Iran-Israel conflict: Congress asks government to show moral courage, slams it for not condemning U.S. bombing
U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to unleash American air power on Iran makes a "mockery" of his own calls for the continuation of talks with Iran, the Congress said on Monday (June 23, 2025) and slammed the Modi government for neither criticising nor condemning the U.S. bombing and Israel's aggression.
The opposition party reiterated the absolute essentiality of immediate diplomacy and dialogue with Iran.
Congress general secretary in-charge of communications Jairam Ramesh said President Trump's decision to unleash U.S. air power on Iran makes a "mockery" of his own calls for the continuation of talks with Iran.
"The Indian National Congress reiterates the absolute essentiality of immediate diplomacy and dialogue with Iran. The Government of India must demonstrate greater moral courage than it has so far," he said.
"The Modi Government has unequivocally neither criticised nor condemned the US bombing and Israel's aggression, bombings and targeted assassinations," Mr. Ramesh said on X.
"It has also maintained a deafening silence on the genocide being perpetrated on the Palestianians in Gaza," he added.
His remarks come after the U.S. bombed three major nuclear sites — Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — in Iran, bringing itself into the Israel-Iran conflict.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday (June 22, 2025) conveyed to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian India's "deep concern" over Iran's conflict with Israel and called for immediate de-escalation of the situation through "dialogue and diplomacy".
The U.S. attack on the Iranian nuclear facilities has triggered fears of a wider regional conflict, with many leading countries and blocs calling for restraint.
On Saturday (June 21, 2025), before the US bombing, Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi had strongly criticised India's silence on Israel's devastation in Gaza and Iran as "not just a loss of its voice, but also a surrender of values".
In an article published in The Hindu - "It is still not too late for India's voice to be heard", she had accused the Modi government of abandoning India's long-standing and principled commitment to a peaceful two-nation solution envisioning an independent Palestine along with Israel.
Gandhi, in the article, had also been critical of US President Trump for following a "destructive path" in West Asia, after having spoken against America's endless wars.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
19 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran turns to Russia after US bombing: Will Putin be of any help?
After the US bombed Iran's nuclear sites, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi rushed to Moscow for urgent talks. But while Russia condemned the strikes, President Vladimir Putin signalled neutrality due to close ties with Israel. Despite a strategic partnership, Iran may find its powerful ally unwilling to escalate, leaving Tehran more isolated than ever read more Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with editors of the federal lineup of history textbooks for grades 5 to 11 of secondary school as well as vocational schools, at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, June 22, 2025. File Image/Sputlink via Reuters Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has travelled to Moscow for a high-level diplomatic consultation with President Vladimir Putin and other senior Russian officials. The visit, which follows US military strikes on Iran's key nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan under Operation Midnight Hammer, signals a critical moment in Iran-Russia ties, testing the limits of their strategic cooperation. While addressing a conference in Istanbul prior to his departure, Araghchi highlighted the importance of Iran's long-standing relationship with Russia, stating that both sides 'always consult with each other and coordinate our positions.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD His arrival in the Russian capital was announced just hours after the military operation by the United States, which used 14,000-kg bunker-buster bombs to target what Washington claims were active components of Iran's nuclear programme. The Iranian foreign minister, speaking on social media, sharply criticised the US operation. 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations… Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour.' He added, 'In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.' How Moscow is walking a diplomatic tightrope Though Tehran and Moscow have deepened their cooperation in recent years — particularly following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 — Putin has taken a measured stance on the recent escalation. Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin explained that Russia's neutrality is influenced by domestic and regional considerations, particularly the significant number of Russian-speaking citizens in Israel. 'Almost two million people from the former Soviet Union and the Russian Federation reside in Israel. It is almost a Russian-speaking country today. And, undoubtedly, we always take this into account in Russia's contemporary history.