
Manfred Mann's Paul Jones: Cliff Richard converted me to Christianity
Autumn 1963: the band signed to EMI less than six months earlier were already feeling the pressure. Their first single, a blues instrumental written by their keyboard player, titled Why Should We Not?, had failed to trouble the charts. The second, a number by their singer called Cock-a-Hoop, had lyrics and, also, what its composer describes now as 'the famous Bo Diddley rhythm. Well, people call it the Bo Diddley rhythm, but it was older than Bo Diddley.'
Unfortunately for Manfred Mann, their second single was another one that 'didn't do anything, sales-wise', acknowledges its writer, Paul Jones. Which, when you're labelmates with The Beatles and they have a 10-month and four-hit lead on you, is a problem.
Still, someone at the nation's new favourite pop show, Ready Steady Go!, which had launched in summer 1963, liked Cock-a-Hoop enough to book Manfred Mann to perform. 'Packing up the instruments at the end, somebody said to us: 'Would you guys be interested in writing us a theme tune?' Because they were using a Ventures track, a rock instrumental.'
Manfred Mann said they could oblige. Then the producers listed their demands: 'Use that rhythm that you use on Cock-a-Hoop. It must start with a countdown because this is the start of the weekend. Then, instrumental only until we're through with the opening credits on the screen. So that would be 30 seconds, maybe a bit more.'
It was a lot. But then, Manfred Mann were used to the controlling ways of the patrician Sixties record business. Their name, which was also the name of their South African-born keyboard player, had been imposed on them by their label after EMI baulked at their existing appellation: 'No one will ever get anywhere with a stupid name like The Blues Brothers.'
So, after leaving the TV studio, Manfred Mann piled into their van and headed off to their next commitment that evening, a pub booking. 'We started with a 12-bar blues. Manfred came up with the bit that goes down the tone. I came up with the lyrics because I was the lyricist. We had it written by with time we got to the gig!'
Within two months of their first appearance on Ready Steady Go!, Manfred Mann's 5-4-3-2-1, buoyed by Jones' alley-cat harmonica, was the clattering theme opening the show. A month after that, in January 1964, it was in the charts. Then, that summer, after another self-penned flop, Hubble Bubble (Toil and Trouble), their singer started raiding his record collection, his canny response to an EMI edict: 'No more singles written by the band.'
As Jones recalls it, 'I said: 'If we're not going to write them ourselves, at least I'm picking them,'' he said of the songs that would, ultimately, be Manfred Mann's next four singles, all of them originally sung by American female artists. 'I heard Do Wah Diddy Diddy by The Exciters on Radio Luxembourg and immediately ordered it, because you couldn't just buy an obscure record like that. It was even obscure in America. It made the Top 30, I think, but only just.'
It was the same, he says, with Sha-La-La (originally sung by The Shirelles), Come Tomorrow (sung by Marie Knight) and Oh No, Not My Baby (written by Gerry Goffin and Carole King). They were era-defining smashes for the Brit R&B group led by the blues-, jazz- and gospel-loving lead singer, a Black American music aficionado who knows his Hambone from his trombone, his Diddley from his Diddy.
In summer 1964, Do Wah Diddy Diddy gave Manfred Mann their first Number One and a career that rattles on, in more than one version, to this day. As he sang of himself in his hip-shaking 1965 R&B composition The One in the Middle – part of an EP, so EMI were OK with Jones writing it – ' there's a geezer called Paul, who's so thin and so tall, and so wants to be a star…'
'We were a band that played pubs and little clubs, and that was all we ever had in our mind. But, hey, suddenly we were – snap, snap, snap! ' Jones clicks his fingers rapidly as we drink tea and eat digestives in an elegant drawing room littered (neatly) with hefty coffee-table books about Buddy Holly and BB King. Those few minutes in a transit van 61 years ago were the start of a songwriting and performing career that – via a solo career, an acting career, a 32-year stint as host of BBC Radio 2's The Blues Show and a re-embracing of Christianity courtesy of Cliff Richard – ended up here, in a spacious country house with landscaped lawns and adjacent lake in a discretely affluent corner of Essex.
