
CEOs Are Quietly Telling Us the Truth: AI Is Replacing You
In public, CEOs like to sound reassuring. They say generative AI will 'enhance productivity' or 'streamline operations.' But when you actually read what they're telling their own employees, or what slips out in investor memos, the message is chilling: virtual workers are here, and they're not just assistants. They're replacements.
Let's take a closer look at what some of the world's most powerful tech CEOs are saying. Not in hype videos, but in official internal messages, blog posts, and investor updates.
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy recently published a company-wide message that sounds reasonable, until you actually read it.
'As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today… We expect this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.'
The key phrase? 'Next few years.' That's corporate speak for 2026 to 2028. Not ten years away. This is soon.
Jassy is not talking about automating only simple or repetitive tasks. He's preparing employees for a reality where AI replaces entire job categories across the board, and where hiring slows or stops altogether for roles that machines can now do.
In a memo posted to LinkedIn, Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn was even more blunt. 'Most functions will have specific initiatives to fundamentally change how they work… Headcount will only be given if a team cannot automate more of their work.'
Translation: No more hiring unless your job is impossible for AI to do. The company is betting that most teams will soon need fewer humans.
Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke shared a similar directive on X: 'Before asking for more headcount and resources, teams must demonstrate why they cannot get what they want done using AI… What would this area look like if autonomous AI agents were already part of the team?' Lütke is openly asking managers to reimagine teams as if AI agents are already integrated, and to justify why any humans are still necessary.
https://t.co/6i6h3sKi3x
— tobi lutke (@tobi) April 7, 2025The message from these CEOs is clear: human employees are now the last resort. The new default is automation.
Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff recently stated that AI is already doing 50% of the work within his company, shortly before announcing another 1,000 job cuts. The CEO of Klarna, a major fintech company, was even more blunt, revealing that AI has already allowed the company to reduce its workforce by 40%.
These aren't future scenarios. This is already happening.
The reason for this sudden shift is the rapid evolution of AI technology. As OpenAI CEO Sam Altman explained in a recent podcast, the latest 'reasoning models' have made a critical leap. In simple terms, these AI systems can now do more than just find information; they can 'think' through complex, multi-step problems. Altman suggested these models can reason on par with someone holding a PhD, meaning they are now capable of performing the high level analytical tasks once reserved for highly educated humans.
This capability is being actively harnessed. Three sources working at major AI labs told Gizmodo that they are training powerful models to perform real world tasks in nearly every 'knowledge work' profession, including banking, financial analysis, insurance, law, and even journalism. These sources, who requested anonymity as their contracts prohibit them from speaking publicly, described how their work is used in side by side comparisons with AI models to refine the technology until it can produce professional grade output with minimal errors. Virtual employees are already doing our jobs; the current phase is simply about making them more perfect.
The 'next few years' Jassy spoke of may be closer to two years at most.
Consider the tech industry's recent layoff trends. In 2024, 551 tech companies laid off nearly 152,922 employees, according to data from Layoff.fyi. The pace has accelerated dramatically this year. In just the first six months of 2025, 151 tech companies have already laid off over 63,823 people. On average a tech company cut 277 workers in 2024. If that rate is maintained for the rest of the year, the average number of layoffs per tech company in 2025 would soar to 851, roughly three times the 2024 average.
While there is no direct evidence linking all these layoffs to AI, the trend is happening during a period of record economic strength. The Nasdaq just closed at an all time high, and eight of the world's ten largest companies are in the tech sector. Profitable, growing companies are shedding workers at an alarming rate, and the quiet implementation of AI is the most logical explanation.
Tech CEOs won't tell you outright that you're being replaced. But the memos speak for themselves.
AI is already here, and your company is likely building a roadmap to automate you out of your role. One internal pilot project at a time. One chatbot at a time. One hiring freeze at a time. If you want to understand what's next for the American workforce, don't listen to the marketing. Read the footnotes in the CEO's blog. Because they're already telling you the truth.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Raymond James Lowers Relay Therapeutics (RLAY) PT to $19 Following Q2 Results, Strategic Cost Cuts
Relay Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:RLAY) is one of the most promising penny stocks under $5. On August 8, Raymond James lowered the firm's price target on Relay Therapeutics to $19 from $29, while keeping a Strong Buy rating on the shares. This sentiment followed Relay Therapeutics' Q2 2025 results, where OpEx was down 16% sequentially following strategic cost-cutting initiatives. Relay Therapeutics reported a net loss of $70.4 million, or $0.41 per share, in Q2 2025, which was an improvement compared to the net loss of $92.2 million, or $0.69 per share, in Q2 2024. Revenue for the quarter was $0.7 million, which was an increase from zero revenue in the same period last year. A chemist arranging containers of compounds, ready for the commercialization process. This quarter also featured the initiation of the Phase 3 ReDiscover-2 trial for RLY-2608 in Q2 2025. At the 2025 American Society for Clinical Oncology/ASCO Annual Meeting, updated interim data from the Phase 1b study for RLY-2608 were presented. In addition to oncology, Relay Therapeutics is continuing to execute its ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial for vascular malformations. Relay Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:RLAY) is a clinical-stage precision medicines company that transforms the drug discovery process with a focus on enhancing small molecule therapeutic discovery in targeted oncology and genetic disease indications. While we acknowledge the potential of RLAY as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TD Cowen Lowers Clear Channel Outdoor (CCO) PT to $1.60 Despite Strong Q2 Performance
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. (NYSE:CCO) is one of the most promising penny stocks under $5. Earlier on July 22, TD Cowen lowered the firm's price target on Clear Channel Outdoor to $1.60 from $1.70, while keeping a Buy rating on the shares. This sentiment by the firm came ahead of the company's Q2 2025 results, with expectations for higher consolidated revenue and outperformance in the Airport segment to offset softness in the America segment. Later in August, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings' consolidated revenue came out to be $402.8 million in Q2, which was a 7% improvement year-over-year. The America segment recorded its highest-ever second-quarter revenue at $303.1 million due to robust digital and local sales. The Airports segment also performed strongly, with a 15.6% increase in revenue, reaching $99.7 million, powered by growth in both national and local sales channels. A busy street corner, with strategically placed advertisements to attract customers. However, the company's static advertising segment continues to lag behind digital growth. National sales in the America segment were also down 1% on a comparable basis. The company is still in the process of selling its business in Spain as well. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. (NYSE:CCO) is an out-of-home advertising company in the US and Singapore. The company operates in 2 segments: America and Airports. While we acknowledge the potential of CCO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
While institutions invested in MA Financial Group Limited (ASX:MAF) benefited from last week's 7.1% gain, retail investors stood to gain the most
Explore MA Financial Group's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Key Insights The considerable ownership by retail investors in MA Financial Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership Recent sales by insiders AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Every investor in MA Financial Group Limited (ASX:MAF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Following a 7.1% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 27% stock also stood to gain from the increase. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of MA Financial Group. See our latest analysis for MA Financial Group What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MA Financial Group? Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MA Financial Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at MA Financial Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Hedge funds don't have many shares in MA Financial Group. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In MA Financial Group's case, its Top Key Executive, Andrew Pridham, is the largest shareholder, holding 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 8.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Julian Biggins, the CEO has 3.1% of the shares allocated to their name. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of MA Financial Group The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of MA Financial Group Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$1.4b, and insiders have AU$374m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over MA Financial Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. Public Company Ownership It appears to us that public companies own 4.0% of MA Financial Group. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MA Financial Group better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for MA Financial Group (1 is potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data