notification issued by the West Bengal government earlier in June that added 76 sub-castes to the OBC category, taking the total number of communities in the grouping to 140. Out of these, 80 communities are from among Muslims, while 60 are non-Muslims, The Indian Express reported. Muslims comprise 57.1% of the population included in the OBC category. The state government's previous list of OBCs had 113 sub-groups, of which 77 were Muslims and 36 non-Muslims. However, the High Court had in May 2024 struck down the list, and had reduced OBC reservations from 17% to 7%. The new list would allow the state government to restore OBC reservations to 17%. The High Court's May 2024 decision was expected to affect nearly five lakh certificates. The state government's challenge to the verdict was also pending before the Supreme Court. On June 17, the High Court stayed the implementation of the new list and told the state government not to take steps based on it till July 31, when the case will be heard next. At the hearing on Monday, Gavai also disagreed with the High Court's observation that the state should have placed the reports and bills before the legislature for amendments and introductions to the 2012 Act's schedule. Advocate Ranjit Kumar, representing the respondents, told the bench that the list had to be approved by the legislature as per the law enacted by the state government. Advocate Guru Krishnakumar, representing the other respondents, also claimed that the list had been prepared without any data, Live Law reported. Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the West Bengal government, said the new list was based on a fresh survey and report by the State Backward Classes Commission. Sibal also argued that even the High Court had not held that the commission failed to conduct the exercise. Gavai then told the respondents that the bench could ask the High Court to form a different bench to hear the matter. 'If you are willing, we will direct the HC to hear the matter in stipulated timeline, till then status quo will maintain,' Live Law quoted the Supreme Court said. 'We will ask the chief justice to constitute another bench to hear.'
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
No interim stay on draft electoral roll publication in Bihar: SC asks EC to accept Aadhaar, voter ID
The Supreme Court Monday refused to stay the publication of draft electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, saying it would once for all decide the pleas against the Election Commission's special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, news agency PTI reported. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said it would fix on July 29, the scheduled time for the final hearing of the matter, as per the report. Appearing for an NGO, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan said the electoral rolls should not be finalised in the interim, and there should be an interim stay on the publication of the draft rolls. The bench observed the last order of the top court noted the petitioners were not pressing for an interim relief and, therefore, it couldn't be done now and matter would be interpreted once for all, PTI quoted. On acceptance of Aadhaar card, voter ID in SIR The SC reiterated its suggestion to the poll panel to continue accepting Aadhaar and voter ID for the SIR exercise in Bihar in compliance with its order saying both documents had a 'presumption of genuineness'. The court said it prima facie agreed with the order of the top court and the EC accepted in its counter affidavit that Aadhaar, voter cards and ration cards were required to be accepted. 'As far as ration cards are concerned, we can say they can be forged easily but Aadhaar and voter cards have some sanctity and have presumption of genuineness. You continue accepting these documents,' the bench said. Earlier, on July 10, the SC, while declining to restrain the EC from proceeding with the SIR in Bihar, suggested the poll panel to consider Aadhaar, voter ID and ration cards for the purpose of updating the rolls. The EC, in a counter-affidavit filed in court on July 22, however, said it was its 'Constitutional authority' to determine whether the requirement of citizenship is fulfilled by electors, but citizenship of an individual will 'not terminate' on account of being held ineligible as an elector. Responding to the poll body's claim in the SC, the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), had argued that it flies in the face of past judgments. It also called the exclusion of Aadhaar and ration cards from the list of acceptable documents 'patently absurd,' noting that Aadhaar is widely accepted when applying for passports, caste certificates, and permanent residence documents. The first phase of SIR of Bihar's electoral rolls concluded last Friday, with EC declaring about 92 per cent of 7.89 crore registered voters in the state would remain on the draft rolls to be published on August 1. About 8 per cent, or approximately 65 lakh names, are likely to be removed from the draft rolls after they were found to be either deceased, registered in more than one place, permanently migrated to another place, or untraceable, according to the EC. The Assembly elections are due to be held in Bihar later this year.
