Shabana Mahmood vows to send foreign criminals ‘packing' when they are jailed
Shabana Mahmood has proposed a law change, which could save taxpayers an average £54,000 per year, per prison place.
The changes would apply to prisoners serving fixed-term 'determinate' sentences, and authorities would retain their power not to deport a criminal but instead keep them in custody, for example, if the offender was planning further crimes against the UK's interests or national security.
'Our message is clear,' Ms Mahmood said.
'If you abuse our hospitality and break our laws, we will send you packing.'
She also said: 'Deportations are up under this Government, and with this new law they will happen earlier than ever before.'
Almost 5,200 foreign national offenders have been deported since July 2024, a 14% increase on the 12 months prior, according to the Government.
The Justice Secretary's announcement follows a tweak in the law in June, expected to come into force in September, so prisoners face deportation 30% into their prison sentence rather than the current 50%.
The Government will need Parliament to greenlight its proposal to bring this down to 0%.
According to a Labour source, the previous Conservative government relied on prison transfer agreements with other countries to deport foreign national offenders, in deals which allow inmates to serve their custodial sentence in their 'home' country.
This saw 945 prisoners sent to jails abroad between 2010 and 2023, equal to less than one-and-a-half criminals per week.
Foreign national offenders make up around 12% of the prison population.
Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'In Starmer's topsy turvy world investors are fleeing the country in their droves while record numbers of violent and sexual offenders from abroad are put up in our prisons. It's a farce.
'Yet again Starmer has refused to confront our broken human rights laws.
'He needs to grow a backbone and change them so we can actually deport these individuals.
'The safety of the British public is infinitely more important than the 'rights' of sick foreign criminals.
'If countries won't take back their nationals, Starmer should suspend visas and foreign aid. His soft-touch approach isn't working.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour accepted £40k donations from criminal it kicked out of party
Labour has said it is returning more than £40,000 donated by a convicted criminal who the party had already expelled as a member. The donations came from businessman Abdul Sattar Shere-Mohammod, 55, known as Shere Sattar, who was convicted of actual bodily harm in 2022, and thrown out of Labour later that year. The money includes £10,300 given to the central party last June, a figure that is just below the threshold to be disclosed to the elections watchdog, the Electoral Commission, the Sunday Times reported. The revelations raise questions about Labour's procedures for accepting political donations, a hot topic in the wake of reports earlier this year that Elon Musk planned to give Nigel Farage's Reform UK party $100m. In its manifesto at the last election, Sir Keir Starmer 's party pledged to 'protect democracy by strengthening the rules around donations to political parties'. As well as the money given to the party, £15,000 was donated by Mr Mohammod to, in part, support the re-election of Portsmouth MP Stephen Morgan, the early education minister. The party said Mr Morgan was not aware of his conviction. His local party should have declared these, but blamed an 'administrative error' that it said was being 'rectified'. Mr Mohammod also gave £10,000 to the local party of Southampton MP Satvir Kaur and £5,000 to Amanda Martin, another Portsmouth MP. Both declared the money in their parliamentary register of interests. The paper said the donations to Mr Morgan and his local party only emerged when a reporter contacted Mr Mohammod. Asked about his conviction this week, Mr Mohammod said he had been present during a violent confrontation after his son's bike had been stolen. He said he had tried to prevent a 'bad situation' but that his sons had gotten into a fight. He denied personally assaulting the victim. Labour told the paper the £10,300 donation to the party was below the £11,180 limit set by the Electoral Commission, meaning it didn't need to be declared. In a statement, the commission said: 'Donations that have been reported late by parties and accounting units are considered in line with our enforcement policy. We can confirm we are currently considering this matter.' Labour said that because Morgan's crowdfunding page said that donations would also support other campaigns in Portsmouth, it could not be considered a direct donation to him and did not need to be declared in his register of interests. It added that the donations would be submitted to the Electoral Commission in the party's next quarterly return. A spokesman said: 'These donations were made to Portsmouth Labour Party. Action has since been taken to return them.' They also said that Ms Kaur returned her donation last year, Martin was in the process of doing so, while the national party did so on Thursday after being contacted by the paper.