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This demographic factor, coupled with Moscow's multi-directional diplomacy in West Asia, has shaped a cautious Russian posture. The Kremlin maintains working relationships with Israel, Arab states and Islamic countries alike. With 15 per cent of its own population identifying as Muslim and holding observer status in the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Moscow continues to present itself as a neutral but influential actor in regional affairs. Although Russia condemned the US strikes on Iranian territory, calling them a violation of international law, its response has been restrained. The Russian foreign ministry stated: 'An irresponsible decision to subject the territory of a sovereign state to missile and bomb strikes, no matter what arguments it is presented with… It is particularly alarming that the strikes were carried out by a country that is a permanent member of the UN Security Council.' How the Iran-Russia relationship is a partnership with limits The strategic partnership between Iran and Russia has flourished under pressure from Western sanctions, with both countries collaborating on areas such as drone manufacturing, satellite technology, and nuclear energy. After Russia began its Ukraine invasion, Iran provided Moscow with Shahed drones, which were later used in attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure. Reports suggest that Moscow may have compensated Tehran with over $100 million worth of gold for these transactions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite these developments, Putin has made clear that Iran has not sought Russian military assistance in this crisis, and their recently signed comprehensive partnership treaty does not contain any provisions related to defence cooperation. As Putin explained, the agreement focuses on non-military collaboration. Russia's posture also indicates it will not escalate its involvement beyond diplomacy. Iran, on its part, has declared that it will not return to the negotiating table until it has retaliated. Araghchi has added Iran was already at the negotiating table and it was the US and Israel who 'blew up' talks. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addresses a special session of the Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, June 20, 2025. File Image/Reuters While Moscow has attempted to act as a mediator, US President Donald Trump declined such efforts. When Putin offered to mediate between Iran and Israel, Trump dismissed the proposal: 'Do me a favour, mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first. You can worry about this later.' How the conflict has put Moscow in a dilemma Following recent losses in Syria — where rebels toppled Bashar al-Assad, a long-time Russian ally — the perception that Moscow is pulling back from full-scale commitments in West Asia has only grown stronger. Even as Russia continues its cooperation with Iran in certain strategic sectors, including local production of Iranian drone designs, it has avoided deeper military entanglement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Kremlin has historically been cautious about Iran crossing the nuclear threshold, wary of losing leverage over Tehran and provoking further US military action in the region. Meanwhile, the geopolitical fallout is benefiting Moscow in some respects. The intensification of hostilities in the region has distracted international attention from Ukraine. At the G7 summit in Canada, global powers opted not to lower the price ceiling on Russian oil, which remains capped at $60 per barrel — a potential boon to Russia's oil-dependent economy. Iran's foreign minister's visit to Moscow reflects a need for diplomatic cover and strategic reassurance at a time when Tehran finds itself increasingly isolated. Iran expects Russia to take a more active role both in the UN Security Council and in the region amid heightened tensions with the United States, foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday. Yet Russia, despite condemning US actions, has offered no indications that it will go beyond rhetoric. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Shashi Tharoor calls for 'greater backing' of PM Modi's energy, dynamism: ‘Prime asset'
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has heaped big praise on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, calling his energy and dynamism an asset for India. His remarks came days after the Operation Sindoor delegations, one of which Tharoor led, came back after representing India overseas. Prime Minister Narendra Modi greets Congress MP Shashi Tharoor as he meets members of the seven multi-party delegations at his residence in Delhi on Tuesday. (PTI)(HT_PRINT) In a news article with an English daily, Tharoor wrote at length about his takeaways from leading such a delegation, representing India's stance against terrorism. "Prime Minister Narendra Modi's energy, dynamism and willingness to engage remains a prime asset for India on the global stage, but deserves greater backing," he wrote in The Hindu article. Tharoor, who led the Indian delegation to the United States, Panama, Guyana, Colombia, and Brazil, termed Operation Sindoor "a moment of national resolve". He also emphasised the value of unity as a nation and of public diplomacy. He also highlighted his engagement in the Washington DC and said that US officials recognised India's concerns, even in the presence of Pakistani representatives. "Even as a Pakistani delegation was simultaneously present, we found US representatives, including those who met the Pakistani officials, echoing our concerns and urging decisive action against terror groups such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed," Tharoor wrote. As part of the Operation Sindoor outreach, members cutting across party lines travelled to 32 countries to put forth India's resolve to tackle terrorism amid tensions with Pakistan following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Shashi Tharoor had drawn criticism from Congress after being chosen to lead the Operation Sindoor delegation, as he was not among the names formally recommended by the party to be included in the delegations. 'BJP's super spokesperson' After Tharoor praised the 2015 Uri strike during his Panama leg and said that India never crossed the Line of Control before that, Congress leader Udit Raj termed him "BJP's super spokesperson", further escalating Congress's internal rift. "My dear Shashi Tharoor, Alas! I could prevail upon PM Modi to declare you as super spokesperson of BJP, even declaring (you) as foreign minister before landing in India. How could you denigrate the golden history of Congress by saying that before PM Modi, India never crossed LoC and International border." This post by Udit Raj was also reshared by Congress MP Jairam Ramesh on X. Reacting to the controversy, Shashi Tharoor had said he cannot dwell on the criticism. "'Undoubtedly, in a thriving democracy, there are bound to be comments, criticisms. But I think at this point, we can't afford to dwell on it, when we get back to India, no doubt we have a chance to speak to our colleagues, critics, and media there," Tharoor had said.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oil routes wobble: Two tankers turn back from Hormuz as US strikes on Iran raise fears of wider conflict
Two supertankers , each capable of carrying around 2 million barrels of crude oil, made a U-turn in the Strait of Hormuz after US airstrikes on Iran triggered fears of retaliation that could affect commercial shipping through the region, Bloomberg reported. The Coswisdom Lake and South Loyalty had both entered the key waterway before abruptly reversing course on Sunday, according to vessel tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The two empty tankers then sailed south, away from the entrance to the Persian Gulf. Although jamming of ship signals and electronics in the Persian Gulf has increased since Israeli airstrikes on June 13, the movement and subsequent turnarounds of the two vessels resemble routine tanker behaviour rather than irregular incidents. Despite signal interference and attempts by ships to stay further away from the Iranian coastline, oil and gas tankers have continued transiting the strait following the US airstrikes. However, the decision by the Coswisdom Lake and South Loyalty to turn back marks the first indication of possible re-routing. Vessel owners and oil traders are now watching closely for signs that the broader conflict in the Middle East could begin to influence shipping flows. Earlier on Sunday, the Greek shipping ministry issued a notice advising its vessels to reassess voyages through Hormuz and instead take shelter in safe ports until the situation stabilises. The United States launched one of its largest aerial attacks in decades on Sunday, striking Iran's key nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that the operation—named Operation Midnight Hammer —was 'an incredible and overwhelming success,' carried out on the direct orders of President Donald Trump . Following the strikes, Iran is now considering the option of shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, according to a EuroNews report published on Sunday. The strait is one of the world's most vital maritime chokepoints for oil shipping. Commercial satellite images suggest the US attack may have severely damaged—or even destroyed—the underground Fordow nuclear facility and the centrifuges used for uranium enrichment. However, experts said on Sunday there was no official confirmation yet. Sardar Esmail Kowsari, a commander in Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and a member of parliament, told local media that closing the Strait of Hormuz 'is under consideration,' and added, 'Iran will make the best decision with determination.' Given the rising tensions, vessels might now prefer to wait outside the strait rather than proceed to their designated loading ports if delays are expected upon arrival. Even before the weekend attacks, benchmark tanker earnings had risen by nearly 90%. On Sunday night, freight derivatives appeared to surge, reflecting expectations of disruption. EuroNews also reported that, in case of further escalation, Iran could use its short- and medium-range missiles to target oil platforms and pipelines in the strait, or launch attacks on commercial ships. Surface-to-surface missiles could be aimed at tankers or coastal facilities, while drones and airstrikes could potentially disable radar and navigation systems at major terminals.