Except it doesn't sound like Jones – a boyishly trim, neat, coiffed, youthful and (his words) pedantic 83-year-old – is here much. When I traverse Jones' crunchy gravel drive on a soggy May afternoon, The Manfreds are still in the midst of what he calls their spring tour. It's Hastings, Isle of Wight, Shrewsbury, Lincoln, with no sleep till Ringwood, before Jones is off to France for dates with Dave Kelly from The Blues Band 'in a chateau for a couple of days. Then I get some time off!'
And that's not factoring in his fund-raising charity concerts (for Prostate Project and Cranleigh Arts venue in Surrey), his obligations as President and ambassador of Harmonica UK (formerly the National Harmonica League; Jones hands out cards to anyone asking for the tricks of his mouth-organ trade), and he and wife Fiona's regular church meetings 'telling people our story'.
For sure, the band of which he was a member for three-and-a-half years between 1962 and 1966 has lasted much, much longer in their current incarnation as The Manfreds. They first got back together in 1991 for the 50 th birthday of guitarist McGuinness (whose first band was The Roosters, alongside Eric Clapton).
'And all of a sudden, Manfred Mann was back together again – except for Manfred. He was the only one who wasn't there. He was on tour in Germany.'
It turned out that Mann – who'd reconfigured the group in 1971 as Manfred Mann's Earth Band (their biggest hit was their 1977 cover of Bruce Springsteen's Blinded by the Light) – was still wedded to that version of the group. 'So we talked about it,' says Jones, 'back and forth and back and forth. And I'm sorry to say that lawyers were involved, which was unnecessary, really. But in the end, it was settled that The Manfreds would not be easily confused with Manfred Mann's Earth Band. And,' he adds, clearly pleased at the mutual turning-of-the-cheek, 'we have become more and more friendly ever since.'
For a minute in the early 1960s, though, it seemed possible that Paul Jones's destiny lay with another band of blues-loving shouters.
Born in Portsmouth, he studied English at Oxford before quitting after one year to follow his first passion. 'I had a band at university, made up of various jazz musicians who wished it could be more of a jazz band, and me.' When the guitarist left, Jones offered the spot to a new friend, a fellow muso 'that I met at a party or a college ball or something like that'. Brian Jones (no relation) said he wasn't keen. Still, when, in 1962, Brian was mulling the formation of a new band, he reciprocated.
'Brian said: 'You and I have just been dilettantes. We haven't been taking this thing seriously.' I said: 'OK, so what's your remedy?' 'Well, first thing I'm going to do is move to London, because it's the centre of everything.' He was still in Cheltenham. 'Then: 'I'm going to get myself a flat, and I'm starting a band, and we're going to become rich and famous. Do you want to be my singer?''
Paul thought Brian was being 'preposterously optimistic. I knew [leading figure on the blues scene] Alexis Korner, and I knew every musician in his band. They all had day jobs. Or if they were lucky enough to be in another band as well, they perhaps didn't have a day job. But [late British R&B legend] Graham Bond [a member of Alexis Korner's Blues Incorporated] was selling Hoovers! So I said to Brian: 'You're going to become rich and famous, playing blues? Come on… ''
Also, Jones had just landed a paying gig, as a singer in a dance band playing the easygoing hits of the day. He duly declined Brian's offer, telling him: 'I'm going to do this for money. And I'm going to play blues because I love it. And those two things probably will never meet.'
So, while Paul Jones was stuck in a residency in Slough's Adelphi Ballroom, togged out in a scarlet jacket and singing I Remember You, Brian Jones went off and formed The Rolling Stones.
The Stones, with Mick Jagger as (effectively) Brian's second choice singer after Paul, released their debut single, Chuck Berry cover Come On, the same summer that Manfred Mann released theirs. It wasn't long before they were far outpacing Paul's band. I ask him: when he saw what The Rolling Stones were achieving, did he ever kick himself that he hadn't taken Brian up in his offer?
'No, never,' he replies firmly. 'I admired those guys because they did a great job.' (It is very difficult to imagine the scrupulously polite Paul Jones, who was recently offended by the amount of swearing he heard coming from notorious rock'n'roll potty mouth Rick Astley, as part of the Stones' debauched rock'n'roll circus.)
But he will allow himself a small pat on the back for another part he played in their rise. After the success in early 1964 of 5-4-3-2-1, Manfred Mann booked a weekly residency at The Marquee Club in Soho. They would turn up in the afternoon to rehearse new songs, 'like an extended soundcheck, really'.