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Cash machine raiders boasted police 'hadn't any concrete evidence' during £700k burglary spree using angle grinders to prize open ATMs
A gang of robbers who stole around £700,000 in ATM thefts boasted that police had no 'concrete evidence' against them just days before they were arrested. The group, who are now facing prison sentences, used angle grinders and sophisticated 'jaws of life' tools - typically used by firefighters - in a looting spree which saw them strike nine times in just under a year. Raiding machines in West Mercia, Leicestershire, Avon and Somerset, Bedfordshire, Greater Manchester, Cumbria, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire and Staffordshire, they used stolen high-speed cars with fake registration plates to flee crime scenes. The group also used a reinforced flatbed truck to pummel their way into the businesses. West Midlands Police launched an investigation into the gang after discovering that they were based nearby, and detectives closed in after finding that the thieves had booked two holiday lets in Cumbria as a base to strike from in August 2024. For three consecutive days they operated in the North Western county, stealing £128,000 from cash machines that they had prized open before using a stolen Audi as a getaway vehicle. However, it was during the group's attempts to return the stolen vehicle to the Midlands, where it was sourced, that an officer spotted it on the back of a low loader being driven by Daniel Hickenbottom. Hickenbottom was arrested and it later transpired that his role in the plot was to take stolen vehicles from A to B on the trailer in a move to avoid detection by the authorities. Subsequent investigations saw the rest of the gang identified through analysis of video footage, mobile phone records, voice recordings and forensic examinations including fingerprints and DNA. Detectives uncovered that Noel Reilly, Craig Howell and Simon Pagett would plan and carry out the raids, and were spotted on CCTV buying clothing to wear on the thefts before arriving in stolen cars with tools to break into the ATMs. During the investigation, police recovered a WhatsApp audio recording from Reilly, who said police had no 'concrete evidence' against the gang. Eleven days later, the force launched dawn raids to arrest him and other gang members. Oliver Matthews was the owner of Bloxwich Resprays, where the gang would store their stolen vehicles and use as a base. He would drive around the country after crimes to assist the gang. On Friday, after a trial lasting more than a two months at Wolverhampton Crown Court: Noel Reilly, aged 46, of Appletrees Crescent, Bromsgrove pleaded guilty to conspiracy to burgle, handle stolen goods and possess criminal property Simon Pagett, aged 43, of Dartford Road, Bloxwich pleaded guilty to conspiracy to burgle, handle stolen goods and possess criminal property Oliver Matthews, 39, of Baneberry Drive, Featherstone pleaded guilty to conspiracy to burgle Craig Howell, 44, of Hatfield Drive, Wolverhampton, was convicted of conspiracy to burgle, handle stolen goods and possess criminal property Daniel Hickenbottom, 38, of Chantry Avenue, Bloxwich, was convicted of conspiracy to burgle, handle stolen goods and possess All five will be sentenced at a later date. Det Sgt Tom Frenchum, from West Midland Police's Major Crime Unit's Proactive Team, said: 'A huge amount of planning and preparation went into these offences and the gang showed a high level of sophistication throughout but our detective worked tirelessly to disrupt them and now put them behind bars. 'The gang had specific roles – some would carry out the ATM attacks, while others would help with the logistics of transporting the stolen vehicles and the specialist cutting equipment.' The investigation was part of the force's Operation Target, which they say is a '24/7 effort' to target those involved in serious and organised crime in the region. The force say: 'Our officers work around the clock to target those involved in guns, drugs, money laundering and exploitation.'
