Ukrainians Declare Victory in Battle of Pokrovsk
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Russia's battle for the eastern Ukrainian town of Pokrovsk is a "failure," according to the head of a Ukrainian think tank, after many months of bitter fighting and slow Russian gains around the settlement.
Why It Matters
Russia has long hoped to take the Ukrainian stronghold of Pokrovsk, but rather than attacking the settlement directly, Moscow has skirted to the south of the Donetsk town and advanced toward the border of Ukraine's neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region.
Pokrovsk, a major logistics hub, has borne the brunt of the fiercest frontline clashes for much of the last year. The town has been referred to as a "fortress" settlement, key to Ukrainian defenses in the east and connected to other critical defensive cities.
What To Know
"We are seeing a coordinated Russian information campaign tied to their failure — the fact that they have lost the battle for Pokrovsk," Serhii Kuzan, from the Ukrainian Center for Security and Cooperation, a Ukrainian think tank, said in an interview with Ukrainian broadcaster, Radio NV.
While Moscow has advanced around Pokrovsk, progress has been incremental for Russian troops and the town remains in Ukraine's hands.
Ukraine has said Russia's casualty count is "many times higher" than Ukraine's around Pokrovsk.
This could not be independently verified, but Russia is known for its "meat grinder" assault tactics, or overwhelming Ukrainian defenses with high numbers of troops while racking up eyewatering casualties.
A Ukrainian soldier walks past damaged buildings in central Pokrovsk, the site of the heaviest battles with the Russian troops in the Donetsk region, Ukraine, Wednesday, April 23, 2025.
A Ukrainian soldier walks past damaged buildings in central Pokrovsk, the site of the heaviest battles with the Russian troops in the Donetsk region, Ukraine, Wednesday, April 23, 2025.
AP Photo/Michael Shtekel
Kuzan said Ukraine had "properly executed" its defensive strategy for Pokrovsk, disrupting Moscow's timelines for seizing the town and "foiling their much larger offensive plans for this summer."
"We disrupted their plans, and now they are falling behind their own schedules — schedules that are critical for their summer offensive campaign," Kuzan said.
"They can't push us out of Donetsk Oblast because we stopped them under Pokrovsk," he added.
Kyiv has warned Russia is pulling together reserve forces for a major push, while senior Ukrainian officials say Moscow launched a concerted effort in two areas of northeastern Ukraine earlier this month.
Ukraine had said that it launched an incursion into Russia's Kursk region in August last year, partly to pull Russian resources away from Donetsk settlements like Pokrovsk.
Russia has recently advanced along a railroad line west of the village of Shevchenko, which sits south of Pokrovsk, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) think tank, which tracks daily changes to the frontline, said on Tuesday.
Ukraine's military said early on Wednesday it had "stopped" 75 Russian attacks around Pokrovsk over the previous 24 hours, including around Shevchenko.
In a later statement on Wednesday, Ukraine's top soldier, General Oleksandr Syrsky, said Russia had "significantly increased" attacks close to Pokrovsk in a bid to reach the Dnipropetrovsk region, despite announcing a unilateral ceasefire due to come into force in May.
"The Russian command daily throws new units into battle, drives its soldiers to their deaths, reports on illusory successes and victories," Syrsky said.
The Kremlin declared a ceasefire on Monday to observe the 80th anniversary of the Great Patriotic War. This is the term used by Russia to describe its participation in World War II after it joined the Allies in 1941, and the victory over Nazi Germany in 1945. Moscow has consistently claimed its invasion of Ukraine aimed to "de-Nazify" the country, a pretext widely rejected.
Russia will not conduct any military operations between midnight on May 8 and midnight on May 11, the Kremlin said, adding that "Russia believes that the Ukrainian side should follow this example." The announcement was greeted with skepticism by Ukraine.
Russia's Defense Ministry said on Wednesday its forces had seized a village in the the north of the Donetsk region. Newsweek could not independently verify this.
What People Are Saying
The Russian government said on Wednesday: "As a result of active offensive actions, units of the West military group liberated the settlement of Novoye in the Donetsk People's Republic."
Syrsky said on Wednesday: "Despite loud statements about readiness for a ceasefire for the May holidays, the occupiers have significantly increased the intensity of hostilities, focusing their main efforts on the Pokrovsk direction."