But one week they were told they'd have to wait a few hours as The Rolling Stones had booked the club for their own rehearsal, ahead of what Jones remembers as 'their first television appearance' (his pedantry is twinned with a fierce memory, so I don't doubt him).
'They were a covers band at the time. And after their rehearsal finished, and ours was about to begin, I said to Mick: 'Are you writing yet?' 'No, I can't write songs.' 'Mick, you will. You should get started now. And I'm not saying anything more on this subject. You've got to start writing songs.''
Jones pauses, a modest smile twitching his lips. 'Well: Andrew Loog Oldham, of course, gets that credit for locking Mick and Keith [Richards] in a room until they came up with a song. But I actually encouraged Mick before that.'
It all speaks, he reflects, of his and Manfred Mann's 'decent relationship' with The Rolling Stones. 'There was a certain amount of rivalry, but it was good-natured. Brian use to take the mickey out of me, and I used to try and take the mickey out of him. But, no, I never for a moment wanted to have gone back and made a different decision. I've enjoyed my career! A lot!'
It's a career that's been fired the his passion for the music he feels in his soul. In summer 1966, after Pretty Flamingo – another cover of a song by an American songwriter – went to Number One, Jones left Manfred Mann and went straight into an acting career that saw him star on stage and screen in Evita, The Beggar's Opera, The Sweeney, kids TV show Uncle Jack and the Jean Shrimpton curio Privilege. But there would, ultimately, be one other 1960s screen appearance that came back to bite Jones. He took part in a televised debate with Cliff Richard about their competing views on faith.
'Cliff was arguing the case for the evangelist Billy Graham. And I was – as an atheist, which I still was – bringing the opposite argument. Cliff was very gentlemanly and respectful. But I'm not proud of the way I behaved on that television programme.'
How did Jones behave? 'I kind of twisted things that he said. I said things like: 'You see, Cliff, what you've actually just said is...' And then I would say something that he hadn't just said… It wasn't clever.'
By the mid-1980s, Jones – who was raised Christian – began 'coming back to faith'. Around that time, he joined the cast of Guys and Dolls at London's National Theatre, taking over, from Ian Charleson, the part of Sky Masterson, as immortalised by Marlon Brando. One of the dancers in the company was Fiona Hendley.
'And we became lovers, but not married,' says Jones, whose first marriage had ended in 1976 (he has two songs from that relationship). 'And because of Fiona, we started to go to a church in London. They quickly realised that we were living as man and wife – but weren't! Then suddenly, one day, we had a call from Cliff Richard: 'Come and hear this preacher whose name is Luis Palau. You and Fiona both need to hear what he has to say.'
'And sure enough, he was preaching out of Paul's Letter to the Romans, chapter one,' he says of Bible passages about God's gift of salvation through faith. 'And it did the trick. I had been an atheist for 25 years, but I wasn't any more. But on the other hand, I hadn't [fully] become Christian either. So Cliff was very much responsible for that –' Jones claps his hands – 'complete change. Or, completing that change, as it were.'
That was in 1984. The following year Jones stopped drinking, which is certainly one reason for his good health. Forty years on, Paul Jones remains staunch – to his teetotality, to his faith and, ultimately, to The Manfreds.
But, I wonder as I look round his frankly fabulous home, what keeps him on the road at age 83, playing the – to be frank – secondary and tertiary concert markets of Shrewsbury and Lincoln?
'I hope they're only secondary, but you could be right,' he replies jovially. 'It's a very special band, The Manfreds. It's like being in a new band in a way – even though it's from 60-odd years ago. I find that deeply fulfilling, like some of the other stuff we do. Fiona and I are still doing churches. Ever since Luis Palau, we've been going round these churches and just telling people our story. We love it. So some of what I do is that, and I can't blame The Manfreds for everything. But there's a lot to be done,' Paul Jones says, beaming, 'and I'm still doing it!'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Katie Price continues to spark concern with her shrinking frame as she parties with Conor McGregor in barely-there bikini in Ibiza
Katie Price has sparked further health fears from fans as she cuddled up to Conor McGregor with her tiny frame on display. The former glamour model, 47, could be seen almost spilling out of her tiny bikini as she attended a wild daytime party in Ibiza. She was all smiles with her pearly-white teeth as she showed off her slender arms and waist as well as razor-sharp jawline. Katie, also known as Jordan, boasted a bronze complexion as she danced beside Irish mixed martial artist Conor, 36. Conor went shirtless for the booze-filled party, wearing just a pair of red shorts and a white hat with his heavily tattooed chest on display. He smiled for a snap with Katie as he told his followers on Instagram: '@KatiePrice forever.' Since arriving in O Beach in Ibiza, Katie has caught up with famous pals including Wayne Linekar, Dean Gaffney and Jamie O'Hara. The mum-of-five previously addressed her shrinking figure back in May on Snapchat to worried fans. She said: 'Yes I've lost weight. Yes that what I've wanted to do, I've wanted to lose weight. 'Because the past three, four years ago when I broke my feet and I was in a wheelchair for 10 months because they said I'd never walk again, and obviously you put weight on being in a wheelchair. 'And then I did all the IVF stuff, that also puts on weight. So yeah I did put on weight and I hated it, I felt uncomfortable and it wasn't me.' Last month, Katie branded herself 'ugly and disgusting' as she watched back video footage of herself undergoing plastic surgery in Turkey. In January, the mother-of-five flew abroad for 'tweaks' to her sixth £10,000 face lift and documented the trip for a new YouTube video. Speaking on The Louis Theroux Podcast last year, Katie explained that she has never been happy with her body. She said: 'I always said I haven't got body dysmorphia but there's definitely something, I don't know what it is... 'I've never looked in the mirror and thought I'm pretty or whatever.' However, despite having had at least six face lifts, Katie insists that she is not scared of aging. She said: 'I'm not afraid of getting old: I like getting old because you become wiser. But with the face and that I just think if there's something to tweak it's just easy to do.'


Times
an hour ago
- Times
The ‘end of history' was the source of our ills
All the best scenes in Shifty, Adam Curtis's new documentary about Britain in the late 20th-century, concern the Millennium Dome. With skilfully spliced footage of its gaping interiors and weirdly looming riverside bulk, the dome is transformed into an almost gothic symbol of fin de siècle spiritual vacuousness. A planning committee decides that it is to have a 'spirit zone', but nobody can decide what religions should be represented there. In a drab conference room a man with an uninspiring powerpoint enthuses that the phrase 'HOW SHALL I LIVE?' should be projected onto a blank wall instead. Isn't that a bit 'banal', wonders Simon Jenkins. He is quickly shouted down. You don't have to buy all of Curtis's arguments — was Margaret Thatcher really the sole author of modern hyperindividualism? — to appreciate his refreshingly eerie and desolate portrait of that much-mythologised period, the 'end of history'. To many today, the late 1990s and early 2000s are a lost Edwardian summer of stability and peace. The endless trend pieces about 'Nineties nostalgia' are more than mere fluff. The undying popularity of Friends, Harry Potter and Bridget Jones among those not alive to see them first time round, and the lucrative resurrections of Oasis and Pulp, represent something real. For people my age and younger, the vanished era of post-Cold War tranquillity is as psychologically significant as the Second World War was to some baby boomers; it is the same painful sense of having just missed a glorious cresting wave in the tide of history. But rather than envying the heroism of our fathers, we covet their low house prices and political stability. To many Gen Zers (almost half of whom tell pollsters they wish TikTok didn't exist) the last years before iPhones have an archaic charm. Apparently banal clips of Noughties life acquire viral currency as artefacts of an innocent time before digital corruptions — the latest TikTok phenomenon is footage of the band MGMT performing dorkily at Yale to a conspicuously non-smartphone waving audience. According to the popular story, a series of earthquakes shook us out of paradise: 9/11, the 2008 crash, social media, mass migration. But as Curtis shows, our unhappy age is a natural evolution of, not an aberration from the 1990s. History doesn't rupture, it mutates. The myth of the blissful end of history is just as bogus as the myth of the long Edwardian summer (in the years before the First World War, readers will recall, Britain was on the brink of civil war over the question of Home Rule for Ireland). The seeds of our present discontent were already germinating in that lost Eden at the end of history. The world Curtis