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Revealed: oligarchs spied on UK lawyers who ran Serious Fraud Office cases
Oligarchs whose business empire was under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office spied on lawyers who ran some of the UK's most sensitive criminal cases. The Guardian has obtained surveillance images of former SFO prosecutors taken by hired spies. Their goal is said to have been gathering information on the agency's activities, identifying its sources and gaining 'leverage'. Backed with billions from Vladimir Putin's regime, the oligarchs were at the time waging an aggressive counterattack against an SFO investigation into suspected corruption and fraud, a major case the agency ultimately dropped. Andy Slaughter, a Labour MP who chairs parliament's justice committee, said: 'It is deeply troubling that individuals with knowledge of serious fraud inquiries should be surveilled by the very organisations they have been investigating.' He added: 'The hunter has become the hunted.' The surveillance began in 2019. It is unclear when, or if, it finished. As the law enforcement agency that takes on the toughest white-collar crime cases against multinational corporations and billionaires, the SFO often faces fightbacks by well-funded law firms and even cyber-attacks. But this is believed to be the first time surveillance of former SFO prosecutors has been revealed. Lawyers for the oligarchs' mining company did not dispute that the surveillance took place. But they said any 'investigations' into the targets were lawful, undertaken in preparation for lawsuits it brought against the SFO. On Saturday 7 March 2020, the spies pulled up in a car outside the home of former senior SFO prosecutor Tom Martin. At 10.39am, the target emerged from his front door wearing jeans and a Wolverhampton Wanderers hoodie. It was a momentous day: Martin was taking his young son to the football for the first time. Martin had run complex, transnational bribery investigations at the SFO. Although he never worked on the oligarchs' case, he felt he would have been an attractive target for anyone seeking intelligence on the agency. Known to his colleagues as a charismatic leader, Martin had brought an employment tribunal claim over his 2018 dismissal during a power struggle with American prosecutors – a claim he would win. It was apparent from press coverage that he knew the SFO's inner workings and had fallen out badly with its management. Over years of pursuing powerful suspects, Martin had sometimes thought he was being watched. But none of his fears were confirmed. He said he was 'absolutely appalled' when the Guardian showed him surveillance images of his home taken by oligarchs' spies. 'I'm there with my lad,' he said. 'We're not fair game.' Martin said that if operatives were seeking 'kompromat', the Russian term for compromising material that can be used to apply pressure, there was nothing to find, except perhaps his passion for model trains. 'It's an attack on the rule of law,' he said. 'You're not trying to defend yourself in a court, you're trying to shift the odds in your favour.' The surveillance stretched across the country. In a rural village, the oligarchs' operatives spied on Mike Walsh, a former Metropolitan police officer. After leaving the force in the late 1990s, Walsh switched to the private intelligence industry. One client had been in a fight with the oligarchs' corporation over some African mines. In May 2019, the spies traced Walsh, who was by then retired, to his home and photographed him as he put the bins out. Other targets had held senior positions in UK law enforcement much more recently, as members of the very SFO team investigating the oligarchs' affairs. James Coussey was awarded an OBE in 2010 after decades trying to convict the perpetrators of financial crimes. Three years later, he was recruited to the SFO for one last assignment: investigating suspected fraud and bribery at a mining company that had been among the most valuable listed on the London Stock Exchange. Three oligarchs, known as the Trio, were the founders and largest shareholders of the Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation (ENRC). It owned mines from Kazakhstan to Congo extracting coal, chrome and cobalt. Every few days it made revenues bigger than the SFO's annual budget. The team Coussey joined followed money trails between Swiss banks, African kleptocracies, ex-Soviet dictatorships and the Mayfair property market. In 2018, after five years on the case, Coussey called an end to his career. 'I don't think he really wanted to retire,' said Martin, his SFO colleague and fellow surveillance target. 'He loved his job and he did it in a really calm and classy way.' By then, the ENRC case had become one of the highest-stakes investigations in the SFO's history. It seemed that criminal charges were close. The SFO's prosecutors had interviewed one of the oligarchs, plus the son-in-law of another. The oligarchs and their company denied wrongdoing. ENRC's lawyers were on the counterattack. As part of a high court claim against the SFO, they alleged that Coussey had negligently mishandled evidence. A judge would find no 'knowing or reckless breach of duty'. But the legal action had revealed Coussey's identity as a member of the investigation team and put him on the oligarchs' radar. In retirement, Coussey fell into ill-health. The spies' surveillance images of him are time-stamped: a Monday morning in February 2020. They show an elderly man outside his home, bald and bespectacled in a jersey and bodywarmer, pottering between the garage and a blue hatchback. Coussey has since died. Martin called him one of the prosecutors of his generation. He was 'the most upright lawyer you could ever meet', albeit with a fondness for rude jokes. 'He's given his country immense service.' Entrusted with powers to seize evidence, SFO prosecutors undergo security vetting. During his years at the agency, Martin was aware of 'near constant' cyber-attacks. So sensitive was the oligarchs' case that Coussey and the rest of the investigating team worked from a restricted area of the SFO's headquarters off Trafalgar Square. Sons of the Soviet Union's central Asian provinces, the Trio's path to riches began when two of them worked at a KGB business venture in Moscow during the fall of communism. They have used an assortment of private intelligence companies since arriving in London in the mid-2000s. There were the former agents of Mossad and other Israeli intelligence and military services who set up Black Cube and Diligence, run by alumni of MI5 and UK special forces. These operatives targeted Neil Gerrard, a former ENRC lawyer who, a judge would later find, leaked to the SFO as he milked the oligarchs for fees. Both firms say they played no part in the surveillance of former SFO prosecutors. That surveillance began in 2019, directed by Dmitry Vozianov, a Russian consultant who handles 'special situations' for oligarchs. Vozianov fends off threats to his clients' business interests, overseeing lawyers, spies and public relations experts. Faced with an SFO investigation, the Trio hired him. For this covert surveillance operation, Vozianov deployed a decorated veteran of the parachute regiment. Damian Ozenbrook served in Afghanistan, Northern Ireland and the Balkans. After leaving the military, he set up his private intelligence company , Blue Square Global. The goals of the surveillance Vozianov assigned to Ozenbrook were 'to know what was going on in the SFO', said a source with knowledge of the operation, and to find out 'what, if any, informants the SFO were using'. The source believes it was 'all about leverage'. Vozianov did not respond to a request for comment. Lawyers for Ozenbrook's firm did not dispute that his operatives spied on former SFO prosecutors on Vozianov's instructions – though they said there had been no surveillance of serving SFO personnel. The oligarchs' operatives also watched John Gibson, a barrister who had run the SFO's ENRC investigation for four years. Gibson left the SFO for a law firm in 2018. A letter he received two years later from ENRC's lawyers at the US firm Quinn Emanuel stated that he had been seen meeting a journalist in the National Theatre's underground car park in September 2020. An SFO spokesperson said: 'We have been aware of the risk of surveillance for many years and our first priority is always the safety and wellbeing of our colleagues. We note that this report relates to surveillance of former colleagues following their departure from the SFO.' In 2023, after a high court judge found the SFO had been wrong to accept leaked material from ENRC's lawyer at the outset of its investigation, the agency dropped the case. There was, it said, 'insufficient admissible evidence' to bring charges. Two of the oligarchs have died during the long struggle with UK law enforcement, their stakes passing to their heirs. The Russian state banks that backed them are now under sanctions. Nonetheless, their corporation is due to receive millions from the public purse as damages. While surveillance by state agencies is highly regulated – the SFO would have needed a warrant to conduct an operation like the oligarchs' – surveillance by private firms is not. Slaughter, the MP, said: 'Everything about this rings alarm bells, from the Russia links to the involvement of ex-security force operatives.' He said it raised 'wider issues for the government as to how it regulates private investigators'.