What Happens Next
It is not clear yet if and how the failure to capture Pokrovsk will affect Russia's alleged plans for a new summer offensive, where Moscow allegedly hopes to deploy troops on motorcycles to counter Ukraine's drones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US Ally Scrambles Jets As Russian Bombers Approach Airspace
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Japan—a key United States ally in the Western Pacific—scrambled fighter jets on Tuesday following Russia's deployment of strategic bombers over waters between the two countries. The Russian Defense Ministry said its aerospace forces conducted all the flights in "strict compliance" with international airspace rules. Japan's Defense Ministry said it will continue taking all "necessary measures" to protect its territory and the peaceful lives of its citizens. Why It Matters Russia continues to project military power around its eastern regions, despite the ongoing war in Ukraine. Earlier this month, it launched a joint naval patrol with China, sending vessels through waters near Japan as part of a military cooperation under the so-called "partnership without limitations." Japan, as part of a strategy aimed at containing America's rivals in the Pacific, regularly reports movements of Russian and Chinese military aircraft and vessels around its territory. Tokyo has an unresolved territorial dispute with Moscow over the Northern Territories, also known in Russia as the Southern Kuril Islands, in the Russian far east. What To Know Between Tuesday morning and afternoon, two Russian Tu-95 bombers and two unidentified fighter jets launched from Russia's eastern mainland and flew southeast over the Sea of Japan—also known as the East Sea in South Korea—according to Japan's Defense Ministry. The Russian aircraft then turned northeast and flew off the western coast of the Japanese archipelago, transiting close to the northeast Asian country's airspace, Tokyo claimed. A coastal state's sovereignty extends to the airspace over its territorial sea, which reaches up to 13.8 miles from the coastline, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea states. Japan established an air defense identification zone, a self-declared buffer that is not considered sovereign airspace, to identify foreign military aircraft flying toward its area of control. A Russian Tu-95MS strategic bomber flies during a rehearsal of a military parade in Moscow on May 7, 2022. A Russian Tu-95MS strategic bomber flies during a rehearsal of a military parade in Moscow on May 7, 2022. Evgeny Biyatov/Sputnik via AP The flight was confirmed by the Russian Defense Ministry, which claimed that the Tu-95MS strategic bombers conducted a scheduled flight over international waters in the Sea of Japan and were supported by Su-35S and Su-30SM fighter jets during the six-hour operation. Russia's long-range aircraft regularly conduct flights over international waters in the Arctic, North Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans, as well as the Black and Baltic Seas, Moscow said. Footage released by the state-run TASS news agency shows the bombers taking off and landing at an undisclosed location, as well as being escorted by fighter jets. Details, however, remain unclear, including whether the bombers were armed with missiles. According to the Federation of American Scientists, the Tu-95MS bomber can carry six to 16 nuclear-armed, air-launched cruise missiles. Last November, the Russian military deployed this type of bomber for a joint patrol over the Sea of Japan with Chinese bombers. Two Tu-95MS strategic missile carriers escorted by Su-35S and Su-30SM fighter jets performed a scheduled flight over the waters of the Sea of Japan. The duration of the flight was more than 6 hours. 📹MoD RF (Aug. 19) — Massimo Frantarelli (@MrFrantarelli) August 19, 2025 What People Are Saying Japan's defense white paper 2025 read: "Russia has been conducting intensive military activities in the region encompassing the Northern Territories, alongside continuing its aggression against Ukraine. Russia has also been observed engaging in joint activities with China involving aircraft and vessels." The Federation of American Scientists said in a report on Russian nuclear weapons in May: "Russia carried out several heavy bomber exercises during 2024, including in October when some Tu-95MS bombers participated in what the Kremlin called a 'Strategic Deterrence Forces exercise,' during which the aircraft fired air-launched cruise missiles." What Happens Next It remains to be seen when Russia and China will organize another joint air patrol with their nuclear-capable bombers over waters near Japan to demonstrate military coordination.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Even Russia has had enough of some Chinese products
Russia's trade boom with China is losing steam, with a top Moscow official warning that the country's markets are already oversupplied with some Chinese goods. "In the current year, we are recording a certain decline in mutual trade," said Anton Alikhanov, Russia's industry and trade minister, on Tuesday at a business forum. "We also note the gradual saturation of the market with Chinese products in certain market segments, as well as internal economic processes both in Russia and in China," Alikhanov said. Sanctions and volatility in commodity markets have also weighed on flows, he said. From record highs to slowdown Trade between the two countries surged after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, as China filled the gap left by Western brands and Moscow diverted energy exports eastward. Turnover in Russia-China trade rose 29% in 2022 and 26% in 2023, reaching a record $245 billion in 2024. But growth slowed to just 2% last year, and in the first seven months of 2025, trade fell about 8% year-on-year to $125.8 billion. Alikhanov warned that the rapid growth of past years is unlikely to return. "In the medium term, we should expect more moderate growth rates of mutual trade than before," he said. Chinese companies have dominated Russia's consumer markets, especially cars, where they quickly took the majority of new sales after Western firms exited. But the wave of imports has also raised unease in Moscow. This year, the Kremlin increased tariffs on Chinese-made cars — a move mirroring protective trade steps in the US and Europe against Chinese overcapacity. That step has already slowed flows: Exports of all Chinese goods to Russia dropped 8.4% in the first half of 2025. Alikhanov suggested that future cooperation should focus less on consumer imports and more on industrial investment. "I believe that in the long term, the most successful initiatives will be those that involve investment in joint production, technology transfer and the introduction of advanced technologies," he