portrays in Shifty is quite spookily familiar. The sleazy politicians of John Major's decaying government (the Starmer administration fleetingly strikes the viewer as almost attractive) have lost both public trust and the capacity to direct events. In the furious eyes of miners filing grimly out of shuttered pits in County Durham you glimpse the first sparks of the populist conflagration soon to engulf western democracies (and, perhaps, a foreshadowing of the AI-driven white collar deindustrialisation to come). Above it all, the unaccountable barons of high finance perch in their glittering silver towers. Off screen in America, political polarisation was already carving ideological rifts down Thanksgiving tables. Newt Gingrich had long since resolved that politics was a 'war for power' and embarked on his attritional battles over the budget with Bill Clinton. The scandal over Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky and the Republicans' subsequent impeachment campaign split the country with almost Trump-era vitriol. In elite universities a movement known as 'political correctness' was campaigning to jettison pale stale writers from the canon, prompting one of the great public intellectuals of the age, Robert Hughes, to warn against the politicisation of art and a burgeoning cult of 'victimhood'. There were no smartphones, true. But the advent of 24-hour news represented a media revolution nearly as important. One of the most effectively jarring moments in Curtis's series juxtaposes the hectic, adrenalised tone of 1990s TV news with a clip showing the staid formality of the BBC in the 1960s. The contrast is almost as stark as that which divides Newsnight from TikTok. By the 1990s, television was fragmenting into an infinity of cable news channels. Anybody who has read Neil Postman's polemic Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985) knows that his criticisms of TV — its inanity, its lack of deep context, its weird juxtapositions of the trivial and the serious — precisely anticipate the smartphone. Screens were already isolating us in the 1990s. Curtis supplies tragicomic footage of an elderly couple sitting side by side in morose silence, hypnotised by a documentary about turtles. Membership of clubs and churches declined, and television was rated the most popular leisure activity. The five hours a day the average person dedicated to TV in 1990 seems restrained compared with the virtually constant smartphone use that characterises many modern lives, but it's also hard to argue that it represents the quasi-Amish technological continence of Gen Z mythology. Though the romanticisation of the 1990s is not exactly baseless — I would rather live in an age before inflated house prices and the automation of the written word — it is overdone. The crises of the present age have helped expose a cultural and spiritual hollowness that was already evident at the turn of the millennium. Perhaps a country that chose to celebrate itself by constructing a huge and vacant white space was always going to end up in trouble


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Love Island feud breaks out as Meg's savage row with Malisha splits the villa – forcing Alima to step in
LOVE Island has been split following Meg Moore's brutal row with bombshell Malisha Jordan. Meg lashed out at Malisha after she asked Dejon Noel Williams to go for a chat in The Hideaway. 7 7 7 Malisha was branded "disrespectful" by furious Meg, who is coupled up with Dejon, and they ended up in a slanging match. During the row, Malisha told Meg to "grow up" and called her an "idiot, to which Megan Forte Clark snapped back. In tonight's episode, Malisha was shown crying following her argument with Meg as she raced back inside the villa. Hot on her heels was Almia Gagio who was quick to comfort her. Then, creating a new and obvious division, Almia stormed outside to confront Meg and the other girls for speaking to Malisha the way they did. Speaking to Megan FC, she said: "That was not nice to see all the shouting." Megan replied: "She called Meg and idiot so I piped in." Meg then attempted to validate her fury by explaining to Alima that she felt Malisha was "disrespectful" for asking Dejon to The Hideaway. "I didn't even want to argue with her," Meg claimed. But Alisha told her: "I know it's not nice to see your boy getting pulled up left, right and centre but at the same time, we can be nice to boys and we can be nice to the girls as well." Love Island fans slam Meg for 'trying to be iconic' as she furiously confronts rival and villa descends into chaos Meg replied: "I completely agree but coming in here with the energy she had last night and sat with Dejon having just had a date with him, starting to argue with the girl he's in a couple with and shouting your mouth off at me and calling me an idiot, that's not a good impression." Standing firm, Alima said: "It's more like, let's try and be nicer to people because that was crazy to watch." Shakira Khan, who had been listening to Meg and Alima, then came over to fight Malisha's corner as well. "I genuinely don't think she was being disrespectful going to The Hideaway, it's no different to The Terrace." Love Island fans have heaped their praise on Alima and Shakira for standing up for Malisha. Writing on X, formerly known as Twitter, one fan said: "Alima was so sweet for checking the girls and Shakira backed it." Another added: "I love girls like Alima and Shakira. all the others are following Meg for what?" And a third said: "Love that Alima went to Meg straight after comforting Malisha and told her that she was in the wrong and even told Megan she was wrong for adding her 2 cents. Also love that Shakira went in to back Malisha." 7 7 7 7