Marines can't replicate Ukraine's drone war, but leaders have another idea for figuring out attack drones
Marine bases to form competitive drone teams to boost much-needed skills
Competition aims to replicate the pressure of combat
Drone adoption and training are critical as technology evolves and procurement lags
Starting next year, the Marine Corps wants to see each Marine base building its own competitive attack drone teams. Leaders say competition will be key to building skills in the absence of combat.
"We can't replicate the existential threat that they feel in places like Ukraine, which forces the cycle of iteration and learning," Lt. Gen. Benjamin Watson, head of the Corps' Training and Education Command, told reporters Wednesday at the Modern Day Marine expo in Washington DC. "The closest thing we can do is put ourselves out there in competition."
"We think that puts us under a level of pressure that will help us to iterate faster, particularly in the first-person-view drone space, which is one of the places we've got the most room to grow," Watson continued.
More funding, held up in continuing resolution turmoil, could also help move things along.
Small, inexpensive FPV drones have come to dominate Ukrainian battlefields, functioning as readily available reconnaissance platforms and cheap precision-strike ammunition, contributing heavily to battlefield casualties.
Such warfare is unlike anything US troops have previously experienced. It's not something that can be easily replicated, but it is what leaders say they want the military training for, spurring the Marine Corps' plan for competition-driven training.
Under such a plan, Marine bases would create their own teams mimicking the services' newly established Attack Drone Team, based out of the Marine headquarters base in Quantico, Va.
Watson described the Corps' Attack Drone Team as the "leading edge" of what the service hopes to replicate across the force, including more focus on counter-UAS training and the authority for developing policies for the rest of the force.
The general compared the new goal to the Corps' marksmanship team in which Marines from across the Corps compete for top spots on the namesake team from their bases.
"The premise has been every Marine a rifleman, and we will still hold true to that ethos, with the idea being that every Marine can be lethal at out to 500 yards," Watson said of the Corps' intense devotion to ensuring each Marine, regardless of speciality, is competent shooting a target from half a kilometer.
The idea behind building these new competitive drone teams is that small arms fire is still necessary but now insufficient for contemporary conflict, he added. "Now that same individual Marine, using a different weapon system, can also be lethal out to 15 or 20 kilometers with a first-person-view drone."
Marine leaders consistently highlighted drone adoption and training as a critical need at the Modern Day Marine symposium, with small group discussions and panels comprised of combat arms, logistics, and aviation Marines trying to work through the headaches of getting drones to junior Marines quickly, in whatever way possible.
Until the service can formalize these plans, units will likely be expected to get troops trained using any scrappy, unconventional method possible.
As the DoD tries to adopt a more rapid procurement process, whatever tech various base drone team Marines use will inevitably be behind the power curve, Watson said, given the lightning pace at which this tech is evolving. But the service has got to make something coherent happen to get Marines using drones, he said. Soon, service-wide competitions will be an answer.
"We've got to field a system and get it in the hands of Marines so that we can start learning and confronting some of these problems that we're going to face head-on," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine's state hydropower operator plans post-war recovery of Kakhovka hydroelectric dam
Ukrhydroenergo, Ukraine's state-owned hydropower operator, is prepared to begin rebuilding the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP), destroyed by Russia, as soon as the war ends, though it is cautious about investing in projects that may not be implemented. Source: Bohdan Sukhetskyi, acting General Director of Ukrhydroenergo, as reported by Ukrainian public broadcaster Suspilne Quote: "We have a clear understanding of the preparatory work, including the routes for machinery, the placement of communications and the construction of a temporary dam. If feasible and in line with procedures, the company is ready to commence work." Details: He added that "we've created a 3D model of the Kakhovka reservoir and mapped its bottom and relief to the centimetre, so we know precisely how the reservoir will be filled." Sukhetskyi noted that with average inflows from the Pivdennyi Buh and Desna rivers, filling the Kakhovka reservoir to its design capacity will take over 18 months. Quote: "The company is collaborating with global firms specialising in hydroelectric power plant construction. Several partnership memoranda have been signed and partners are ready to contribute to construction and design and provide modern technologies, offer innovative solutions and even invest." Background: On the morning of 6 June 2023, Russian forces blew up the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant. According to the United Nations, the damage caused amounts to US$14 billion. On 18 July 2023, Ukraine's Cabinet of Ministers (government) approved a resolution for an experimental project titled Construction of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Complex on the Pivdennyi Buh River. It was previously reported that rebuilding the Kakhovka HPP will take at least seven years. Repairing the plant itself will require several years, with an additional 2-3 years to fill the reservoir. Further time will be needed to repair and restore canals and irrigation systems built in the 1970s and 1990s. Ukrhydroenergo estimates that the rebuilding of this complex hydroelectric facility will take at least five years. European Pravda obtained an explanatory note to the draft government decree, detailing the specific requirements for rebuilding the Kakhovka HPP. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
How to Take Incredible Underwater Photos Like a Pro Photographer