said. Russia's energy lifeline falters But it's not just consumer trade that is under strain — Russia's energy exports to China have also come under pressure due to lower global oil prices and tighter US sanctions on tankers carrying Russian crude. That slowdown is rippling through the wider economy, with GDP growing just 1.1% in the second quarter — down from 1.4% in the first quarter and sharply lower than 4% a year earlier. "Falling Chinese demand for Russian raw materials — particularly crude oil — has intensified fiscal pressure on Moscow by eroding the tax base tied to energy exports, a key pillar of federal revenues," wrote Maciej Kalwasiński, a senior fellow at the China Department at the Centre for Eastern Studies in Poland, last week. He added that the overall contraction in bilateral trade exerts a "tangible negative impact" on the Russian economy. "This further strains Russia's ability to sustain wartime spending, especially since Russia's economic growth rate has slowed sharply since the beginning of 2025," wrote Kalwasiński.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Trump's trade policies are helping India-China ties — but they aren't resetting them
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi wrapped up his two-day trip to India on Tuesday — the latest sign of warming ties between Beijing and New Delhi. During his visit, Wang said India and China should "view each other as partners and opportunities rather than adversaries or threats," according to a readout from the Chinese Foreign Ministry translated by Google. In the readout, Wang also said the meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in October 2024 marked a "restart" in China-India relations. Contrast that with the souring of U.S.-India relations over the past few months. U.S. President Donald Trump went from giving bear hugs to Modi in February, to labeling India the "tariff king" six months on, slapping India with one of the highest duties, and accusing it of fueling Russia's war in Ukraine through oil purchases . The rift raises the question: Is India, a country that has enjoyed strong diplomatic relations with Washington, now drawing closer to Beijing? Ivan Lidarev, visiting senior fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies, told CNBC that India is indeed moving toward Beijing, but pointed out that the cooling of U.S.-India ties is just one factor. India and China ties had warmed after Xi and Modi met in October last year on the sidelines of the BRICS summit, where the two sides had agreed to deescalate tensions along their disputed border. "President Trump's policy toward India, and actually toward China, to some extent, has accelerated this process," Lidarev said. Trump slapped high tariffs on India for buying oil from Moscow, but said last week after his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin that he has no immediate need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for doing the same. Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at Washington-based think tank Wilson Center, told CNBC's " Squawk Box Asia " Wednesday that with friction in the U.S.-India relationship, New Delhi is more inclined to hedge against the uncertainty in its relations with the U.S. by trying to "open things up "with China. Lidarev pointed out, "On the U.S. side, there is no change in public perception of India, but on the Indian side, there is a very big change in public perceptions. I think that many Indians are very unhappy with U.S. behavior. They believe that India has been mistreated. They're outraged by the tariffs and by what they see as American attempts to twist India's hand." Thawing China-India ties In a sign of warming ties, China's Wang called on Modi on Tuesday, extending to him an invitation from Xi to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Tianjin at the end of August. Modi has accepted the invitation. A trip would mark the Indian prime minister's first visit to China in seven years. Direct flights from India to mainland China , which have been suspended since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, are set to resume. Both sides also agreed to reopen border trade at three designated trading points. Indian media reported on Wednesday that China agreed to lift curbs on exports on fertilizers, rare earths and tunnel boring machines. Separately, several Indian companies have pursued partnerships with Chinese companies earlier this year, The Economic Times reported in July. Indian conglomerates Reliance and Adani Group have, likewise, reportedly been pursuing deals with Chinese companies , with Adani Group founder Gautam Adani visiting companies like battery maker Contemporary Amperex Technology in June. Tactical, not strategic reset However, the move toward Beijing does not signify a fundamental reshaping of India's relationships in the Indo-Pacific, experts said. Chietigj Bajpaee, senior research fellow for South Asia at Chatham House, told CNBC that the China-India relationship is undergoing a "tactical rather than strategic reset." " None of the fundamental grievances in the bilateral relationship have been resolved," he highlighted. Bajpaee noted that the border dispute has not been resolved, and there are some fault lines that are still present in the relationship, including water disputes and China's "all-weather" relationship with Pakistan. That was seen in the border conflict in May between India and Pakistan, in which the latter claimed that Chinese-made J-10C Pakistani fighters shot down India's French-made Rafale fighter jets. Pakistan had procured the J-10Cs back in 2021, in response to India buying 36 Rafales in 2015. Similarly, Li Mingjiang, associate professor at Singapore's S Rajaratnam School of International Studies said the current detente is more of a "tactical pause." He noted that both sides — referring to Beijing and New Delhi — have strong incentives to manage tensions, but because of the unresolved tensions, the easing is likely to be short term in nature. In his view, the broader Indo-Pacific landscape is still defined by competition and hedging. To be sure, India still does have a deep relationship with the U.S., with the two nations having a "Comprehensive and Global Strategic Partnership" with cooperation in defense, technology, and clean energy . India was also designated a "major defense partner" by the U.S. in 2016. When asked if India will remain the U.S.' counterweight to China, Li said it's unlikely that New Delhi would abandon that role. He added that both countries share "enduring strategic interests" in limiting Beijing's regional dominance, and that current tariff pressures are mainly related to the Russia-Ukraine war. "If that conflict winds down, Washington and New Delhi may find it easier to smooth over trade frictions," Li said.