When you're diving, the water around you filters light — but not evenly. As you descend, red wavelengths disappear first, followed by orange and yellow. Soon, all you have left are greens and blues. Most recreational dives are shallow enough that you'll still be able to capture some oranges and yellows, but after 15 feet or so you have very little red. And that's the best-case scenario, on a sunny day when the water is clear; murky water, cold water, and overcast days all create unique lighting challenges. The result is that your images right out of the camera will typically be far less vibrant than the inspo you've likely seen on social media. If you've been dazzled by underwater photos with vibrant oranges and reds, what you've seen is either the results of a very shallow dive or the product of the photographer's bringing their own lights underwater. Avoid: Color filters Color filters that you mount in front of your camera's lens can serve as a bridge between bringing your own lights and getting enough from the sun. Typically these lights are red, orange, or magenta for underwater use, but they don't add red, orange, or magenta light — instead, they reduce green and blue light. The camera tries to compensate by letting in more light so that there's more red, orange, or magenta than there otherwise would have been. However, I'm not a fan of using these lights, for several reasons. First, doing so darkens the overall image and forces the camera to compensate by increasing the ISO sensitivity, shutter speed, and/or the aperture setting to let in more light; that process tends to reduce overall image quality. In addition, these filters work only at some depths and lighting conditions. So, although filters can help, editing is a better, more flexible fix for beginners. Use: Editing software Virtually all underwater photos you see online have been edited. Generally, they have been brightened, and the colors have been adjusted to make them look a little more natural. Editing is entirely optional, of course, and many of my favorite underwater photos that I've taken haven't been messed with much, if at all. But when you're 50 feet under the sea, the world is blue and green. Editing the images you capture to add reds, oranges, and yellows may make them less 'realistic,' but the result is often more pleasing and interesting to a viewer. Ultimately, there's no right or wrong answer as to how much editing is too much. If you're handy at photo editing, you can use Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, or Premiere Pro — or any of the many free photo and video alternatives. These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter In addition, the apps created by action cam manufacturers — such as DJI's Mimo app (iOS, Android via APK only), Insta360's desktop and mobile app (iOS, Android), and GoPro's Quik app (iOS, Android) — have filters to improve the colors of underwater footage from their various cameras. CapCut, our pick for the best third-party video editing app, doesn't have a specific filter for underwater footage but does include the tools you need to fix the colors yourself. But if you don't want to mess with adjustment sliders yourself, consider AquaColorFix (iOS, Android). This automated color-correction app is simple to use and does a great job. It also has traditional image adjustments, as a standard photo editor does. The free version works only with photos and adds watermarks, while the paid version removes the watermarks and also works with video. At this writing, it costs $25 as a one-time purchase, $10 per year, or $3 per month. AquaColorFix makes the colors more visually interesting with just a few taps. There's no singular 'right' way to do photo editing; more elaborate photo editing software, such as Photoshop, will let you do more but at a higher cost in both money and time. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter Another solid option is the Dive+ app (iOS, Android) which has additional social and location-guide features. The free version has a watermark and a limit to how many images and videos you can color-correct per day. The paid version costs $24 per year or $4 per month at this writing. Avoid: LED lights It's possible to add red and orange back into images by bringing your own lighting. You can find rigs that add small LED lights and strobes to everything from action cameras to more elaborate camera setups. But you don't need lights for good underwater photography, and for most people they would be more trouble than they're worth. They add cost and complexity, and even the smallest rigs are bulkier than just the camera itself. Yes, they can absolutely help you get some epic shots, but they're effective only within a short distance from the camera — roughly 3 to 10 feet, give or take a few feet depending on the situation. You shouldn't consider adding lights to your camera before you are extremely comfortable and experienced with both diving and underwater photography.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Anduril Industries raises $2.5bn funding, valuation hits $30.5bn
Anduril Industries has closed a $2.5bn funding round, significantly increasing its valuation to $30.5bn. The defence technology company aims to establish itself as a key player in the American national security sector. This funding round was led by Founders Fund, with a $1bn investment, marking the largest check in the venture capital firm's history. As per a filing with the SEC, Founders Fund finalised a $4.6bn late-stage venture fund in April 2025. The company's valuation has surged from $14bn in 2024, according to Anduril executive chairman Trae Stephens in an interview on Bloomberg Television. Anduril, based south of Los Angeles, focuses on technologies such as drones and artificial intelligence to enhance American defence capabilities. Anduril offers a range of products, including weaponised drones, software for drone control, and augmented reality helmets for military use. The importance of defence technology is underscored by recent events, such as the Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian military assets, highlighting the role of technology in modern warfare, reported the media outlet. Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, who previously co-founded Oculus VR, emphasised the need for the US to accelerate drone development to remain competitive with China. The company is also working on new infantry goggles for the US Army, a project potentially valued at over $20bn in the next decade. The recent funding follows a $1.5bn funding raise in 2024, aimed at constructing a factory in Columbus, Ohio, called Arsenal-1. This facility will mass-produce aerial and maritime drones, sensors, and other defence products. Additionally, Anduril has announced a partnership with Meta Platforms to develop AI-powered military products, including helmets. "Anduril Industries raises $2.5bn funding, valuation hits $30.5bn" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati